raunchydog wrote:
If you want to see what an incredible
variety of female sexual appetites
there are, check out the Vagina
Monologues created by Eve Ensler who
interviewed 200 women and helped
empower womens' sexuality by letting
them talk about their Vagina.
The majority of women
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
Keep arguing about gay marriage if you want, Raunchy.
You may do so believing that you are liberal on the
issue. All I see is another form of agenda-laden
repressed behavior, on both sides.
Barry thinks I should
On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:24 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
YOU are the one trying to control what's talked
about here, Raunchy, not me. Talk *all you want*
about gay marriage. I don't have to. And if I
want to introduce a sidebar topic into a thread
that YOU want to go the way that YOU want it to,
tough
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
jstein@ wrote:
And now Barry's hallucinating that *Raunchy*
was talking about polyamory!
Raunchydog was projecting a bent, feminist
sexism onto the word polygamy,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
no_re...@... wrote:
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
Polygamy: My strategy here would be to shift
the burden of proof and make a devil's advocate
argument.
snip
The differences Raunchy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
no_re...@... wrote:
snip
I merely wanted to steer a conversation away from
the ugly finger-pointing and blame *you* wanted
it to remain on and onto a more lofty plane, in
which wider and less agenda-driven discussions
might take place.
Says
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
no_re...@... wrote:
snip
What happened is that YOU DIDN'T LIKE the
sidebar, because it gave other people a chance
to talk about something else than the thing you
wanted them to talk about.
No, she didn't like the sidebar because it involved
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
salsunsh...@... wrote:
On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:24 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
YOU are the one trying to control what's talked
about here, Raunchy, not me. Talk *all you want*
about gay marriage. I don't have to. And if I
want to introduce a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
Keep arguing about gay marriage if you want, Raunchy.
You may do so believing that you are liberal on the
issue. All I see is another form of
raunchydog wrote:
Barry seems to have forgotten that it
was Shemp who wanted to discuss gay
marriage from his anti-gay POV using
the box turtle, and slippery slope
arguments and that Shemp initiated the
discussion with What about that
disgusting butt thing the guys do?
For the
TurquoiseB wrote:
YOU are the one trying to control what's talked
about here, Raunchy, not me. Talk *all you want*
about gay marriage. I don't have to. And if I
want to introduce a sidebar topic into a thread
that YOU want to go the way that YOU want it to,
tough shit for you.
Sal
-- h.
And what did you have for dinner?
...listening.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
And now Barry's hallucinating that *Raunchy* was
talking about polyamory!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willy...@...
wrote:
raunchydog wrote:
Barry seems to have forgotten that it
was Shemp who wanted to discuss gay
marriage from his anti-gay POV using
the box turtle, and slippery slope
arguments and that Shemp initiated the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, meowthirteen meowthirteen@ wrote:
---
*Turquoise:
How was your dinner?
I bet it was lovely.
I wonder if you ate outside,if the weather was gorgeous
and what you had brought to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams willy...@...
wrote:
raunchydog wrote:
Barry seems to have forgotten that it
was Shemp who wanted to discuss gay
marriage from his anti-gay POV using
the box turtle, and slippery slope
arguments and that Shemp initiated the
--ooops
I posted before I read all the listed...
Grand merci;
many thanks for allowing me to live vicariously through you;
enjoy Europe .
I appreciate the mindset there, as opposed to America,
the Puritans made dark what needn't be
(my opinion)
You , full of heart,enjoy...
-
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@... wrote:
On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:24 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
YOU are the one trying to control what's talked
about here, Raunchy, not me. Talk *all you want*
about gay marriage. I don't have to. And if I
want to introduce a
On Jun 15, 2009, at 10:48 AM, do.rflex wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine
salsunsh...@... wrote:
On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:24 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
YOU are the one trying to control what's talked
about here, Raunchy, not me. Talk *all you want*
about gay marriage. I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rf...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ wrote:
On Jun 15, 2009, at 2:24 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
YOU are the one trying to control what's talked
about here, Raunchy, not me. Talk *all you want*
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
(Except, of course, for the rules that keep other
people from doing or saying what he'd rather they
didn't do or say--that's why he's such a strong
supporter of the posting limits.)
