Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Sorry Judy, when you justified the politics of it, you defended it. Doesn't 
matter what else you say about it.Saying it was disgraceful is like putting 
lipstick on a pig and refusing to call it a pig.


  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 9:11 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
   
    

No, Mike, I am NOT defending the cartoon. I said it was "disgraceful." As I 
said, your reading comprehension is in the toilet.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

No Judy, my reading comprehension is just fine and you continue to defend the 
cartoon by justifying it. 

 


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 7:24 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
 
 Your reading comprehension is getting worse and worse. I didn't defend the 
cartoon, I said I understood why some might do so: because the *political* 
point was valid. The political point had nothing to do with race. If Prissy in 
GWTW and/or Condi had been white, the exact same point would have been made 
with the same cartoon without the racial aspect.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

It is a matter of hypocrisy Judy. Ollie suggested that a cartoon of Michelle 
Obama was racist  because of her body mass as opposed to Trumps former model 
wife and I countered with the hypocrisy of the left. If you didn't notice, I 
followed that sentence invoking the Times and the Post with a question mark. 
No, it wasn't published by them but was by a syndicated cartoonist that they 
frequently publish and continue to do so.Let's not play stupid Judy, you know 
exactly what the sentiment of that cartoon was meant to convey. A black woman 
sitting in a rocking chair, rocking an aluminum tube as if it were a baby with 
a play on words from a famous movie. The line, "I don't know nothing 'bout 
birthing babies", mocking a simpleton, an uneducated lazy slave, one who does 
what the massa tells her to do. 
The very fact that you can defend it, while claiming you're not, is ten times 
lower than my not knowing that neither the Times nor the Post actually 
published it even though it was one of their syndicated  cartoonists.It was all 
about hypocrisy Judy..
  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 For you to suggest the cartoon was published in the New York Times or 
Washington Post when you knew it wasn't was pretty low, Mike.
And I just got done saying myself that the accuracy of the caption wasn't 
relevant.
I don't know what "sentiment" the cartoon was intended to evoke, and neither do 
you. The political point, though, was valid, and I would guess that's why some 
defended it.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

No Judy, I didn't need a source. I remember the controversy it caused. Whether 
it was published in a news paper or not, it was defended by liberal bloggers 
and people in the media and there was more than just that one cartoon. The 
accuracy of the caption is irrelevant. It's the sentiment that it intended to 
evoke, that she was a stupid,  uneducated, black woman, still on the plantation.
WWW.iwf.org/media/2434659/IWF-Denounces-Racist-Depictions-of-Dr-Condoleezza-Rice-in-Popular-Editorial-Cartoons


   From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:28 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

(snip)
A cartoon about Michelle being big and husky?How about the one with Condolezza 
Rice crying *I don't know nuthin' 'bout birthin' tubes* while rocking ion a 
chair with a rag tied around her head as if she were a slave in Gone With The 
Wind. Was that New York Times or Washington Post?
H?
 
That disgraceful cartoon was never published in a newspaper, only on the 
cartoonist's Web site.
So much for the accuracy of your right-wing sources. (You have the caption 
wrong too, but it doesn't make any difference.)







  #yiv6907133646 #yiv6907133646 -- #yiv6907133646ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv6907133646 
#yiv6907133646ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv6907133646 
#yiv6907133646ygrp-mkp #yiv6907133646hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv6907133646 #yiv6907133646ygrp-mkp #yiv6907133646ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv6907133646 #yiv6907133646ygrp-mkp .yiv6907133646ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv6907133646 #yiv6907133646ygrp-mkp .yiv6907133646ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv6907133646 #yiv6907133646ygrp-mkp .yiv6907133646ad a 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 
No, Mike, I am NOT defending the cartoon. I said it was "disgraceful." As I 
said, your reading comprehension is in the toilet.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 No Judy, my reading comprehension is just fine and you continue to defend the 
cartoon by justifying it. 

 

 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 7:24 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
 
 
   Your reading comprehension is getting worse and worse. I didn't defend the 
cartoon, I said I understood why some might do so: because the *political* 
point was valid. The political point had nothing to do with race. If Prissy in 
GWTW and/or Condi had been white, the exact same point would have been made 
with the same cartoon without the racial aspect.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 It is a matter of hypocrisy Judy. Ollie suggested that a cartoon of Michelle 
Obama was racist  because of her body mass as opposed to Trumps former model 
wife and I countered with the hypocrisy of the left.
  If you didn't notice, I followed that sentence invoking the Times and the 
Post with a question mark. No, it wasn't published by them but was by a 
syndicated cartoonist that they frequently publish and continue to do so.
 Let's not play stupid Judy, you know exactly what the sentiment of that 
cartoon was meant to convey. A black woman sitting in a rocking chair, rocking 
an aluminum tube as if it were a baby with a play on words from a famous movie. 
The line, "I don't know nothing 'bout birthing babies", mocking a simpleton, an 
uneducated lazy slave, one who does what the massa tells her to do. 
 The very fact that you can defend it, while claiming you're not, is ten times 
lower than my not knowing that neither the Times nor the Post actually 
published it even though it was one of their syndicated  cartoonists.
 It was all about hypocrisy Judy..


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 
   For you to suggest the cartoon was published in the New York Times or 
Washington Post when you knew it wasn't was pretty low, Mike.
 

 And I just got done saying myself that the accuracy of the caption wasn't 
relevant.
 

 I don't know what "sentiment" the cartoon was intended to evoke, and neither 
do you. The political point, though, was valid, and I would guess that's why 
some defended it.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 No Judy, I didn't need a source. I remember the controversy it caused. Whether 
it was published in a news paper or not, it was defended by liberal bloggers 
and people in the media and there was more than just that one cartoon. The 
accuracy of the caption is irrelevant. It's the sentiment that it intended to 
evoke, that she was a stupid,  uneducated, black woman, still on the plantation.
 
 
WWW.iwf.org/media/2434659/IWF-Denounces-Racist-Depictions-of-Dr-Condoleezza-Rice-in-Popular-Editorial-Cartoons





 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:28 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 (snip)
 
 A cartoon about Michelle being big and husky?How about the one with Condolezza 
Rice crying *I don't know nuthin' 'bout birthin' tubes* while rocking ion a 
chair with a rag tied around her head as if she were a slave in Gone With The 
Wind. Was that New York Times or Washington Post?

H?

 
 

 That disgraceful cartoon was never published in a newspaper, only on the 
cartoonist's Web site.
 

 So much for the accuracy of your right-wing sources. (You have the caption 
wrong too, but it doesn't make any difference.)
 

