And WWII made money for these people all the way around.
Angela Mailander wrote:
Who's they is a good question, and I know for sure that I can't know what the
upper levels of the governing hierarchy are. I know for sure the Vatican was
very much involved in the creation of Hitler. And
Angela Mailander wrote:
Who's they is a good question, and I know for sure that I can't know what the
upper levels of the governing hierarchy are. I know for sure the Vatican was
very much involved in the creation of Hitler. And Wall Street was ultimately
responsible for the financing. In
Absolutely. Naomi Klein's Shock Doctrine doesn't research as far back as
that, but the mind set she discusses was alive and well in WWI as well. a
Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And WWII made
money for these people all the way around.
Angela Mailander
It was Sitchin I meant. So everything I said actually refers to Sitchin. a
hugheshugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bronte Baxter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Angela Mailander wrote:
Who's they is a good question, and I know
I'm not ascribing evil intent to anyone and shall probably never do so. a
Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 14, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Angela Mailander wrote:
I might not have time to elaborate too much this week since I've got a house
guest from China staying with
MMY's interest in Hitler may be to the point and it may not. My interest in
Hitler certainly doesn't make me a Nazi. Someone has suggested that my
interest in these things is not good for me. I'd like to know why not? Is a
historian's field of interest not good for him? Is a researcher's
Read the posts. I made zero comments about what MMY said. All that came from
others, which I noted with interest. I had no idea he ever said anything at all
about Hitler. So what, exactly, have I distorted? a
feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Interesting
how you
I have an abiding interest in the one called Hitler.
He was a great man in this earth walking.
--- feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My point is very obvious. It is you who should read
the posts. If you
didn't even know that MMY ever said anything about
Hitler, why then do
you write MMY's
I was referring to other people's post. I don't know that he had any real
interest. If he did, then that is certainly of interest and may relate to my
line of inquiry, and then again, it may not. Whence the hostile tone? a
feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My
On Oct 14, 2007, at 4:55 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You also may not be aware, Mahesh was a real Hitler fan according to
some movement insiders.
I challenge you to verify these claims. You are a f. lier !
I'll post
On Oct 14, 2007, at 5:44 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 14, 2007, at 4:55 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
You also may not be aware, Mahesh was a real Hitler fan
There is a misunderstanding that I'd like to clear up right from the start.
Hitler was not responsible for fascism. Hitler was a tool that was used. They
did a talent search for a dictator, very openly. Then, when they found their
man, they groomed him and educated him, gave him new clothes,
I might not have time to elaborate too much this week since I've got a house
guest from China staying with me. But I'll do what I can. Also, it's a big
subject that can't be dealt with in a few emails. It definitely can't be
dismissed with a facile phrase like the Nazis highjacked the New
On Oct 14, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Angela Mailander wrote:
There is a misunderstanding that I'd like to clear up right from
the start. Hitler was not responsible for fascism. Hitler was a
tool that was used. They did a talent search for a dictator, very
openly. Then, when they found their
On Oct 14, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Angela Mailander wrote:
I might not have time to elaborate too much this week since I've
got a house guest from China staying with me. But I'll do what I
can. Also, it's a big subject that can't be dealt with in a few
emails. It definitely can't be dismissed
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Angela Mailander
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2007 4:30 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Links between New Age and Naziism -- in
Fairfield?
There is a misunderstanding that I'd like
Angela Mailander wrote:
I might not have time to elaborate too much this week since I've got a house
guest from China staying with me. But I'll do what I can. Also, it's a big
subject that can't be dealt with in a few emails. It definitely can't be
dismissed with a facile phrase like the
lurkernomore20002000 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a misunderstanding that I'd like to clear up right from
the start. Hitler was not responsible for fascism. Hitler was a
tool that was used. They did a talent search for a
Who's they is a good question, and I know for sure that I can't know what the
upper levels of the governing hierarchy are. I know for sure the Vatican was
very much involved in the creation of Hitler. And Wall Street was ultimately
responsible for the financing. In 1947 Senator Homer T. Bone
19 matches
Mail list logo
