Ah, Judy's back from another long, relaxing,
rejuvenating weekend away :-), firing off nine
posts in a row, each distinguished by...uh, wait
for it...I know it'll come as a surprise...her
correcting someone on this forum and setting
them straight about how the world really is
and what the truth
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, Judy's back from another long, relaxing,
rejuvenating weekend away :-), firing off nine
posts in a row, each distinguished by...uh, wait
for it...I know it'll come as a surprise...her
correcting someone on this
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Ah, Judy's back from another long, relaxing,
rejuvenating weekend away :-), firing off nine
posts in a row, each distinguished by...uh, wait
for
Barry, I love you infinitely, and IMO/IME virtually everything Judy
tells you is true -- she must love you infinitely more than I do, to
show that much patience and compassion with you; you are *supremely*
fortunate to have merited and attracted her concentrated attention
for as long as you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
Ah, Judy's back from another long, relaxing,
rejuvenating weekend away :-),
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Ah, Judy's back from another long, relaxing,
rejuvenating weekend away :-),
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
Ah,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip
And, as I've said *many times* here, I DON'T
KNOW THE TRUTH. I don't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Turq, this first part reminded me of the division of Hindu
scripture into the Srutis, Smirtis, and Puranas -- the Heard
(actually experienced), the Remembered (got the skinny
from someone actually experienced, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis reavismarek@
wrote:
snip
The problems with believing in the stories, as you say,
is that you can start taking them personally and then
feel personally diminished
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---true, very perceptive - I love your alternative story. It's
so Philip - Dickian (he wrote The Man in the High Castle and
other short books expressing such themes as time travel, alternative
possible histories
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, billy jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not a single part of Swami Rama's statement is based upon
Shankara's actual written works or upon his transmissions
to his disciples. Scholars of Shankara would consider the
claims written below to be typical hindu
On Jul 29, 2007, at 1:56 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Of course, Vaj is the incarnation of the Buddhist Tantrik
Abhinava Gupta, who was so jealous of Shankara (MMY and TM).
Vaj, you should have regular exams to look for fistulas.
I can't disagree with you here. :-
Too bad, then you might want
Comment below:
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
**snip**
Vaj and some others here have suggested at various times
that Maharishi and his teachings might *not* be a legitimate
example of the Shankaracharya tradition, and have expressed
their
Thats why I like the Wok. It claims to be the worlds worst technique,
inferior to all others, and only nobodies with little self-esteem
would even be associated with it. No bragging rights, no
one-upmanship, no debates. Practicioners become and amount to
nothing.Its a hollow teaching, of no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats why I like the Wok. It claims to be the worlds worst
technique, inferior to all others, and only nobodies with
little self-esteem would even be associated with it. No
bragging rights, no one-upmanship, no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 28, 2007, at 9:34 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
His many debates with other spiritual teachers, Shankara
*himself* trying to establish best-ness, that's what.
The bio is almost a litany of such encounters, a listing
of
---true, very perceptive - I love your alternative story. It's
so Philip - Dickian (he wrote The Man in the High Castle and
other short books expressing such themes as time travel, alternative
possible histories (e.g. Hitler takes over Europe and the U.S., then
what happens).
Of course, Vaj
18 matches
Mail list logo