 










 
















 















 


 

[FairfieldLife] California Drops Water Restrictions

[jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

It makes sense since northern California got a lot of rain from El Nino.
 

 
http://http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/in-sharp-reversal-california-suspends-water-restrictions/ar-BBtdHdk?ocid=spartandhp
 
http://http//www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/in-sharp-reversal-california-suspends-water-restrictions/ar-BBtdHdk?ocid=spartandhp
 

 

 

 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

[olliesed...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

By your definition here, I am too limited to continue this discussion. :-) 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 No Ollie, I don't expect you to have the ability to appreciate Rice's 
intellect or talents.That would be expecting an awfully lot of you. I'm 
pointing out your liberal hypocrisy on race. You referred to her as a *token*. 
Is Obama(either one) a *token*? 
 Black and liberal = highly intelligent thoughtful person that has overcome or 
is overcoming racial injustice.
 Black conservative = Stupid Uncle Tom, Step n Fetchit, servin' da white man 
and in your case a token.
 


 From: "olliesedwuz@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 8:06 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
 
 
   Excuse me? Is Rice in some exalted class, that I should not even deign to 
disparage her? Pa-leeze. I don't buy into that mind-set. She's a dummy and a 
puppet, plain and simple. No big deal to me, though she was so obviously 
unqualified, it was more than a little embarrassing to have her representing 
this country. 
 

 For example, even TRY to compare her to George Schultz, Dean Rusk, John Foster 
Dulles, Madeline Albright, John Kerry, or even Henry Kissinger, for example. 
She falls to the bottom of the list effortlessly, out of her depth, and then 
some. 
 

 Michelle Obama is a beautiful, smart, well-qualified First Lady, who has done 
nothing except bring grace and poise to The White House. No comparison at all 
to the bad hire.
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Well Ollie, you might as well say that she's a real *Aunt Jemima*. 
 BTW, what has Michelle Obama ever done that is so note worthy besides 
parroting her husband and showing off her new clothes and taking food out of 
the mouths of hungry kids?
  For you to try to judge her intelligence is like the twenty watt light bulb 
saying the hundred watt ain't so bright.
 


 From: "olliesedwuz@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 3:36 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 
   I didn't care for either cartoon. That said, Michelle Obama is miles ahead 
of Condoleeza in terms of intelligence and ability. What a failed pianist was 
doing as secretary of state is beyond me. As far as I could tell, her main gig 
was showing off all her new clothes and parroting whatever Cheney wanted her to 
say - a real doofus. Now she is back at Stanford, playing the token. Bah.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 It is a matter of hypocrisy Judy. Ollie suggested that a cartoon of Michelle 
Obama was racist  because of her body mass as opposed to Trumps former model 
wife and I countered with the hypocrisy of the left.
  If you didn't notice, I followed that sentence invoking the Times and the 
Post with a question mark. No, it wasn't published by them but was by a 
syndicated cartoonist that they frequently publish and continue to do so.
 Let's not play stupid Judy, you know exactly what the sentiment of that 
cartoon was meant to convey. A black woman sitting in a rocking chair, rocking 
an aluminum tube as if it were a baby with a play on words from a famous movie. 
The line, "I don't know nothing 'bout birthing babies", mocking a simpleton, an 
uneducated lazy slave, one who does what the massa tells her to do. 
 The very fact that you can defend it, while claiming you're not, is ten times 
lower than my not knowing that neither the Times nor the Post actually 
published it even though it was one of their syndicated  cartoonists.
 It was all about hypocrisy Judy..


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 
   For you to suggest the cartoon was published in the New York Times or 
Washington Post when you knew it wasn't was pretty low, Mike.
 

 And I just got done saying myself that the accuracy of the caption wasn't 
relevant.
 

 I don't know what "sentiment" the cartoon was intended to evoke, and neither 
do you. The political point, though, was valid, and I would guess that's why 
some defended it.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 No Judy, I didn't need a source. I remember the controversy it caused. Whether 
it was published in a news paper or not, it was defended by liberal bloggers 
and people in the media and there was more than just that one cartoon. The 
accuracy of the caption is irrelevant. It's the sentiment that it intended to 
evoke, that she was a stupid,  uneducated, black woman, still on the plantation.
 
 
WWW.iwf.org/media/2434659/IWF-Denounces-Racist-Depictions-of-Dr-Condoleezza-Rice-in-Popular-Editorial-Cartoons





 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

No Ollie, I don't expect you to have the ability to appreciate Rice's intellect 
or talents.That would be expecting an awfully lot of you. I'm pointing out your 
liberal hypocrisy on race. You referred to her as a *token*. Is Obama(either 
one) a *token*? 
Black and liberal = highly intelligent thoughtful person that has overcome or 
is overcoming racial injustice.Black conservative = Stupid Uncle Tom, Step n 
Fetchit, servin' da white man and in your case a token.

  From: "olliesed...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 8:06 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
   
    Excuse me? Is Rice in some exalted class, that I should not even deign to 
disparage her? Pa-leeze. I don't buy into that mind-set. She's a dummy and a 
puppet, plain and simple. No big deal to me, though she was so obviously 
unqualified, it was more than a little embarrassing to have her representing 
this country. 
For example, even TRY to compare her to George Schultz, Dean Rusk, John Foster 
Dulles, Madeline Albright, John Kerry, or even Henry Kissinger, for example. 
She falls to the bottom of the list effortlessly, out of her depth, and then 
some. 
Michelle Obama is a beautiful, smart, well-qualified First Lady, who has done 
nothing except bring grace and poise to The White House. No comparison at all 
to the bad hire.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Well Ollie, you might as well say that she's a real *Aunt Jemima*. 
BTW, what has Michelle Obama ever done that is so note worthy besides parroting 
her husband and showing off her new clothes and taking food out of the mouths 
of hungry kids? For you to try to judge her intelligence is like the twenty 
watt light bulb saying the hundred watt ain't so bright.

