--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, drpetersutphen drpetersutphen@
wrote:
I missed this post.
And apparently didn't read it when you did see it.
Every one of the commenters Brian quotes--and Brian
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, drpetersutphen drpetersutphen@
wrote:
I missed this post.
And apparently didn't read it when you did
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
snip
I was NOT arguing that the project showed anything
hopeful. I don't believe that even if the ME exists,
it could ever be demonstrated scientifically. My
point was that Peter declared the methodology flawed
*without
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
I was NOT arguing that the project showed anything
hopeful. I don't believe that even if the ME exists,
it could ever be demonstrated
So, some 'heavy hitters' of the spiritual
world have written a book about your guru,
the Maharishi?
Joe:
No, you've *wildly* distorted the point I was
making, very deliberately. You may not be
psychotic, but you're almost as dishonest as
Barry and Vaj.
Barry and Vaj are dishonest?
Joe:
According to my sources, yes.
Not everyone that lives in Texas is Latino, Joe.
Silly Willie is still smarting from the waxing
he got from Judy yesterday.
Brazilian?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfiend jstein@ wrote:
Unbelievable. Having been shown to be totally wrong,
she just keeps on fabricating accusations.
And *everybody here thinks that's just fine*.
So you think
Brian deserves kudos for maintaining a civil tone even though he was attacked
in a very rude and unfair way. He did not fabricate anything. He also brought
attention to a very small ME study that I had not heard of before, and gave
interesting details about it. People should also read his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
On Jul 26, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
Can't we just respectfully disagree?
But you're not respectfully disagreeing, Brian~~you're
fabricating.
On Jul 27, 2010, at 3:48 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
It's fascinating, just dropping in long enough to scan
what's been going on, that Brian (who won't be missed
whether the door hit him in the ass on his way out or
not) complained about people trying to score points
here but missed the person
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jpgillam jpgil...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
On Jul 26, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
Can't we just respectfully disagree?
But
On Jul 27, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Sal Sunshine wrote:
What's fascinating is watching Judy-logic at work.
Instead of just coming out and saying, Yeah, it *was*
misleading if not dishonest of Brian not to put links in
or to admit the quotes he put down *might* not have
been talking about the TMO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jpgillam jpgillam@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
On Jul 26, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Rick
TurquoiseB
What is unbelievable is that an almost-70-year-old
woman is incapable of controlling the hatred she feels
for another woman on this forum (Sal), hatred that in
my considered opinion she feels for no more intelligent
reasons than 1) Sal continually laughs at Judy, 2) Sal
can't
Can't we just respectfully disagree?
Sal:
But you're not respectfully disagreeing,
Brian~~you're fabricating.
feste37:
Brian is quite correct in saying that these
studies have been published in peer-reviewed
journals.
So, Brian wasn't fabricating anything, and so
Judy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@... wrote:
snip
What's fascinating is watching Judy-logic at work.
Instead of just coming out and saying, Yeah, it *was*
misleading if not dishonest of Brian not to put links in
or to admit the quotes he put down *might* not have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@... wrote:
snip
And, I should have added, Brian's repeatedly ignoring
my criticisms of his posting style and trying to drag
the conversation into the whole area of personal
attacks (which of course he posts no
examples of)
Other
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
snip
What is *unbelievable is that an almost-70-year-old
woman is incapable of controlling the hatred she feels
for another woman on this forum (Sal), hatred that in
my considered opinion she feels for no more intelligent
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfiend jstein@ wrote:
Unbelievable. Having been shown to be totally wrong,
she just keeps on fabricating accusations.
And *everybody here thinks that's just fine*.
So you
Silly Willie is still smarting from the waxing he got from Judy yesterday. He's
clearly still upset about this. (And, he's feeling mighty lonely to boot!)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex willy...@... wrote:
TurquoiseB
What is unbelievable is that an almost-70-year-old
Joe:
Silly Willie is still smarting from the waxing he
got from Judy yesterday. He's clearly still upset
about this.
Which one? Today is the July 27th, right?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/253087
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/253107
(And,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jpgillam jpgillam@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend wrote:
--- In
On Jul 27, 2010, at 9:41 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Thanks for putting up the good fight, Judy. Sorry I'm
not in a position to join you in calling out the untruths,
but that's not the way I'm wired.
I have no idea how to interpret that comment, Patrick!
Go for the default, Judy. Patrick was
I missed this post. This research means nothing because it is methodologically
flawed. How were the measures taken? What was the control period. Anyone with
even a little training in doing this type of research will see huge holes in it.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, drpetersutphen drpetersutp...@...
wrote:
I missed this post.
And apparently didn't read it when you did see it.
Every one of the commenters Brian quotes--and Brian
himself--pointed out that the study couldn't be taken
as conclusive because the sample size
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@... wrote:
On Jul 27, 2010, at 9:41 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Thanks for putting up the good fight, Judy. Sorry I'm
not in a position to join you in calling out the untruths,
but that's not the way I'm wired.
I have no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@... wrote:
snip
Because while that may not be what
you intended at all, she *knows* what you are
thinking, (better than you do yourself, of course)
she *knows* when you're awake...and well, you
know the rest. :)
Plus which,
You can always tell that Judy is losing it when she
feels that it requires two posts in a row from her to
properly respond to one post from another woman.
Another woman like Sal. Or Ruth. If you're into B
movies, there is a real Queen-dyke-in-a-womens-prison
vibe to Judy's responses when she
Fish in a barrel, folks, fish in a barrel.
TurquoiseB:
You can always tell that Judy is losing it
when she feels that it requires two posts
in a row from her to properly respond to
one post from another woman.
You can always tell that Turq is losing it
when he feels that it
Even though my post was delayed, you're clearly still smarting from this one:
Re: Robes of Silk, Feet of Clay
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex willy...@... wrote:
authfriend:
snip
You know, along these lines:
I have noticed that the 'heavy hitters'
of the spiritual world
He's frothing at the mouth because I caught him
contradicting his own comments last year about
French women, this year attributing the same
characteristics to Dutch women and saying French
women are lacking in them.
He could be sitting in a cave writing all this
crap. It has nothing to do with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Joe geezerfr...@... wrote:
Silly Willie is still smarting from the waxing he got from Judy yesterday.
Brazilian?
According to my sources, yes.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Joe geezerfreak@ wrote:
Silly Willie is still smarting from the waxing he got from Judy yesterday.
Brazilian?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@... wrote:
On Jul 26, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
Can't we just respectfully disagree?
If you had bothered reading for 5 minutes before
coming in here, you might have noted that there
are a significant amount
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@... wrote:
On Jul 26, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
Can't we just respectfully disagree?
But you're not respectfully disagreeing, Brian~~you're
fabricating.
Unbelievable. Having been shown to be totally wrong,
she
These posting problems here have been frustrating over the last 48 hours. Seems
Yahoo Groups is getting overloaded. I think it's time for me to quit this
group. It's also a downer to me to read so many posts that appear more
interested in scoring points than sharing news and inspiration. There
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@... wrote:
On Jul 26, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
Can't we just respectfully disagree?
But you're not respectfully disagreeing, Brian~~you're
fabricating. And you're not providing any links, either.
That is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfiend jst...@... wrote:
Unbelievable. Having been shown to be totally wrong,
she just keeps on fabricating accusations.
And *everybody here thinks that's just fine*.
So you think *everybody here* is a liar and hypocrite.
Rght.
38 matches
Mail list logo
