Re: [FairfieldLife] Missing Pundits

2014-02-01 Thread Zoran Krneta
They never got what Movement promised them especially payments, I remember
one pundit, he was a good one, you could saw him on most broadcasts in the
time of Global Country inauguration, he had family, he complained again and
again about the money, finally he was paid in Raams which is useless and
unrecognized currency.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Missing Pundits

2014-01-31 Thread Zoran Krneta
Such things were happening in Holland too, I have spent some time working
closly with indian comunity in Vlodrop, I knew very well their problems,
and that article is not very far from truth.
Dana 31. 1. 2014. 21:18 osoba Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com
napisala je:



 Then why did Hagelin in his official communique to the faithful say that
 only 5% of them were missing? You idiot.
 
 On Fri, 1/31/14, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Missing Pundits
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Friday, January 31, 2014, 6:57 PM





























 On 1/31/2014
 9:00 AM,
 awoelfleba...@yahoo.com
 wrote:



 Maybe you
 need to read the other
 comments posted here BEFORE you post

 redundant messages. This news story has already been
 discredited
 in a

 previous FFL post - there are NO missing
 pandit boys in Vedic
 City.



 How do you know this Ricky? Because who
 said so? I
 missed the first go-around on this so fill me
 in...

 

 According to my sources in Fairfield, there are no
 missing pandit
 boysup in Vedic City.


























  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hello FFL -

2012-06-09 Thread Zoran Krneta
hi :)

2012/6/9 Jason jedi_sp...@yahoo.com

 **




 Are you the old 'akashya_108' or 'zoran kneta'?


 --- iranitea no_reply@... wrote:
 
  I think it's fair to introduce myself, well as you can probably see from
 my handle, I use an anonymous one. Irani tea or chai is a tea from
 Hyderabad, (I actually didn't know till I looked it up yesterday. But I
 know it from drinking, hehe.) I do this for several reasons, one is that I
 want to simply be free to say what I want to say, but personally respecting
 the choices of close friends and not hurting them. Another one is, that I
 do not want to be associated with certain topics, as has happened in the
 past. One third, not less important is, to not be put into a box; like he
 is pro-TM, he is anti-TM, he is a TBB etc. So, I also believe in
 reincarnation, not just in the usual sense of the word, but also on
 Internet forums.
 
  So I am not new here, some of you I know for a long time. To break
 through my policy a bit, I will tell you a bit of what I have done in the
 past. In one incarnation I created this video
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kiKZjq0vTWg
  I think most of you have already seen it, it came out of a dialog, we
 had at the time, centering around something Buck brought up. It was already
 online before, with 3000 hits, and has now again over 400, you may just
 look at it again, to give it another boost.
 
  At a later incarnation I have discussed various topics with some people,
 trying to address typical TM-hook-ups, as the nature of transcendence, hazy
 vs. real, and the roots of TM in traditional japa, and why TM is not in any
 way more special. I have done so to understand the (con)text that surrounds
 TM and its own dynamic.
 
  In my previous incarnation, I was shocked to notice, how long term
 TM-ers, who profess to be experts on TM in many ways, are actually lacking
 any basic sense of discrimination. Something that usually comes only by
 having actual *life* experiences with people, which is something people
 have got who paid their dues in the movement, or any other spiritual
 surrounding for a longer time.
 
  Not having experienced oneself directly the dangers that come with
 extended meditations, like virtually going crazy, you would have known, if
 you had any experience in real life in similar situations, when for example
 friends are involved. There would be signs, red flags, one notices in
 people, and any person with a realistic, down to earth sense would know.
 
  This is actually the lack, when only discussing in Internet forums, and
 drawing most information from there, than from actual places and people, or
 simply watching teachers just giving a 3 days checking, without sitting
 through the various problems that may actually come up at these.
 
  So, in a way, I feel like a fresh white paper, no need of having to
 continue any old quibbles. OTOH, I am not afraid either, not of anybody
 here, I think I have a clear stand.
 

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Nand Kishore

2011-08-22 Thread Zoran Krneta
with Purusha group in Uttarkashi

2011/8/21 Vaj vajradh...@earthlink.net

 **



 On Aug 21, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Rick Archer wrote:

 I just watched “David Wants to Fly” for the first time last night. I had
 heard about the “controversy among the rajas” that was part of the film, but
 no one had mentioned that Nand Kishore was the center of the controversy. He
 was the Indian guy who sat there next to Bevan and challenged Tony Nader’s
 right to take over the movement (until they shut off his mic). Kind of an
 interesting tidbit, don’t you think? Wonder where he is now?


 You should write a review from your POV, esp. given your inside knowledge.

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Omnipresence

2010-03-06 Thread Zoran Krneta
Chaitanyas supposed lineage comes through Madhvacharya. Madhva is Dvaita.
Completely at the opposite spectrum of Nimbarki's Dvaitadvaita. YET,
Chaitanya upon entering Vrindavan decides to adopt Dvaitadvaita - and simply
adds his 'Achintya' infront of it. Whereas Nibarki's is Svabhavika
dvaitadvaita or svabhavika bhedabheda (natural unity in diversity);
Chaitanya said his is inconcievable unity in diversity. i.e., that the
relationship of God, the soul and the universe was one of unity in
diversity.



In Nibark Sampradaya they hold that it is important to understand Vedantic
principles in order for their devotions to be based on correct fact. It
therefore appears that Chaitanya was heavily influenced by their style of
Devotion that was prevalent in Vrindavan when he arrived there.



Shri Keshava Kashmiri Bhattacharya (Digvijayi) was a 13th Century leader of
the Nimbarka Sampradaya; the most learned and powerful Acharya they have had
in the modern times. He composed a VAST commentary on the Brahmasutras, the
Bhagavadgita, the 11 upanishads, the Shrimad Bhagavatam. His crowning glory
was his mastery of Vaisnava Tantra Agamas. He composed the Kramadipika
outlining how Vaisnavas could acquire powers for the use of protecting
themselves from Muslim attackers in addition to the proper method of worship
and japa etc.

HOWEVER, the Chaitanya's followers claim that Keshava was defeated by
Chaitanya when he was just 12 years old (even though Chaitanya was 1500's
and Keshava lived in the 1200's).


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-20 Thread Zoran Krneta
It's disgusting what are you doing!

I did not ask that you publicly comment my friends from my FB list here on
FFL. I asked you that in case you know somebody you can check directly with
them who I am...
I kept your privacy here... which in turn you did not with my friends... in
addition you abuse them to make yourself important...

What a perverseness...!

Alex, Rick... how you will call this abuse...?



2010/1/19 nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com





 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 Zoran Krneta krneta.zo...@... wrote:
 
  I would never expose Naby's privacy.
  I wanted to make him aware that he can check who I am from people who we
 may
  know from Facebook since he has profile there as I am.
  I came a cross with his FB profile but I did not want to deal with that.
 
  I would not expose his identity for another reason... probably he would
 run
  away from FFL... still he is quite unique character... kind of ''precious
  gem'' who make this place more interesting and more piquant :)

 Since you asked I checked your Movement friends there; a french gay couple
 (not that there is anything wrong with that) and Lothar, long since married
 (not that there is anything wrong with that), not exactly what I would
 characterize as a very insider friend list, to say the least.

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-19 Thread Zoran Krneta
The raja thing certainly happened after Tony got married.

False.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-19 Thread Zoran Krneta
Read whole post next time. Think before act.

The raja thing certainly happened after Tony got married.

False.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-19 Thread Zoran Krneta
Someone with name authfriend posted...

 The raja thing certainly happened after Tony got married.

...trying to discus about issue but doesn't know the fact that Tony Nader
become raja in 2000 so I replied that was wrong fact.




2010/1/19 TurquoiseB no_re...@yahoogroups.com



 Zoran, can you include some kind of reference to
 the post you are replying to? Reading what's below
 (and your last post as well), there is no way that
 we can tell who or what you are replying to. Thanks
 in advance.


 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 Zoran Krneta krneta.zo...@... wrote:
 
  Read whole post next time. Think before act.
 
  The raja thing certainly happened after Tony got married.
 
  False.
 

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-19 Thread Zoran Krneta
WRONG

2010/1/19 authfriend jst...@panix.com



 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 Zoran Krneta krneta.zo...@... wrote:
 
 [I wrote:]

   The raja thing certainly happened after Tony got married.
 
  False.

 According to the Hagelin email, Tony got married eight
 years ago, which would mean sometime in 2002.

 The first public mention I'm aware of of the raja thing
 was in a press release from the Global Country of World
 Peace dated December 23, 2003 (posted on that date on
 alt.meditation.transcendental), announcing the
 Administrators Course to be held beginning January 12,
 2004.

 From the press release:

 Conditions of Appointment
 1. This training is for those who wish to be the permanent administrators
 of the Global Country of World
 Peace in their regions. Their status in society may be
 visualized as the administrator—or Raja (ruler)—of Raam
 Raj in their regions, so that the global purpose of the
 parental role of Raja Nader Raam is assisted by the
 regional administrators in the world.

 This lays out the field of training and specifies the
 performance of the trained administrators who will be
 crowned as Rajas—or administrators of their areas—to be
 the embodiment of perfect administration, which
 demonstrates the parental role of the cosmic
 administrator. They will be coronated as the Raja of
 Raam Raj or the President of the Peace Government in
 their area—they will represent the government of the
 universe, cosmic government, in their area.


 http://groups.google.com/group/alt.meditation.transcendental/msg/1735fbb7b64dc292

 http://tinyurl.com/ykdpflf

 I quoted this part because it explains what the rajas
 are supposed to be and do in a manner that suggests
 it's a brand-new concept for the TMO, including for
 those who might be interested in applying for it.

 This course is what I was referring to by the raja
 thing having happened after Tony's marriage.

 If you have contrary information, it would be nice
 if you'd spill it, Zoran, rather than simply issuing
 a flat denial.

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-19 Thread Zoran Krneta
OK... I have misunderstand you... I was thinking you are referring the fact
about when Tony become king but you are referring to the ''raja thing''
having in mind about when those courses started...