  From: "olliesedwuz@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 3:36 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
 
 I didn't care for either cartoon. That said, Michelle Obama is miles ahead of 
Condoleeza in terms of intelligence and ability. What a failed pianist was 
doing as secretary of state is beyond me. As far as I could tell, her main gig 
was showing off all her new clothes and parroting whatever Cheney wanted her to 
say - a real doofus. Now she is back at Stanford, playing the token. Bah.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

It is a matter of hypocrisy Judy. Ollie suggested that a cartoon of Michelle 
Obama was racist  because of her body mass as opposed to Trumps former model 
wife and I countered with the hypocrisy of the left. If you didn't notice, I 
followed that sentence invoking the Times and the Post with a question mark. 
No, it wasn't published by them but was by a syndicated cartoonist that they 
frequently publish and continue to do so.Let's not play stupid Judy, you know 
exactly what the sentiment of that cartoon was meant to convey. A black woman 
sitting in a rocking chair, rocking an aluminum tube as if it were a baby with 
a play on words from a famous movie. The line, "I don't know nothing 'bout 
birthing babies", mocking a simpleton, an uneducated lazy slave, one who does 
what the massa tells her to do. 
The very fact that you can defend it, while claiming you're not, is ten times 
lower than my not knowing that neither the Times nor the Post actually 
published it even though it was one of their syndicated  cartoonists.It was all 
about hypocrisy Judy..
  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 For you to suggest the cartoon was published in the New York Times or 
Washington Post when you knew it wasn't was pretty low, Mike.
And I just got done saying myself that the accuracy of the caption wasn't 
relevant.
I don't know what "sentiment" the cartoon was intended to evoke, and neither do 
you. The political point, though, was valid, and I would guess that's why some 
defended it.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

No Judy, I didn't need a source. I remember the controversy it caused. Whether 
it was published in a news paper or not, it was defended by liberal bloggers 
and people in the media and there was more than just that one cartoon. The 
accuracy of the caption is irrelevant. It's the sentiment that it intended to 
evoke, that she was a stupid,  uneducated, black woman, still on the plantation.
WWW.iwf.org/media/2434659/IWF-Denounces-Racist-Depictions-of-Dr-Condoleezza-Rice-in-Popular-Editorial-Cartoons


   From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:28 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

(snip)
A cartoon 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Change of Leadership

[dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

FW: Dear Revered Friend of Maharishi University of Management:
 I am going to retire as President of Maharishi University of Management on 
Founder's Day, September 12th, after 36 years as President.
 I will be devoting my time to my duties as Prime Minister of the Global 
Country of World Peace, and as International President of Maharishi 
Universities of Management.
 I am proposing to the Board of Trustees that Raja John Hagelin be appointed as 
President of the University. He is tops in knowledge, both in science and 
Maharishi Vedic Science, a charismatic and inspiring figure, and has proven his 
administrative and marketing skills by increasing the number of people in the 
US learning Transcendental Meditation tenfold in just a few years.
 He has agreed that he is willing to do this, and I feel sure that the Board 
will support him in this role (he is already Honorary Chairman of the Board of 
Trustees, and the University's most senior faculty member, researcher, and 
public speaker). He has expressed his admiration for the existing faculty and 
administrative teams at the University who have vast experience, and feels with 
their help he will be able to manage everything well.
 He also says he already has ideas how to promote the University more, and 
attract more students, including building a closer relationship between 
Maharishi Foundation and Maharishi University of Management, and calling upon 
the skills and contacts of Dr. Bob Roth to raise the University's profile. This 
will also include greater promotion of the unique knowledge offered by the 
faculty of the University at special conferences Raja Hagelin will organize.
 He has also mentioned his desire to be able to consult with me on any issues 
that may come up, and I of course am very happy to do that.
 We will also bring out this change in the leadership during the Commencement 
ceremony on June 18th, without taking too much time.
 I do feel strongly that this is a great step of progress for Maharishi 
University of Management, and will lead to the faster expansion we all desire.
 Raja John Hagelin and I have had a chance to discuss this with Maharaja 
Adhiraj Rajaraam to gain his perspective, and he feels this is a very good move.
 Thank you all for your kindness and loving support through all the years! You 
have done and are doing so much for Maharishi University of Management and the 
whole world!!! Please continue your support and expand it if you can!
 With Best Wishes,
 Jai Guru Dev
 Bevan
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 News this morning, 
 [
 ..a quick summary of today's letter from Bevan to the Trustees and Faculty 
(and of course many others):
  
 In his continuing role as Prime Minister of the Global Country of World Peace, 
and as International President of Maharishi Universities of Management, Bevan 
is resigning from his presidency of MUM, effective this Sept 12 (Founder's 
Day). Raja John Hagelin has accepted the position.

 

 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

[olliesed...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Excuse me? Is Rice in some exalted class, that I should not even deign to 
disparage her? Pa-leeze. I don't buy into that mind-set. She's a dummy and a 
puppet, plain and simple. No big deal to me, though she was so obviously 
unqualified, it was more than a little embarrassing to have her representing 
this country.  

 For example, even TRY to compare her to George Schultz, Dean Rusk, John Foster 
Dulles, Madeline Albright, John Kerry, or even Henry Kissinger, for example. 
She falls to the bottom of the list effortlessly, out of her depth, and then 
some. 
 

 Michelle Obama is a beautiful, smart, well-qualified First Lady, who has done 
nothing except bring grace and poise to The White House. No comparison at all 
to the bad hire.
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Well Ollie, you might as well say that she's a real *Aunt Jemima*. 
 BTW, what has Michelle Obama ever done that is so note worthy besides 
parroting her husband and showing off her new clothes and taking food out of 
the mouths of hungry kids?
  For you to try to judge her intelligence is like the twenty watt light bulb 
saying the hundred watt ain't so bright.
 


 From: "olliesedwuz@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 3:36 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
 
 
   I didn't care for either cartoon. That said, Michelle Obama is miles ahead 
of Condoleeza in terms of intelligence and ability. What a failed pianist was 
doing as secretary of state is beyond me. As far as I could tell, her main gig 
was showing off all her new clothes and parroting whatever Cheney wanted her to 
say - a real doofus. Now she is back at Stanford, playing the token. Bah.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 It is a matter of hypocrisy Judy. Ollie suggested that a cartoon of Michelle 
Obama was racist  because of her body mass as opposed to Trumps former model 
wife and I countered with the hypocrisy of the left.
  If you didn't notice, I followed that sentence invoking the Times and the 
Post with a question mark. No, it wasn't published by them but was by a 
syndicated cartoonist that they frequently publish and continue to do so.
 Let's not play stupid Judy, you know exactly what the sentiment of that 
cartoon was meant to convey. A black woman sitting in a rocking chair, rocking 
an aluminum tube as if it were a baby with a play on words from a famous movie. 
The line, "I don't know nothing 'bout birthing babies", mocking a simpleton, an 
uneducated lazy slave, one who does what the massa tells her to do. 
 The very fact that you can defend it, while claiming you're not, is ten times 
lower than my not knowing that neither the Times nor the Post actually 
published it even though it was one of their syndicated  cartoonists.
 It was all about hypocrisy Judy..


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 
   For you to suggest the cartoon was published in the New York Times or 
Washington Post when you knew it wasn't was pretty low, Mike.
 

 And I just got done saying myself that the accuracy of the caption wasn't 
relevant.
 

