Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The Vivid and Present Threat of Hooliganism on Fairfield Life.
Or, does the real Toby know you're posting here under his name? On 12/5/2013 7:53 PM, Toby Walker wrote: maybe? On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com mailto:pundits...@gmail.com wrote: Are you the famous Toby Walker? On 12/5/2013 2:08 PM, Toby Walker wrote: Oh this is great! lol! On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:49 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com mailto:awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: See Barry. See Barry stalk Judy. Stalk, stalk, stalk. Nothing new here; move along, folks. I wrote: Buck, reflect a minute. What makes you think I stalk? Barry replied: You mean, other than the fact that you're doing it right now? :-) When you go out of your way to write a post dumping on the person you've been dumping on consistently for nearly twenty years, about whom you've written literally thousands of posts dumping on him, you're stalking. You mean, the way you've gone out of your way to write posts dumping on me and have done relentlessly for nearly twenty years over thousands of posts, and are doing right now? That's what you mean by stalking, what you've been spending most of your time on the Web doing to me and many others ever since I've known you? Get over your self-delusions, honey...you're a stalker. Well, that's an interesting definition. Trouble is, it applies to you far more than it does to me. You da talker-in-chief, sweet cheeks. I didn't go out of my way to write the post, BTW. As you know, I was responding to Buck. If I'm a stalker according to your new definition, at least I'm an honest stalker. You are a viciously malicious, profoundly and consistently dishonest stalker. That was (as you know) my point to Buck. We'll see a demonstration in the very next paragraphs: You even stalked Curtis recently when one of your former minions said he liked him, and he hasn't been here since August: You mean, after Dr. Dumbass responded to one of your long dump-on-Judy rants that fawned over Curtis? In which he said he liked Curtis but found him emotionally duplicitous, and I agreed? Because that's the post of mine you're quoting, along with my follow-up: Curtis, in stark contrast, went to considerable lengths to hide his emotional duplicity. To be a little more specific, if I may: Curtis pretended to be comfortable with who he was, as Barry puts it. But that was a carefully constructed facade, and it took very little in the way of chipping to expose the real Curtis underneath. *You went on to stalk Dr. Dumbass for what he had said about Curtis, and in that post added Robin to your list of stalkees for the day--Robin, who hadn't been here since early April.* * * *Did you think I wasn't going to provide the context you dishonestly left out? (And it was obviously deliberate dishonesty, folks, since he had actually looked up the posts in question.)* * * *If anybody would like to verify what I just wrote, let me know and I'll provide the URLs to the posts.* * * *As I said in a post a couple of days ago, Barry doesn't have the wherewithal to make an honest case. He'd have to refrain from stalking if he had to be honest, because he'd have nothing to say.* Stalking is just what you DO, Judy. Everyone here knows this but you. *Says the Master Stalker of FFL.* * * *Your hypocrisy is unparalleled. It's stupefying. And that's giving you the benefit of the doubt, because if you really believe what you're saying, you're insane, completely out of touch with reality.* * * *Now, how do you explain your claim that I have stalked you from forum to forum?* * * *(See, Barry has switched definitions. Before, he meant stalking in the standard sense of following someone around, as in his claim above. But now he's using it as a synonym for dumping on.)* * * *How about explaining the fact that you were stalking me on FFL before I even arrived here?* * * *I can find the URLs for those posts as well if anyone is interested.* * * *I swear to God, interacting with Barry is like being in a hall of funhouse mirrors. Everything he says is warped, twisted, turned
