--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig lengli...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
perhaps after
all MMY was just human, true it would have been nice had he
said so!!
On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:43 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig lengli...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
perhaps after
all MMY was just human, true it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
perhaps after
all MMY
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:43 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In
that was the point of the Maharishi showing up-- he was here to do
anything but continue the tired old standards of normalcy, the very
low bar that granted normalcy to anyone with a pulse. he understood
that the stressed out nervous systems of the world needed something
refreshing to attain.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
perhaps after
who needs a teacher once CC is reached? only a seeker of CC stays
with a teacher.
I had some clear CC experiences a few times. Back when I was a kid.
They are what led me to start work with the energies, and they happened
before I did TM. They showed me where to go and what to work
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:43 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig lengli...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
perhaps after
all MMY was just human, true it would have been nice had he said
so!!
He
thanks for the clarification Kirk-- i should have said, who needs a
teacher once the state of CC is permanent?...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kirk kirk_bernha...@...
wrote:
who needs a teacher once CC is reached? only a seeker of CC stays
with a teacher.
I had some
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig lengli...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
perhaps after
all MMY was just human, true it would have been nice had he
said so!!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
perhaps after
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11
no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:43 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In
-Isn't BC - Brahman Consciousness - Unity?
Oneness Temple:
http://www.experiencefestival.com/forum/photopost/showphoto.php/photo/
878
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In
BC is exploring the fullness and texture of motion found in the stillness of
CC :)
- Original Message -
From: yifuxero yifux...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 2:03 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Judy, MMY was a Potentate! (new books
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kirk kirk_bernha...@... wrote:
BC is exploring the fullness and texture of motion found in the
stillness of
CC :)
I like to put it this way; when you realize the spark of God that
exists as your own soul in its fullness, that is CC. When that
singular
---thx. Some Neo-Advaitins only wish to not exist in any relative
sense after death. Horrifying!
Here's the true form of the TMO:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090204/ap_on_sc/sci_monster_snake
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
beautifully said. absolutely accurately put. no one could say it
better than you have, even the greatest teachers. very, very well
said. thank you!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Kirk kirk_bernhardt@
wrote:
BC is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, amritasyaputra
amritasyapu...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote:
Follow the money, Billy. See if the mantra can take the bad
taste
magical elevator ride?! i think you have confused analogy with
reality...another example, no doubt, of your confused selfless
behavior.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Feb 2, 2009, at 8:26 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
there are many ways of gaining
On Feb 2, 2009, at 11:43 PM, yifuxero wrote:
--You call it epiphenomenon. I call it Celestial.
A gyulus style realization, where the body simply vanishes, like
Abhinavagupta and his 40 disciples, is the more celestial type of
realization and has been believed to have happened in both
On Feb 2, 2009, at 8:26 PM, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
there are many ways of gaining enlightenment. first off, it is not
an either/or proposition-- i see the process of gaining
enlightenment initially like a lightbulb that flashes on, and then
off, with no regular interval to its timing. an
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Judy, MMY was a Potentate! (new books on
Maharishi ???)
we all looked to
Maharishi as God. Maharishi did not; He simply stated that I am a
normal human being
Maybe you should have taken him at his word, Nabby.
I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
perhaps after
all MMY was just human, true it would have been nice had he said so!!
He did.
MMY: I'm just a normal human being
Bevan: Well today we
Judy,
You call that your normal response? What a cop out. What am I?
Chopped liver? Where's your red pencil?
It's one thing to carp about definitions, by you are totally and
mindfully changing the subject of the conversation.
Maharishi had the rights, privileges and spending power that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
Judy,
You call that your normal response? What a cop out.
What am I? Chopped liver? Where's your red pencil?
It's one thing to carp about definitions, by you are
totally and mindfully changing the subject of the
BillyG. wrote:
I don't think you understand MMY at all, I think you project your
own weaknesses onto him. You seem to have a knowledge of MMY's *inner*
life, as if he weren't the enigma me and a dozen others have thought.
