I hate to admit it, but they're not bad, IMHO. He has a good eye, if not a
brilliant technique.
Interestingly, what seems to me to be the least successful portrait in this
series is the one of his father, which barely even resembles him.
The best one, I think, is of Blair. It reveals
Sez Barry, making his first mistakes for today because he was so eager to take
another shot that he didn't bother to read what Buck wrote: That doesn't mean
much of the 'deadwood' isn't not loyal and many go to assemblies etc. IOW, the
deadwood were NOT all people who came to their senses and
BTW, here's the transcript of the tape:
http://minet.org/www.trancenet.net/secrets/soma/soma2.shtml
http://minet.org/www.trancenet.net/secrets/soma/soma2.shtml
Answering my own question below: It's definitely the Trancenet writer's image,
not Maharishi's, as you'll see if you read the
and ten or twenty non lethal
shootings in addition.
On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 5:10 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
This is a bit misleading, Mike. Rates of aggravated assault and rape
decreased significantly from what would have been expected over the period of
the study. Robberies
it.
On Thu, 4/3/14, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... authfriend@...
mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Research Shows Group Meditation Can Reduce Crime
Rates
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, April 3
Actually, as I recall, they were planning to do some studies to see whether
soma could be detected. Whether they ever did them, with no result, or called
them off, I don't know.
You are hilarious! I recall someone on the sidhi preps asked something like
that - a nurse I think she was and the
Actually, they wouldn't have to do endoscopies on hundreds of sidhas. Why
would you need that many? Remember, what they'd be looking for is an unfamiliar
substance never before documented to exist in the human stomach. All you'd need
would be a few samples of the substance. Then you'd have to
, April 3, 2014 9:56 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
Actually, they wouldn't have to do endoscopies on hundreds of sidhas. Why
would you need that many? Remember, what they'd be looking for is an unfamiliar
substance never before documented to exist in the human stomach. All you'd need
want to fall back on the old TM standby of It was a bit of
unstressing then you have to accept that the rapes and murders that did happen
wouldn't have happened if the TMO weren't there. I dub it BS until there is
Heaven on Earth.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote
You mean, anyone who has read the Ninth Mandala in the translation TM uses will
know that's how the Ninth Mandala in that translation describes soma. But they
won't necessarily know to what degree that description is
symbolic/poetic/metaphorical rather than literal, or even whether the original
). If you want to fall back on the old TM standby of It was a bit of
unstressing then you have to accept that the rapes and murders that did happen
wouldn't have happened if the TMO weren't there. I dub it BS until there is
Heaven on Earth.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
Bit of a problem responding intelligently, eh, Salyavin?
Are you for real?
You mean, anyone who has read the Ninth Mandala in the translation TM uses
will know that's how the Ninth Mandala in that translation describes soma. But
they won't necessarily know to what degree that
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHTVWtx2rooamp;amp;feature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHTVWtx2rooamp;amp;feature=youtu.be
(The composer, Matthew Schickele, is the son of Peter Schickele, a.k.a. P.D.Q.
Bach http://www.schickele.com/. The lyrics have been fact-checked by two
This is an outstanding example of Barry's asserting something he doesn't
actually believe.
Or at least you have to hope that's what it is, because if he really does
believe it, he's in far worse mental shape than even I thought.
The obvious problem with his thesis is that while oxytocin
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Barry is incoherent with rage, positively incandescent with it, at having
fucked up and gotten caught so many times yesterday. Every time he got his nose
rubbed in one of his humiliating booboos, he'd be so beside himself with fury,
he'd almost immediately make another
on the planet is fully developed.
For me, in the context of FFL, I find that I guess about how developed someone
is by the TONE of MOST of their posts.
On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 2:49 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
No, it doesn't. Did you not read the Wikipedia article I linked
don't think anybody on the planet is fully developed.
For me, in the context of FFL, I find that I guess about how developed someone
is by the TONE of MOST of their posts.
On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 2:49 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
No, it doesn't. Did you not read
Of course it isn't hypocritical, since, as Barry knows, she'd gotten over her
anger at Robin long before she ever showed up here 25 years later.
Looks like Barry's still in a state of serious mental disarray and is likely
to make at least as many nitwit mistakes today as he did yesterday.
that I guess about how developed someone
is by the TONE of MOST of their posts.
On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 2:49 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
No, it doesn't. Did you not read the Wikipedia article I linked to?
But my question stands even if we use your definition: Are you
. Your
grasp of semantics is very poor, which is why you always try to cover
up your mistakes by obfuscating rather than clarifying them.