Ah, the expected delayed result of me
I am opposed to most male thrusting - it's
usually serves no purpose, and it's downright
dangerous during an epidemic. Just for the
record, and in my opinion.
raunchydog wrote:
Habit? Really? What two consenting adults
do in the privacy of their bedroom is nobody's
business and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
Man, you just *gotta* chuckle at Chuckles. He's as out
of at as Sal, maybe more so.
But that's not possible ! ;-)
I am opposed to most male thrusting - it's
usually serves no purpose, and it's
downright dangerous during an epidemic.
Duveyoung wrote:
Apparently hetero men just gots ta hav it.
Yet, Willy, we hear nothing from you about
this practice being exactly the same as a
homosexual anal
nablusoss1008 wrote:
Man, you just *gotta* chuckle at Chuckles.
He's as out of at as Sal, maybe more so.
So, Nabby, why do you suppose that people
are so addicted to thrusting? According to
Edg, he's just got to have it. Perhaps the
idea of a large, ever-erect, penile member
is just a male
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex no_re...@... wrote:
I am opposed to most male thrusting - it's
usually serves no purpose, and it's
downright dangerous during an epidemic.
Duveyoung wrote:
Apparently hetero men just gots ta hav it.
Yet, Willy, we hear nothing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex no_re...@... wrote:
I am opposed to most male thrusting - it's
usually serves no purpose, and it's
downright dangerous during an epidemic.
Duveyoung wrote:
Apparently hetero men just gots ta hav it.
Yet, Willy, we hear nothing
do.rflex wrote:
Judy's latest 'gotcha,' whatever it represents
in her own mind, is simply another example of
her ongoing never-ending perpetual nitpick and
nag persona including her ulgy, nasty personal
attacks on anyone she disagrees with...
Yeah, you really got Judy this time, and you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex no_re...@... wrote:
I am opposed to most male thrusting - it's
usually serves no purpose, and it's downright
dangerous during an epidemic. Just for the
record, and in my opinion.
raunchydog wrote:
Habit? Really? What two
Listen, Moron, I am opposed to most male
thrusting - it serves no useful purposes
and it is disgusting and dangerous...
I don't get WillyTex. Are you saying that men
or just gay men should not thrust when they
have sex? How much fun is that?
Why would a real woman need a male
Yes, I am opposed to most male thrusting, on
general principles, whether it's perpetrated
upon women or upon men. It serves no purpose
and should be discouraged. Thrusting is a habit
most men are addicted to. Most women who are
addicted to male thrusting are just feeding
the male
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex no_reply@ wrote:
I am opposed to most male thrusting - it's
usually serves no purpose, and it's
downright dangerous during an epidemic.
Duveyoung wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex no_re...@... wrote:
Listen, Moron, I am opposed to most male
thrusting - it serves no useful purposes
and it is disgusting and dangerous...
I don't get WillyTex. Are you saying that men
or just gay men should not thrust when they
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
(Except, of course, for the rules that keep other
people from doing or saying what he'd rather they
didn't do or say--that's why he's such a strong
Listen, Moron, I am opposed to most male
thrusting - it serves no useful purposes
and it is disgusting and dangerous.
Edg wrote:
I'd say that Willy's contributions here have
almost no value compared to Nab's fine
service unto us all in which he keeps the
concepts in focus...
So,
Why would a real woman need a male thrusting?
raunchydog wrote:
Duh? It feels good?
That's the question I guess. Maybe some women
like to live dangerously, I don't know.
I happen to like thrusting as long as I have a
partner skilled and sensitive enough to know what
feels good
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
(Except, of course, for the rules that keep other
people from doing or saying what
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
(Except, of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
(Except, of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rf...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In
(snip)
Hmmm, I seem to remember someone who obsessively talked about pinky petals
and colorless sap by endlessly rehashing and repeating the lecture.
(snip)
He was just describing his experience...of how the transcendent manifests...
Most people still don't get it.
R.G.
Duveyoung wrote:
And now Willy comes along with this use of the
word thrusting. GAWD how creepy is this guy
going to get?
So, you're in favor of men thrusting into other
men, but Willy is the vile creep for opposing
such behavior? Go figure.
It's one thing to want America
to be
And, yeah, you guys out there, learn to fucking fuck will ya?