First, I don't understand why is that fact important.

Second, in 2002 I was in Vlodrop and I think it started smehow in that time.



2010/1/19 authfriend jst...@panix.com



 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 Zoran Krneta krneta.zo...@... wrote:
 
 [I wrote:]

   The raja thing certainly happened after Tony got married.
 
  False.

 According to the Hagelin email, Tony got married eight
 years ago, which would mean sometime in 2002.

 The first public mention I'm aware of of the raja thing
 was in a press release from the Global Country of World
 Peace dated December 23, 2003 (posted on that date on
 alt.meditation.transcendental), announcing the
 Administrators Course to be held beginning January 12,
 2004.

 From the press release:

 Conditions of Appointment
 1. This training is for those who wish to be the permanent administrators
 of the Global Country of World
 Peace in their regions. Their status in society may be
 visualized as the administrator—or Raja (ruler)—of Raam
 Raj in their regions, so that the global purpose of the
 parental role of Raja Nader Raam is assisted by the
 regional administrators in the world.

 This lays out the field of training and specifies the
 performance of the trained administrators who will be
 crowned as Rajas—or administrators of their areas—to be
 the embodiment of perfect administration, which
 demonstrates the parental role of the cosmic
 administrator. They will be coronated as the Raja of
 Raam Raj or the President of the Peace Government in
 their area—they will represent the government of the
 universe, cosmic government, in their area.


 http://groups.google.com/group/alt.meditation.transcendental/msg/1735fbb7b64dc292

 http://tinyurl.com/ykdpflf

 I quoted this part because it explains what the rajas
 are supposed to be and do in a manner that suggests
 it's a brand-new concept for the TMO, including for
 those who might be interested in applying for it.

 This course is what I was referring to by the raja
 thing having happened after Tony's marriage.

 If you have contrary information, it would be nice
 if you'd spill it, Zoran, rather than simply issuing
 a flat denial.

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-19 Thread Zoran Krneta
In my first post I was referring to the movement structure before ''raja
thing'' in which MMY put the administrators who were single or married
couples whom he suggested not to have children.
He was always in favor for single style of life without worldly
responsibilities. I also know situations after the ''raja thing'' in which
MMY asked people to join him and to leave wife and children. That was kind
of ''Guru is requsting desciple to leave the world and surrender to him''
attitude from MMY side.

Everybody who was in that time around MMY was aware of that fact. Having
that in mind it is HARD to accept that MMY suddenly allowed Tony to have
children secretly and that MMY was participating in that secrecy also. No
thanks, I can't believe in that.

Even if you leave that a side... look what he did to the Purushas. MMY was
convincig them that Tony is the ''ONE OF THEM''. They accepted Tony as their
leader.

Because I was in Vlodrop in 2002 I knew the things which Tony was doing. I
mentioned those things to my friend who is in Purusha. He told me if that
was true he would leave the movement. These days I can't get him online :(



2010/1/19 authfriend jst...@panix.com



 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 Zoran Krneta krneta.zo...@... wrote:
 
  OK... I have misunderstand you... I was thinking you are
  referring the fact about when Tony become king but you are
  referring to the ''raja thing'' having in mind about when
  those courses started...

 Right. I assumed that was what Curtis meant (raja thing
 was his phrase), but I could be wrong. At any rate, Curtis
 didn't mean when Tony became king; he was talking about
 the regional raja administrators.


  First, I don't understand why is that fact important.

 Here's what Curtis said:

  I don't know the timeline but it always seemed to me that
  the whole raja thing came out of the blue. Maybe it was
  a way for Maharishi to create a householder leadership to
  accommodate the fact that he had no dedicated single guy
  to hand the movement over to.

 As I said in response, I don't think it came out of the
 blue any more than any of MMY's other ideas. Both Tony's
 kingship and the rajas were pretty clearly a matter of
 setting up a structure that would keep the movement
 together after MMY died, something he must have been
 thinking about for some time.


  Second, in 2002 I was in Vlodrop and I think it started
  smehow in that time.

 You could well be right, but it doesn't seem to have
 been publicly announced until the end of 2003.

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-19 Thread Zoran Krneta
On the other hand, we also have MMY saying, at least
according to Hagelin, that a king should have a family
to support him. Do you think Hagelin just made that up?
It's not that hard to make a distinction between what
works best for a king and what works best for his
worker bees and monks, I should think.

Doesn't matter what Hagelin said. MMY NEVER, EVER indicated such thing may
happen in future.

For me is important fact that Tony has only MMY from a grave to approve his
words.

2010/1/19 authfriend jst...@panix.com



 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 Zoran Krneta krneta.zo...@... wrote:
 
  In my first post I was referring to the movement structure
  before ''raja thing'' in which MMY put the administrators
  who were single or married couples whom he suggested not
  to have children. He was always in favor for single style
  of life without worldly responsibilities. I also know
  situations after the ''raja thing'' in which MMY asked
  people to join him and to leave wife and children. That
  was kind of ''Guru is requsting desciple to leave the
  world and surrender to him'' attitude from MMY side.

 On the other hand, we also have MMY saying, at least
 according to Hagelin, that a king should have a family
 to support him. Do you think Hagelin just made that up?
 It's not that hard to make a distinction between what
 works best for a king and what works best for his
 worker bees and monks, I should think.


  Everybody who was in that time around MMY was aware of
  that fact. Having that in mind it is HARD to accept that
  MMY suddenly allowed Tony to have children secretly and
  that MMY was participating in that secrecy also. No
  thanks, I can't believe in that.

 So what *do* you think really happened? MMY couldn't
 have been unaware of Tony's marriage, could he?

 Seems to me a lot depends on whether Tony had the
 stones to tell MMY he was going to get married, and
 that if MMY tried to stop him, he'd step down as
 king and MMY's successor. He'd have had MMY over a
 barrel after all the hoohah of his coronation. It
 would have looked really bad if Tony had quit and
 MMY had to find another king and go through it all
 again.

 If Tony did stand up to MMY and insist on getting
 married and having kids, it would make sense for MMY
 to have said, OK, but only if you keep it quiet
 until after I'm gone.

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-19 Thread Zoran Krneta
I wasn't work in kitchen on a Prep Purusha even I would like sometimes...
that would be a kind of relaxation...
You a constantly saying lies about who I am... I am on Facebook as you are.
So you can easily check with people whom may we both know.



2010/1/19 nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com





 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 Zoran Krneta krneta.zo...@... wrote:
 snip


 I also know situations after the ''raja thing'' in which
  MMY asked people to join him and to leave wife and children.

 Highly unlikely, I've never heard such a thing. Referance please ! But oh,
 I forgot it's a rumour you heard while working in the kitchen.


 That was kind
  of ''Guru is requsting desciple to leave the world and surrender to him''
  attitude from MMY side.

 Utter nonsense.


  Everybody who was in that time around MMY

 And you supposedly where around MMY ? May I remind you that there was
 somehow a distance from the kitchen to the Suite - if you understand what
 I mean.


 was aware of that fact.

 I can mention that I was on Purusha until 1994 and never ever heard such
 nonsense.

 snip


 
  Even if you leave that a side... look what he did to the Purushas. MMY
 was
  convincig them that Tony is the ''ONE OF THEM''.

 Never heard this, when ? Referances please !


 They accepted Tony as their
  leader.

 Is that so ? When is that supposed to have happened ?


 
  Because I was in Vlodrop in 2002 I knew the things which Tony was doing.

 Who told you, the dishwasher ?

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-19 Thread Zoran Krneta
What was your question? It's hard to hear here in kitchen!



2010/1/19 nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com





 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 Zoran Krneta krneta.zo...@... wrote:
 
  I wasn't work in kitchen on a Prep Purusha even I would like sometimes...
  that would be a kind of relaxation...
  You a constantly saying lies about who I am... I am on Facebook as you
 are.
  So you can easily check with people whom may we both know.

 Why don't you answer the questions I posted to your (insane) utterings
 instead ?


  2010/1/19 nablusoss1008 
  no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com
 
 
  
  
  
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
   FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.comFairfieldLife%
 40yahoogroups.com,

   Zoran Krneta krneta.zoran@ wrote:
   snip
  
  
   I also know situations after the ''raja thing'' in which
MMY asked people to join him and to leave wife and children.
  
   Highly unlikely, I've never heard such a thing. Referance please ! But
 oh,
   I forgot it's a rumour you heard while working in the kitchen.
  
  
   That was kind
of ''Guru is requsting desciple to leave the world and surrender to
 him''
attitude from MMY side.
  
   Utter nonsense.
  
  
Everybody who was in that time around MMY
  
   And you supposedly where around MMY ? May I remind you that there was
   somehow a distance from the kitchen to the Suite - if you understand
 what
   I mean.
  
  
   was aware of that fact.
  
   I can mention that I was on Purusha until 1994 and never ever heard
 such
   nonsense.
  
   snip
  
  
   
Even if you leave that a side... look what he did to the Purushas.
 MMY
   was
convincig them that Tony is the ''ONE OF THEM''.
  
   Never heard this, when ? Referances please !
  
  
   They accepted Tony as their
leader.
  
   Is that so ? When is that supposed to have happened ?
  
  
   
Because I was in Vlodrop in 2002 I knew the things which Tony was
 doing.
  
   Who told you, the dishwasher ?
  
  
  
 

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-19 Thread Zoran Krneta
I would never expose Naby's privacy.
I wanted to make him aware that he can check who I am from people who we may
know from Facebook since he has profile there as I am.
I came a cross with his FB profile but I did not want to deal with that.

I would not expose his identity for another reason... probably he would run
away from FFL... still he is quite unique character... kind of ''precious
gem'' who make this place more interesting and more piquant :)


2010/1/19 TurquoiseB no_re...@yahoogroups.com



 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 Alex Stanley j_alexander_stan...@... wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 Zoran Krneta krneta.zoran@ wrote:
   
I wasn't work in kitchen on a Prep Purusha even I would like
sometimes...that would be a kind of relaxation...
You a constantly saying lies about who I am... I am on Facebook
as you are.
So you can easily check with people whom may we both know.
  