The Corrector has spoken.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:36 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
You didn't understand the implications
Do you think maybe you could limit these posts to, say, five a day?
457 with a population with more than 1,ooo,ooo, so you have something to look
forward to :-)
I meant cities. Oh dear
196, and thanks to the Blessings of the Masters of Wisdom all are enjoying
rising happiness.
I don't have a link, but I read a couple of days ago that the Yellowstone
geologists have said the swarms almost certainly do not presage a volcanic
eruption.
(I know, I know, it's a conspiracy to keep the truth from us so we won't try
to flee and will just die.)
Okay then, is the Ring of
It's not grumpy, it's just a request.
Don't be so grumpy :-)
Do you think maybe you could limit these posts to, say, five a day?
457 with a population with more than 1,ooo,ooo, so you have something to look
forward to :-)
I meant cities. Oh dear
196, and thanks to the
This is a bit misleading, Mike. Rates of aggravated assault and rape decreased
significantly from what would have been expected over the period of the study.
Robberies stayed about the same. And the homicide rate (around 10 per week)
over the eight weeks of the study was also about the same as
.
For me, in the context of FFL, I find that I guess about how developed someone
is by the TONE of MOST of their posts.
On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 2:49 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
No, it doesn't. Did you not read the Wikipedia article I linked to?
But my question stands even
of FFL, I find that I guess about how developed someone
is by the TONE of MOST of their posts.
On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 2:49 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
No, it doesn't. Did you not read the Wikipedia article I linked to?
But my question stands even if we use your
developed.
For me, in the context of FFL, I find that I guess about how developed someone
is by the TONE of MOST of their posts.
On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 2:49 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
No, it doesn't. Did you not read the Wikipedia article I linked to?
But my
The unforgettable image of ravening Gods jostling each other to feed at the
stomachs of TMers around the world to get their share of the mythical Soma--is
this Maharishi's image, or the image of the guy who wrote this essay, Michael?
(I've read the transcript of this tape, by the way, so don't
the details but that it was a national concern at the
time on all the national news programs. It sure seems that there were more than
just ten homicides. Might have been ten homicides and ten or twenty non lethal
shootings in addition.
On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 5:10 PM, authfriend
Share, do you know what apologist means?
Steve, since you asked me what I think (-: I think we all have apologist
tendencies to some degree. Meaning that we all have parts of our brain that are
still developing and maturing, are not yet fully developed.
Because you seem to be saying here
I've never seen any statistics compariing the rate of suicides or attempted
suicides among TMers with the rate in the general population, have you,
Michael? For all we know, rates may be the same; or there might even be a lower
rate among TMers. In any case, without some intensive study, we
based on HER
behavior?
From: authfriend@... authfriend@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Self Course Fairfield
Barry's insulting caricatures of the people here he doesn't like (his
critics) are not, in fact, even
worth based on HER
behavior?
From: authfriend@... authfriend@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Self Course Fairfield
Barry's insulting caricatures of the people here he doesn't like (his
critics
Barry seems to be fantasizing that Lawson is a continuous presence on FFL, when
in fact he only drops in once in a while for relatively short visits. As to
starting discussions elsewhere and then inviting FFLers to participate, he's
done that exactly twice that I can recall.
As to whether
I may (or may not) get to the rest of this post of Barry's later, but I just
can't resist highlighting this bit, because it gave me such a belly laugh:
What have her *accomplishments* been in those 70+ years? It seems to me, based
on what she has posted here and on other forums, that they
BARRY IS A LIAR. He knows none of this is true. His rage is truly out of
control today.
Ann's just a born stalker. She stalked Robin to FFL after what...20 years of
NOT getting over him. And now she'll continue to stalk anyone else who blows
her off and refuses to interact with her. It's
mentality to me. Please spin it a different
way...if you can...
As for rage, I shall allow lurkers to decide who sounds more enraged -- you
and Ann, or moi... :-)
From: authfriend@... authfriend@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 8:12 PM
Subject: Re
almost always try to insist that the person saying
things about them that don't fit their inner image is lying, because that's
easier for their fragile egos to accept than accepting the fact that this is
how someone actually sees them...
From: authfriend@... authfriend@...
To: FairfieldLife
Well said. It's also black-and-white thinking to accuse anyone who says
anything less than 100 percent negative about the TMO/MMY of being a cult
apologist.
Ironically, Barry and Michael are guilty of this sort of thinking more than
are most of the TMers on FFL.
To say that “black and
7:13 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
Share, do you know what apologist means?