 I don't know what "sentiment" the cartoon was intended to evoke, and neither 
do you. The political point, though, was valid, and I would guess that's why 
some defended it.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 No Judy, I didn't need a source. I remember the controversy it caused. Whether 
it was published in a news paper or not, it was defended by liberal bloggers 
and people in the media and there was more than just that one cartoon. The 
accuracy of the caption is irrelevant. It's the sentiment that it intended to 
evoke, that she was a stupid,  uneducated, black woman, still on the plantation.
 
 
WWW.iwf.org/media/2434659/IWF-Denounces-Racist-Depictions-of-Dr-Condoleezza-Rice-in-Popular-Editorial-Cartoons





 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:28 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 (snip)
 
 A cartoon about Michelle being big and husky?How about the one with Condolezza 
Rice crying *I don't know nuthin' 'bout birthin' tubes* while rocking ion a 
chair with a rag tied around her head as if she were a slave in Gone With The 
Wind. Was that New York Times or Washington Post?

H?

 
 

 That disgraceful cartoon was never published in a newspaper, only on the 
cartoonist's Web site.
 

 So much for the accuracy of your right-wing sources. (You have the caption 
wrong too, but it doesn't make any difference.)
 

 










 
















 














 


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

No Judy, my reading comprehension is just fine and you continue to defend the 
cartoon by justifying it. 

 


  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 7:24 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
   
    Your reading comprehension is getting worse and worse. I didn't defend the 
cartoon, I said I understood why some might do so: because the *political* 
point was valid. The political point had nothing to do with race. If Prissy in 
GWTW and/or Condi had been white, the exact same point would have been made 
with the same cartoon without the racial aspect.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

It is a matter of hypocrisy Judy. Ollie suggested that a cartoon of Michelle 
Obama was racist  because of her body mass as opposed to Trumps former model 
wife and I countered with the hypocrisy of the left. If you didn't notice, I 
followed that sentence invoking the Times and the Post with a question mark. 
No, it wasn't published by them but was by a syndicated cartoonist that they 
frequently publish and continue to do so.Let's not play stupid Judy, you know 
exactly what the sentiment of that cartoon was meant to convey. A black woman 
sitting in a rocking chair, rocking an aluminum tube as if it were a baby with 
a play on words from a famous movie. The line, "I don't know nothing 'bout 
birthing babies", mocking a simpleton, an uneducated lazy slave, one who does 
what the massa tells her to do. 
The very fact that you can defend it, while claiming you're not, is ten times 
lower than my not knowing that neither the Times nor the Post actually 
published it even though it was one of their syndicated  cartoonists.It was all 
about hypocrisy Judy..
  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
 
 For you to suggest the cartoon was published in the New York Times or 
Washington Post when you knew it wasn't was pretty low, Mike.
And I just got done saying myself that the accuracy of the caption wasn't 
relevant.
I don't know what "sentiment" the cartoon was intended to evoke, and neither do 
you. The political point, though, was valid, and I would guess that's why some 
defended it.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

No Judy, I didn't need a source. I remember the controversy it caused. Whether 
it was published in a news paper or not, it was defended by liberal bloggers 
and people in the media and there was more than just that one cartoon. The 
accuracy of the caption is irrelevant. It's the sentiment that it intended to 
evoke, that she was a stupid,  uneducated, black woman, still on the plantation.
WWW.iwf.org/media/2434659/IWF-Denounces-Racist-Depictions-of-Dr-Condoleezza-Rice-in-Popular-Editorial-Cartoons


   From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:28 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

(snip)
A cartoon about Michelle being big and husky?How about the one with Condolezza 
Rice crying *I don't know nuthin' 'bout birthin' tubes* while rocking ion a 
chair with a rag tied around her head as if she were a slave in Gone With The 
Wind. Was that New York Times or Washington Post?
H?
 
That disgraceful cartoon was never published in a newspaper, only on the 
cartoonist's Web site.
So much for the accuracy of your right-wing sources. (You have the caption 
wrong too, but it doesn't make any difference.)





  #yiv4061960395 #yiv4061960395 -- #yiv4061960395ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv4061960395 
#yiv4061960395ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv4061960395 
#yiv4061960395ygrp-mkp #yiv4061960395hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv4061960395 #yiv4061960395ygrp-mkp #yiv4061960395ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv4061960395 #yiv4061960395ygrp-mkp .yiv4061960395ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv4061960395 #yiv4061960395ygrp-mkp .yiv4061960395ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv4061960395 #yiv4061960395ygrp-mkp .yiv4061960395ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4061960395 #yiv4061960395ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv4061960395ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv4061960395 
#yiv4061960395ygrp-sponsor #yiv4061960395ygrp-lc #yiv4061960395hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv4061960395 
#yiv4061960395ygrp-sponsor #yiv4061960395ygrp-lc .yiv4061960395ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv4061960395 #yiv4061960395actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv4061960395 
#yiv4061960395activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv4061960395
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Your reading comprehension is getting worse and worse. I didn't defend the 
cartoon, I said I understood why some might do so: because the *political* 
point was valid. The political point had nothing to do with race. If Prissy in 
GWTW and/or Condi had been white, the exact same point would have been made 
with the same cartoon without the racial aspect. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 It is a matter of hypocrisy Judy. Ollie suggested that a cartoon of Michelle 
Obama was racist  because of her body mass as opposed to Trumps former model 
wife and I countered with the hypocrisy of the left.
  If you didn't notice, I followed that sentence invoking the Times and the 
Post with a question mark. No, it wasn't published by them but was by a 
syndicated cartoonist that they frequently publish and continue to do so.
 Let's not play stupid Judy, you know exactly what the sentiment of that 
cartoon was meant to convey. A black woman sitting in a rocking chair, rocking 
an aluminum tube as if it were a baby with a play on words from a famous movie. 
The line, "I don't know nothing 'bout birthing babies", mocking a simpleton, an 
uneducated lazy slave, one who does what the massa tells her to do. 
 The very fact that you can defend it, while claiming you're not, is ten times 
lower than my not knowing that neither the Times nor the Post actually 
published it even though it was one of their syndicated  cartoonists.
 It was all about hypocrisy Judy..


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
 
 
   For you to suggest the cartoon was published in the New York Times or 
Washington Post when you knew it wasn't was pretty low, Mike.
 

 And I just got done saying myself that the accuracy of the caption wasn't 
relevant.
 

