Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the homos!
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the Iraq war!
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the Christian infidels!
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the black magic and sex!
Or, maybe, just maybe, Katrina destroyed NOLA because it's a coastal
city in a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the homos!
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the Iraq war!
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the Christian infidels!
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the black magic and sex!
Or,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the homos!
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the Iraq war!
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the homos!
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the Iraq war!
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the Christian infidels!
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the black magic and sex!
Or,
On 9/8/05 10:17 AM, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about:
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the Rakshasa Ravana
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of all the south facing non vastu
buildings
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of lack of pundits
Katrina destroyed NOLA because the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/8/05 10:17 AM, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about:
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the Rakshasa Ravana
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of all the south facing non vastu
buildings
Katrina
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/8/05 10:17 AM, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about:
Katrina destroyed NOLA because of the Rakshasa Ravana
Katrina
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/8/05 10:17 AM, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most Americans, according to recent polls, don't think the President
is to blame for a national disater.
From comedian Will Durst
The American people want drive through nickel beer night.
The American people
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex Stanley wrote:
Why the need for magical thinking?
Most Americans, according to recent polls, don't think the
President
is to blame for a national disater.
CNN Poll:
Based on this CNN/USA
Most Americans, according to recent polls, don't think the
President is to blame for a national disater.
From comedian Will Durst
Apparently you don't think much of polls or the American people. Most
Americans I've talked to don't blame the President for the disater and
they reject the
jstein wrote:
Forty-two percent of respondents characterized President Bush's
response to the disaster as bad or terrible, while 35 percent
said it was good or great.
Most Americans, according to recent polls, don't think the President
is to blame for a national disaster and they don't buy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jstein wrote:
Forty-two percent of respondents characterized President Bush's
response to the disaster as bad or terrible, while 35 percent
said it was good or great.
Most Americans, according to
jstein wrote:
Forty-two percent of respondents characterized President Bush's
response to the disaster as bad or terrible, while 35 percent
said it was good or great.
So most Americans surveyed in the poll don't blame the President or
race factors in the rescue.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jstein wrote:
Forty-two percent of respondents characterized President Bush's
response to the disaster as bad or terrible, while 35 percent
said it was good or great.
So most Americans surveyed in the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most Americans, according to recent polls, don't think the
President is to blame for a national disater.
From comedian
jstein wrote:
Forty-two percent of respondents characterized President Bush's
response to the disaster as bad or terrible, while 35 percent
said it was good or great.
So most Americans surveyed in the poll don't blame the President, or
race, or sexual perversion factors in the rescue.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jstein wrote:
Forty-two percent of respondents characterized President Bush's
response to the disaster as bad or terrible, while 35 percent
said it was good or great.
So most Americans surveyed in the
jstein wrote:
Forty-two percent of respondents characterized President Bush's
response to the disaster as bad or terrible, while 35 percent
said it was good or great.
So most Americans surveyed in the poll don't blame the President, or
race, or sexual perversion factors in the rescue, but you
As you've no doubt noticed, Judy LOVES to stir the waters. And there
is nothing I can imagine President Bush ever doing or not doing that
she wouldn't condemn with all the considerable skill behind her sharply
pointed tongue.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Cliff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As you've no doubt noticed, Judy LOVES to stir the waters.
Uh, Cliff, you're not paying attention. What's quoted
below from me was originally part of my response to
a post of *Willytex* in which he had very selectively
quoted
Judy - you don't know me well. If you did, I suspect you'd know that I
usually pay VERY close attention and am not known for fuzzy thought. Of
course, there is the vanishingly slim possibility that you use those
pejoratives merely to try and gain some silly arguing advantage? But
you wouldn't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Cliff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Judy - you don't know me well. If you did, I suspect you'd know
that I usually pay VERY close attention and am not known for fuzzy
thought.
Well, you seem to be slipping up pretty badly
where I'm concerned.
Of
course,
Yes, Judy.
Have a good night.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Cliff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Judy - you don't know me well. If you did, I suspect you'd know
that I usually pay VERY close attention and am not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cliff wrote:
Judy - you don't know me well.
Cliff - You'll get to know Judy well! Most Americans surveyed in
the
poll don't blame the hurricane on the President, and that's a fact.
From Powerline:
Cliff wrote:
As you've no doubt noticed, Judy LOVES to stir the waters.
Cliff - She would make a good pit-bull!
Ad hominem is the second to last resort of someone who is loosing a
debate and is unable to respond with legitimacy. The last resort, most
difficult for the ego, is to consider that
jim_flanegin wrote:
I hear from you the same inability to accept that the man is not
flawless, or that any acknowledgement of such an idea is heretical,
or at the least, 'giving comfort to the enemy'.
Well, Jim, the fact is that most Americans support the federal
government and the Bush
condense to 5 7 5 and I will actually read you.
ELSE ...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Funny how God works in strange ways:
What we give, we get back;
Revenge is mine, said God.
So, perhaps, the invasion and destruction of
28 matches
Mail list logo