[FairfieldLife] Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The Vivid and Present Threat of Hooliganism on Fairfield Life.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Buck, reflect a minute. What makes you think I stalk? You mean, other than the fact that you're doing it right now? :-) When you go out of your way to write a post dumping on the person you've been dumping on consistently for nearly twenty years, about whom you've written literally thousands of posts dumping on him, you're stalking. Get over your self-delusions, honey...you're a stalker You even stalked Curtis recently when one of your former minions said he liked him, and he hasn't been here since August: Curtis, in stark contrast, went to considerable lengths to hide his emotional duplicity. To be a little more specific, if I may: Curtis pretended to be comfortable with who he was, as Barry puts it. But that was a carefully constructed facade, and it took very little in the way of chipping to expose the real Curtis underneath. Stalking is just what you DO, Judy. Everyone here knows this but you. I'll tell you: Because that's what Barry has said that I do, over and over. He claims I've stalked him from forum to forum. That is factually untrue. Of the four forums we've been on together, one (alt.m.t) I joined before I had ever encountered him; two I joined before he did; and the fourth, FFL, he Invited me to join, along with other members of alt.m.t. So what does that make Barry, Buck? I could go on and on listing the things Barry has said about me (and others) that were simply factually false, and that he knows were false. Literally hundreds of things. And he's not the only one, he's just the worst. If all you do is take little peeks here and there, you really do not have a clear idea of what goes on here. Neither does Rick, for that matter. Error of thought, a weak mind, or some natural vagueness in conversation is not what I'm referring to by lying. I mean deliberate and malicious misstatements of fact. I'll tell you something else. It is *vanishingly* unlikely that Yahoo is going to storm in here and shut FFL down because of some squabbling. Yahoo doesn't have the time or the interest to monitor millions of groups for ad hominem or unkindness. Or lying, for that matter. If you're genuinely concerned that might happen, you can stop worrying. Yahoo is not going to enforce the guidelines. They're not much more than a gesture, a formality. They can use the guidelines if they need to dump someone who is *really* seriously misbehaving in a way nobody on FFL even comes close to doing, *including* Barry, obnoxious and vicious as he is. But even that is unlikely. And Rick has time only to handle the worst infractions of the actual FFL *rules*--about pornography and outing the identity of members who wish to remain anonymous. That's why Ravi was dumped this time around (and the time before that); he outed someone the first time and threatened to do so the second time. Not because he was unkind. Feste's critique was nonsense, by the way. You apparently read it but not my response. He was trying to protect someone he likes who has a propensity to be untruthful, IMO. What I *wish* were the case here is that people would not be so tolerant of deliberate dishonesty, that they would express strong disapproval of anyone who engages in it. Social sanctions of that sort, if consistent, would do more for the tone of this forum than all your bombast, Buck. Malicious dishonesty breeds disrespect of others generally. If telling deliberate falsehoods about other people is OK, then what isn't OK? To expect people to be kind to a person who attacks them repeatedly with falsehoods and lies is a little too much to expect. We aren't saints here. I appreciate your willingness to speak to me for a change, Buck. But from what you say, I don't think you have anything more than a very superficial impression of the interpersonal dynamics of FFL. I can't hope to give you an in-depth course to catch you up on what you've missed. You'd have to decide to start paying close attention to the traffic here. I wrote: How about the lying? You never mention the lying, Buck. Does that mean you think it's OK to lie? Buck wrote: Buck's interest is more narrowly the endurance and survival of FFL as a community given these newer Yahoo-groups management guidelines that clearly supersede Rick's âalmost anything goesâ FFL guidelines. That old FFL guideline is the rot-in-ist damn pin holding FFL to be the unkind place it has become from the moment Rick tried it. I have not been following your attempt at equivalence other than the message view of posts. Feste a while back had a fair critique of it. Like as Rick in skipping posts from you and others as soon as they show themselves just to be personal bickering between you and others I save time too. You have over a hundred posts so far this week and I don't have much of a clue what you write other than in message view or what shows up in other posts as replies from other people. You are
[FairfieldLife] Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The Vivid and Present Threat of Hooliganism on Fairfield Life.