Too bad, you seem to have lost your objectivity.
Billy,
Hey, haven't
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Duveyoung
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 2:01 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Judy, MMY was a Potentate! (new books on
Maharishi ???)
I think I reported here that once
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
Billy, you're a puzzle to me, cuz ya agrees with me and then ya don't.
So, point taken by you again with your noting that Maharishi got so
many to place their attentions on the inner life. That's at the top
of his Column
On Feb 2, 2009, at 2:07 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
] On Behalf Of Duveyoung
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 2:01 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Judy, MMY was a Potentate! (new books
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote:
The only thing that Maharishi lacked was a Trikke.
Edg
I suppose that sentence says it all about your level of insight, Edg.
I don't think you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
When the ultra-rich buy their yachts etc., what needs are they
fulfilling? Whatever and however you describe those needs, it will be
seen that Maharishi's lifestyle fulfilled exactly those needs for his
ego.
snip
Sorry,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wg...@... wrote:
perhaps after
all MMY was just human, true it would have been nice had he said so!!
He did.
MMY: I'm just a normal human being
Bevan: Well today we certainly got a new definition of a normal human
being
- Vlodrop, 1999
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
Hey, haven't lost a thing; if anyone here is rich with
objectionalness, it's me. Heh.
No, Billy, I don't understand MMY at all. (By the way, when I was a
hotshot gob'nor of the age of enlit, it was considered very bad to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
Judy,
When the ultra-rich buy their yachts etc., what
needs are they fulfilling?
I wasn't discussing psychological needs.
snip
On the other hand, wealthy people tend to use
their money to enrich their private lives.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
perhaps after
all MMY was just human, true it would have been nice had he said so!!
He did.
MMY: I'm just a normal human being
Bevan: Well today we
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
perhaps after
all MMY was just human, true it would have been nice had he
said so!!
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 5:43 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Judy, MMY was a Potentate! (new books on
Maharishi ???)
we all looked to
Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_re...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
perhaps after
On Feb 2, 2009, at 6:47 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
] On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 5:43 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Judy, MMY was a Potentate! (new books
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wg...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_re...@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
--- In
Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 5:43 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Judy, MMY was a Potentate! (new
books
on Maharishi ???)
we all looked to
Maharishi as God. Maharishi did not; He simply stated that I am a
normal human being
Maybe you
On Feb 2, 2009, at 7:06 PM, amritasyaputra wrote:
But Jivan-Mukta IS (or should be) a normal human being. So he was.
Shaas
Nice try.
A jivan-mukta by ANY modern standard is an extraordinary human being.
After all, they are beyond the living--but still living. Incredible.
Amma got it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 5:43 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Judy, MMY
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Judy, MMY was a Potentate! (new
books on
Maharishi ???)
we all looked to
Maharishi as God. Maharishi did not; He simply stated that I am
a
normal human being
Maybe you should have taken him at his word, Nabby.
I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Feb 2, 2009, at 7:06 PM, amritasyaputra wrote:
But Jivan-Mukta IS (or should be) a normal human being. So he was.
Shaas
Nice try.
A jivan-mukta by ANY modern standard is an extraordinary human
being.
After
What is so extraordinary about embracing totality if the universe
can be found in a grain of sand.
Totality is YOU, is I.
And that is a normal state of life
By the way, what do you mean by by ANY modern standard? Modern
means probably Kali Yuga, because that is modern since 5000 years.
Shaas
On Feb 2, 2009, at 7:34 PM, amritasyaputra wrote:
What is so extraordinary about embracing totality if the universe
can be found in a grain of sand.
Totality is YOU, is I.
And that is a normal state of life
No, not by a long shot kiddo. The universe might be found in a grain
of sand, but
dear Vaj,
If Totality is found in a grain of sand, it is found in every cell of
your body and brain, too. It is you! OK, that I don't know :-) since
you are doubting it.
But it is the Self, that's me! And if you don't know your Self, the
basis of your life... sorry but that's not normal.