 I don't know what "sentiment" the cartoon was intended to evoke, and neither 
do you. The political point, though, was valid, and I would guess that's why 
some defended it.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 No Judy, I didn't need a source. I remember the controversy it caused. Whether 
it was published in a news paper or not, it was defended by liberal bloggers 
and people in the media and there was more than just that one cartoon. The 
accuracy of the caption is irrelevant. It's the sentiment that it intended to 
evoke, that she was a stupid,  uneducated, black woman, still on the plantation.
 
 
WWW.iwf.org/media/2434659/IWF-Denounces-Racist-Depictions-of-Dr-Condoleezza-Rice-in-Popular-Editorial-Cartoons





 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:28 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 (snip)
 
 A cartoon about Michelle being big and husky?How about the one with Condolezza 
Rice crying *I don't know nuthin' 'bout birthin' tubes* while rocking ion a 
chair with a rag tied around her head as if she were a slave in Gone With The 
Wind. Was that New York Times or Washington Post?

H?

 
 

 That disgraceful cartoon was never published in a newspaper, only on the 
cartoonist's Web site.
 

 So much for the accuracy of your right-wing sources. (You have the caption 
wrong too, but it doesn't make any difference.)
 

 










 
















 


 

[FairfieldLife] Post Count Thu 19-May-16 00:15:06 UTC

[FFL PostCount ffl.postco...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]]

Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): 05/14/16 00:00:00
End Date (UTC): 05/21/16 00:00:00
117 messages as of (UTC) 05/18/16 22:32:49

 27 Mike Dixon mdixon.6569
 18 awoelflebater
 13 olliesedwuz
 13 dhamiltony2k5
  8 emily.mae50
  7 jr_esq
  7 Bhairitu noozguru
  6 email4you mikemail4you
  5 hepa7
  3 'Rick Archer' rick
  2 authfriend
  2 William Leed WLeed3
  1 yifuxero
  1 wleed3 WLeed3
  1 steve.sundur
  1 s3raphita
  1 hanumanboy1
  1 Dick Mays dickmays
Posters: 18
Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times
=
Daylight Saving Time (Summer):
US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM
Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM
Standard Time (Winter):
US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM
Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM
For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Danziger's inspiration for his cartoon about Condileezza 
Ricehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hE7w7KaKbmM
Of course it wasn't racist!:)
  
|  
|   
|   
|   ||

   |

  |
|  
||  
GONE WITH THE WOMEN
 Poor Butterfly Mc Queen gets it every time.  |   |

  |

  |

 



  From: "Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 4:44 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
   
    Well Ollie, you might as well say that she's a real *Aunt Jemima*. 
BTW, what has Michelle Obama ever done that is so note worthy besides parroting 
her husband and showing off her new clothes and taking food out of the mouths 
of hungry kids? For you to try to judge her intelligence is like the twenty 
watt light bulb saying the hundred watt ain't so bright.

  From: "olliesed...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 3:36 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
  
    I didn't care for either cartoon. That said, Michelle Obama is miles ahead 
of Condoleeza in terms of intelligence and ability. What a failed pianist was 
doing as secretary of state is beyond me. As far as I could tell, her main gig 
was showing off all her new clothes and parroting whatever Cheney wanted her to 
say - a real doofus. Now she is back at Stanford, playing the token. Bah.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

It is a matter of hypocrisy Judy. Ollie suggested that a cartoon of Michelle 
Obama was racist  because of her body mass as opposed to Trumps former model 
wife and I countered with the hypocrisy of the left. If you didn't notice, I 
followed that sentence invoking the Times and the Post with a question mark. 
No, it wasn't published by them but was by a syndicated cartoonist that they 
frequently publish and continue to do so.Let's not play stupid Judy, you know 
exactly what the sentiment of that cartoon was meant to convey. A black woman 
sitting in a rocking chair, rocking an aluminum tube as if it were a baby with 
a play on words from a famous movie. The line, "I don't know nothing 'bout 
birthing babies", mocking a simpleton, an uneducated lazy slave, one who does 
what the massa tells her to do. 
The very fact that you can defend it, while claiming you're not, is ten times 
lower than my not knowing that neither the Times nor the Post actually 
published it even though it was one of their syndicated  cartoonists.It was all 
about hypocrisy Judy..
  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
 
 For you to suggest the cartoon was published in the New York Times or 
Washington Post when you knew it wasn't was pretty low, Mike.
And I just got done saying myself that the accuracy of the caption wasn't 
relevant.
I don't know what "sentiment" the cartoon was intended to evoke, and neither do 
you. The political point, though, was valid, and I would guess that's why some 
defended it.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

No Judy, I didn't need a source. I remember the controversy it caused. Whether 
it was published in a news paper or not, it was defended by liberal bloggers 
and people in the media and there was more than just that one cartoon. The 
accuracy of the caption is irrelevant. It's the sentiment that it intended to 
evoke, that she was a stupid,  uneducated, black woman, still on the plantation.
WWW.iwf.org/media/2434659/IWF-Denounces-Racist-Depictions-of-Dr-Condoleezza-Rice-in-Popular-Editorial-Cartoons


   From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:28 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

(snip)
A cartoon about Michelle being big and husky?How about the one with Condolezza 
Rice crying *I don't know nuthin' 'bout birthin' tubes* while rocking ion a 
chair with a rag tied around her head as if she were a slave in Gone With The 
Wind. Was that New York Times or Washington Post?
H?
 
That disgraceful cartoon was never published in a newspaper, only on the 
cartoonist's Web site.
So much for the accuracy of your right-wing sources. (You have the caption 
wrong too, but it doesn't make any difference.)





  

 #yiv7972876740 #yiv7972876740 -- #yiv7972876740ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv7972876740 
#yiv7972876740ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv7972876740 
#yiv7972876740ygrp-mkp #yiv7972876740hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv7972876740 #yiv7972876740ygrp-mkp #yiv7972876740ads 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Well Ollie, you might as well say that she's a real *Aunt Jemima*. 
BTW, what has Michelle Obama ever done that is so note worthy besides parroting 
her husband and showing off her new clothes and taking food out of the mouths 
of hungry kids? For you to try to judge her intelligence is like the twenty 
watt light bulb saying the hundred watt ain't so bright.

