Rick Archer wrote: > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] > On Behalf Of emptybill > Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 1:33 PM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count -- For The Record > > > Turq > > I'm not opposed to posting limits since they have curbed the over-posters on > FFL. However, having a bank of 10 unused posts would solve the problem of > going over the limit from inadvertence. > I don't have a dog in the fight on most of these contentions between people. > I also don't have likes or dislikes in who could call upon a free post. My > offer to Judy is the same for people I have had disputes with in the past - > like you or Vaj or WillyTex. > The choice doesn't have to be either/or - limit or no limit. A "10 post > bank" would solve the problem in a non-punitive way while maintaining the > present state of order. > > Yeah, but then Alex and I have to do clerical work keeping track of how many > posts people have in their "bank". > >
All this talk is silly. Either keep the 50 post limit or no limits. And how do we know that Judy wasn't planning a "vaca" and won't be back for a week anyway so didn't care. I believe she did that before.
