Guidelines File - Updated 8/25/2012
1) Posts by users of the site are not edited or scrutinized before
appearing online.
2) The forum moderators do not purport to vouch for the authenticity or
veracity of any statements within the forum.
3) All parties who feel aggrieved by any statements
on 9/15/05 3:57 PM, Patrick Gillam at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cliff unsubscribed because of friction with Judy and someone else
on 9/15/05 4:57 PM, lurkernomore20002000 at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Richard Williams declared about a week ago, that
FFL was going to be conquered, but the alt.med attitude.
Was that wishful thinking on his part? I think he's wrong.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
That would be a big mistake IMO. We should include everyone, after all
integration is the very spirit of Unity Consciousness, no?
IMO the biggest issue with this mailing list--as opposed to other mailing
lists--is that it is not private. This definitely affects certain
professionals and people in
on 9/15/05 5:15 PM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That would be a big mistake IMO. We should include everyone, after all
integration is the very spirit of Unity Consciousness, no?
IMO the biggest issue with this mailing list--as opposed to other mailing
lists--is that it is not private.
On 9/15/05 6:51 PM, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But a lot of the posters here already use
pseudonyms (including yourself). This
shouldn't be an obstacle.
If we lived in a world of honest people, but you know as well as I do that
there are people who love to out others.
You may
on 9/15/05 7:58 PM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
That's fine Jim, but do you know the tenor of alt.med. It is not
very pleasant. From my limited lurking, it seemed 80% vitriholic
(?). There