Is this Raunchy?
Hi Rick, is it possible to increase the posting limit to 70/week which is
10/day which is easier on sharelong 64 yr old brain?
Hi Raunchy, forgot to thank for Roz Russell clip, the Queen of Droll. My
absolute favorite: Auntie Mame which one must see. Her gang sort of like the
one here on FFL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, It's just a ride
bill.hicks.all.a.ride@ wrote:
We'll get what we'll get and we'll work from there. Maybe
you can take up knitting. All of this worry can't be good
for your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, It's just a ride
bill.hicks.all.a.r...@... wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:50 PM, raunchydograunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, It's just a ride
bill.hicks.all.a.ride@ wrote:
The only way we are going to get a public option
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of It's just a ride
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 9:16 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: So, Raunchy
We must have misunderstood. We actually thought the whole point of
reforming health care was to help the American people have better, more
affordable health care. We thought the promise was:
BARACK OBAMA'S PLAN FOR A HEALTHY AMERICA
http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/HealthPlanFull.pdf :
Lowering
Bharat2 qrote:
Maybe we should wish for coup d'etat that
would make the US a socialist state and
then we can have single payer. Those who
complain, well off to the camps for them.
We? Since when have you been in a battle?
You probably couldn't fight your way out of
a wet paper bag. You
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:19 AM, raunchydograunchy...@yahoo.com wrote:
We must have misunderstood. We actually thought the whole point of reforming
health care was to help the American people have better, more affordable
health care. We thought the promise was:
BARACK OBAMA'S PLAN FOR A
bill hicks wrote:
...some things you just can't win.
Right, Bill, but we just weren't expecting to
lose the war, the economy, and our health care,
all at the same time, in the first few months
of Obama's Presidency. What happened to all
the the promises? The hope and the change?
There are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, It's just a ride
bill.hicks.all.a.r...@... wrote:
We'll get what we'll get and we'll work from there. Maybe you can
take up knitting. All of this worry can't be good for your blood
pressure and over all stress levels even though you are a TB.
Well,
We'll get what we'll get and we'll work
from there. Maybe you can take up knitting.
All of this worry can't be good for your
blood pressure and over all stress levels
even though you are a TB.
raunchydog wrote:
I've gotten more respect and zero sexist
insults from WillyTex, than
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:16 AM, raunchydograunchy...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, It's just a ride
bill.hicks.all.a.r...@... wrote:
Well, Bill just can't seem to help himself. Give him the benefit of the doubt
that he can rise above juvenile behavior and speak to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, It's just a ride
bill.hicks.all.a.r...@... wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:16 AM, raunchydograunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, It's just a ride
bill.hicks.all.a.ride@ wrote:
Well, Bill just can't seem to help himself. Give
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of It's just a ride
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 5:51 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] So, Raunchy, Obama has
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, It's just a ride
bill.hicks.all.a.r...@... wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Rick Archerr...@... wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/08/17/health.care/index.html
http://tinyurl.com/leefle
What am I missing? This implies that he may have
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:50 PM, raunchydograunchy...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, It's just a ride
bill.hicks.all.a.r...@... wrote:
The only way we are going to get a public option is to reject the idea that a
co-op is an acceptable fallback position. Co-ops are
It's just a ride wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:50 PM, raunchydograunchy...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, It's just a ride
bill.hicks.all.a.r...@... wrote:
The only way we are going to get a public option is to reject the idea that
a co-op is an acceptable
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of It's just a ride
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 9:16 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: So, Raunchy, Obama has given up on the
public options, huh?
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
A Gift
Anointing fingertips
Touch slices of sky
Gathering stars
Like treasured pebbles
In pants pockets
Calculous collisions in space
Bump and grind
Like angels arabesquing
On pins of benediction
Shiny Zodiac
I didn't realize Raunchy and Meow were in on this challenge as well. I vote
for them to stay, but I think this whole challenge deal is a little
manipulative. Does one really need their postings affirmed like this?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
Well
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000 steve.sun...@...
wrote:
I didn't realize Raunchy and Meow were in on this
challenge as well. I vote for them to stay, but I think
this whole challenge deal is a little manipulative.
A little? It's so manipulative that I refuse
On Jul 5, 2009, at 9:03 AM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
I didn't realize Raunchy and Meow were in on this challenge as
well. I vote for them to stay, but I think this whole challenge
deal is a little manipulative. Does one really need their postings
affirmed like this?
