http://www.bhagavad-gita.org/Gita/verse-13-07.html
Try these commentaries.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, card cardemaister@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@ wrote:
Card
Apparently you never tire of parading Hairless Krishna
These so-called authorized sampradaya-s and their versions are merely
Vaishnava creations based upon various favored interpretations.
Nothing more.
Shridar Swami's was the commentary which Shri Chaitanya recommended
for his disciples but whenever tat tvam asi was uttered or
quoted he covered
emptybill:
There are no texts to read, Willy, because
tantra only developed as puja-yajna during
the puranic temple-historical phase later
known as Hinduism...
You mean during the Gupta Age in India? LoL!!!
Vyasa, the narrator of the Mahabharata, is
traditionally considered the
emptybill:
This does not mean that either Shankara or SBS were
tantrika-s...
It means that if SBS was an adherent of Sri Vidya, then
that might account for the Karpatri Swami, SBS's desciple,
being an adherent of Sri Vidya tantric sect.
He was also the great expert of Shree Vidya and
Sorry, Willy, but you are starting to bluster again.
No Western trained scholar (Indian or Euro-American) would believe these
invented claims by Indians. There are no texts to read, Willy, because
tantra only developed as puja-yajna during the puranic temple-historical
phase later known as
emptybill:
No Western trained scholar (Indian or Euro-American)
would believe these invented claims by Indians.
Tmer devotees don't care what trained scholars say
about SBS. What matters to us is what the current
sannyasins and yogis believe and practice.
What's relevant here is that SBS
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, card cardemaister@... wrote:
Radhakrishnan:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/66867356@N02/7560460532/in/photostream/lightbox/
Sh. = Shankara
R. Raamaanuja
Bhakti is the highest form of yoga? Advaita is for those
who are incapable of doing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, card cardemaister@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, card cardemaister@ wrote:
Radhakrishnan:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/66867356@N02/7560460532/in/photostream/ligh\
tbox/
Sh. = Shankara
R. Raamaanuja
Bhakti is the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, card cardemaister@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, card cardemaister@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, card cardemaister@ wrote:
Radhakrishnan:
cardemaister:
Bhakti is the highest form of yoga?
Kashmere Saivism is an absolute idealism, just
like Adwaita Vedanta. The main difference, according
to Theos Bernard, is the intrepretation given to the
term 'maya'.
Swami Laksmanjoo used to teach Kashmere Saivism to
some of the SRM
You must have been a disciple of Joseph Propagandhi Goebbels last
lifetime thus believing that if you tell a story enough times
people will believe it is true. Funny though, I don't remember you
there.
Shankara instituted the shanmata method of puja-yajna (worship of Shiva,
Vishnu, Shakti,
emptybill:
This does not mean that either Shankara or SBS
were tantrika-s...
Can't help you if you won't read the texts, Bill.
Get some smarts and learn some history! MMY got
the TM bijas from SBS and he got them from SKS,
all they way back to the Adi Shankara. All the
Sringeri sannyasins
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, card cardemaister@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@ wrote:
Card
Apparently you never tire of parading Hairless Krishna
Propagandhi. I discussed this forced interpretation in
a post with you in the past.
Etymologically, Vijnana means discernment and
within Vijnanavada usage perhaps cognition.
Vijnana-matra does not mean consciousness but
mere discernment or mere cognition.
I have the Mandukya Upanishad with
Shankara's detailed commentary. Nowhere
is there a discussion of 7 states of
emptybill:
I have the Mandukya Upanishad with
Shankara's detailed commentary. Nowhere
is there a discussion of 7 states of consciousness,
much less Maharishi's 7 states. Shankara's so called
usage of Kashmiri Trika or Shri Vidya is untrue and
has long been disproven.
It has already been
Card
Apparently you never tire of parading Hairless Krishna
Propagandhi. I discussed this forced interpretation in
a post with you in the past.
Early Old-Timers?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, card cardemaister@... wrote:
[Prev][Next][Index]
Vedanta (4 of 4)
Subject: Vedanta
emptybill:
Apparently you never tire of parading Hairless Krishna
Propagandhi. I discussed this forced interpretation in
a post with you in the past.
Early Old-Timers?
It's a re-statement of the Buddhist Vijnana of Vasubandhu.
So, it's pretty well established that Advaita is a copy
of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@... wrote:
Card
Apparently you never tire of parading Hairless Krishna
Propagandhi. I discussed this forced interpretation in
a post with you in the past.
Early Old-Timers?
Well, it's kinda interesting that A.C's website has
18 matches
Mail list logo