Steve, since you asked me what I think (-: I think we all have apologist
tendencies to some degree. Meaning that we all have parts of our brain that are
still developing and maturing, are not yet fully
on HER
behavior?
From: authfriend@... authfriend@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Self Course Fairfield
Barry's insulting caricatures of the people here he doesn't like (his
critics) are not, in fact, even
Er, Michael, more likely the New Age got It's all the Self from TM. The Self
has always been a TM thing. It's what you're said to experience when you
transcend, remember? Boy, you are really out in left field here.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote :
Oh my God! Its
No kidding. Let's see if he can acknowledge his error. (He probably didn't even
look at the Web site to see what it was all about.)
The MJ-fellow seems to have forgotten what Maharishi's central theme was from
day 1 :-)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote :
Judy.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
authfriend@...
wrote :
Er, Michael,
more likely the New Age got It's all the
Self from TM. The Self has always been a TM thing.
It's what you're said to experience when you
transcend, remember? Boy, you
!
On Monday, March 31, 2014 9:23 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote:
On 3/30/2014 4:19 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Still at it...snicker
Apparently Judy has never seen an episode of Dr. Who - if she had, she would
know that Dr. Who is constantly running
, March 31, 2014 9:44 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
Hey, Share, why don't you just make up some stuff out of thin air and
pretend you're actually saying something meaningful? I guess that's the only
way you can convince yourself you look smart.
(BTW, apparently you aren't aware
Barry, your insults would be ever so much better if they were at all connected
to reality. You've become so out of it you can't even come up with a meaningful
insult, just as Share can't.
(Love the way you're into citing your own posts over and over these days as if
they were Received
What's wrong with you, Michael? Maharishi is all over that Web site.
Come on Steve, be real - you know damn good and well they are distancing
themselves from the Hindu roots and from Maharishi himself - if you can't see
how disingenuous that is then you are a truly sheared TM sheep.
Barry's insulting caricatures of the people here he doesn't like (his critics)
are not, in fact, even remotely accurate. Nor, BTW, does the practice of TM
have anything whatsoever to do with what he doesn't like about us (our
propensity to criticize him).
Haven't you ever noticed that he has
too.
On Sunday, March 30, 2014 9:35 AM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote:
On 3/29/2014 9:30 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
See what I mean?
No. What do you mean? In the TV show Dr.Who, the TARDIS is quite often tardy.
Go figure.
Origin of TARDY
As you know, Richard--because you quoted Barry's post saying so--according to
Barry, he saw Lenz levitate in many different situations, not just lecture
halls or places where he might have had help staging an illusion. It's fine to
make Barry look foolish by questioning what it was that Barry
What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding
acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel SMART
to mislead, to be disingenuous, to twist words, to obfuscate, even to lie
outright. What she doesn't realize is that she's not very good at it, so
to understand your opinion, Judy?! And even if we do,
what then?!
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:28 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding
acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel SMART
Why do we all need to understand your opinion, Judy?! And even if we do,
what then?!
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:28 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding
acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys
need to understand your opinion, Judy?! And even if we do,
what then?!
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 10:28 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
What we all need to understand about Share is that for her, avoiding
acknowledging reality is a WIN; that's what she enjoys. It makes her feel
, March 29, 2014 10:55 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
We know better how to deal with you when we know what drives you. We don't
expect you to behave like a normal person who doesn't stand on their head to
avoid reality, who doesn't think it's fun to mislead and obfuscate
No, it doesn't, and furthermore, you know it doesn't. More dishonesty. Keep at
it, Share. The more you say, the more you prove what I said about you.
Ok, thanks turq and Mr. Twain. Judy does claim to be an editor so I guess that
explains her continual use of we when posting on FFL.
On
Translation: No, Emily, I can't. But I'll pretend I can, because that's how I
do things.
Emily, Richard's main insight, imo, is that he enjoys life and doesn't take
FFL arguments seriously.
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 12:47 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@...
wrote:
Re: We are
reading when your words are right here to see and
read. Nor is it mind reading when I ask you what use of we means?!
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 11:44 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
Share, I've told you before, your mind-reading abilities are not up to
snuff. (And you're
As you know, Share, nothing Barry said applies.
Keep it coming. More dishonesty, please. (But I don't really need to ask, do
I?)
Ok, Judy, then I hope you get rid of your tapeworms sooner rather than later.
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 1:29 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote
She did look it up after her first response about Richard's insight didn't
quite make the grade. But she didn't read far enough.
Richard, I'm still hung up on the fact that they call the time machine Tardis,
you know, like tardy! You might wonder what's in a name. Then again, you might
See what I mean?
