--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All you're trying to do is impose political correctness here
and instead you will wind up killing off this this group.
No one will come here. Who wants to read the posts of a
bunch of pansies. :D
Other pansies? :-)
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 6:41 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Rick: ANOTHER FLAMING POST (Re: New Policy and
updated guidelines)
Edg, Willytex is quoting old posts
authfriend wrote: Edg, I think you're going way overboard
about all this (not just Willytex's post but the whole thing).
Edg: Yes, I am going way over the top in tender feeling level
sensitivity, and, for me, it is a tiring and a tedious labor to lay
out in words why the use of one
Bhairitu wrote: All you're trying to do is impose political
correctness here and instead you will wind up killing off this this
group. No one will come here. Who wants to read the posts of a bunch
of pansies. :D FFL R.I.P. 2001-2007
Edg: I believe I understand your concept. We all want
Where I'm from pansy isn't considered a homosexual slur but a synonym
for wuss or someone who is weak. But I'm not against weak people
either. I know that some got my point though.
Duveyoung wrote:
And I don't think you meant to slur homosexuals, er, did you? See? I
have to ask you this,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Turq comes off as non-pansyish in his forthright
shootings-from-the-hip, but I'll bet he likes his inner babe
as much as he likes his outer bubba.
To quote (I think) Robin Williams, if I had an
inner babe I'd probably
TurquoiseB wrote: To quote (I think) Robin Williams, if I had an
inner babe I'd probably never get anything done because I'd be
playing with her breasts all day.
Edg: Turq, sorry, but I think I see your inner babe pretty clearly --
meaning you listen to your heart. I have yet to see if your
Rick,
Er, after a hundred posts from folks who seemed to agree to warn then
penalize someone for flaming, I would think that you'd have warned
Willy for his previous post. Now the one below seems to go way over
the top into very obvious flaming.
Are you going to do this warn-then-ban bit?
Edg
Edg, Willytex is quoting old posts (mostly mine)
from FFL and alt.m.t. Didn't you click on the links?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick,
Er, after a hundred posts from folks who seemed to agree to warn
then
penalize someone for flaming, I would
Judy,
I didn't go very deeply into it, because, well, Rick would know
whatever you seem to know that I don't know regarding this matter.
That and the fact that I am a sinner of this very kind of sinning and
to the same or worst degree. I didn't delineate my own conceptions
because Rick is the
All you're trying to do is impose political correctness here and instead
you will wind up killing off this this group. No one will come here.
Who wants to read the posts of a bunch of pansies. :D
FFL R.I.P. 2001-2007
Duveyoung wrote:
Judy,
I didn't go very deeply into it, because, well,
Edg, I think you're going way overboard
about all this (not just Willytex's post but the
whole thing).
If you're getting something positive out of just
writing these posts, fine; but if you're going to
be crushed if everybody doesn't fall in line with
just how you think it should go,
12 matches
Mail list logo