See Barry. See Barry stalk Judy. Stalk, stalk, stalk. Nothing new here; move along, folks. I wrote: Buck, reflect a minute. What makes you think I stalk? Barry replied: You mean, other than the fact that you're doing it right now? :-) When you go out of your way to write a post dumping on the person you've been dumping on consistently for nearly twenty years, about whom you've written literally thousands of posts dumping on him, you're stalking. You mean, the way you've gone out of your way to write posts dumping on me and have done relentlessly for nearly twenty years over thousands of posts, and are doing right now? That's what you mean by stalking, what you've been spending most of your time on the Web doing to me and many others ever since I've known you? Get over your self-delusions, honey...you're a stalker. Well, that's an interesting definition. Trouble is, it applies to you far more than it does to me. You da talker-in-chief, sweet cheeks. I didn't go out of my way to write the post, BTW. As you know, I was responding to Buck. If I'm a stalker according to your new definition, at least I'm an honest stalker. You are a viciously malicious, profoundly and consistently dishonest stalker. That was (as you know) my point to Buck. We'll see a demonstration in the very next paragraphs: You even stalked Curtis recently when one of your former minions said he liked him, and he hasn't been here since August: You mean, after Dr. Dumbass responded to one of your long dump-on-Judy rants that fawned over Curtis? In which he said he liked Curtis but found him emotionally duplicitous, and I agreed? Because that's the post of mine you're quoting, along with my follow-up: Curtis, in stark contrast, went to considerable lengths to hide his emotional duplicity. To be a little more specific, if I may: Curtis pretended to be comfortable with who he was, as Barry puts it. But that was a carefully constructed facade, and it took very little in the way of chipping to expose the real Curtis underneath. You went on to stalk Dr. Dumbass for what he had said about Curtis, and in that post added Robin to your list of stalkees for the day--Robin, who hadn't been here since early April. Did you think I wasn't going to provide the context you dishonestly left out? (And it was obviously deliberate dishonesty, folks, since he had actually looked up the posts in question.) If anybody would like to verify what I just wrote, let me know and I'll provide the URLs to the posts. As I said in a post a couple of days ago, Barry doesn't have the wherewithal to make an honest case. He'd have to refrain from stalking if he had to be honest, because he'd have nothing to say. Stalking is just what you DO, Judy. Everyone here knows this but you. Says the Master Stalker of FFL. Your hypocrisy is unparalleled. It's stupefying. And that's giving you the benefit of the doubt, because if you really believe what you're saying, you're insane, completely out of touch with reality. Now, how do you explain your claim that I have stalked you from forum to forum? (See, Barry has switched definitions. Before, he meant stalking in the standard sense of following someone around, as in his claim above. But now he's using it as a synonym for dumping on.) How about explaining the fact that you were stalking me on FFL before I even arrived here? I can find the URLs for those posts as well if anyone is interested. I swear to God, interacting with Barry is like being in a hall of funhouse mirrors. Everything he says is warped, twisted, turned inside-out and upside-down. And the older he becomes, the worse it gets. It's hard to imagine that he genuinely thinks anybody believes him, but it's even harder to understand why he would constantly spout such obviously dishonest crap if he didn't. I wrote to Buck: I'll tell you: Because that's what Barry has said that I do, over and over. He claims I've stalked him from forum to forum. That is factually untrue. Of the four forums we've been on together, one (alt.m.t) I joined before I had ever encountered him; two I joined before he did; and the fourth, FFL, he Invited me to join, along with other members of alt.m.t. So what does that make Barry, Buck? I could go on and on listing the things Barry has said about me (and others) that were simply factually false, and that he knows were false. Literally hundreds of things.
