Praedor Atrebates wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have logged directly into my popmail server (yahoo) via the web and find
that the spam message isn't being repeatedly sent - the same message is
causing a problem over and over. Yahoo tagged it as spam and put it in my
On Sunday 19 October 2003 09:17 pm, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
I have receive over 100 of these today alone. Nothing i've tried with
procmail recipes has worked. I cannot stop this nonsense. The from
address is my own fetchmail-daemon:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am considering having all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here is the syslog entry associated with this repetitive spam (based on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] message):
^[[B^[[BOct 20 08:57:26 lapdog postfix/smtpd[9542]: connect from
localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
Oct 20 08:57:26 lapdog postfix/smtpd[9542]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have logged directly into my popmail server (yahoo) via the web and find
that the spam message isn't being repeatedly sent - the same message is
causing a problem over and over. Yahoo tagged it as spam and put it in my
bulk mail folder on their
On Monday 20 October 2003 09:11 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
snipped
Okay, we don't see the Postfix error code but based upon the text of the
message, my guess is that Postfix is rejecting this message upon the delivery
attempt by Fetchmail, fetchmail is then sending a failure message to let
On Monday 20 October 2003 09:38 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
I have logged directly into my popmail server (yahoo) via the web and find
that the spam message isn't being repeatedly sent - the same message is
causing a problem over and over. Yahoo tagged it as spam and put it in my
bulk mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thank you, that appears to have done the trick.
I was getting filled up with a new spam, producing the same type of message,
but adding that line to fetchmailrc did the trick. It is gone.
I was getting quite angry and frustrated with this
On Monday 20 October 2003 11:52 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
Thank you, that appears to have done the trick.
I was getting filled up with a new spam, producing the same type of
message, but adding that line to fetchmailrc did the trick. It is gone.
I was getting quite angry and frustrated
Praedor Atrebates grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
I have logged directly into my popmail server (yahoo) via the web and find
that the spam message isn't being repeatedly sent - the same message is
causing a problem over and over. Yahoo tagged it as spam and put it in my
bulk mail folder on
Bryan Phinney grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
The fetchmail log should be telling you what the error code is from Postfix
but if I had to guess, I would say it is a 501, fetchmail normally counts 55?
codes as spam rejects by default.
Not on *my* system, it didn't. :-) I had to put it in to
On Monday 20 October 2003 03:23 pm, David Guntner wrote:
Bryan Phinney grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
The fetchmail log should be telling you what the error code is from
Postfix but if I had to guess, I would say it is a 501, fetchmail
normally counts 55? codes as spam rejects by default.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have receive over 100 of these today alone. Nothing i've tried with
procmail recipes has worked. I cannot stop this nonsense. The from address
is my own fetchmail-daemon:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am considering having all fetchmail-daemon emails
I have receive over 100 of these today alone. Nothing i've tried with
procmail recipes has worked. I cannot stop this nonsense. The from
address
is my own fetchmail-daemon:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am considering having all fetchmail-daemon emails sent to dev/null but
fear
the
El Mié 20 Jun 2001 00:15, s escribió:
Hi all, I sure could use some help. As the subject states this is my
problem on my gateway machine. I have used reiserfs and interactive
bastille. I tried to reconfigure bastille and told it not limit number of
process and I put 'ulimit -f unlimited'
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:15, s wrote:
Hi all, I sure could use some help. As the subject states this is my
problem on my gateway machine. I have used reiserfs and interactive
bastille. I tried to reconfigure bastille and told it not limit number of
process and I put 'ulimit -f unlimited' in
Thanks Guys, I appreciate it. That did it.
-s
On Tuesday 19 June 2001 05:15 pm, you wrote:
Hi all, I sure could use some help. As the subject states this is my
problem on my gateway machine. I have used reiserfs and interactive
bastille. I tried to reconfigure bastille and told it not
On Tuesday 19 June 2001 18:15, s wrote:
Hi all, I sure could use some help. As the subject states
this is my problem on my gateway machine. I have used
reiserfs and interactive bastille. I tried to reconfigure
bastille and told it not limit number of process and I put
'ulimit -f
Hi all, I sure could use some help. As the subject states this is my problem
on my gateway machine. I have used reiserfs and interactive bastille. I
tried to reconfigure bastille and told it not limit number of process and I
put 'ulimit -f unlimited' in my /etc/profile file (per the only
Hi,
Sounds like a possible `lock file', but I am not certain of that, you
can check it in a terminal window by going into your `.netscape'
directory where
the `user' in question resides.
hth
mrweb
Aravind Sadagopan wrote:
Hi Guys,
I know this is a wrong place to ask this question..but
Hi Guys,
I know this is a wrong place to ask this question..but the problem is
I dont use Redhat but my friend had this problem..If anyone has an idea
..please help
I have had problems with my mail from netscape 4.75 under RedHat 7.0.
Basically, if I log in as a normal user, start netscape,
Mogens Jæger wrote:
Viêt wrote:
sounds like a User ID problem with the RedHat distro.
I can't experiment on it because we don't use RedHat over here,
and our distrib doesn't show the same behaviour.
try suid netscape's binary.
HA Quoc-Viet
Services
MandrakeSoft
Aravind
sounds like a User ID problem with the RedHat distro.
I can't experiment on it because we don't use RedHat over here,
and our distrib doesn't show the same behaviour.
try suid netscape's binary.
HA Quoc-Viet
Services
MandrakeSoft
Aravind Sadagopan wrote:
This is a multi-part message in
Viêt wrote:
sounds like a User ID problem with the RedHat distro.
I can't experiment on it because we don't use RedHat over here,
and our distrib doesn't show the same behaviour.
try suid netscape's binary.
HA Quoc-Viet
Services
MandrakeSoft
Aravind Sadagopan wrote:
This is a
23 matches
Mail list logo