   Hey Zoran, as you so rightly point out, you are
   posting using your own name and Nabby is not.
   Since you seem to know who he is, tell me his
   Facebook name and I'll look him up and post the
   information here for everyone.
 
  Please don't. Part 15 of the FFL guidelines:
 
  15) Keep in mind that many FFL members desire to maintain
  anonymity. If you happen to know a member's real name,
  perhaps because that member has mentioned it in a post or
  two, or to you privately, please refer to that member only
  by their pseudonym.

 I was just yanking Nabby's chain, Alex. I don't think,
 based on what he has said so far, that Zoran really
 knows who Nabby is. I just wanted Nabby to experience
 a moment of panic when he *thought* he did.

 This is just my way of pointing out that since this
 whole snit hit the fan, as far as I can tell only two
 people on this forum have *gone out of their way* to
 call the critics names and attempt to undermine their
 credibility, along with formulating mind-bogglingly
 inane excuses to absolve Maharishi of any culpability
 in this fiasco. I thought it would be fun for at least
 one of those two people to have a moment of panic
 when the curtain was pulled back and the person trying
 to pass him- or herself off as the Wizard Of Oz was
 revealed to be rather ordinary, and pathetic.

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-19 Thread Zoran Krneta
No... just about alligator wanted to breakfast Adi Shankara...

2010/1/19 WillyTex willy...@yahoo.com





 Zoran Krneta wrote:
  What was your question? It's hard to hear here
  in kitchen!
 
 Have you heard any rumors about the Maharishi
 having girlfriends when he lived down in Spain?

 Or, that he murdered his guru, Swami Brahmananda
 Saraswati.

 What's up with that?

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-18 Thread Zoran Krneta
Thanks Shemp... I am aware of that now... but 10 years ago wasn't...

2010/1/18 ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@netscape.net



 Ha ha ha.

 Joke's on you, Zoran.

 Yet another suckling vampire who tried to transform the TM Movement into
 some sort of Guru/disciple relationship sort of thing.

 Look, cult person, TM has nothing to do with Purusha, gurus, kings, or
 celibacy. That's a lifestyle that you did or didn't choose for yourself. If
 you were listening to some guru or his proxy and wanted to do something in
 Holland, that's your problem.


 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 Zoran Krneta krneta.zo...@... wrote:
 
  *Tony Nader is liar. That's now evident.*

 
  Everyone who was with MMY last 10-20 years was aware about the fact that
 he
  was strongly encouraging people to join him in organization but to remain
 as
  a single or if they were married couple then MMY did not accept them to
 join
  with children. There were very rare exceptions.
  There are still now a lot of couples in organization who accept that and
  they drop off the posibility to became normal families. The same thing
  happened to us... me and my wife wanted to join but they told us that MMY
  will not accept us if we want to have children.
 
  How Tony Nader can look at the faces of those people and say such thing?
  How he can lie to people who decided to stay issueles in order to serve
  their Guru but the same Guru aproved him from the grave that he can have
  children?
  Who can confirm that MMY gave him blessing for that? Nobody.. because
 that
  never happened.
 
  I was in Vlodrop in '92 when Nader all of the sudden was pulled back by
 MMY
  from Japan. There was some bad rumor going in the back that he was
  entertaining someones wife. Strange things were happening then with him
 and
  his French secretary.
 
  Probably MMY was aware of Nader's affairs but for sure he was asking him
 to
  drop off such behavior as he was doing in the same way in similar
 situations
  during the past. I think many of you can confirm that.
 
  How many times MMY said Tony is purusha and that his domain is from
 silence?
  Did he mentioned during his life that Tony will have family?
  Of course not and that is why Tony Nader is liar.
 
  Nothing will stay the same... you will not wait much time until Girish
 Varma
  attack his position.
 
  Hallo Mr. Konhaus... wake up... your dream ended... drink your sugar free
  cup of coffee and fuck off...
 

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja with children is a shock?

2010-01-18 Thread Zoran Krneta
Anyway... I can confirm that Schiffgins has ''close male friend'' but for me
that it's not issue here. It's about ''PEOPLE TELLING LIES''
I don't care if Nader would have 100 wives and 1000 children. It's about
credibility. MMY NEVER MENTIONED that Nader is going to be married... Ask
guys on Purusha what was told to them

This is story about dirty politics and power... that has nothing to do with
spirituality whatsoever... period... who likes can folow...

2010/1/18 TurquoiseB no_re...@yahoogroups.com



 Sorry...it might have been shukra who mentioned
 Raja Schiffgen's close male friend.


 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 shukra69 shukra69@ wrote:
   
People here accept a gay Raja easily but Maharaja with children
is a shock? He is meant to be the leader of the movement for
householders so of course what do you think the Vedic tradition
is? It would be a tragedy for a Maharaja to have no wife and
child.
  
   Tragedy no, but the fact is that the majority of the Masters
   in our Holy Tradition were householders.
 
  Technical question for Nablus:
 
  If, as Zoran indicates, Raja Schiffgens has a close
  male friend and they live together, does that make
  him a householder?
 
  Curious minds want to know...
 
  :-)
 

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja with children is a shock?

2010-01-18 Thread Zoran Krneta
It's about ''PEOPLE TELLING LIES''

Again; what lies ?

Oh... I apologize for calling Mr. Nader a liar... he was just telling us
''unrevealed secret truth known only to him and MMY and which nobody can
confirm''. How does people call such arguments in your country? Are they
using them in court cases and judges are accepting them as valid one.

Let me ask you something:
Do you know how much more ''unrevealed secret truth's known only to Tony and
MMY and which nobody can confirm'' exists and Tony will tell us them in the
future?
What is the bottom line of such ''unrevealed secret truth's known only to
Tony and MMY and which nobody can confirm'' which your intelligence and
common sense will accept?

Yes, that would be interesting. I'm sure Zorak, who from what I understand
was a short while on Prep-Purusha working in the kitchen knows everything
about Maharishis instructions not only to Purusha but also to the Rajas and
the Couples !

I am standing here on FFL with my full name openly expresing my thinking
which is not your case. I don't need to explain you who I was and what I was
doing in movement... anyway you can check it's not so difficult...


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-17 Thread Zoran Krneta
If we assume that information is true and having in mind whole situation in
Vlodrop known from the people who were there last 10 - 15 years, then:

*This would be a fraud and big lie:*
Maharishi had requested him to, for the children's sake, maintain the
privacy of his family until the oldest was old enough to begin school.
Maharishi had told him that, in the tradition of rulership, having the
support of a Royal Family brought stability and strength to the Kingdom.

*and this is wishfull thinking because nothing will remain the same...*
Of course, as was obvious to all--and as Maharaja himself
emphasized--nothing has changed, or would change, in his Administration, and
his continued one-pointed focus on the fulfillment of Maharishi's global
legacy:




2010/1/17 Rick Archer r...@searchsummit.com



   *From:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
 fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *metoostill
 *Sent:* Saturday, January 16, 2010 6:18 PM

 *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2
 daughters



  If it turns out to be true, I would say it is 50/50 at best that MMY ever
 knew about it at all.



 Are you kidding? Tony lived in MMY's house for many of the final years of
 his life. He didn't sneeze without MMY knowing it. The whole family may have
 been living there. If they were living off-site, Tony wouldn't have been
 able to come and go without MMY's knowledge.
  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-17 Thread Zoran Krneta
I can confirm from my reliable sources from Vlodrop that story is true.


[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-17 Thread Zoran Krneta
*Tony Nader is liar. That's now evident.*

Everyone who was with MMY last 10-20 years was aware about the fact that he
was strongly encouraging people to join him in organization but to remain as
a single or if they were married couple then MMY did not accept them to join
with children. There were very rare exceptions.
There are still now a lot of couples in organization who accept that and
they drop off the posibility to became normal families. The same thing
happened to us... me and my wife wanted to join but they told us that MMY
will not accept us if we want to have children.

How Tony Nader can look at the faces of those people and say such thing?
How he can lie to people who decided to stay issueles in order to serve
their Guru but the same Guru aproved him from the grave that he can have
children?
Who can confirm that MMY gave him blessing for that? Nobody.. because that
never happened.

I was in Vlodrop in '92 when Nader all of the sudden was pulled back by MMY
from Japan. There was some bad rumor going in the back that he was
entertaining someones wife. Strange things were happening then with him and
his French secretary.

Probably MMY was aware of Nader's affairs but for sure he was asking him to
drop off such behavior as he was doing in the same way in similar situations
during the past. I think many of you can confirm that.

How many times MMY said Tony is purusha and that his domain is from silence?
Did he mentioned during his life that Tony will have family?
Of course not and that is why Tony Nader is liar.

Nothing will stay the same... you will not wait much time until Girish Varma
attack his position.

Hallo Mr. Konhaus... wake up... your dream ended... drink your sugar free
cup of coffee and fuck off...


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam is married with 2 daughters

2010-01-17 Thread Zoran Krneta
*Tony Nader is liar. That's now evident.*

Everyone who was with MMY last 10-20 years was aware about the fact that he
was strongly encouraging people to join him in organization but to remain as
a single or if they were married couple then MMY did not accept them to join
with children. There were very rare exceptions.
There are still now a lot of couples in organization who accept that and
they drop off the posibility to became normal families. The same thing
happened to us... me and my wife wanted to join but they told us that MMY
will not accept us if we want to have children.

How Tony Nader can look at the faces of those people and say such thing?
How he can lie to people who decided to stay issueles in order to serve
their Guru but the same Guru aproved him from the grave that he can have
children?
Who can confirm that MMY gave him blessing for that? Nobody.. because that
never happened.

I was in Vlodrop in '92 when Nader all of the sudden was pulled back by MMY
from Japan. There was some bad rumor going in the back that he was
entertaining someones wife. Strange things were happening then with him and
his French secretary.

