--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Self in each of us recognizes the Self in another. We are
conscious of this to one degree or another, whether our Self has
been fully awakened to us, or not.
This is how someone somewhat Awake will recognize
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
The Self in each of us recognizes the Self in another. We are
conscious of this to one degree or another, whether our Self has
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With all respect, I think you have missed the point of what I have
written.
Perhaps. I am certainly open to any corrections.
But perhaps you have missed my point. You have an experience /
knowlwedge that you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
With all respect, I think you have missed the point of what I have
written.
In order to consider what I have stated as theoretical means that
the point value of my Self needs to claim ownership of what I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
With all respect, I think you have missed the point of what I
have
written.
Perhaps. I am certainly open to any corrections.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
With all respect, the bedrock of my Awakening serves as the
foundation for that which I write. Accept it or not, makes no
difference to me.
While I agree with the sentiment, I might present
another possibility.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
With all respect, the bedrock of my Awakening serves as the
foundation for that which I write. Accept it or not, makes no
difference to me.
On May 24, 2006, at 5:48 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
With all respect, I think you have missed the point of what I have
written.
In order to consider what I have stated as theoretical means that
the point
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With all respect, the bedrock of my Awakening serves as the
foundation for that which I write. Accept it or not, makes no
difference to me.
And why would I, or anyone, accept your truth or your awakening.
simply
>From the alistair shearer translation of the yoga sutras of Patanjali
Chapter 2 vs 37. When we are firmly established in integrity, all
riches present themselves freely.
In a conversation with a friend going through a difficult time it
became clear to me that holding any belief as valid or
TurquoiseB wrote:
One could say that the common denominator in both cases is the
rigidity of their underlying belief system and the level
of personal identification they have with that rigid
belief system. Anything that appears to contradict the
belief system is perceived as a personal
11 matches
Mail list logo
