-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simple question. Originally I used spamassassin directly from kmail (spamc to
work through spamd). Since it was I who was making the call I could assume
that whenever I did a sa-learn --spam --dir Mail/Spam/cur that whatever was
learned was used
I actually don't use sa-learn, but I do use individual procmailrc's
instead of /etc/procmailrc; this causes spamc to always be called with
the user's UID.
There's an article I've always meant to implement about using redirects
to activate sa-learn from evolution vfolders or regular MUA mailboxes,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I suppose I could bring the /etc/procmailrc to .procmailrc in my home
directory. As I am the only user on my system, I didn't see much need to
setup individual procmail and fetchmail settings. Besides which, I HAD to do
the global setup for
On Monday 20 October 2003 11:47 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
Simple question. Originally I used spamassassin directly from kmail (spamc
to work through spamd). Since it was I who was making the call I could
assume that whenever I did a sa-learn --spam --dir Mail/Spam/cur that
whatever was
On Monday 20 October 2003 12:37 pm, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
I suppose I could bring the /etc/procmailrc to .procmailrc in my home
directory. As I am the only user on my system, I didn't see much need to
setup individual procmail and fetchmail settings. Besides which, I HAD to
do the global
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I rarely see spam anymore, since going to postfix, procmail, and spamd all in
combination. Anything spamd identifies as spam gets /dev/nulled. The only
stuff I see (rarely) are messages that get past spamassassin and into my
inbox, thus it is
On Monday 20 October 2003 11:47 am, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
Now I use spamd with spamc called from a procmail recipe. The user is
nobody instead of me. So, does doing sa-learn, etc still work? Does
user root or nobody make use of the learning I give to spamassassin via
sa-learn?
On