Probably MMY was aware of Nader's affairs but for sure he was asking him to
drop off such behavior as he was doing in the same way in similar situations
during the past. I think many of you can confirm that.

How many times MMY said Tony is purusha and that his domain is from silence?
Did he mentioned during his life that Tony will have family?
Of course not and that is why Tony Nader is liar.

Nothing will stay the same... you will not wait much time until Girish Varma
attack his position.

Hallo Mr. Konhaus... wake up... your dream ended... drink your sugar free
cup of coffee and fuck off...


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Walking on Water as a Siddhi

2010-01-09 Thread Zoran Krneta
Aboriginal folklore and fairytales''...
http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/3225/aboriginal-dreaming-story-leads-meteorite-crater
http://www.universetoday.com/2009/12/30/dreamtime-meteor-impact-found-with-google-earth-2/


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Gomorra -- the gnarliest crime family movie ever made

2009-12-30 Thread Zoran Krneta
Yes, after that movie i didn't feel good for 2-3 days. Movie is actually
good... but what it describes is horrible.

2009/12/30 PaliGap compost...@yahoo.co.uk





 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 TurquoiseB
 no_re...@... wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 PaliGap
 compost1uk@ wrote:
  
   [snip]
Gomorra is shot in the slums of Naples, in an almost
documentary fashion. It chronicles five stories that are
unrelated except that they (of necessity) interface with
the Camorra crime family that basically runs things in
that area of Italy. Slum life is gloomy in itself; there
ain't no Slumdog Millionaire fantasies here. And it's
pretty obvious that your chance of *surviving* a life
in the slums are not very high, no matter who you are.
   
The film is RUTHLESS. It doesn't glorify the actions of
the crime family, it doesn't prettify them, and it
doesn't portray them as human, just misunderstood the
way that American filmmakers tend to.
   [/snip]
  
   How does it compare to The Wire?
 
  The Wire is a Disney series by comparison. Seriously.
 
   I think all The Wire's plaudits are very well-deserved.
   That too did not prettify. It had no simplistic
   goodies and baddies. You could say that yes, it did
   portray everyone as human, just misunderstood in the sense
   that everybody is all caught up in a web of circumstance and
   fate (karma). And everyone is just trying to move themselves
   along as best they are able to given what they *see* from
 their
   perspective.
  
   Take for example Stringer Bell - a Shakespearean character
   or what!
  
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stringer_Bell
  
   He is implicated in many wicked, bad things. But he's also
   trying desperately to move out of the dark and into the
 light.
   Tragically (or is it justice?) his past misdeeds track him
 down
   as surely as Captain Hook is pursued inexorably to his
 doom by
   the ticking crocodile.
 
  That's why it's a Disney series. There is no *option*
  to move out of the dark in Scampia.

 And in The Wire there is? Plenty folks try, but no one succeeds
 as I recall.

 * Stringer Bell? Murdered
 * D'Angelo Barksdale? Gets conscience = murdered
 * Frank Sobotka? Tries to protect his family = murdered
 * Howard Bunny Colvin? Tries to fix the city = fatal career
 move
 etc etc

 There must be some kinda way outta here, I can't get no relief


  There is no
  *possibility* of being good. The film does not show
  even a single one of the people who *run* the Camorra
  clan. Those people sit down to expensive dinners with
  other rich people around the world and are, in fact,
  the biggest investors in rebuilding the World Trade
  Center. Their profits exceed $250 *billion* yearly.
 
  But they're not in the movie. Only their footsoldiers
  are. And for them there is no *possibility* of consider-
  ing a life other than the one they were born into. There
  is not even any payoff -- the footsoldiers live in the
  same squalor as their neighbors. Two examples of excep-
  tions to this lack of options are presented in the film
  -- a master tailor who decides to become a truck driver
  rather than continue to participate in the Camorra-
  run knockoff designer wear business, and a henchman who
  walks away rather than continue to participate in the
  toxic waste scam. The film ends with them walking away.
  In the book from which the film was made -- all carefully
  researched and documented -- both characters were killed
  when they attempted this.
 
  One of the young characters, who has memorized the dia-
  logue from Brian DePalma's Scarface and acts it out
  at one point thinks about the payoff of one of his
  latest harebrained schemes. If he pulls it off, he says,
  he may live to see 30. He doesn't.
 
  This is a film about the *grunts* -- the people on the
  bottom rung of the Camorra organization, and bystanders
  who get caught in the crossfire.
 
  The Wire is prettified. The Wire is more a fantasy
  by comparison to Gomorra than Peter Pan is.

 Apparently the series was based on many real characters (some
 of whom appear in the series). And written and created by guys
 who had walked the walk.

 We are not selling hope, or audience gratification, or cheap
 victories with this show. The Wire is making an argument about
 what institutions—bureaucracies, criminal enterprises, the
 cultures of addiction, raw capitalism even—do to individuals.
 It is not designed purely as an entertainment. It is, I'm
 afraid, a somewhat angry show.

 The writers strive to create a realistic vision of an
 American city based on their own experiences. Central to this
 aim is the creation of truthful characters. Simon has stated
 that most of them are composites of real-life Baltimore
 figures. The show often casts non-professional actors in minor
 roles, distinguishing itself from other television series by
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] AVATAR

2009-12-23 Thread Zoran Krneta
now i am at home in Croatia...

2009/12/23 Vaj vajradh...@earthlink.net




 On Dec 22, 2009, at 4:01 PM, Zoran Krneta wrote:

 watched Avatar... disapointed... looks like New Age John Wayne in
 psyihodelic environment...

 Aren't you in India Zoran? Where did you see it at?
  



Re: [FairfieldLife] AVATAR

2009-12-22 Thread Zoran Krneta
watched Avatar... disapointed... looks like New Age John Wayne in
psyihodelic environment...


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WARNING - TM mantra information!

2009-12-15 Thread Zoran Krneta
I did not mentioned bijas... I referred your question to the fact that in
Upanishads the principle about nick names is described.
So stick to the subject Willy!

2009/12/14 WillyTex willy...@yahoo.com





   But, how did the Gods get the 'nick-names'?
  
 Zoran Krneta wrote:
  So you did not read Upanishads!
 
 Are there any bija mantras mentioned in any of
 the major Upanishads? I think not, Zoran. The
 bija mantras are mentioned in the Tantras, which
 came much later during the Gupta Age in India.

 There are no bijas in the Rig Veda or in any of
 the major Upanishads. The alphabet wasn't used
 in India until the time of the Ashokan Pillars,
 (circa 200 BC). So, assuming that the bijas were
 based on the letters of the alphabet, their use
 would be after Pannini.

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WARNING - TM mantra information!

2009-12-15 Thread Zoran Krneta
The principles of the nick-names and the bija
mantras are described in the Tantras, Zoran, not
in the Upanishads.

So you did not read Upanishads carefully Willy. You don't know where in the
Upanishads is the part of the text which brings out principle that Gods are
pleased to be called indirectly.
That is very simple to admit rather then lecturing me about something which
I did not ask you.
Please stick to the subject Willy!


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: WARNING - TM mantra information!

2009-12-14 Thread Zoran Krneta
But, how did the
Gods get the 'nick-names'? Did someone make them up
or what? Maybe the Gods don't like being addressed by
their real names, so they told the Rishis to call
them by other, shorter names. But, who was the first
person to call a God by his nick-name?

So you did not read Upanishads!


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'World's Biggest Animal Sacrifice' Begins

2009-11-27 Thread Zoran Krneta
I have gone through many purana texts... I did not find any part in it
mentioning human sacrifices...
It is true that in India still you can find human sacrifices but they belong
to tantric tradition not to vedic one...




2009/11/27 Vaj vajradh...@earthlink.net




 On Nov 27, 2009, at 10:02 AM, ShempMcGurk wrote:

 Thanks for the info, Vaj, I had no idea.

 I wonder whether human sacrifice is/was being done at all?


 Probably, but in only in very rare, isolated instances and outside any
 major institution. Consider this: India has child abduction cases just like
 any other country, they have a high population that is impossible to police
 and religious doctrines, while on the fringe, which do support live
 sacrifice.

 Of course, I am letting my imagination get the better of me and it's
 probably as a result of that second Indiana Jones movie from back in the
 '80s (the one that starred Kate Capshaw and the little Chinese kid) in which
 human sacrifice was being performed by what was most certainly Vedic
 inspired characters. But I do wonder...

 Do the Vedas or any related Vedic books have anything on human sacrifice?


 Yes, they describe human sacrifice, purusha-medha (
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purushamedha). India also, till very
 recently, had the institution of large mock battles, in which people were
 often killed and the participants left covered in blood.

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'World's Biggest Animal Sacrifice' Begins

2009-11-27 Thread Zoran Krneta
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,501020729-322673,00.html
http://www.theisticsatanism.com/asp/hs.html


2009/11/27 ShempMcGurk shempmcg...@netscape.net





 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 Zoran Krneta krneta.zo...@... wrote:

 [snip]


  It is true that in India still you can find human sacrifices but they
 belong
  to tantric tradition not to vedic one...

 [snip]

 Oh, REALLY

 Do tell...

  



[FairfieldLife] Pogledaj moj Facebook profil

2009-11-19 Thread Zoran Krneta
Bok FairfieldLife, 

Napravio/la sam profil na Facebooku gdje mogu objaviti svoje fotografije, video 
zapise i događaje i želim te dodati kao prijatelja da ih i ti možeš vidjeti. Za 
početak, trebaš se registrirati na Facebook! Nakon toga i ti možeš napraviti 
vlastiti profil.

Hvala,
Zoran

Za registraciju na Facebook idi na:
http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=1017027930k=Z6D2Y3PRV5TF6ADESA6ZQ5PQV4EG2ZZFr



Already have an account? Add this email address to your account 
http://www.facebook.com/n/?merge_accounts.phpe=fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.comc=adff96e49cfc6264aeb8cb7926a5a8e9.Zoran
 Krneta je pozvao/la fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com da se pridruži Facebooku. 
Ukoliko ne želiš ubuduće primati e-mailove ovakve vrste od Facebooka, molimo 
klikni na donji link za otkazivanje.
http://www.facebook.com/o.php?k=e29a6bu=1030523060mid=16f6251G3d6c88b4G0G8
Facebookovi uredi se nalaze u 1601 S. California Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94304.