If your partner isn't coming almost every time you make love, you ain't making
love.
If the stats that report that most women are not coming from thrusting are
true, (I think they are,) then why don't you men get jiggy with your
Says Judy, two posts from posting out, less
than three days into the week. :-)
I have no idea who wrote the above, but I would like to propose that the FFL
rules be changed so that we can offer each other our unused posts similar to
senators, etc. offering their own unused speaking
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, scienceofabundance no_re...@... wrote:
Says Judy, two posts from posting out, less
than three days into the week. :-)
I have no idea who wrote the above, but I would like to propose that the FFL
rules be changed so that we can offer each
I did that for Judy a while ago, and I got thoroughly abused for it.
Edg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, scienceofabundance no_re...@... wrote:
Says Judy, two posts from posting out, less
than three days into the week. :-)
I have no idea who wrote the above, but I would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert babajii...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, scienceofabundance no_reply@ wrote:
Says Judy, two posts from posting out, less
than three days into the week. :-)
I have no idea who wrote the above, but I would
Sal started things rolling this week with one
simple post that Judy felt so threatened by
that she spend almost a dozen posts refuting
it. Sal, on the other hand, just sat back and
allowed Judy to refute all she wanted to.
More like a half dozen, actually. (Barry has
counting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
Sal started things rolling this week with one
simple post that Judy felt so threatened by
that she spend almost a dozen posts refuting
it. Sal, on the other hand, just sat back and
allowed Judy to refute all she
Duveyoung wrote:
And, yeah, you guys out there, learn
to fucking fuck will ya?
So, it always comes back to thrusting,
Edg. I thought so. That's all some guys
can think about, thrusting, every single
day, if not every hour. It's all about
their penis and their pleasure. It's all
about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex no_re...@... wrote:
Why would a real woman need a male thrusting?
raunchydog wrote:
Duh? It feels good?
That's the question I guess. Maybe some women
like to live dangerously, I don't know.
I happen to like thrusting as long
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
[...]
I'm for gay marriage, polygamous marriage, gay polygamous marriage,
bestiality marriage, and incest marriage in equal measure.
Aren't you?
Do you really perceive them as all being the same, or are you just
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
I'm for gay marriage, polygamous marriage, gay polygamous marriage,
bestiality marriage, and incest marriage in equal measure.
Aren't you?
This is the box turtle argument.
Interpreting the statement literally: it is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig lengli...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
[...]
I'm for gay marriage, polygamous marriage, gay polygamous marriage,
bestiality marriage, and incest marriage in equal measure.
Aren't you?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
I'm for gay marriage, polygamous marriage, gay polygamous marriage,
bestiality marriage, and incest marriage in equal measure.
Aren't you?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
I'm for gay marriage, polygamous marriage, gay polygamous marriage,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
snip
The box turtle statement above is really making the
case against gay marriage by not making the case: It
is not telling you what is wrong with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
snip
The box turtle statement above is really making the
case against gay
If there were a movement in favor of incestuous
marriage or polygamy or box-turtle marriage as
substantial as there is in favor of same-sex
marriage, you might have a point (although there
would still be good arguments against it), but
there isn't.
Knowing from my friends that there is a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
[snip]
Again, the point remains that these are separate battles.
I disagree. I think they are the same battle.
The slippery slope argument does not have merit, it's just another version of
the box turtle
raunchydog:
You've now called me (1) a wingnut; and (2) a bigot.
Whether or not I am those things, I am not inclined to debate with you over
these issues when you stoop to name-calling. I suspect that you do that in
order to get OUT of debates because at your core you really don't believe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
If there were a movement in favor of incestuous
marriage or polygamy or box-turtle marriage as
substantial as there is in favor of same-sex
marriage, you might have a point (although there
would still be good
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
snip
Are you so repulsed by gay marriage that you feel
compelled to share your prurient interest with a
link so that we can feel as repulsed as you? You
have missed the point completely if you think that
such images
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
Polygamy: My strategy here would be to shift the burden of
proof and make a devil's advocate argument.
For those who cite procreation as the basis of marriage,
polygamy should be fine given that it is an efficient way
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
raunchydog:
You've now called me (1) a wingnut; and (2) a bigot.
