--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
With Lawson's, yes. It's not something I normally do--only with the
more inane, compulsive posters like him, which, thankfully, are few.
I'm hardly alone. In fact, of the ones who receive email, I'd wager
more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 12, 2006, at 7:54 PM, authfriend wrote:
I thought you didn't get his posts.
I read them in *your* posts and those of others, Judy, geez--don't you
read your own posts? How am I supposed to avoid them
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
[...[
was, and it's *especially* noticeable in many rural
areas, in which apparently somewhat larger families are allowed.
Even so, in many
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With Lawson's, yes. It's not something I normally do--only with the
more inane, compulsive posters like him, which, thankfully, are few.
I'm hardly alone. In fact, of the ones who receive email, I'd wager
more
On Aug 12, 2006, at 9:43 PM, authfriend wrote:
(You seem to have deleted the context showing
that I meant you've had quite a bit of experience
living with egg on your face.)
Almost as much as you, I would guess.
I'm just mystified as to why anyone would think
enough of Lawson's posts are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Aug 12, 2006, at 9:43 PM, authfriend wrote:
(You seem to have deleted the context showing
that I meant you've had quite a bit of experience
living with egg on your face.)
Almost as much as you, I would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
Judy, are you advocating banning ultrasound?
No, I'm advocating not letting women use it to
selectively abort females (in other words, I'm
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 8/10/06 6:00:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
sparaig@ writes:
Prediction: there will be more outrage over this than over the
Chinese
In a message dated 8/11/06 12:29:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a
message dated 8/10/06 6:00:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes: Prediction: there will be more outrage over this than
over the Chinese practice of throwing female
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/11/06 12:29:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a message dated 8/10/06 6:00:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
sparaig@ writes:
Prediction: there will be more outrage over
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/11/06 12:29:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a message dated 8/10/06 6:00:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
sparaig@ writes:
Prediction: there will be more outrage over
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 8/11/06 12:29:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
sparaig@ writes:
a message dated 8/10/06 6:00:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
In a message dated 8/11/06 3:16:34 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I thought they just aborted them It's pretty
high-tech to be able to tell the sex of an unborn.
Is there some reason Chinese wouldn't have that tech? India
does. India has the
In a message dated 8/11/06 3:21:40 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you support abortion, you can't be against aborting female
fetuses.You can if the ONLY reason is because they're
female.
It's a mothers right to choose. Women have the right to decide
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/11/06 3:21:40 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you support abortion, you can't be against aborting female
fetuses.
You can if the ONLY reason is because they're
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 8/11/06 3:21:40 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
sparaig@ writes:
If you support abortion, you can't be against aborting female
fetuses.
In a message dated 8/11/06 7:04:50 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You can if the ONLY reason is because they're
female.It's a mothers right to choose. Women have
the right to decide if they want to carry a child regardless of
it's sex. Perhaps,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 8/11/06 3:21:40 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
sparaig@ writes:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated
In a message dated 8/11/06 9:42:04 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's a mothers right to choose. Women have the right to decide if
they want to carry a child regardless of it's sex.
Perhaps, but the social issue is overwhelming the
individual
In a message dated 8/11/06 10:25:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ban
anything that can be used to determine the sex of the fetus. Ultrasound
while the mom isn't allowed to look, would be OK, as long as the
doctor doesn't reveal the sex.Hey, that might
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/11/06 9:42:04 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's a mothers right to choose. Women have the right to decide if
they want to carry a child regardless of it's sex.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/11/06 10:25:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ban anything that can be used to determine the sex of the fetus.
Ultrasound while the
mom isn't allowed to look, would be OK,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Friend,
I thought you might be interested in this Humane Society International
campaign to save dogs in China.
The recent killing of more than 50,000 dogs in southwestern China has
prompted worldwide outrage
In a message dated 8/10/06 6:00:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Prediction: there will be more outrage over this than over the Chinese
practice of throwing female infants out with the
trash...
I thought they just aborted them
__._,_.___
To subscribe, send
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/10/06 6:00:00 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Prediction: there will be more outrage over this than over the Chinese
practice of throwing
female infants out with the trash...
101 - 128 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