Re: [FairfieldLife] Jerry's back (was Re: Interesting MUM Developments)

2009-11-02 Thread Zoran Krneta
bitterness and arrogance is also included in your proper understanding of
the word advanced...?



2009/11/2 Premanand premanandp...@yahoo.co.uk



 Doug, whilst I accept that the use of 'advanced' is normal within the
 TMorg, I question that there is anything 'advanced' about advanced meetings?
 In fact my most profound insights into reality and philosophy came directly
 from my first faltering attempts to understand how to meditate, in the first
 meditation session I attended. Nothing, including so-called 'advanced'
 meetings have ever furthered that experience. I suggest that in fact the
 word 'advanced' contradicts the meaning of having a pathless path. Perhaps
 the word 'advanced' is just another clue that maybe he movement does not
 understand its own doctrines very fully.
 Oh but I guess that 'advanced' is not what they mean really, what they mean
 is that the meeting is just for those who have been meditating for quite a
 while, and calling the meeting 'advanced' makes them feel special. Hey ho.

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 dhamiltony2k5 dhamiltony...@... wrote:
 
 
 
  
  
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 jpgillam jpgillam@ wrote:
   
 Doug Hamilton wrote:
   
 Bring back Jerry Jarvis?
   
 Rick Archer wrote:
   
 He's back. He'll be giving a lecture at the
 Santa Monica library sometime soon.
   
Last Sunday Jerry spoke in Lancaster,
Massachusetts, with John Hagelin.
   
  
   Observable shift in underlying TM-movement plate tectonics
  
 
  Real nice advanced lecture last nite up at the Peace Palace. Short group
 meditation, a Maharishi lecture tape from Mallorca era about going from
 ignorance to enlightenment. Was a good discernment about it. Talk after the
 tape by Peter Wallace and Wally Devasier, both of whom traveled extensively
 with Maharishi through the old days. Meeting opened  mc'ed,  meditation
 led by a newer younger TM teacher.
 
  About 40 people in attendance. Mostly (foreign) university students and
 several old-time meditators from the FF meditating community sitting in with
 it. Peter W. and Wally D. in fun form as very good experienced meditation
 teachers, even handling prickly pointed intellectual question from some
 un-happy person about the tape.
 
  -D in FF
 

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Rajas

2009-08-24 Thread Zoran Krneta
most of them communicate through their secretaries... so rajas wont
answer...
you will get answer like life is bliss and if you persist probably you are
stressed person and need checking... or you don't live in proper vastu with
eastern entrance...

so before writing have a house with proper entrance and get checking...


Re: [FairfieldLife] Questions about mantra shakti and saying mantras out loud

2009-08-10 Thread Zoran Krneta
There is no harm in saying mantra loudly but rather then listenng a
h-h theories on this form go and do the checking of your meditation.

2009/8/10 Damjan Jovanovic dj...@yahoo.com



 Hi

 I learned TM at the age of 10, and found it to be one of the most wonderful
 and profound things I've ever experienced. However only 2-3 years later, my
 mantra completely stopped working, and hasn't worked since (for the 13-14
 years till present day).

 The only thing I did wrong, according to what I was told during the course,
 was to say my mantra out loud a few times (ok maybe more than just a few),
 mostly by accident. My TM teacher told me it didn't really matter, but if
 that didn't do it, what did?

 After much searching, on this forum I found the (Tantric?) idea that what
 makes mantras work is the shakti they receive during initiation. Is this
 really the case?

 I really want to get back into TM. Will getting initiated for the second
 time work for me? What else can recharge a mantra with shakti?

 And where does one find out more about this shakti?

 Please help.

 I know this probably isn't the right forum to ask most of this but I
 haven't found any better one yet (know any?).

 Thank you

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Questions about mantra shakti and saying mantras out loud

2009-08-10 Thread Zoran Krneta
That's really a great question Damjan, however, there is NO evidence what so
ever, to suggest that TM is a *diksha* initiation where the Guru (MMY is NOT
a guru per se) charges the mantra with his shakti or enlightenment.

There are a lot of examples in Indian spiritual traditions where disciples
alone were taken all kind of initiations in front of Guru's picture giving
wow.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Fwd: Maharishi's translation of Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 7, Verse 20

2009-07-22 Thread Zoran Krneta
Please if someone have manuscript of that chapter can it compare?

Thanks


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Narayana Kavach Mantra in TM Initiation Puja

2009-07-21 Thread Zoran Krneta
Everything has meaning, Zoran, but bija mantras
have no semantic meaning.

Richard, does the word usa have semantic meanining?

Every word have sound value dosen't matter it sounds meaningless or not. If
you listen or read Rig Ved texts you will get the result doesn't matter you
understand it or not. But Rig Ved text HAVE meaning.

Sound power of mantra comes from mantra itself whether you understand it or
not whether it seems to have or not semanticmeaning.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Narayana Kavach Mantra in TM Initiation Puja

2009-07-21 Thread Zoran Krneta
Richard, you did not answer my question:

Does the word USA have semantic meaning?


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Narayana Kavach Mantra in TM Initiation Puja

2009-07-19 Thread Zoran Krneta
There are Vedic mantras and Tantric mantras... Vedic procedures and Tantric
procedures.
Tantric means quickly, directly without long procedures and texts.

Vedic mantras are Vedic texts used in Vedic procedures of worship.
Tantric bija mantra is short, condensed esence of vedic mantras... like...
you can worship Vishnu through Purusha sukta from Rig Ved and related
procedure or you can worship Vishnu through Tantric procedure with single
bija mantra. Result will be the same.

In these days there are no pure Vedic or Tantric procedures. They are mixed.
But Vedic mantra has meaning as Tantric mantra. If somebody says different
then he did not go deeply in investigation of Vedic and Tantric texts and
procedures.

Every single sound in Universe has meaning. There are no meaningles sounds.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Narayana Kavach Mantra in TM Initiation Puja

2009-07-19 Thread Zoran Krneta
Zoran this may be the case in general in regards to older traditions

Yes, I was simplifying and made as general example.

but there are sages and yogis in the Buddhist tradition (and I'm sure
in the inner tantras of Hinduism as well) who are revealing/seeing new
tantras/cycles.

Can be... that's vast area of knowledge...


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Narayana Kavach Mantra in TM Initiation Puja

2009-07-18 Thread Zoran Krneta
Woodroffe and Eliade both say unequivocally
that the mantras have absolutely no semantic
meaning...

I don't know who Mr. Woodroffe and Eliade are, but Mr. Jaimini in Mimansa
said that there were a lot of words in Rig Veda which appeared only there
and only once and Mr. Jaimini did not know their meaning at all, as he
admitted.
So, to come to the true meaning of those words he suggested krama method of
analysis of Rig Ved new coined words.
That is the the method in which you divide words in to the syllables and
letters and from meaning which are attributed to them you can conclude true
meaning of those words.
In this way he suggested how the words were originally created.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Narayana Kavach Mantra in TM Initiation Puja

2009-07-17 Thread Zoran Krneta
om apavitrah pavitro va sarvavastham gato 'pi va
yah smaret pundarikaksham sa bahyabhyantarah sucih
sri vishnu sri vishnu sri vishnu

that part is introduction in every puja that belongs to nityakarm...


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Narayana Kavach Mantra in TM Initiation Puja

2009-07-17 Thread Zoran Krneta
 Bija mantras cannot be translated into
English because bija mantras are not words with
semantic meaning.

They don't have semantic meaning like usual words.

Each letter in bija mantra has a meaning which you can translate. Guru who
gives you a mantra should know that meaning of each  letter. So you can
translate it into English but it is long, that's reason why bija mantras are
seed mantras because they have meaning in seed form within it.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Drug-Dependent Pundits Riot

2009-07-14 Thread Zoran Krneta
You idiot, children don't smoke betel leaves,
they chew them.

So now you come to know that Indian pundits chewing something... but you
don't know what they are chewing... maybe nuts ha...

Tobacco is a relatively new ingredient in the mix,
however, the chewing of Paan dates back to the
Harappan empire.

Hahahaha... so they started to import it from Virginia...


Re: [FairfieldLife] Drug-Dependent Pundits Riot

2009-07-13 Thread Zoran Krneta
So most of people in Vedic City dont know habits of Indian pundits?!


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Drug-Dependent Pundits Riot

2009-07-13 Thread Zoran Krneta
This is outrageous - twelve year old children
don't smoke betel leaves!

So you don't know present habits of Indian pundits?
But you are learned abut their history which took place 5.000 years ago?


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cause of obesity in the tmorg

2009-07-11 Thread Zoran Krneta
The largest sect of Adwaita Vedantins in
India ascribe to the Sri Vidya doctrine.

I dont know why some people here are relating Shri Vidya with Shankara and
Advaita Vedanta ONLY.
Acharyas like Ramunuja and Nimbark also had Shri Vidya incorporated in their
teachings... mantras too.
And Ramunuja and Nimbark were proponents of different type of Vedanta like
Visisht Advaita and Dwitadvaita.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cause of obesity in the tmorg

2009-07-11 Thread Zoran Krneta
This kind of speech is supported by practice of all angas of Yoga?


2009/7/11 Robert babajii...@yahoo.com




  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 BillyG. wgm4u@ wrote:
   
Since most TM'ers, especially in the tmorg,
have accepted TM in lieu of Religion they

  Nothing can compare to formalized Religion to provide moral,blah, blah,
 blah...
 
  And get a life, you know I am the only authority on this subject, blah,
 blah, blah...
 (snip)

 Having a woman wear a Burka, is a disgrace to all of mankind, as far as I'm
 concerned...