Whether or not I am those things, I am not inclined to debate with you over
these issues when you stoop to name-calling. I suspect that you do that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
raunchydog:
You've now called me (1) a wingnut; and (2) a bigot.
Whether or not I am those things, I am not inclined to debate
with you over these issues when you stoop to name-calling. I
suspect that you do that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In
And now Barry's hallucinating that *Raunchy* was
talking about polyamory!
Nor did he notice, apparently, that she was quoting
somebody else.
He also didn't notice that the person she was
quoting was making a *devil's advocate* argument,
even though that's explicitly stated in the first
paragraph
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
snip
Are you so repulsed by gay marriage that you feel
compelled to share your prurient interest with a
link so that we can feel as repulsed as you?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
raunchydog:
You've now called me (1) a wingnut; and (2) a bigot.
Whether or not I am those things, I am not inclined to debate
with you over
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
snip
But Raunchy is spouting feminist bullshit about
polyamory without knowing ANY of the actual facts
about it.
What Raunchy quoted never mentioned polyamory.
Nobody is talking about polyamory but Barry.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
Polygamy: My strategy here would be to shift the burden of
proof and make a devil's advocate argument.
For those who cite procreation as the basis
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
raunchydog:
You've now called me (1) a wingnut; and (2) a bigot.
Whether or not I am those things, I am not inclined to debate with you over
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
raunchydog:
You've now called me (1) a wingnut; and (2) a bigot.
Whether or not I am those things, I am not inclined to debate
with you over
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip
But Raunchy is spouting feminist bullshit about
polyamory without knowing ANY of the actual facts
about it.
What Raunchy quoted never mentioned
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
snip
Are you so repulsed by gay marriage that you feel
compelled to share
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
raunchydog:
You've now called me (1) a wingnut; and (2) a bigot.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
I'll agree that to push buttons was part of the motivation.
Me, me, me.I pushed the button first. You just reacted to my pushed
button as you sensed the pressure of my button on your 13th chakra.
Science
---
*Turquoise:
How was your dinner?
I bet it was lovely.
I wonder if you ate outside,if the weather was gorgeous
and what you had brought to you...
I wonder if you had really nice wine with it.
I hope you had good conversation and are having bella serah.
*Speaking more to the post now,there is a
-
If anyone needs proof that women have
drive
need
for sex
there's a forum on yahoo
for women who have partners with ED
Erectile Difunction
The fact that it is in existance and used is proof enough that sex is full of
life meaning and complete-ing-ness to females.
The cries of aloneness and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
[snip]
And I still don't see the connection between gay porn
and gay marriage. Nobody should be forced to view porn
of any kind for any reason.
If that is the issue, then I agree with you.
And to the extent that people
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
[snip]
And I still don't see the connection between gay porn
and gay marriage. Nobody should be forced to view porn
of any kind for any reason.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
And now Barry's hallucinating that *Raunchy* was
talking about polyamory!
Raunchydog was projecting a bent, feminist
sexism onto the word polygamy, which
*describes* a form of polyamorous marriage.
Only one form, as it turns
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchy...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
raunchydog:
You've now called me (1) a wingnut; and (2) a bigot.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@ wrote:
Polygamy: My strategy here would be to shift the burden of
proof and make a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, meowthirteen meowthirt...@... wrote:
---
*Turquoise:
How was your dinner?
I bet it was lovely.
I wonder if you ate outside,if the weather was gorgeous
and what you had brought to you...
I wonder if you had really nice wine with it.
I hope you had good
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
snip
I'm not saying I'm for or against gay marriage; what
I'm saying is if you hold it to be equal to
heterosexual marriage then you should treat gay porn
just as you would hetero porn...and if looking at it
shocks you,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
snip
I'm not saying I'm for or against gay marriage; what
I'm saying is if you hold it to be equal to
heterosexual marriage then you should treat gay
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
snip
I'm not saying I'm for or against gay marriage; what
I'm saying is if you hold it to be equal to
heterosexual marriage then you should treat gay
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
snip
I'm not saying I'm for or against gay marriage; what
I'm saying is if
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
snip
I'm not saying I'm for or against gay marriage; what
I'm saying is if
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
snip
I'm
97 matches
Mail list logo
