{$local_part}lsearch{/etc/aliases}}}
Hope this is useful!
Merlin
--
Merlin Hartley
Computer Officer
MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit
University of Cambridge
Cambridge, CB2 0XY
United Kingdom
On 13 Feb 2018, at 09:38, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users
<exim-users@exim.org> wrote:
Hardy vi
Hi folks,
my aim is to have something in the way of
myname.*: myname
for the local user myname, if this is possible to do in the alias file.
I would rather like to have it here than to change the conf. Possible?
Hardy
--
## List details at
In fact I have an approach not too different from yours. I call it the
"volatile" addresses you use for suspicious cases where you need to give
your email. It is nameYYMM, it exists for the current and last month,
but disappears after that automatically. (By that time you need to
decide,
On 13.02.2018 13:14, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2018, Hardy via Exim-users wrote:
>> my aim is to have something in the way of
>>
>> myname.*: myname
>>
>
> I wonder whether you are trying to implement a feature
> already expli
A simple solution may be to read the
domainlist local_domains =
from a flat file that needs to hold the names of the user defined
domains, and keep BOTH routers in their original configuration.
On 14.02.2018 10:28, Cyborg via Exim-users wrote:
Am 14.02.2018 um 09:59 schrieb Bambero via
Update
Jeremy, I saw your post via web. I do not even use check_data, it is
commented. In the check_rcpt I now added a condition-less "accept" VERY
early to mitigate effects of later rules. Problem persists.
And NOW:
2019-10-18T13:56:03.718183+02:00 mailfass exim[4587]: SMTP data timeout
Cyborg,
you mean it really may happen that "all of a sudden" my kernel is not IP
stack compatible with half of the other world?
Given, it is quite an old one, as I do not update productive systems
often, I prefer to build a new system and migrate - but not as often then.
But again, all of
Hi all,
all of a sudden (after a reboot of the machine, but I cannot see a
connection to that) exim produces a lot of
data timeout on (message abandoned) on connection from mx.example.com
[IP] F=
in my logs. These are always the same systems, that retry and fail
again. Other systems don't
Hi all,
I just want to let you know the situation normalized "all by itself",
and as far as I can judge no message was lost, as obviously the sender
part considered the problem a temporary one and we were still within
retry periods.
I didn't change effectively anything, neither to cause nor
Hi Gregory,
I want to reject the message completely if sender is in two or more RBLs
and accept if
it hits only one.
I check quite some RBLs and also want to have this fine granulated to
circumvent false positives. I have a counter, and some RBL have a higher
weight (adding 2 points). A
10 matches
Mail list logo