  From: "olliesed...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 3:36 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
   
    I didn't care for either cartoon. That said, Michelle Obama is miles ahead 
of Condoleeza in terms of intelligence and ability. What a failed pianist was 
doing as secretary of state is beyond me. As far as I could tell, her main gig 
was showing off all her new clothes and parroting whatever Cheney wanted her to 
say - a real doofus. Now she is back at Stanford, playing the token. Bah.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

It is a matter of hypocrisy Judy. Ollie suggested that a cartoon of Michelle 
Obama was racist  because of her body mass as opposed to Trumps former model 
wife and I countered with the hypocrisy of the left. If you didn't notice, I 
followed that sentence invoking the Times and the Post with a question mark. 
No, it wasn't published by them but was by a syndicated cartoonist that they 
frequently publish and continue to do so.Let's not play stupid Judy, you know 
exactly what the sentiment of that cartoon was meant to convey. A black woman 
sitting in a rocking chair, rocking an aluminum tube as if it were a baby with 
a play on words from a famous movie. The line, "I don't know nothing 'bout 
birthing babies", mocking a simpleton, an uneducated lazy slave, one who does 
what the massa tells her to do. 
The very fact that you can defend it, while claiming you're not, is ten times 
lower than my not knowing that neither the Times nor the Post actually 
published it even though it was one of their syndicated  cartoonists.It was all 
about hypocrisy Judy..
  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
 
 For you to suggest the cartoon was published in the New York Times or 
Washington Post when you knew it wasn't was pretty low, Mike.
And I just got done saying myself that the accuracy of the caption wasn't 
relevant.
I don't know what "sentiment" the cartoon was intended to evoke, and neither do 
you. The political point, though, was valid, and I would guess that's why some 
defended it.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

No Judy, I didn't need a source. I remember the controversy it caused. Whether 
it was published in a news paper or not, it was defended by liberal bloggers 
and people in the media and there was more than just that one cartoon. The 
accuracy of the caption is irrelevant. It's the sentiment that it intended to 
evoke, that she was a stupid,  uneducated, black woman, still on the plantation.
WWW.iwf.org/media/2434659/IWF-Denounces-Racist-Depictions-of-Dr-Condoleezza-Rice-in-Popular-Editorial-Cartoons


   From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:28 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

(snip)
A cartoon about Michelle being big and husky?How about the one with Condolezza 
Rice crying *I don't know nuthin' 'bout birthin' tubes* while rocking ion a 
chair with a rag tied around her head as if she were a slave in Gone With The 
Wind. Was that New York Times or Washington Post?
H?
 
That disgraceful cartoon was never published in a newspaper, only on the 
cartoonist's Web site.
So much for the accuracy of your right-wing sources. (You have the caption 
wrong too, but it doesn't make any difference.)





  #yiv6125831602 #yiv6125831602 -- #yiv6125831602ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv6125831602 
#yiv6125831602ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv6125831602 
#yiv6125831602ygrp-mkp #yiv6125831602hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv6125831602 #yiv6125831602ygrp-mkp #yiv6125831602ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv6125831602 #yiv6125831602ygrp-mkp .yiv6125831602ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv6125831602 #yiv6125831602ygrp-mkp .yiv6125831602ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv6125831602 #yiv6125831602ygrp-mkp .yiv6125831602ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv6125831602 #yiv6125831602ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv6125831602ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv6125831602 
#yiv6125831602ygrp-sponsor #yiv6125831602ygrp-lc #yiv6125831602hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv6125831602 
#yiv6125831602ygrp-sponsor #yiv6125831602ygrp-lc 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

[olliesed...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

I didn't care for either cartoon. That said, Michelle Obama is miles ahead of 
Condoleeza in terms of intelligence and ability. What a failed pianist was 
doing as secretary of state is beyond me. As far as I could tell, her main gig 
was showing off all her new clothes and parroting whatever Cheney wanted her to 
say - a real doofus. Now she is back at Stanford, playing the token. Bah. 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 It is a matter of hypocrisy Judy. Ollie suggested that a cartoon of Michelle 
Obama was racist  because of her body mass as opposed to Trumps former model 
wife and I countered with the hypocrisy of the left.
  If you didn't notice, I followed that sentence invoking the Times and the 
Post with a question mark. No, it wasn't published by them but was by a 
syndicated cartoonist that they frequently publish and continue to do so.
 Let's not play stupid Judy, you know exactly what the sentiment of that 
cartoon was meant to convey. A black woman sitting in a rocking chair, rocking 
an aluminum tube as if it were a baby with a play on words from a famous movie. 
The line, "I don't know nothing 'bout birthing babies", mocking a simpleton, an 
uneducated lazy slave, one who does what the massa tells her to do. 
 The very fact that you can defend it, while claiming you're not, is ten times 
lower than my not knowing that neither the Times nor the Post actually 
published it even though it was one of their syndicated  cartoonists.
 It was all about hypocrisy Judy..


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
 
 
   For you to suggest the cartoon was published in the New York Times or 
Washington Post when you knew it wasn't was pretty low, Mike.
 

 And I just got done saying myself that the accuracy of the caption wasn't 
relevant.
 

 I don't know what "sentiment" the cartoon was intended to evoke, and neither 
do you. The political point, though, was valid, and I would guess that's why 
some defended it.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 No Judy, I didn't need a source. I remember the controversy it caused. Whether 
it was published in a news paper or not, it was defended by liberal bloggers 
and people in the media and there was more than just that one cartoon. The 
accuracy of the caption is irrelevant. It's the sentiment that it intended to 
evoke, that she was a stupid,  uneducated, black woman, still on the plantation.
 
 
WWW.iwf.org/media/2434659/IWF-Denounces-Racist-Depictions-of-Dr-Condoleezza-Rice-in-Popular-Editorial-Cartoons





 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:28 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 (snip)
 
 A cartoon about Michelle being big and husky?How about the one with Condolezza 
Rice crying *I don't know nuthin' 'bout birthin' tubes* while rocking ion a 
chair with a rag tied around her head as if she were a slave in Gone With The 
Wind. Was that New York Times or Washington Post?

H?

 
 

 That disgraceful cartoon was never published in a newspaper, only on the 
cartoonist's Web site.
 

 So much for the accuracy of your right-wing sources. (You have the caption 
wrong too, but it doesn't make any difference.)
 