Name and form, Richard, name and form. Does one really want a time machine
whose name TARDIS evokes the idea of tardiness?!
On Saturday, March 29, 2014 5:07 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@...
wrote:
On 3/29/2014 4:27 PM, Share Long wrote:
I'm still hung up on
Lawson, I think it's less confusing if you talk about
pure-consciousness-by-itself rather than the 'pure' state of PC.
It looks to me as though Salyavin is describing first PC-by-itself, and then
witnessing during meditation, in which PC coexists with sensory and/or mental
perception (as it
Ever seen Lenz on videotape? There are some very interesting clips of his
interview with John Hockenberry for Dateline NBC. Here's a post with a bunch of
URLs to those clips (some are just of Hockenberry talking to Lenz's former
followers):
For me, the answer to Barry's question would be a definite No. (In fact, I
think it would take a bit of effort not to go back to the mantra.)
For me, the whole issue of whether TM is effortless comes down to how its
adherents would answer the question: Does it take effort -- when you
The TMO doesn't have a shoot the messenger philosophy.
That's really how the TMO shoot the messenger philosophy is taught: That's
just how things are done around here.
From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 4:47 PM
I should add that for me, realizing I'm not thinking the mantra and going back
to it are virtually simultaneous. The realization instantly evokes the
mantra--as if, in some sense, the realization were the mantra.
For me, the answer to Barry's question would be a definite No. (In fact, I
, March 28, 2014, 2:12 PM
On 3/28/2014
8:41 AM,
authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@...
wrote:
Where
did you take this essay from,
Michael?
From Honest John?
But, but, but Xeno says that having an idea and checking it out is not how to
do science. In fact, he compares it to what fundamentalist Christians do. Are
you saying he's (gasp) wrong?
BTW, this whole exchange, and most of Lawson's recent posts, all very much
demonstrate the wish to find
Where did you take this essay from, Michael?
Wouldn't be from here, would it?
http://transcendental-meditation-honestly.blogspot.com/2009/09/lies-of-tm-1-effortless-lie.html
http://transcendental-meditation-honestly.blogspot.com/2009/09/lies-of-tm-1-effortless-lie.html
Would
He knows that. He's just being disagreeable. And there's only one typo, not a
couple as he says.
It was supposed to read Is TM an Effortless Practice?
Note that
the subject of this thread 'IS TM and
Effortless Practice' is nonsensical because of a couple
of typos.
The first
part
As Xeno knows, all-caps are often used for emphasis in Web comments.
No, I was having fun, but I was unaware of Michael's situation at home. The
first typo is 'IS' instead of 'Is' and the second typo is 'and' instead of
'an'.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
He
Translation: If you think I'm going to acknowledge being inconsistent right
here in front of God and everybody, you've got another think coming. What a
nerve!
Emily, that's a very interesting perspective.
On Friday, March 28, 2014 1:56 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote:
Opsie-Share. You left a word out of that quote there, didn'cha? How
dishonest is that?
OTOH, consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, etc.
Translation: If you think I'm going to acknowledge being inconsistent right
here in front of God and everybody, you've got another
http://jcr.sagepub.com/content/32/4.toc http://jcr.sagepub.com/content/32/4.toc
It'll cost you $30 to see the text of either the Editor's Comment or the study
itself; the abstract of the study you can see on the site.
The editor's worldview wasn't shaken in the slightest, nor was he
to is the illusion we have that our sense of
self is somehow qualitatively different from everything else that is going on
in there.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
She needs first to realize she's making a gigantic cognitive error in saying
consciousness and the sense
Yee is the third Democratic senator to face charges this year. Sen. Rod Wright
was convicted of perjury and voter fraud for lying about his legal residence in
Los Angeles County, and Sen. Ron Calderon has been indicted on federal
corruption charges. Wright and Calderon are taking a voluntary
sentence of the
article. That sentence indicated more than just *tightening up* the scientific
method.
On Thursday, March 27, 2014 10:32 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
http://jcr.sagepub.com/content/32/4.toc
http://jcr.sagepub.com/content/32/4.toc
It'll cost you $30 to see
else that is going on
in there.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
She needs first to realize she's making a gigantic cognitive error in saying
consciousness and the sense of self are an illusion. She can't possibly get
anything else right (including TM pure
or wrong. Anyway, I remember the last sentence as being very
dramatic, something along the lines of: if such an idea can be supported by the
scientific method then we need to question the scientific method itself.
On Thursday, March 27, 2014 11:10 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote
Valkyries don't have horned hats, sorry.