Dear amritasyaputra:
On Feb 2, 2009, at 7:58 PM, amritasyaputra wrote:
dear Vaj,
If Totality is found in a grain of sand, it is found in every cell of
your body and brain, too. It is you! OK, that I don't know :-) since
you are doubting it.
But it is the Self, that's me! And if you don't
Wow! Are we loosing some of the cool-cat-ness? Maybe some hug from
Ammaji would help.
Shaas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
Dear amritasyaputra:
On Feb 2, 2009, at 7:58 PM, amritasyaputra wrote:
dear Vaj,
If Totality is found in a grain of sand, it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote:
Billy, you're a puzzle to me, cuz ya agrees with me and then ya don't.
So, point taken by you again with your noting that Maharishi got so
many to place their attentions on the inner life. That's at the top
of his Column
Yes, and the world is flat like a cake... because geezerfreak said so.
Enjoy
Shaas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfr...@...
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote:
Billy, you're a puzzle to me, cuz ya agrees with me and then ya
there are many ways of gaining enlightenment. first off, it is not
an either/or proposition-- i see the process of gaining
enlightenment initially like a lightbulb that flashes on, and then
off, with no regular interval to its timing. an experience of
enlightenment, then darkness for awile,
, February 02, 2009 5:43 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Judy, MMY was a Potentate! (new
books
on Maharishi ???)
we all looked to
Maharishi as God. Maharishi did not; He simply stated that I
am a
normal human being
Maybe you should have taken
] Re: Judy, MMY was a Potentate! (new
books
on Maharishi ???)
we all looked to
Maharishi as God. Maharishi did not; He simply stated
that I
am a
normal human being
Maybe you should have taken him at his word, Nabby.
Isn't that what Amma told you
Ya want an acid test of the movement?
Ask the kings for a complete list of all the million-dollar-course
participants, so that we can see if they all agree that the money was
well spent. Let's see how many of those dummies finally got it that
they'd been taken to the cleaners once
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfr...@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote:
Billy, you're a puzzle to me, cuz ya agrees with me and then ya don't.
So, point taken by you again with your noting that Maharishi got so
many to
There are no female Avatars in incarnation at this present moment.
- Benjamin Creme
He couldn't get Elizabeth St Clair Prophet under his thumb.
On Feb 2, 2009, at 8:13 PM, amritasyaputra wrote:
Wow! Are we loosing some of the cool-cat-ness? Maybe some hug from
Ammaji would help.
I'm always open to the embrace of Totality, what can I say?
On Feb 2, 2009, at 8:32 PM, boo_lives wrote:
Same thing - at this point most of these people have too much invested
to question the investment.
And this is the quintessential point for anyone with over-investment
with the movement. Can one really trust what the TB says after the
signs of
---Good start, but the body (DNA) is not necessarily free of Entropy.
That type of freedom would entail one getting a Rainbow Light Body,
which I assume would be basically equivalent to the Fundie Christian
concept of being Raptured...; i.e. being physically translated into
Heaven without an
i've always made a distinction between the average person on the
street, which i would call ordinary, and someone with a normally
functioning nervous system, or enlightened physiology, which i would
call normal.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, BillyG. wg...@... wrote:
--- In
On Feb 2, 2009, at 10:30 PM, yifuxero wrote:
---Good start, but the body (DNA) is not necessarily free of Entropy.
That type of freedom would entail one getting a Rainbow Light Body,
which I assume would be basically equivalent to the Fundie Christian
concept of being Raptured...; i.e. being
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
Dear amritasyaputra:
On Feb 2, 2009, at 7:58 PM, amritasyaputra wrote:
dear Vaj,
If Totality is found in a grain of sand, it is found in every
cell of
your body and brain, too. It is you! OK, that I don't know :-)
--You call it epiphenomenon. I call it Celestial.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradh...@... wrote:
On Feb 2, 2009, at 10:30 PM, yifuxero wrote:
---Good start, but the body (DNA) is not necessarily free of
Entropy.
That type of freedom would entail one getting a Rainbow
67 matches
Mail list logo