 










 
















 


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

It is a matter of hypocrisy Judy. Ollie suggested that a cartoon of Michelle 
Obama was racist  because of her body mass as opposed to Trumps former model 
wife and I countered with the hypocrisy of the left. If you didn't notice, I 
followed that sentence invoking the Times and the Post with a question mark. 
No, it wasn't published by them but was by a syndicated cartoonist that they 
frequently publish and continue to do so.Let's not play stupid Judy, you know 
exactly what the sentiment of that cartoon was meant to convey. A black woman 
sitting in a rocking chair, rocking an aluminum tube as if it were a baby with 
a play on words from a famous movie. The line, "I don't know nothing 'bout 
birthing babies", mocking a simpleton, an uneducated lazy slave, one who does 
what the massa tells her to do. 
The very fact that you can defend it, while claiming you're not, is ten times 
lower than my not knowing that neither the Times nor the Post actually 
published it even though it was one of their syndicated  cartoonists.It was all 
about hypocrisy Judy..
  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 11:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation
   
    For you to suggest the cartoon was published in the New York Times or 
Washington Post when you knew it wasn't was pretty low, Mike.
And I just got done saying myself that the accuracy of the caption wasn't 
relevant.
I don't know what "sentiment" the cartoon was intended to evoke, and neither do 
you. The political point, though, was valid, and I would guess that's why some 
defended it.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

No Judy, I didn't need a source. I remember the controversy it caused. Whether 
it was published in a news paper or not, it was defended by liberal bloggers 
and people in the media and there was more than just that one cartoon. The 
accuracy of the caption is irrelevant. It's the sentiment that it intended to 
evoke, that she was a stupid,  uneducated, black woman, still on the plantation.
WWW.iwf.org/media/2434659/IWF-Denounces-Racist-Depictions-of-Dr-Condoleezza-Rice-in-Popular-Editorial-Cartoons


   From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:28 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

(snip)
A cartoon about Michelle being big and husky?How about the one with Condolezza 
Rice crying *I don't know nuthin' 'bout birthin' tubes* while rocking ion a 
chair with a rag tied around her head as if she were a slave in Gone With The 
Wind. Was that New York Times or Washington Post?
H?
 
That disgraceful cartoon was never published in a newspaper, only on the 
cartoonist's Web site.
So much for the accuracy of your right-wing sources. (You have the caption 
wrong too, but it doesn't make any difference.)



  #yiv6149725845 #yiv6149725845 -- #yiv6149725845ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv6149725845 
#yiv6149725845ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv6149725845 
#yiv6149725845ygrp-mkp #yiv6149725845hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv6149725845 #yiv6149725845ygrp-mkp #yiv6149725845ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv6149725845 #yiv6149725845ygrp-mkp .yiv6149725845ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv6149725845 #yiv6149725845ygrp-mkp .yiv6149725845ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv6149725845 #yiv6149725845ygrp-mkp .yiv6149725845ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv6149725845 #yiv6149725845ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv6149725845ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv6149725845 
#yiv6149725845ygrp-sponsor #yiv6149725845ygrp-lc #yiv6149725845hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv6149725845 
#yiv6149725845ygrp-sponsor #yiv6149725845ygrp-lc .yiv6149725845ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv6149725845 #yiv6149725845actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv6149725845 
#yiv6149725845activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv6149725845
 #yiv6149725845activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv6149725845 
#yiv6149725845activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv6149725845 #yiv6149725845activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv6149725845 #yiv6149725845activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv6149725845 #yiv6149725845activity span 
.yiv6149725845underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv6149725845 
.yiv6149725845attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv6149725845 .yiv6149725845attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv6149725845 .yiv6149725845attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv6149725845 .yiv6149725845attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv6149725845 

[FairfieldLife] Change of Leadership

[dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

News this morning, 
 [
 ..a quick summary of today's letter from Bevan to the Trustees and Faculty 
(and of course many others):
  
 In his continuing role as Prime Minister of the Global Country of World Peace, 
and as International President of Maharishi Universities of Management, Bevan 
is resigning from his presidency of MUM, effective this Sept 12 (Founder's 
Day). Raja John Hagelin has accepted the position.

 

 

[FairfieldLife] Re: For Anyone Who Cares

[emily.ma...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Yes, certainly more well-rounded in personality!  I am generally ignorant about 
Hinduism.  This is entertaining and informative.  
 

 Rakshasa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rakshasa 
 
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rakshasa 
 
 Rakshasa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rakshasa A Rakshasa (Sanskrit: rākṣasa) is a 
demonic being from Hindu mythology. As mythology made its way into other 
religions, the rakshasa was later incorp...
 
 
 
 View on en.wikipedia.org https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rakshasa 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The amount of time and energy Drumpf has spent extolling himself for his 
"richness" and inflating his financial truth to a point of extreme absurdity is 
certainly one of a host of reasons he can't and won't release his tax returns.  
 

 Notice the expression on his face?  He's peddling his "presidential" face now. 
Lol.  
 

 He is so phony through and through that it astounds me over and over how many 
people have bought into him as "anti-establishment" and "real." 
 

 The con continues.  If there is a "rakshasa" in this race, it would be Drumpf. 
 
 

 Yes and no. Drumpf isn't interesting enough to be a rakshasha. Drumpf is 
repetitive, boring and annoying. Real evil would be fascinating, arresting and 
captivating.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/just-how-rich-is-donald-trump?mbid=gnepintcid=gnepgoogle_editors_picks=true
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/just-how-rich-is-donald-trump?mbid=gnepintcid=gnepgoogle_editors_picks=true







  

Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

For you to suggest the cartoon was published in the New York Times or 
Washington Post when you knew it wasn't was pretty low, Mike. 

 And I just got done saying myself that the accuracy of the caption wasn't 
relevant.
 

 I don't know what "sentiment" the cartoon was intended to evoke, and neither 
do you. The political point, though, was valid, and I would guess that's why 
some defended it.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 No Judy, I didn't need a source. I remember the controversy it caused. Whether 
it was published in a news paper or not, it was defended by liberal bloggers 
and people in the media and there was more than just that one cartoon. The 
accuracy of the caption is irrelevant. It's the sentiment that it intended to 
evoke, that she was a stupid,  uneducated, black woman, still on the plantation.
 
 
WWW.iwf.org/media/2434659/IWF-Denounces-Racist-Depictions-of-Dr-Condoleezza-Rice-in-Popular-Editorial-Cartoons





 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 5:28 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consolation

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 (snip)
 
 A cartoon about Michelle being big and husky?How about the one with Condolezza 
Rice crying *I don't know nuthin' 'bout birthin' tubes* while rocking ion a 
chair with a rag tied around her head as if she were a slave in Gone With The 
Wind. Was that New York Times or Washington Post?

H?

 
 

 That disgraceful cartoon was never published in a newspaper, only on the 
cartoonist's Web site.
 

 So much for the accuracy of your right-wing sources. (You have the caption 
wrong too, but it doesn't make any difference.)
 

 










 


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Bevan retiring

[olliesed...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

um...was it something I said?? :-) Great news. Thanks for doing the right thing 
Mr. Morris.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Dear Members of the Faculty:

I am going to retire as President of Maharishi University of Management on 
Founder’s Day, September 12th, after 36 years as President.

I will be devoting my time to my duties as Prime Minister of the Global Country 
of World Peace, and as International President of Maharishi Universities of 
Management.