[FairfieldLife] Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The Vivid and Present Threat of Hooliganism on Fairfield Life.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: See Barry. See Barry stalk Judy. Stalk, stalk, stalk. Nothing new here; move along, folks. I wrote: Buck, reflect a minute. What makes you think I stalk? Barry replied: You mean, other than the fact that you're doing it right now? :-) When you go out of your way to write a post dumping on the person you've been dumping on consistently for nearly twenty years, about whom you've written literally thousands of posts dumping on him, you're stalking. You mean, the way you've gone out of your way to write posts dumping on me and have done relentlessly for nearly twenty years over thousands of posts, and are doing right now? That's what you mean by stalking, what you've been spending most of your time on the Web doing to me and many others ever since I've known you? Get over your self-delusions, honey...you're a stalker. Well, that's an interesting definition. Trouble is, it applies to you far more than it does to me. You da talker-in-chief, sweet cheeks. I didn't go out of my way to write the post, BTW. As you know, I was responding to Buck. If I'm a stalker according to your new definition, at least I'm an honest stalker. You are a viciously malicious, profoundly and consistently dishonest stalker. That was (as you know) my point to Buck. We'll see a demonstration in the very next paragraphs: You even stalked Curtis recently when one of your former minions said he liked him, and he hasn't been here since August: You mean, after Dr. Dumbass responded to one of your long dump-on-Judy rants that fawned over Curtis? In which he said he liked Curtis but found him emotionally duplicitous, and I agreed? Because that's the post of mine you're quoting, along with my follow-up: Curtis, in stark contrast, went to considerable lengths to hide his emotional duplicity. To be a little more specific, if I may: Curtis pretended to be comfortable with who he was, as Barry puts it. But that was a carefully constructed facade, and it took very little in the way of chipping to expose the real Curtis underneath. You went on to stalk Dr. Dumbass for what he had said about Curtis, and in that post added Robin to your list of stalkees for the day--Robin, who hadn't been here since early April. Did you think I wasn't going to provide the context you dishonestly left out? (And it was obviously deliberate dishonesty, folks, since he had actually looked up the posts in question.) If anybody would like to verify what I just wrote, let me know and I'll provide the URLs to the posts. As I said in a post a couple of days ago, Barry doesn't have the wherewithal to make an honest case. He'd have to refrain from stalking if he had to be honest, because he'd have nothing to say. Stalking is just what you DO, Judy. Everyone here knows this but you. Says the Master Stalker of FFL. Your hypocrisy is unparalleled. It's stupefying. And that's giving you the benefit of the doubt, because if you really believe what you're saying, you're insane, completely out of touch with reality. Now, how do you explain your claim that I have stalked you from forum to forum? (See, Barry has switched definitions. Before, he meant stalking in the standard sense of following someone around, as in his claim above. But now he's using it as a synonym for dumping on.) How about explaining the fact that you were stalking me on FFL before I even arrived here? I can find the URLs for those posts as well if anyone is interested. I swear to God, interacting with Barry is like being in a hall of funhouse mirrors. Everything he says is warped, twisted, turned inside-out and upside-down. And the older he becomes, the worse it gets. It's hard to imagine that he genuinely thinks anybody believes him, but it's even harder to understand why he would constantly spout such obviously dishonest crap if he didn't. Like I said once before and I still stand by it, Barry is a freak of nature. I wrote to Buck: I'll tell you: Because that's what Barry has said that I do, over and over. He claims I've stalked him from forum to forum. That is factually untrue. Of the four forums we've been on together, one (alt.m.t) I joined before I had ever encountered him; two I joined before he did; and the fourth, FFL, he Invited me to join, along with other members of alt.m.t. So what does that make Barry, Buck? I could go on and on listing the things Barry has said about me (and others) that were simply factually false, and that he knows were false. Literally hundreds of things.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The Vivid and Present Threat of Hooliganism on Fairfield Life.
