Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-13 Thread Lord Nightwalker
The windows 95 network routines generally suck. On Sat, 12 Aug 2000 03:08:56 Bob Puff@NLE wrote: 10 times faster? Me thinks you are dreaming. Bandwidth is bandwidth, and there's only so much. Whether you set up 10 simultaneous downloads or do only one, you are going to get the file in the

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-12 Thread Alexander Skwar
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 06:35:43PM -0500, Ellick Chan wrote: Wget anyone? It runs on just about any machine without X, and does a good job at this, without sucking your CPU dry. wget kicks gFTP's a** if you already know the complete URL! Use it all the time! Alexander Skwar -- Homepage:

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-12 Thread Admiral Michael H. Collins
tcp/ip only goes so fast. "Bob Puff@NLE" wrote: 10 times faster? Me thinks you are dreaming. Bandwidth is bandwidth, and there's only so much. Whether you set up 10 simultaneous downloads or do only one, you are going to get the file in the same period of time. Actually, I

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-11 Thread Stephen F. Bosch
Ron Stodden wrote: I feel sure the original questioner was referring to the ability of the Windows GetRight downloader to divide the file to be downloaded into up to 10 (number is user-specified) contiguous equal chunks and download them all in parallel, resulting in a single downloaded

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-11 Thread Anton Graham
Submitted 11-Aug-00 by Ron Stodden: No respondent has yet identified any Linux download software with this (simple obvious ( necessary IMO)) capability. Actually one did, he simply didn't mention that particular feature: Dowloader for X. An excerpt from the site's features list (found at

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-11 Thread Ron Stodden
Anton Graham wrote: Submitted 11-Aug-00 by Ron Stodden: No respondent has yet identified any Linux download software with this (simple obvious ( necessary IMO)) capability. Actually one did, he simply didn't mention that particular feature: Dowloader for X. An excerpt from the site's

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-11 Thread Austin L. Denyer (SysAdmin.) as root
"Stephen F. Bosch" wrote: Ron Stodden wrote: I feel sure the original questioner was referring to the ability of the Windows GetRight downloader to divide the file to be downloaded into up to 10 (number is user-specified) contiguous equal chunks and download them all in parallel,

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-11 Thread Ron Johnson, Jr.
Ron Stodden wrote: [snip] No dreaming - think it through ... Results depend on where the bandwidth bottleneck is - for 500MB/sec cable users like us it is usually at or near the far end and applies on a per-connection basis. So for the usual trans-pacific download achievable of about

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-11 Thread Stephen Bosch
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Austin L. Denyer (SysAdmin.) as root wrote: "Stephen F. Bosch" wrote: Ron Stodden wrote: I feel sure the original questioner was referring to the ability of the Windows GetRight downloader to divide the file to be downloaded into up to 10 (number is

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-11 Thread Lord Nightwalker
I am sorry, but I have to disagree. Sometimes both your box and the server have sufficient bandwidth, but downloads are slowed down by the interlying network. This is because everytime a packet is sent out, it has to be routed trough several hosts before it reaches its destination, and if those

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-11 Thread Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 times faster? Me thinks you are dreaming. Bandwidth is bandwidth, and there's only so much. Whether you set up 10 simultaneous downloads or do only one, you are going to get the file in the same period of time. Actually, I found at least with a dialup with Win95 and Netscape, downloading

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-10 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Nt is more stable. And it supports netscape drag'n'drop. Sarang Lakare a écrit : caitoo .. its available as rpm at rpmfind.. adn its a great to manage u're downlaods.. (thought it takes a little time to get started!) -sarang -- Guillaume Rousse Iremia - Université de la Réunion Plus

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-10 Thread Mark Weaver
faisal wrote: Do we have any Download managers like gozilla , getright ... on linux to download large files ? No way! that stuff is "spyware" and poison to an operating system. In linux we use gFTP, IglooFTP-PRO, ncFTP, so and so forth. gFTP supports resume and append, and most FTP server do

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-10 Thread Michael H. Collins
ftp seems to work for me. faisal wrote: Do we have any Download managers like gozilla , getright ... on linux to download large files ? -- Michael H. Collins http://www.linuxlink.com Admiral of OpenSourcery Penguinista Navy All Things French..

RE: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-10 Thread Carver, Paul, NLSOP
. Collins [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 09:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] Download managers ! ftp seems to work for me. faisal wrote: Do we have any Download managers like gozilla , getright ... on linux to download large files

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-10 Thread Lord Nightwalker
Downloader for X. It isn't integrated in the browser, like GetRight for example, but it works nice enough... If you play a bit with the settings, you'll see there's an option called "monitor clipboard". Activate that option, start your DfX and minimize it, and when there's a file you wich to

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-10 Thread Austin L. Denyer (SysAdmin.) as root
"Carver, Paul, NLSOP" wrote: What is a Download manager? I wasn't aware that downloading files was complex. FTP is pretty much a universal standard and there are plenty of Linux/Unix clients. Can you be more specific about what special features a Download manager provides? A download

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-10 Thread Ellick Chan
faisal wrote: Do we have any Download managers like gozilla , getright ... on linux to download large files ? No way! that stuff is "spyware" and poison to an operating system. In linux we use gFTP, IglooFTP-PRO, ncFTP, so and so forth. gFTP supports resume and append, and most FTP

RE: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-10 Thread Ellick Chan
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Carver, Paul, NLSOP wrote: Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 09:32:01 -0400 From: "Carver, Paul, NLSOP" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [expert] Download managers ! What is a Download manager? I wasn't aware that d

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-10 Thread Craig Woods
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [expert] Download managers ! What is a Download manager? I wasn't aware that downloading files was complex. FTP is pretty much a universal standard and there are plenty of Linux/Unix clients. Can you be more specific about what special features

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-10 Thread Ellick Chan
On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Craig Woods wrote: Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 20:52:55 -0500 From: Craig Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [expert] Download managers ! Good info, Ellick, and quite timely as well. Maybe others on the list have seen

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-10 Thread Ron Stodden
"Carver, Paul, NLSOP" wrote: What is a Download manager? I wasn't aware that downloading files was complex. FTP is pretty much a universal standard and there are plenty of Linux/Unix clients. Can you be more specific about what special features a Download manager provides? I feel sure the

[expert] Download managers !

2000-08-09 Thread faisal
Do we have any Download managers like gozilla , getright ... on linux to download large files ?

Re: [expert] Download managers !

2000-08-09 Thread Sarang Lakare
caitoo .. its available as rpm at rpmfind.. adn its a great to manage u're downlaods.. (thought it takes a little time to get started!) -sarang