I am proposing to the Board of Trustees that Raja John Hagelin be appointed as 
President of the University. He is tops in knowledge, both in science and 
Maharishi Vedic Science, a charismatic and inspiring figure, and has proven his 
administrative and marketing skills by increasing the number of people in the 
US learning Transcendental Meditation tenfold in just a few years… not to 
mention his leadership of the Dr. David Lynch Foundation!

He has agreed that he is willing to do this, and I feel sure that the Board 
will support him in this role (he is already Honorary Chairman of the Board of 
Trustees, and the University’s most senior faculty member, researcher, and 
public speaker). He has expressed his admiration for the existing faculty and 
administrative teams at the University who have vast experience, and feels with 
their help he will be able to manage everything well.

He also says he already has ideas how to promote the University more, and 
attract more students, including building a closer relationship between 
Maharishi Foundation and Maharishi University of Management, and calling upon 
the skills and contacts of Dr. Bob Roth to raise the University’s profile. This 
will also include greater promotion of the unique knowledge offered by the 
faculty of the University at special conferences Raja Hagelin will organize.

He has also mentioned his desire to be able to consult with me on any issues 
that may come up, and I of course am very happy to do that.

We will also bring out this change in the leadership during the Commencement 
ceremony on June 18th, without taking too much time.

I do feel strongly that this is a great step of progress for Maharishi 
University of Management, and will lead to the faster expansion we all desire.

Raja John Hagelin and I have had a chance to discuss this with Maharaja Adhiraj 
Rajaraam to gain his perspective, and he feels this is a very good move.

Thank you all for your kindness and loving support through all the years! You 
are the greatest intellectuals of this age,, and the gifts you give to the 
future leaders of the world and to the world as a whole are beyond measure. I 
appreciate you so much.

With Best Wishes

Jai Guru Dev

Bevan
  

[FairfieldLife] Bevan retiring

['Rick Archer' r...@searchsummit.com [FairfieldLife]]

Dear Members of the Faculty:

I am going to retire as President of Maharishi University of Management on 
Founder’s Day, September 12th, after 36 years as President.

I will be devoting my time to my duties as Prime Minister of the Global Country 
of World Peace, and as International President of Maharishi Universities of 
Management.

I am proposing to the Board of Trustees that Raja John Hagelin be appointed as 
President of the University. He is tops in knowledge, both in science and 
Maharishi Vedic Science, a charismatic and inspiring figure, and has proven his 
administrative and marketing skills by increasing the number of people in the 
US learning Transcendental Meditation tenfold in just a few years… not to 
mention his leadership of the Dr. David Lynch Foundation!

He has agreed that he is willing to do this, and I feel sure that the Board 
will support him in this role (he is already Honorary Chairman of the Board of 
Trustees, and the University’s most senior faculty member, researcher, and 
public speaker). He has expressed his admiration for the existing faculty and 
administrative teams at the University who have vast experience, and feels with 
their help he will be able to manage everything well.

He also says he already has ideas how to promote the University more, and 
attract more students, including building a closer relationship between 
Maharishi Foundation and Maharishi University of Management, and calling upon 
the skills and contacts of Dr. Bob Roth to raise the University’s profile. This 
will also include greater promotion of the unique knowledge offered by the 
faculty of the University at special conferences Raja Hagelin will organize.

He has also mentioned his desire to be able to consult with me on any issues 
that may come up, and I of course am very happy to do that.

We will also bring out this change in the leadership during the Commencement 
ceremony on June 18th, without taking too much time.

I do feel strongly that this is a great step of progress for Maharishi 
University of Management, and will lead to the faster expansion we all desire.

Raja John Hagelin and I have had a chance to discuss this with Maharaja Adhiraj 
Rajaraam to gain his perspective, and he feels this is a very good move.

Thank you all for your kindness and loving support through all the years! You 
are the greatest intellectuals of this age,, and the gifts you give to the 
future leaders of the world and to the world as a whole are beyond measure. I 
appreciate you so much.

With Best Wishes

Jai Guru Dev

Bevan

 

[FairfieldLife] Re: For Anyone Who Cares

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The amount of time and energy Drumpf has spent extolling himself for his 
"richness" and inflating his financial truth to a point of extreme absurdity is 
certainly one of a host of reasons he can't and won't release his tax returns.  
 

 Notice the expression on his face?  He's peddling his "presidential" face now. 
Lol.  
 

 He is so phony through and through that it astounds me over and over how many 
people have bought into him as "anti-establishment" and "real." 
 

 The con continues.  If there is a "rakshasa" in this race, it would be Drumpf. 
 
 

 Yes and no. Drumpf isn't interesting enough to be a rakshasha. Drumpf is 
repetitive, boring and annoying. Real evil would be fascinating, arresting and 
captivating.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/just-how-rich-is-donald-trump?mbid=gnepintcid=gnepgoogle_editors_picks=true
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/just-how-rich-is-donald-trump?mbid=gnepintcid=gnepgoogle_editors_picks=true

[FairfieldLife] Re: For Anyone Who Cares

[emily.ma...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

The amount of time and energy Drumpf has spent extolling himself for his 
"richness" and inflating his financial truth to a point of extreme absurdity is 
certainly one of a host of reasons he can't and won't release his tax returns.  
 

 Notice the expression on his face?  He's peddling his "presidential" face now. 
Lol.  
 

 He is so phony through and through that it astounds me over and over how many 
people have bought into him as "anti-establishment" and "real." 
 

 The con continues.  If there is a "rakshasa" in this race, it would be Drumpf. 
 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/just-how-rich-is-donald-trump?mbid=gnepintcid=gnepgoogle_editors_picks=true
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/just-how-rich-is-donald-trump?mbid=gnepintcid=gnepgoogle_editors_picks=true

[FairfieldLife] Trump, Hillary or Sanders: Seven reasons why our next president should meditate

[email4you mikemail4...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

1. Slow down the mind. Hillary Clinton is on record saying she meditates to 
slow things down and cool the mind.  A recent survey that my colleagues and I 
conducted on over 600 Transcendental Meditation (TM) practitioners supports 
this benefit.  Most respondents (92%) said that, since starting to meditate, 
they felt a sense of stillness in the presence of activity.  Here’s how storied 
hedge fund owner Ray Dalio, a decades-long TM practitioner, describes how this 
benefits his negotiations:
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/05/17/trump-hillary-or-sanders-seven-reasons-why-our-next-president-should-meditate.html
 **  ~~  e n j o y 
~~~   
*

[FairfieldLife] For Anyone Who Cares

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/just-how-rich-is-donald-trump?mbid=gnepintcid=gnepgoogle_editors_picks=true
 
http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/just-how-rich-is-donald-trump?mbid=gnepintcid=gnepgoogle_editors_picks=true