Oh this is great! lol! On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:49 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: See Barry. See Barry stalk Judy. Stalk, stalk, stalk. Nothing new here; move along, folks. I wrote: Buck, reflect a minute. What makes you think I stalk? Barry replied: You mean, other than the fact that you're doing it right now? :-) When you go out of your way to write a post dumping on the person you've been dumping on consistently for nearly twenty years, about whom you've written literally thousands of posts dumping on him, you're stalking. You mean, the way you've gone out of your way to write posts dumping on me and have done relentlessly for nearly twenty years over thousands of posts, and are doing right now? That's what you mean by stalking, what you've been spending most of your time on the Web doing to me and many others ever since I've known you? Get over your self-delusions, honey...you're a stalker. Well, that's an interesting definition. Trouble is, it applies to you far more than it does to me. You da talker-in-chief, sweet cheeks. I didn't go out of my way to write the post, BTW. As you know, I was responding to Buck. If I'm a stalker according to your new definition, at least I'm an honest stalker. You are a viciously malicious, profoundly and consistently dishonest stalker. That was (as you know) my point to Buck. We'll see a demonstration in the very next paragraphs: You even stalked Curtis recently when one of your former minions said he liked him, and he hasn't been here since August: You mean, after Dr. Dumbass responded to one of your long dump-on-Judy rants that fawned over Curtis? In which he said he liked Curtis but found him emotionally duplicitous, and I agreed? Because that's the post of mine you're quoting, along with my follow-up: Curtis, in stark contrast, went to considerable lengths to hide his emotional duplicity. To be a little more specific, if I may: Curtis pretended to be comfortable with who he was, as Barry puts it. But that was a carefully constructed facade, and it took very little in the way of chipping to expose the real Curtis underneath. *You went on to stalk Dr. Dumbass for what he had said about Curtis, and in that post added Robin to your list of stalkees for the day--Robin, who hadn't been here since early April.* *Did you think I wasn't going to provide the context you dishonestly left out? (And it was obviously deliberate dishonesty, folks, since he had actually looked up the posts in question.)* *If anybody would like to verify what I just wrote, let me know and I'll provide the URLs to the posts.* *As I said in a post a couple of days ago, Barry doesn't have the wherewithal to make an honest case. He'd have to refrain from stalking if he had to be honest, because he'd have nothing to say.* Stalking is just what you DO, Judy. Everyone here knows this but you. *Says the Master Stalker of FFL.* *Your hypocrisy is unparalleled. It's stupefying. And that's giving you the benefit of the doubt, because if you really believe what you're saying, you're insane, completely out of touch with reality.* *Now, how do you explain your claim that I have stalked you from forum to forum?* *(See, Barry has switched definitions. Before, he meant stalking in the standard sense of following someone around, as in his claim above. But now he's using it as a synonym for dumping on.)* *How about explaining the fact that you were stalking me on FFL before I even arrived here?* *I can find the URLs for those posts as well if anyone is interested.* *I swear to God, interacting with Barry is like being in a hall of funhouse mirrors. Everything he says is warped, twisted, turned inside-out and upside-down. And the older he becomes, the worse it gets. It's hard to imagine that he genuinely thinks anybody believes him, but it's even harder to understand why he would constantly spout such obviously dishonest crap if he didn't.* Like I said once before and I still stand by it, Barry is a freak of nature. *I wrote to Buck:* I'll tell you: Because that's what Barry has said that I do, over and over. He claims I've stalked him from forum to forum. That is factually untrue. Of the four forums we've been on together, one (alt.m.t) I joined before I had ever encountered him; two I joined before he did; and the fourth, FFL, he Invited me to join, along with other members of alt.m.t. So what does that make Barry, Buck? I could go on and on listing the things Barry has said about me (and others) that were simply factually false, and that he knows were false. Literally hundreds of things.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The Vivid and Present Threat of Hooliganism on Fairfield Life.