 Now, as far as your 'Idolizing of Religious Dogma, let me say this,
 'Fuck your Religion!'
 Hitler had a religion, also, and had the young children, brainwashed in the
 same way, as you suggest, by the same moral authority, that says, 'The Jews
 Killed Christ'...when we all know, that is a 'Damn Lie'...
 Pilot and Rome, killed Jesus, and continue to kill him everyday, with their
 F'ing Roman Christian Values of Lucifer...!

 Just like the 'Pool Club', in Huntington Valley, Pennsylvania...
 This is what it was like in Nazi Times...what a shame!
 Backward damn idiots, they should close the F'ing place down...
 r.g.

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Cause of obesity in the tmorg

2009-07-10 Thread Zoran Krneta
BilyG,
I agree with you but MMY was more supportive towards Vedanta than Yoga,
especially knowing that Shankara lineage rejected Yoga as philospohy and
practice...

In India, if you ask some Swamis about Yoga usually  they don't know nothing
about that and they will say is good for health because of stretching etc.
:)

They will advocate Vedanta...

Now, what kind of Vedanta...?


Re: [FairfieldLife] Cause of obesity in the tmorg

2009-07-10 Thread Zoran Krneta
Shankara rejected Yoga philosophy in his commentaries on Brahma Sutras.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Cause of obesity in the tmorg

2009-07-10 Thread Zoran Krneta
Sankara philosophy has some logical inconsistencies in itself and that is
the reason why Shankara lineage is full of controversial teachings. Take SBS
example.

MMY took those aspects of Patanjali Yoga which were supportive to Vedanta
view but he did not claimed he was vedantin.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Cause of obesity in the tmorg

2009-07-10 Thread Zoran Krneta
I am referring to his philosophy not practice.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Maharishi's commentary on Chapter 7 of the Bhagavad-Gita

2009-07-05 Thread Zoran Krneta
He certainly edited it in every detail personally spending months on this
glorious book.

……….

Reading commentaries of chapters 8 and 9 I found that they are not on the
same quality level as commentaries of chapters 1-6. It seems that author
spent much more time editing them in every detail.
Chapters 8 and 9 looks like manuscripts which are not finalized. I think
that’s reason why MMY never gave them out.

So this opens at lest 2 questions:

Did somebody finalize them?

and if not…

Why somebody release them knowing they were never finalized by author?


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL Post Count Meditator Status

2009-06-10 Thread Zoran Krneta
yes
1 Zoran Krneta krneta.zoran@

2009/6/10 dhamiltony2k5 dhamiltony...@yahoo.com



 outing people as meditators?

 No, you misinterpret this. No, these are not outings in the sense of that
 word the way some might use it. Is simply a compiling in to a status list of
 those admitted meditator FFL'ers. Those who have published thus here as
 writers saying publicly that they are practicing meditators.

 Consequently, by what was publicly published before the list is known.

 For instance, there are some few noteworthy real names of folks we all have
 known in the past as meditators who have not confirmed in recent memory that
 they are still meditate; hence, they simply have not been upgraded as
 `yes'=meditator yet in the listing. Of course they may be meditators still
 or they may be, as Nabby would point out, quitters. Can't say.

 Have a nice day. I'm on now the Raja program for meditation this morning.

 Jai Guru Dev,

 -D in FF

 
   this survey is creepy.
 
 
  Naw, practically I find knowing the meditator status of writers here to
 be quite useful. You know, it helps in setting the spam filter accordingly.
 
  On the one hand, the many thoughtful postings of FFL meditators do come
 right through. On the other hand if a non-meditator might write something
 useful, when that happens it often subsequently will get picked up by some
 real meditators of FFL and occasionally that might become a thread
 worthwhile to check out. Hence it all very innocently, naturally and simply
 works a very effective editing of the list.
 
   hey, the spam filter usually takes care of most all that Judy/Barry
 personal stuff sending it directly over to spam delete file. Is highly
 effective that way.
 
  In the end it all does work great towards a higher quality list in simply
 knowing better where people are honestly coming from. A simple Meditator 
 non-meditator sorting that weights the writing on FFL. Is that so
 threatening?
 
  Are you a meditator?
 
  Om, it's a pretty simple question.
 
 
  Jai Guru Dev,
  -Doug in FF
 
 
 
  posting status.
 
 
  Posters: 99
 
 
  `Yes' = meditators
 
 
 
  Fairfield Life Post Counter, Meditator Status:
 
  50 authfriend jstein@
  `Yes' 50 TurquoiseB 
  no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com
 
  `Yes' 45 Vaj vajradhatu@
  `Yes' 44 nablusoss1008 
  no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com
 
  32 grate.swan 
  no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com
 
  `Yes' 31 Bhairitu noozguru@
  29 sparaig LEnglish5@
  27 ruthsimplicity 
  no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com
 
  27 Richard J. Williams willytex@
  `yes' 24 Robert babajii_99@
  22 off_world_beings 
  no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com
 
  `Yes' 22 dhamiltony2k5 dhamiltony2k5@
  21 enlightened_dawn11 
  no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com
 
  `Yes' 20 Rick Archer rick@
  `Yes' 20 Duveyoung 
  no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com
 
  18 do.rflex do.rflex@
  17 bob_brigante 
  no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com
 
  16 Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
  `Yes' 15 BillyG. wgm4u@
  13 Richard M compost1uk@
  `Yes' 12 shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
 'Yes' 10 satvadude108 
 no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com
 
  `Yes' 10 raunchydog raunchydog@
  10 lurkernomore20002000 steve.sundur@
  9 cardemaister no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com
 
  8 WLeed3@
  8 Nelson nelsonriddle2001@
  7 geezerfreak geezerfreak@
  3 drpetersutphen drpetersutphen@
  3 William108 william108wm@
  3 Dick Richardson somerset_2@
  `Yes' 3 Dick Mays dickmays@
  `Yes' 3 Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@
  2 sgrayatlarge no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com
 
  2 scienceofabundance 
  no_re...@yahoogroups.comno_reply%40yahoogroups.com
 
  2 beno beno mynameisbeno@
  2 Tom azgrey@
  2 Marek Reavis reavismarek@
  2 Hugo richardhughes103@
  1 uns_tressor uns_tressor@
  1 tkrystofiak krysto@
  1 pranamoocher bhrma@
  1 nelson lafrancis nelsonriddle2001@
  1 metoostill metoostill@
  1 Peter drpetersutphen@
  1 Paul Mason premanandpaul@
  1 Patrick Gillam jpgillam@
  1 Mike Doughney mike@
  1 Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@
  1 Joe Smith msilver1951@
  1 Barbara Thomas barbara_thomas73@
  1 min.pige min.pige@
  1 wayback71 wayback71@
  1 jyouells2000 john_youells@
 
  1 shukra69 shukra69@
  1 sanosh2002 sanosh2002@
  1 Zoran Krneta krneta.zoran@
  1 John jr_esq@
  `Yes' 1 enpai enpai@
   2 Jason jedi_spock@
   2 tomwalsh23 tomwalsh23@
   2 It's just a ride bill.hicks.all.a.ride@
   3 kaladevi93 no_re...@yahoogroups.com no_reply%40yahoogroups.com
   2 Stu buttsplicer@
   6 Ben brbenjaminassisi@
   1 kuldip jhala kulls2005@
   1 ve-da@
   1 ultrarishi no_re

Re: [FairfieldLife] Hello Jai Guru Dev

2009-05-25 Thread Zoran Krneta
Thanks Rick for posting this... I spoke with him because I am going in
Alhabad soon. Nice guy..!



2009/5/24 Rick Archer r...@searchsummit.com



   *From:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
 fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *bhawani_shank2000
 *Sent:* Sunday, May 24, 2009 12:00 AM
 *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Hello Jai Guru Dev



 This is Pandit Bhawani Shankar Kaushik
 From Allahabad India,

 This fellow is one of the pundits in the TM pundit group in Allahabad. He's
 been a pundit for 18 years and is on faculty there, teaching Yajur Veda
 chanting to younger pundits. I know this because he Skyped me.


   



Re: [FairfieldLife] kaayastha: brahmin/kshatriya?

2009-05-09 Thread Zoran Krneta
...that his family was of the kayastha (scribal) caste.

That is correct... but that caste is not very much liked in India because
they were serving Muslim administration during their occupation of India.

In India they appreciate that cast as lower Kshatriya cast or upper Vaishya
cast.


[FairfieldLife] movement project to create a new book

2009-04-28 Thread Zoran Krneta
Dear Friend,


It is a very great joy to inform you of the launch today - on the auspicious
day of Akshaya Tritiya, the day of Lasting Achievements - of the project to
create a new book to which all our Movement people will have the opportunity
of contributing their personal and professional experiences with Maharishi.

Maharishi gave enlightenment to millions of people all over the world, and
many people had beautiful experiences of Maharishi’s Cosmic nature, his
unbounded love, intelligence, and organizing power.

Maharishi told us that a Saint's life can not be represented by instances on
the surface value of happenings. The life of the Realized is all on the
level of unity, on the level of bliss consciousness. We heard from Maharishi
some instances of the life of his Master, Guru Dev, which helped us to
understand the unbounded greatness of what it was that Maharishi gave his
all to in total devotion for his whole life.

Maharaja Adhiraj Rajaraam has warmly blessed the idea that we should in turn
do the same for future generations. All of us who had some contact with
Maharishi can together give those who come after us some feeling of what it
was like to be in his presence; what was that Cosmic Intelligence like in
action; how did it manifest in its infinite organizing power as the
unbounded achievements that made Kali Yuga bow to Sat Yuga; how did pure,
unbounded love move in the world as a wave of infinite, divine love, what
was it like to be in the world with the living incarnation of Brahm. Many
thousands of people had experiences with Maharishi that can be a lighted
lamp for the hearts and minds of future generations. We will collect these
experiences and put them in a book.