Well obviously
--
gosh Bluey
I read about the Bee
thought you'd revel in a little playyy
I'm givin' you a beep.
Bp!
-
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In
-
Ouch!My butt!
Have to pick out those splinters later...
OH!!
Looky there!
The door shut and then i turned and ther's a slide!
It goes out off the deck into this neat place!
I thought maybe utopia was behind the door, but maybe it's out there-
Hey
there's a person smiling!
I think I'll go down
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
Well folks, the time approacheth. Raunchy and Meow have integrity, and
they've taken a vow to take time off from posting here if they don't get at
least a few more of you to say, Here's my vote, please stay here with us.
Lurk,
Of course, you're right, and I noted that the situation is entirely
artificial.
But, so what?
It was for funzies really. And, if my darkside got a piece of the
action and felt affirmed, what's it to anyone here? The intent to give
FFL a chance to be lovingly playful was worth going with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000 steve.sun...@...
wrote:
I didn't realize Raunchy and Meow were in on this challenge as well. I vote
for them to stay, but I think this whole challenge deal is a little
manipulative. Does one really need their postings affirmed
TurquoiseB wrote:
The thing I found most interesting in the article
is that everyone has assumed that Obama (being
Pro-Choice) would have picked a person whom he
knew to agree with him...
I hope that we can avoid the political posturing and
ideological brinksmanship that has bogged down
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog
raunchy...@... wrote:
snip
Many progressive liberals voted for Obama believing
he would promote a liberal agenda.
What's particularly amusing about Barry's show of
faux outrage is that the concept of doing the right
thing rather than adhering
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
vajradh...@... wrote:
On May 28, 2009, at 3:51 AM, raunchydog wrote:
snip
I'm sure there will be many questions Sotomayor
will answer. We still don't know much about her.
I'm crossing my fingers that she at least
supports Roe v. Wade. I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog
raunchydog@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
no_reply@ wrote:
T'would seem we're about to see how much of a
feminist Raunchy really is.
Yet another demonstration of Barry's incredibly
sloppy, shallow thinking:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
no_re...@... wrote:
T'would seem we're about to see how much of a
feminist Raunchy really is.
Actually we have no idea if we're going to see that,
even on Barry's own
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
T'would seem we're about to see how much of a
feminist Raunchy really is. Some Pro-Choice
advocates are calling into question Sotomayor's
stance on the right to abortion. At this point
there seems to be no clear-cut
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
T'would seem we're about to see how much of a
feminist Raunchy really is. Some Pro-Choice
advocates are calling into question Sotomayor's
stance
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
This is an equally unsane response in my
opinion. It brings us back to previous
arguments on this forum between those who
are committed to reliance on axioms and
those who are committed to doing the
right thing, as it
On May 28, 2009, at 3:51 AM, raunchydog wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
T'would seem we're about to see how much of a
feminist Raunchy really is. Some Pro-Choice
advocates are calling into question Sotomayor's
stance on the right to abortion. At
You've got to stand for something or you'll fall for anything.
When we see the TV series 24 always showing that great and
immediate danger sways the intellect to do all sorts of violent
actions that are illegal, we see heart taking precedence over
logic and saying, this is the exception that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
[...]
Yeah Raunch, she'll probably convert to Universalist Unitarian any
day now...
I don't know that anyone ever converts to Unitarian Universalism.
Perhaps in their own minds, but the dogma of the church isn't clear-cut
Barry, what you seem to miss in this discussion is that it is not about RULES
you think Obama is so smart to ignore, it is about ideology, the core values of
your political compass, a general framework from which an administration will
make policy on a political spectrum from left to right.
On May 28, 2009, at 11:26 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
[...]
Yeah Raunch, she'll probably convert to Universalist Unitarian any
day now...
I don't know that anyone ever converts to Unitarian Universalism.
Perhaps in their own
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On May 28, 2009, at 1:52 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
But would Raunchy agree? Let's say some writings
turn up in the archives saying that Sotomayor
is *not* firmly committed to upholding Roe v.
Wade. Would Raunchy still be as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@...
wrote:
My dog, my friend has jumping fleas
[snip]
The Orangutans in my local zoo
Male and female, with baby in tow
Sit and groom each other
I don't know if they host fleas
Of either the jumping or sedentary persuasions
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Wroj0FLvzs
43 matches
Mail list logo