Are you the famous Toby Walker? On 12/5/2013 2:08 PM, Toby Walker wrote: Oh this is great! lol! On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:49 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com mailto:awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote: See Barry. See Barry stalk Judy. Stalk, stalk, stalk. Nothing new here; move along, folks. I wrote: Buck, reflect a minute. What makes you think I stalk? Barry replied: You mean, other than the fact that you're doing it right now? :-) When you go out of your way to write a post dumping on the person you've been dumping on consistently for nearly twenty years, about whom you've written literally thousands of posts dumping on him, you're stalking. You mean, the way you've gone out of your way to write posts dumping on me and have done relentlessly for nearly twenty years over thousands of posts, and are doing right now? That's what you mean by stalking, what you've been spending most of your time on the Web doing to me and many others ever since I've known you? Get over your self-delusions, honey...you're a stalker. Well, that's an interesting definition. Trouble is, it applies to you far more than it does to me. You da talker-in-chief, sweet cheeks. I didn't go out of my way to write the post, BTW. As you know, I was responding to Buck. If I'm a stalker according to your new definition, at least I'm an honest stalker. You are a viciously malicious, profoundly and consistently dishonest stalker. That was (as you know) my point to Buck. We'll see a demonstration in the very next paragraphs: You even stalked Curtis recently when one of your former minions said he liked him, and he hasn't been here since August: You mean, after Dr. Dumbass responded to one of your long dump-on-Judy rants that fawned over Curtis? In which he said he liked Curtis but found him emotionally duplicitous, and I agreed? Because that's the post of mine you're quoting, along with my follow-up: Curtis, in stark contrast, went to considerable lengths to hide his emotional duplicity. To be a little more specific, if I may: Curtis pretended to be comfortable with who he was, as Barry puts it. But that was a carefully constructed facade, and it took very little in the way of chipping to expose the real Curtis underneath. *You went on to stalk Dr. Dumbass for what he had said about Curtis, and in that post added Robin to your list of stalkees for the day--Robin, who hadn't been here since early April.* * * *Did you think I wasn't going to provide the context you dishonestly left out? (And it was obviously deliberate dishonesty, folks, since he had actually looked up the posts in question.)* * * *If anybody would like to verify what I just wrote, let me know and I'll provide the URLs to the posts.* * * *As I said in a post a couple of days ago, Barry doesn't have the wherewithal to make an honest case. He'd have to refrain from stalking if he had to be honest, because he'd have nothing to say.* Stalking is just what you DO, Judy. Everyone here knows this but you. *Says the Master Stalker of FFL.* * * *Your hypocrisy is unparalleled. It's stupefying. And that's giving you the benefit of the doubt, because if you really believe what you're saying, you're insane, completely out of touch with reality.* * * *Now, how do you explain your claim that I have stalked you from forum to forum?* * * *(See, Barry has switched definitions. Before, he meant stalking in the standard sense of following someone around, as in his claim above. But now he's using it as a synonym for dumping on.)* * * *How about explaining the fact that you were stalking me on FFL before I even arrived here?* * * *I can find the URLs for those posts as well if anyone is interested.* * * *I swear to God, interacting with Barry is like being in a hall of funhouse mirrors. Everything he says is warped, twisted, turned inside-out and upside-down. And the older he becomes, the worse it gets. It's hard to imagine that he genuinely thinks anybody believes him, but it's even harder to understand why he would constantly spout such obviously dishonest crap if he didn't.* * * Like I said once before and I still stand by it, Barry is a freak of nature. * * *I wrote to Buck:* I'll tell you: Because that's what Barry has said that I do, over and over. He claims I've stalked him from forum to forum. That is factually untrue. Of the four forums we've been on together, one (alt.m.t) I joined before I had ever encountered him; two I joined before
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The Vivid and Present Threat of Hooliganism on Fairfield Life.