As a rich beginning for this book, Prime Minister has suggested to include
the tributes of the Rajas, Ministers and other leaders, which were compiled
into a book at the request of the Shankaracharya of Jyotir Math. These
tributes are more formal in nature, and now all who wish to contribute their
most precious experiences as a record of the heart and mind will also be
invited to contribute.

All those who were fortunate to have any personal experience with Maharishi
are invited to write it down and send it for inclusion.

For some it will be a challenge to choose from many great experiences, and
others may feel their one experience is too humble and simple to be
included. How to choose? There is really only one question to ask yourself:
Does my story bring out Maharishi’s universal greatness? If you feel it
does, please send it. If you have many great experiences they could all be
sent, and the book will grow to multiple volumes. It may take many years to
bring out all the experiences. The plan is to begin, and publish when a
good-sized volume is ready.

Guidelines for submissions:
 - Submissions could be any length, although about 2 pages would be good
 - Your text should be concise and to the point
- Focus just on the points that bring out Maharishi's Cosmic status,
including events that highlight important points of knowledge
- It would be good to include any photos of the occasion if they are
available
- Also if there were other people who could verify the occasion please
include their names
- At the top of the first page please put your name and the country where
the experience took place. It would be most ideal if you could send your
text in both your mother tongue and English, so it can be published in both
languages.

Please send submissions to maharishi.b...@maharishi.net

Wishing you great joy in bringing out the precious highlights of your Cosmic
experience with our divine Master,

Jai Guru Dev,

Peter Swan

Minister of Communication

Global Country of World Peace


Re: [FairfieldLife] Meditation vs. Vedantic Contemplation

2009-03-30 Thread Zoran Krneta
Those are 2 different types of practice for 2 different levels of
consciousness.

Cosmic consciousness: “The observer and the observed create a dualistic
reality [witnessing]…” – DHYAN PPRACTICE

Brahman consciousness: “…and the higher step of contemplation helps one to
realize that one's real self is the Self of all.” – CONTENPLATION PRACTICE



I don’t know how you can realize the second not doing first – not realizing
turya, fourth. Transcendental, Samadhi…


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Free Web Event: McCartney/Lynch Benefit Concert to Push TM in Public Schools

2009-03-27 Thread Zoran Krneta
Kirk wrote:
 TM is ultimately a Vaishnava methodology...


You are right...

Shankara had Shri Vidya and Saiva background... but his Guru was
Vaishnava... He worshiped Lord Narasimha and whole lineage was worshiping
Vishnu: Parashara (read Brihad Parashara Hora Sastra), Vyasa, Shukadev...


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Free Web Event: McCartney/Lynch Benefit Concert to Push TM in Public Schools

2009-03-26 Thread Zoran Krneta
Hindu word for religion is Dharma.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Free Web Event: McCartney/Lynch Benefit Concert to Push TM in Public Schools

2009-03-25 Thread Zoran Krneta

 It heightens awareness of an aspect of our mind. I don't believe that it
 heightens awareness itself or our capacity to be aware of anything else more
 or better. The purpose for me is that it is enjoyable. No higher state
 needed. That said it is way down on my list of things I want to do with my
 day so I haven't meditated in a long time. But I enjoy meditation without
 the belief's attached to it or the idea that I am experiencing a higher
 state of mind.
 That was my original point. You can enjoy meditaiton without the context of
 religious beliefs. Without assuming the traditional belief structure it
 becomes an experiment without an assumed conclusion. I don't assume any
 benifits other than the enjoyment of the experience itself. This approach
 isn't for everyone, but it works for me.



What you are promoting here is certain belief system.

My point was that there is no secular meditation – it means that there is
no meditation WITHOUT certain belief system whether you believe in Mickey
Mouse or God or nothing at all.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Free Web Event: McCartney/Lynch Benefit Concert to Push TM in Public Schools

2009-03-25 Thread Zoran Krneta
*I believe* you are confused about the meaning of the word secular:


Hallelujah brother... you are believer :)



I know what word secular in strict sense means, but if you want to explain
to mass of others about your type of meditation you will end up in some sort
of belief system because you will not have scientific arguments about it.

Like... you say: The purpose for me is that it is enjoyable.

Then you will need to explain what kind of joy is that, what is purpose of
it... etc.etc. and soon you will have belief system no matter how that fits
in your understanding of word secular.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Free Web Event: McCartney/Lynch Benefit Concert to Push TM in Public Schools

2009-03-24 Thread Zoran Krneta
Meditation is for Self realization and God realization.

Secular meditation simply does not exist. If Sufi meditation HELPS me to
realize my Self and finally God I would accept it.



You wouldn't?


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Free Web Event: McCartney/Lynch Benefit Concert to Push TM in Public Schools

2009-03-24 Thread Zoran Krneta
Which you like…


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Free Web Event: McCartney/Lynch Benefit Concert to Push TM in Public Schools

2009-03-24 Thread Zoran Krneta
In my personal life, sure. In state-sponsored public schools? No.
In my Country in state-sponsored public schools children have religion
classes and they participating on the voluntary basis. Other confessions
have the same chance. Nobody makes problems about that.

Meditation has many different purposes in many person's lives.

May have different purposes and effects but goal is the same.

Buddhism honors no god.

But it is religion.

Is it your feeling that Buddhists don't meditate?

They meditate of course, but the object or goal of their meditation they can
call as they like... it's essentially the same as in other religions no
matter they honors God or not.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Free Web Event: McCartney/Lynch Benefit Concert to Push TM in Public Schools

2009-03-24 Thread Zoran Krneta
Secular meditation simply does not exist.

Sure it does.


You are claiming that secular meditation develops higher state of
consciousness too. If you are right than Self realization/God realization
are reachable by your secular meditation also.



So what are the differences between them?


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Free Web Event: McCartney/Lynch Benefit Concert to Push TM in Public Schools

2009-03-24 Thread Zoran Krneta
 You are claiming that secular meditation develops higher state of
consciousness too.

I don't see any evidence that they do.
I think meditation heightens an awareness of an aspect of our mind that has
a small role in who we are or how we perform in the world.


What you say is contradiction.

If you don’t see evidence then what would be the purpose of doing
“meditation that heightens awareness…”?


Re: [FairfieldLife] Gayatri, Buddhist mantra, HHDL on enlightenment

2009-03-15 Thread Zoran Krneta
Gayatri Mantra comes together with Yagya Upavit Samskara. If you want to
learn and chant Gayatri there are some other things about which you have to
take care... not only how pronounce properly. Other mantras are not included
in this procedure.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: MMY on zero

2009-03-03 Thread Zoran Krneta
Zero is infinitely smallest but... Brahman is bigger than the biggest and
smaller than the smallest.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Where are you getting your B-12 from as a vegetarian?

2009-02-24 Thread Zoran Krneta
lentils (dhal)







2009/2/24 off_world_beings no_re...@yahoogroups.com

   Where are you getting your B-12 from as a vegetarian?

 Anybody know?

 OffWorld

 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Where are you getting your B-12 from as a vegetarian?

2009-02-24 Thread Zoran Krneta
then try beans

2009/2/24 Alex Stanley j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com

   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 Zoran Krneta krneta.zo...@...
 wrote:
 
  lentils (dhal)

 Only if the lentils are contaminated with animal feces.

 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Where are you getting your B-12 from as a vegetarian?

2009-02-24 Thread Zoran Krneta
then farmacy :)

2009/2/24 Alex Stanley j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 Zoran Krneta krneta.zo...@...
 wrote:
 
  then try beans

 Nope.

 http://www.vrg.org/nutrition/b12.htm

  2009/2/24 Alex Stanley j_alexander_stan...@...
 
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com
 FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
   Zoran Krneta krneta.zoran@
   wrote:
   
lentils (dhal)
  
   Only if the lentils are contaminated with animal feces.
  
  
  
 

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Where are you getting your B-12 from as a vegetarian?

2009-02-24 Thread Zoran Krneta
cottage cheese also

2009/2/24 Alex Stanley j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
 Zoran Krneta krneta.zo...@...
 wrote:
 
  then try beans

 Nope.

 http://www.vrg.org/nutrition/b12.htm

  2009/2/24 Alex Stanley j_alexander_stan...@...
 
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com
 FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com,
   Zoran Krneta krneta.zoran@
   wrote:
   
lentils (dhal)
  
   Only if the lentils are contaminated with animal feces.
  
  
  
 

  



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: digitizing Vedic chanting

2009-01-01 Thread Zoran Krneta
All Vedic chanting records were done in Vlodrop - analog in beginning and
afterwards there were all digitized, while MMY was still there. Most of
analog records were damaged due the conditions in which there were stored.
What you are listening on MMY channel are digitized versions of Vedic
chanting.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: digitizing Vedic chanting

2009-01-01 Thread Zoran Krneta
in adition... listening Rig Ved is not any more part of game... it's Vishnu
Sahasranam...


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Spa?WHERE in India to the Europeans go CONTACT INFO?PLEASE

2008-12-28 Thread Zoran Krneta
Try this:

http://sashas-india.blog.de/2007/12/26/8_ayurveda_bhavan_at_rishikesh~3493264

http://www.indiamart.com/amvpharmacy/about-us.html


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Guardian on Karadzic

2008-07-24 Thread Zoran Krneta
http://dragandabic.com/


Re: [FairfieldLife] Radovan Karadzic hidden in plain view

2008-07-24 Thread Zoran Krneta
http://dragandabic.com/


Re: [FairfieldLife] Radovan Karadzic hidden in plain view

2008-07-23 Thread Zoran Krneta
Most bizarre thing is that he was going around teaching meditation!

http://www.jutarnji.hr/vijesti/clanak/art-2008,7,22,,127436.jl


(Sorry isn't in English)


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Guardian on Karadzic

2008-07-23 Thread Zoran Krneta
Slobodan Milosevic and his wife were supporters of Serbian TM movement. All
time through they were in close connection with movement leaders and they
enjoy support. I heard that one of them started TM.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Guardian on Karadzic

2008-07-23 Thread Zoran Krneta
Daily meditation was the requirement of the SS

In Ramayana you have description of demon Ravana and his Rakshasa army. They
also followed and practised Vedic rituals, but with one difference - for
realisation of selfish aims - power, money and pleasure.

