From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of dhamiltony2k5
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:17 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A Case for Modifying The Five Post Limit
NewMorn you autocrat you, need to see some scientific chart or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
>
NewMorn you autocrat you, need to see some scientific chart or peer-
review publication before can believe your claim of coup here.
Rick, watch out for this guy as a moderator. & what is his interest
anywa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> new.morning wrote:
> > Someone jokingly suggested we should make it an average of 5
posts a
> > day -- thus 35 a week or something. Hard to track and administer.
> > However, I find I barely have time to read a few posts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Like it or not, the posting limit works,
> and praise of it is almost unanimous.
The 7-post limit is kind of an interesting idea. Any feedback on
> that?
Ken Hassman writes:
Yah, if the praise of the 5-post lim
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Like it or not, the posting limit works,
> and praise of it is almost unanimous.
The 7-post limit is kind of an interesting idea. Any feedback on
> that?
>
Yah, if the praise of the 5-post limit is nearly unanim
I propose modifying the requirement to a permanent & final 7-post limit.
Cosmically speaking, 7 is a much better number than 5 (I'm serious). Musically
speaking, as progfreaks in general (and fans of King Crimson in particular)
already know: if it ain't in seven then ya ain't in heaven. And
IMHO, this site has been vastly improved by the five-post limit. It is
now more readable, individual's ideas are easier to follow, and it has
eliminated much of the annoying bickering. The only improvement I
could suggest is a one-post-per-day limit. In this way, a person would
really, really, real
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Kenny H" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> For what little my opinion will be worth, and I'm mainly a
> lurker, I have really enjoyed reading FF Life again since
> the 5 post limit came into being. It is much more manageable,
> the tone is much more civil, and
Kenny... I totally agree. Since the five post limit I have been able
to read and ENJOY most of the posts. Not the case before the limit.
I also want to say... working in the service industry for many years,
I have come to realize that no matter what a person does it will not
satisfy everyone. A
For what little my opinion will be worth, and I'm mainly a lurker, I
have really enjoyed reading FF Life again since the 5 post limit came
into being. It is much more manageable, the tone is much more civil,
and there is not a lot of one liner posts and the people who felt a
need to post about anyt
Rick,
I don't want to place an administrative burden on you or anyone. I was
thinking more of an honor system -- with sosme verification for
blatant abusers.
In other words, I think most people can count thier own posts and self
limit them. I would tend to post way less than 35 a week, but might
11 matches
Mail list logo
