Sen. Joseph Lieberman, Democrat Al Gore's running mate
in 2000, said he had intended to wait until after the
primaries to make a choice for the 2008 presidential
race. But McCain asked for his support and no Democrat
did.
Full story:
'Former Dem Lieberman endorses McCain'
By Jennifer Loven
Richard J. Williams wrote:
Hillary Clinton may be an electable candidate and I
could vote for her as well. She supports the war and
wants to win it - she supports regime change and voted
to authorize the President to use force against Saddam
Hussain.
The Des Moines Register's editorial
off wrote:
Stop policing the world, spend the money at home
for better security at ports etc.
I'm all in favor of security, but we must stand up
and fight the terrorists where they live and breed.
It is impossible to make U.S. borders 100% secure.
And I'm not in favor of the federal
I'm all in favor of security, but we must stand up
and fight the terrorists where they live and breed.
Terrorists can live and breed anywhere. They are not assciated with
any country. All they need is a friendly banker. They could move to
Brazil, transfer their money to a friendly Brazilian
Great post. Great analysis to a highly emotional issue. The sound bites we get
from
candidates can be pretty crazy. Fighting non nation state enemies using
conventional
armies is so crazy. When Ron Paul said a small team of mercenaries would have
been a
better response to find Osama in a
I'm all in favor of security, but we must stand up
and fight the terrorists where they live and breed.
bailey wrote:
Terrorists can live and breed anywhere.
Maybe so, but Ron Paul is in favor of using military force
against terrorists in Afghanistan.
They are not associated with any
Brian Horsfield wrote:
When Ron Paul said a small team of mercenaries would
have been a better response to find Osama in a cave
he was ridiculed.
We tried that, with a small team that went after Osama
at Tora Bora. But a small team can't fight a whole country
full of terrorists; that's why
Richard, are you seriously supporting the McCain doctrine for continued war?
Every
candidate says they will end the war - like the Democrats said in 2006. The
civilian death
toll is close to one million by independant estimates using change in the death
rates since
the US invaded. And to a
Brian Horsfield wrote:
Richard, are you seriously supporting the McCain
doctrine for continued war?
So, we are agreed that the U.S. is in a war. Then,
I'm thinking of voting for the candidate who can win
the war, not lose it. Ron Paul has zero experience
winning any wars and apparently has no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Brian Horsfield wrote:
Richard, are you seriously supporting the McCain
doctrine for continued war?
So, we are agreed that the U.S. is in a war. Then,
I'm thinking of voting for the candidate who can win
So, we are agreed that the U.S. is in a war.
Brian Horsfield wrote:
You miss the point. Wars against non nation state enemies
are pretty much unwinnable since there is no definable
enemy. You have to essentially kill everybody to truly
declare victory.
Not everybody, Brian, just the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So, we are agreed that the U.S. is in a war.
Brian Horsfield wrote:
You miss the point. Wars against non nation state enemies
are pretty much unwinnable since there is no definable
enemy. You have
Brian Horsfield wrote:
You call Vietnam a Victory? South Korea?
We were not defeated in Viet Nam, Brian, we were defeated
in the streets of Berkley. America's involvement in Vietnam
was a noble cause - the U.S signed an armistice in Paris.
The North Koreans have been held at 37th parallel. The
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Horsfield wrote:
Richard, are you seriously supporting the McCain
doctrine for continued war?
So, we are agreed that the U.S. is in a war. Then,
I'm thinking of voting for the candidate who can win
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Horsfield wrote:
You call Vietnam a Victory? South Korea?
We were not defeated in Viet Nam, Brian, we were defeated
in the streets of Berkley.
ROTFLMAO ! ! !
Get real. You lost in Vietnam.
off_world_beings wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian Horsfield wrote:
You call Vietnam a Victory? South Korea?
We were not defeated in Viet Nam, Brian, we were defeated
in the streets of Berkley.
I think it would be very cool if Ron got the nom, but on the 15th
Kucinich is doing his send me money on the 15th thingy. I doubt
he'll beat any of Ron's money totals, but I'm giving Kucinich $100
just so I can look in the mirror and say I did one small thing for my
political beliefs besides
Duveyoung wrote:
Still, I don't hear these guys saying often enough
how they would reverse what BushCo has done to all
the laws with signing statements, outright disobediance,
and cramming every federal bureaucracy with cronies
done to the second or third levels -- it'll be tough
to
18 matches
Mail list logo