maybe? On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote: Are you the famous Toby Walker? On 12/5/2013 2:08 PM, Toby Walker wrote: Oh this is great! lol! On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:49 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... authfriend@...wrote: See Barry. See Barry stalk Judy. Stalk, stalk, stalk. Nothing new here; move along, folks. I wrote: Buck, reflect a minute. What makes you think I stalk? Barry replied: You mean, other than the fact that you're doing it right now? :-) When you go out of your way to write a post dumping on the person you've been dumping on consistently for nearly twenty years, about whom you've written literally thousands of posts dumping on him, you're stalking. You mean, the way you've gone out of your way to write posts dumping on me and have done relentlessly for nearly twenty years over thousands of posts, and are doing right now? That's what you mean by stalking, what you've been spending most of your time on the Web doing to me and many others ever since I've known you? Get over your self-delusions, honey...you're a stalker. Well, that's an interesting definition. Trouble is, it applies to you far more than it does to me. You da talker-in-chief, sweet cheeks. I didn't go out of my way to write the post, BTW. As you know, I was responding to Buck. If I'm a stalker according to your new definition, at least I'm an honest stalker. You are a viciously malicious, profoundly and consistently dishonest stalker. That was (as you know) my point to Buck. We'll see a demonstration in the very next paragraphs: You even stalked Curtis recently when one of your former minions said he liked him, and he hasn't been here since August: You mean, after Dr. Dumbass responded to one of your long dump-on-Judy rants that fawned over Curtis? In which he said he liked Curtis but found him emotionally duplicitous, and I agreed? Because that's the post of mine you're quoting, along with my follow-up: Curtis, in stark contrast, went to considerable lengths to hide his emotional duplicity. To be a little more specific, if I may: Curtis pretended to be comfortable with who he was, as Barry puts it. But that was a carefully constructed facade, and it took very little in the way of chipping to expose the real Curtis underneath. *You went on to stalk Dr. Dumbass for what he had said about Curtis, and in that post added Robin to your list of stalkees for the day--Robin, who hadn't been here since early April.* *Did you think I wasn't going to provide the context you dishonestly left out? (And it was obviously deliberate dishonesty, folks, since he had actually looked up the posts in question.)* *If anybody would like to verify what I just wrote, let me know and I'll provide the URLs to the posts.* *As I said in a post a couple of days ago, Barry doesn't have the wherewithal to make an honest case. He'd have to refrain from stalking if he had to be honest, because he'd have nothing to say.* Stalking is just what you DO, Judy. Everyone here knows this but you. *Says the Master Stalker of FFL.* *Your hypocrisy is unparalleled. It's stupefying. And that's giving you the benefit of the doubt, because if you really believe what you're saying, you're insane, completely out of touch with reality.* *Now, how do you explain your claim that I have stalked you from forum to forum?* *(See, Barry has switched definitions. Before, he meant stalking in the standard sense of following someone around, as in his claim above. But now he's using it as a synonym for dumping on.)* *How about explaining the fact that you were stalking me on FFL before I even arrived here?* *I can find the URLs for those posts as well if anyone is interested.* *I swear to God, interacting with Barry is like being in a hall of funhouse mirrors. Everything he says is warped, twisted, turned inside-out and upside-down. And the older he becomes, the worse it gets. It's hard to imagine that he genuinely thinks anybody believes him, but it's even harder to understand why he would constantly spout such obviously dishonest crap if he didn't.* Like I said once before and I still stand by it, Barry is a freak of nature. *I wrote to Buck:* I'll tell you: Because that's what Barry has said that I do, over and over. He claims I've stalked him from forum to forum. That is factually untrue. Of the four forums we've been on together, one (alt.m.t) I joined before I had ever encountered him; two I joined before he did; and the fourth, FFL, he Invited me to join, along with other members of alt.m.t. So what does that make Barry, Buck? I could go on and on listing the things Barry has said about me (and others) that were simply factually false, and that he knows were false. Literally
[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The Vivid and Present Threat of Hooliganism on Fairfield Life.
How about the liars, Buck? Lying about other members of the community is the worst sort of unkindness there is, yet you never mention it.
[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: The Vivid and Present Threat of Hooliganism on Fairfield Life.
How about liars, Buck? Do you feel liars are perfectly acceptable on FFL and in civil society generally? Society has no need to protect itself from liars, right? Buck wrote: Banishment, has its place in civil society to protect society. In protecting the larger right of any civil community to exist it certainly is why societies remove asocial types from society.
