Heck, in Fairfield, Iowa with Global Weird Weather I'd just like several days
in a row of sunshine this month right now to be able to mow and make some
decent hay. It is looking like a two-cutting summer..
SEVERE WEATHER...THERE IS A THREAT OF SEVERE THUNDERSTORMS THIS
MORNING AND AGAIN
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote :
Heck, in Fairfield, Iowa with Global Weird Weather I'd just like several days
in a row of sunshine this month right now to be able to mow and make some
decent hay. It is looking like a two-cutting summer..
In Victoria, you
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :
The earth is 15 years from a mini ice-age that will cause bitterly cold
winters during which rivers such as the Thames freeze over, scientists have
predicted.
Man, am I confused. So we are in the early but terminal stages of
FWIW, it's been on the market since last December. Someone
posted the story at the time:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/297788
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jpgillam jpgillam@... wrote:
This message was at the top of an email announcing a Columbus Day residence
You are correct. In addition to a lot less access to explosives, Americans are
also a LOT less likely to know how to use them or have access to those who are
knowledgeable of their application without blowing themselves up in the
process.
seekliberation
I would think angry Iraqis had a
An even better rant:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embeddedv=X6bvfGPqiOk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@... wrote:
http://act.ly/57z
A rant by Cenk that nails it about Obama's intent to sign the Defense
Authorization Act.
I suppose the War
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote:
On 12/15/2011 09:52 AM, Duveyoung wrote:
http://act.ly/57z
A rant by Cenk that nails it about Obama's intent to sign the Defense
Authorization Act.
I suppose the War Monger is happy now that we can round up all the
Duveyoung:
A rant by Cenk that nails it about Obama's intent
to sign the Defense Authorization Act...
So, what's your point? You're unhappy with Obama?
The bill would require that the military take
custody of a suspect deemed to be a member of
al-Qaida or its affiliates who is involved in
Halliburton is taking a big risk being in Iraq. Its more likely that they will
be bribing a lot of people to get anything done in that country. And, that
doesn't even include the Qaeda operatives.
In other words, the US government should get out of there.
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_...@... wrote:
This is good news for the US Army and the Obama Administration. But can the
Iraqi Army take on the burden of defending its own country?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/ml_iraq_americans_head_home
It's good news for Halliburton as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... wrote:
Someone sent me this on the side:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Dick Richardson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Goodbye. May all your troubles be smaller to you than you are to
yourselves. Keep at it and you might become decent human beings one
day.
Albeit plainly not in this lifetime.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/post?postID=P4zJ-qt7up-ayk5\
6z28KvamP5pppO696AS40CBKRRuvx5RDYwMR-FyeQyzq_eyx-NVO5EdlgvHx-oB71vMNtCAv\
YKH5bQQ , shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
who do you have in mind as the previous one?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow! We haven't had a blowhard like him in a while.
--- On Fri, 11/14/08, Dick Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Dick Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Dick Richardson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Goodbye. May all your troubles be smaller to you than you are to
yourselves. Keep at it and you might become decent human beings one day.
You won't have Nixon to kick around anymore, because gentlemen, this
is my
strange dude!
--- On Fri, 11/14/08, enlightened_dawn11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: enlightened_dawn11 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Goodbye
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 14, 2008, 12:33 PM
who do you have in mind as the previous one
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Peter
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 5:30 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Goodbye
Probably just a figure of speech. I don't think any regular poster here over
the last several
I think this says it all.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Dick Richardson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Goodbye. May all your troubles be smaller to you than you are to
yourselves. Keep at it and you might become decent human beings one
day.
Albeit plainly not in this lifetime. But
--- On Fri, 11/14/08, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Goodbye
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 14, 2008, 7:08 PM
From:
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
]
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Goodbye
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, November 14, 2008, 12:33 PM
who do you have in mind as the previous one?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
drpetersutphen@ wrote:
Wow! We haven't had a blowhard like him in a
while
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Curtis, she's way too rational. Has she been validated
through a peer reviewed journal? Wait, we're
antis-science. See if babies cry in her presence or if
milk curdles and then we'll know the real story behind
this Angela
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
Curtis, she's way too rational. Has she been validated
through a peer reviewed journal? Wait, we're
antis-science. See if babies cry in her
the truth of the
premises.
- Original Message
From: off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 1:16:19 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Goodbye to the
anti-science crowd here
on FFL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
Curtis, she's way too rational. Has she been validated
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Goodbye to the anti-science crowd her on FFL. I have no intention of
conversing with anti-science fundamentalists on the topic of science.
People like Curt, Lurk, Turq., Peter, Boo, Sal, Doug, Vaj, and
others,
And BTW, it's Curtis.
Thanks Sal. And it's Mr. Curtis if you're nasty, like Miss. Jackson said!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 21, 2007, at 9:52 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
People like Curt, Lurk, Turq., Peter, Boo, Sal, Doug, Vaj, and
If one is predisposed to conspiracy theories and the like, turning to
peer review science would be a boon. If one is predisposed to useful
stuff (including accumulated wisdom), turning to peer review science
will turn you into an absent minded klutz.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If one is predisposed to conspiracy theories and the like, turning
to
peer review science would be a boon. If one is predisposed to
useful
stuff (including accumulated wisdom), turning to peer review science
will turn you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
Goodbye to the anti-science crowd her on FFL. I have no intention
of
conversing with anti-science fundamentalists on the topic of
science.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 21, 2007, at 9:52 AM, off_world_beings wrote:
People like Curt, Lurk, Turq., Peter, Boo, Sal, Doug, Vaj, and
others, are anti-science, just like Jerry Falwell, Ted Haggard,
George Bush, Rush Limbaugh,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you don't state this above statement, then you ARE stating that
you are against science.
Let's see If you are not with us, you are against us
So you ARE stating that you are agianst science, and yes you
, this says nothing about the truth
of the premises.
- Original Message
From: off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 1:16:19 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Goodbye to the anti-science crowd here on FFL
If you don't state this above statement, then you ARE stating that
you are against science.
Let's see If you are not with us, you are against us...who gave that
ultimatum...
Reason and logic must work together with the scientific method to
advance human knowledge. You are way OFF here.
When my Mom tells me to put on fresh clean underwear before going out
for a drive - I am not supposed to take her as an authority on the
subject - - wait till I tell her, she'll come and kick your ass.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
Goodbye to the anti-science crowd her on FFL. I have no intention
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
If you don't state this above statement, then you ARE stating that
you are against science.
Let's see If you are not
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Goodbye to the anti-science crowd here
on FFL
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ ... wrote:
If you don't state this above statement, then you ARE stating that
you
: Friday, December 21, 2007 1:16:19 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Goodbye to the
anti-science crowd here
on FFL
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups.
com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ ... wrote:
If you don't state
: [FairfieldLife] Re: Goodbye to the
anti-science crowd here
on FFL
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups.
com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ ... wrote:
If you don't state this above statement, then
you
From: off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] s.com
To: FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 1:16:19 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Goodbye to the
anti-science crowd here
on FFL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Off, get a grip. Curtis is not anti-science and he wrote an
intelligent and well-written piece about that. He's against
absolutist statements and ultimatums.
Ah yes, the anti-science crowd predictably going
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
If you don't state this above statement, then
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Curtis, she's way too rational. Has she been validated
through a peer reviewed journal? Wait, we're
antis-science. See if babies cry in her presence or if
milk curdles and then we'll know the real story behind
this Angela
43 matches
Mail list logo
