RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record

2010-06-12 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of emptybill Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 1:33 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record Turq I'm not opposed to posting limits since they have curbed

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record

2010-06-12 Thread Bhairitu
Rick Archer wrote: From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of emptybill Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 1:33 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record Turq I'm not opposed to posting

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record

2010-06-12 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bhairitu Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 2:06 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record All this talk is silly. Either keep the 50 post limit