Lord Krishna in BG describes 2 types of human nature: divine and demonic
one. It is up to us what we are going to choose - for what purposes we are
going to perform spiritual practices - to realize God (Supreme
Transcendental Realty) or to use spiritual practices to harm others.

In TM movement you have the same situation: some people are looking for
Divine, some for power, money and pleasures.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Guardian on Karadzic

2008-07-23 Thread Zoran Krneta
search for freedom from disease and poverty is not same as search for power,
money and pleasures... those are different categories...
realisation of Divine gives freedom from disease and poverty... if it
comes... if not... only Divine remains...:-)

again in BG Lord Krishna describes 4 types of those who are searching Him...


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: pics of MMY other Gurus

2008-07-12 Thread Zoran Krneta
http://www.maharishi.org.ua/india2006/




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Raja Barrett in Finland?

2008-06-02 Thread Zoran Krneta
In Croatian kupiti - to buy

2008/6/1 cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED]:


  There might be a connection between those twain things, or, of
  course, then again, there mightn't. Be it as it may, I predicted
  that a couple of weeks ago or so, in a forum(?) of Kauppalehti
  (kauppa

 The word 'kauppa' (store, commerce, etc.) seems to be an
 Indo-Germanic loan word, cf. German 'kaufen', Islandic
 'kaupthing', Swedish 'köpa' [sic!] and stuff.

 



Re: [FairfieldLife] TM sounds so much better in a Serbian accent

2008-03-25 Thread Zoran Krneta
It's not matter of accent … more important is the posture in which he is
addressing to us...

zoran


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: if you want to know movement's future...

2008-03-14 Thread Zoran Krneta
Sorry, Zoran, but your suggestion is a bit too coy
for my simple perception. What would I see in the
pictures from Maharishi's funeral? Thanks.


There are two movements in the movement:

American/European one (rajas) and Indian one (Maharishi's family -
Shrivastavas, Girish Varma, Nand Kishore etc.)

Maaharishi's family has shown during funeral who is with them and whom they
are supporting.



Indian part of movement was always dragging money from westerners and
spending it in India on various things.

They are expecting that this will continue, but Maharishi is not there any
more to collect such amounts from westerners and forward it to India.

Confrontation between those two movements is inevitable.



In that light you should analyze this suggestion that Nand Kishore should be
Maaharishi's successor.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Brahmachari Nandikeeshore should be the Guru after MMY!

2008-03-14 Thread Zoran Krneta
There are two movements in the movement:

American/European one (rajas) and Indian one (Maharishi's family -
Shrivastavas, Girish Varma, Nand Kishore etc.)

Maaharishi's family has shown during funeral who is with them and whom they
are supporting.



Indian part of movement was always dragging money from westerners and
spending it in India on various things.

They are expecting that this will continue, but Maharishi is not there any
more to collect such amounts from westerners and forward it to India.

Confrontation between those two movements is inevitable.



In that light you should analyze this suggestion that Nand Kishore should be
Maaharishi's successor.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Fwd: Message about Raja Raam of Japan Konhaus

2008-03-13 Thread Zoran Krneta
He said now there's not one Maharishi, but in some sense Maharishi is now
expressing himself to all of us, that he has multiplied himself through all
of us.

But most through those who payed more


[FairfieldLife] if you want to know movement's future...

2008-03-13 Thread Zoran Krneta
...closely look at the pictures from Maharishi's funeral...
and in adition make small intellectual exercise about movement's money...


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: From a recertified Governor

2008-03-12 Thread Zoran Krneta
Black Hand (Serbian: Црна рука / Crna Ruka), officially Unification
or Death (Serbian: Уједињење или смрт / Ujedinjenje ili smrt), was a
secret society founded in Serbia in May 1911, this
society's possible connections to the June 28, 1914 assassination in
Sarajevo of Franz Ferdinand, Archduke of Austria is considered to
have been the main catalyst to the start of World War I.

Ohhh you got me!
Yes, Franz Ferdinand was a king killed by the Serbs. Do you see conection?
Due to my bad reputation I am going around killing kings.

My father was Croatian Serb, my mother is Croatian, I am living in Croatia.
Is that relevant for someone? Maybe for such people who were creating war
during 90' in ex-yugoslavia.
During war on Kosovo I picked up 30 people in small bus and with help of
others we were runing Dubrovnik Peace Project for 2 years. That is something
what one political Serb would never did - to fight for peace on Kosovo.
I concerne myself as someone without feeling of patriotism of any kind.


Re: [FairfieldLife] From a recertified Governor - From the heart to you

2008-03-12 Thread Zoran Krneta
In the meantime, I've been following the thread on John Konhaus' email
responses to the Serb's emails, and the truth of this interchange is very
important to me because it speaks volumes concerning whether or not I can
continue being an active part of any organization under such leaders. As I
see it, the truth of this whole Konhaus/Serb interchange would be revealed
if the Serb could post the complete, unaltered email messages between
himself and supposedly Konhaus. According to my understanding, emails that
are forwarded cannot be altered therefore all of us will have the chance
to see the original emails. In following the thread, no one has suggested
this as yet.


Dear unanimous,

I made an effort and expose myself to danger contacting wild, criminal,
killing-king Serb.

He told me that is irrelevant what was in the letters between him/Serb and
Konhaus. He said that this was not a curt case so that evidences should be
presented.

Open letter was an act of resignation from the movement on the basis of
his PERSONAL impression on Konhaus attitude. Are people making
resignation from movement on the basis of fantasies? What do you think? What
are your experiences?

How many people left the movement? Do they need to present their evidences
here?

Wild, criminal, killing-king Serb said IT WAS A PERSONAL ACT!

It is not the matter of Konhous, it is the matter of him/Serb who wanted to
stop his PERSONALY agony with that organization.

Is that enough?

You are expecting that he/Serb show his correspondence but you don't want
show up your name and face.

If you want to see his/Serbs correspondence you can personally contact him
he has an e-mail address thanks God!

But be careful take some weapon to protect yourself in case... :-)

Zoran


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Konhous replay_Open letter_2

2008-03-11 Thread Zoran Krneta
Then why did you claim that Konhaus attacked you, when the letter you
just posted shows the exact opposite ?

Read carefully: Konhous replay_ Open letter_2
Konhous replay came AFTER my first open letter... ok?

And ought to give rise to some excuses for the vile attacks on
Konhaus from certain persons on this board. Turq and Sal comes to
mind. But it won't happen. The TMO-hate has become patological.

But is quite normal for you to throw shit on me and hide... it's not
patological...?


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Validity of Mahrishi's apaurusheya bhasya in the light of linguistics

2008-02-20 Thread Zoran Krneta
Brahman alone is real, this
world is unreal; the Jiva is identical with Brahman.

That would be Advaita philosophy but part of that statement is argument
which is used by mayavada philosophers. Shankara introduced concept of maya
or illusion of the world and with that he actually introduced concept of
qualified monism. Shankara also introduced concept of nirguna and saguna
Brahman which is difficult to fit in concept of pure monism, so Shankara's
Advaita or better to say mayavada fails to be pure monism.

Zoran - The Shankara Acharya composed the following works:
Bhashyas on Brahma Sutras...

According to George Thibaut Ramunuja's commentary of Brahma Sutras is giving
more accurate explanation of what Vyasa said, but Thibaut also added that
Shankara's views are closer to Upanishad philosophers than Ramunuja's. Also
we must say that there are many Upanishads and each school uses those ones
which are basis for their specific arguments.
Thanks for mentioning Nimbark acharya his teaching is also interesting...


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Validity of Mahrishi's apaurusheya bhasya in the light of linguistics

2008-02-20 Thread Zoran Krneta
Maybe so, but the TMer tradition follows the Adwaita
tradition of Shankaracharya...
You may believe that Shankara's advaita is right one, but that philosophy
suffers from many inconsistencies. Shakara on many places did not put a
comment on Vyasa's sutras rather he introduced and forced his own philosophy
and system which give existence to mayavada philosophy which is not pure
advaita.

Maybe so, but the tradition TMers follow is the Sri Vidya
and the Trupura Upanishad...

Shankar's tradition which TMers are following is tradition which came from
Lord Vishnu (Narayana)... Shankara's gurus were Vaishnavs. Later on it
turned to be everything else including tradition of Shri...


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Validity of Mahrishi's apaurusheya bhasya in the light of linguistics

2008-02-19 Thread Zoran Krneta
According to Shankara, we can only know Brahman through
transcendental knowledge; everything else experienced
through the senses is an appearance only.

If you are standing for Advaita it can't be Brahman and everyting else,
that's mayavada platform... Mayavadins are not pur monists.

Brahman alone is real; all objects of the senses are not real, yet not
unreal.

That is Ramunuja qualified monism.

According to the Upanishadic view, Brahman, as seen
through the senses, is real, not an illusion. Brahman
is the Transcendental Person who can be seen and
experienced with the senses.

Transcedental Person is Brahman... Lord Krishna gave Divine sight to Arjuna
in order that he is able see him.

This is the dualistic
view of Ramanuja, Madhva, and Vallabha.

They are representing diferent schools of advaita. Only Madhva stands for
pure dualism, Vallabaha - pure monism, Ramunuja - qualified monism.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Validity of Mahrishi's apaurusheya bhasya in the light of linguistics

2008-02-18 Thread Zoran Krneta
You are suggesting that there is a Brahman on one side which can be known
through transcendental knowledge and on the other side is everything else
like ego, mind, senses... etc.
What kind of Brahman is that which doesn't include everything and can not be
the object of gross perception?
Seems you fall in trap of dualism...


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: where was this man?

2008-02-16 Thread Zoran Krneta
I remember during MMY birthday he had long hear and beard... I did not see
him on photos... or he shaved hear and beard, because that will be normal
if somebody participate that samskara.
Does somebody saw him for sure?


  1   2   >