Salyavin, who/what has this illusion?
You.
Who is being deluded?
You. Unless there's someone else in their you haven't told us about
LOL. The mind boggles at the possibilities of postulating the various alternate
.
On Thursday, March 27, 2014 11:42 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
Yes, he meant fix the holes in it so it doesn't let studies like this get
through. It isn't stringent enough, IOW.
(BTW, how is it that your interpretations can neither be right or wrong?)
Judy, from
Time series analysis is right (and Box-Jenkins analysis, whatever the hell
that is).
I'm short on time right now; I'll try to get back to this tonight sometime.
There are some interesting angles to it.
http://jcr.sagepub.com/content/32/4.toc http://jcr.sagepub.com/content/32/4.toc
Well, in any case, Valkyries had winged helmets:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Valkyrie_bearing_Hero_to_Valhalla.jpg
(The guy she's hanging onto is dead, slain in battle, BTW. She isn't
kidnapping him. Presumably he'll be revived once they get to Valhalla.)
Oh,
Hilarious. Talk about obsession!
I agree Seagall is out of shape in this picture. But Putin is still thinking
of the martial artist actor that Seagall was many years ago. Maybe a lot of
Russians have been awed by Seagall's movies.
I understand. Many people still imagine Maharishi as
: authfriend@... authfriend@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Steven Seagall to Help Putin
Hilarious. Talk about obsession!
I agree Seagall is out of shape in this picture. But Putin is still thinking
See that little kid at the end of the table? She's a genius.
Share, this is where geniuses hang out; it is a genius bar.
LOL, that's all I have to say.
What kind of place is it, Richard?
On Thursday, March 27, 2014 7:07 PM, Pundit Sir punditster@... wrote:
Today, we went to
if she goes
over them each night before beddybye. That might explain some things. (-:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
And left dangling is your failure to chastise either Barry or Steve
concerning their vile speculations about DoctorDumbass's marriage. Talk about
It's a floor wax!
No, it's a dessert topping!
Michael, Hinduism is far, far too complex and elaborate to insist that it's
either one or the other, a religion or a philosophy. It has elements of both.
Rather than just screeching at people like a fundamentalist preacher, why don't
you ask
How do you think lurkers perceive you, Barry? Just curious. Do you think they
perceive your own behavior as repetitive, and what you focus on as largely
unchanging?
BTW, you didn't actually make the point you thought you made, because your
profiles didn't come close to accurately
Barry, I asked you this earlier this morning, but I haven't seen a response:
How do you think lurkers perceive you? Do you think they perceive your own
behavior as repetitive, and what you focus on as largely unchanging? Or not?
This shouldn't be difficult for you to answer.
Share,
Michael: Do you not understand the phrase elements of both?
Try to engage here with what people are telling you. Otherwise you sound like
the most rigid fundamentalist True Believer. This issue isn't cut-and-dried,
yes/no, black/white; it's complicated. And it isn't only a TM issue by any
You aren't an authority on Hinduism, but you know for a fact that a billion
Hindus agree with you?
You aren't an authority on Hinduism, but you know exactly what you're talking
about?
Oopsie.
Michael, you're really crashing and burning here, making it all too clear how
closed
Hey, I have a terrific idea. Why don't you call your local library and ask?
I just heard about hoopla. Does anyone know why a library would not have it?
Does it cost the library money? Time and attention?
Nobody said it was a reply button, Lawson.
This is a link (not a button) saying Show message history in the lower
left-hand corner of the Reply window. It doesn't give any options. It just
shows what post you were responding to when you click on it.
except that different reply buttons
Who has the false idea of the persisting self? Who is deluded by this
illusion?
Susan Blackmore has a new essay about consciousness research on her website.
Food for thought:
Consciousness is not some weird and wonderful product of some brain processes
but not others. Rather, it is an
WAY out of line, Michael. Shame on you.
Nappy is a thinly veiled Nazi
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Nobody said it was a reply button, Lawson.
This is a link (not a button) saying Show message history in the lower
left-hand corner of the Reply window. It doesn't give any options. It just
shows what post you were responding to when you click
stupid, or perhaps they've fixed the issue.
L
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Nobody said it was a reply button, Lawson.
This is a link (not a button) saying Show message history in the lower
left-hand corner of the Reply window. It doesn't give any options
in the brain without any content to be alert about.
L
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Who has the false idea of the persisting self? Who is deluded by this
illusion?
Susan Blackmore has a new essay about consciousness research on her website.
Food for thought
301 - 400 of 25156 matches
Mail list logo
