14 12:48 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alternative View of Deepak Chopra
Judy, you may be right. But there is just one thing. People have been know to
be petty, and to take petty disputes to unreasonable lengths. Do you sort of
know what I mean?
Good point. This is the insight that
On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 8:45 AM, "awoelflebater@..."
wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
From: "steve.sundur@..."
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 12:48 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alternative View of Deepak
Life@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
From: "steve.sundur@..."
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 12:48 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alternative View of Deepak Chopra
Judy, you may be right. But there is just one thing. People have been know to
be pet
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
From: "steve.sundur@..."
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 12:48 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alternative View of Deepak Chopra
Judy, you may be right. But there is just one thing. People
On 3/18/2014 2:20 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
Judy, you may be right. But there is just one thing. People have
been know to be petty, and to take petty disputes to unreasonable
lengths. Do you sort of know what I mean?
Good point. This is the insight that writers like John Le Carré and
Len Deig
From: "steve.sun...@yahoo.com"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 12:48 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alternative View of Deepak Chopra
Judy, you may be right. But there is just one thing. People have been know to
be petty, and to take petty d
There's no evidence of that either in the pilot's case. But if you feel the
need to dispute the news reports, that's up to you.
Judy, you may be right. But there is just one thing. People have been know
to be petty, and to take petty disputes to unreasonable lengths. Do you sort of
know
Judy, you may be right. But there is just one thing. People have been know to
be petty, and to take petty disputes to unreasonable lengths. Do you sort of
know what I mean?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Why it makes no sense to suspect the pilot of terrorism or hijacking be
Why it makes no sense to suspect the pilot of terrorism or hijacking because of
his political views:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/foreigners/2014/03/pilot_zaharie_ahmad_shah_supported_anwar_ibrahim_was_he_a_terrorist.html
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/for
I'm happy to say I have not the slightest idea what you just said, so I can't
comment. ;-)
My point is just that if you're a satellite operator looking for visuals, you
have to know what you're looking for and approximately where it is, and there
was no reason to be looking for this plane unt
[damn Jude, always pressing the issue - ok] - yeah, but I used to work for a
satellite comm company, roughly a million years ago (mid-80's) - launched their
own sat, on an Ariane rocket, from Kourou, French Guiana (been there).
I used to peak signals, with a spectrum analyzer, from the ground s
The "on-board telemetry system" stopped transmitting shortly after 8 a.m. last
Saturday morning (the plane was nearly out of fuel by that time).
What about visual and infrared surveillance, Doc? They didn't know there was a
lost plane for them to be looking for, or where to look, until days af
On 3/16/2014 7:30 PM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Seriously? What about visual, and infrared surveillance??
>
"A transponder is a device that transmits a response. In a plane, the
transponder is receiving an interrogation and responding by transmitting
a burst of data. Turning off th
Seriously? What about visual, and infrared surveillance??
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Satellites don't "see" aircraft whose communications systems aren't
functioning.
Here's a list, of the 3,909 active satellites, orbiting the planet. I should
think someone knows, or
On 3/16/2014 2:48 PM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote:
lot of evidence pointing to the pilot.
>
"Data showing the number of plausible runways where the plane could have
touched down - which need to be at least 5,000ft - offer a baffling
number of potential locations."
Daily Mail:
http://www.dai
lot of evidence pointing to the pilot. family problems. (wife and son moved
out day before flight), and anger at government, (attended trial of opposition
leader he strongly supported, and who was sentenced to jail, day of flight)
for those who may not be keeping up
---In FairfieldLife@yaho
Satellites don't "see" aircraft whose communications systems aren't
functioning.
Here's a list, of the 3,909 active satellites, orbiting the planet. I should
think someone knows, or is close to finding out. Unfortunately, this one *does*
take a rocket scientist (had to happen, eventually)
Here's a list, of the 3,909 active satellites, orbiting the planet. I should
think someone knows, or is close to finding out. Unfortunately, this one *does*
take a rocket scientist (had to happen, eventually) --
http://www.n2yo.com/satellites/?c=&t=country
http://www.n2yo.com/satellites/?c=&t=c
So where's the fuckin' plane! Speaking of practical benefits. (-:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
Yeah, so true, and well said - I like to find a practical benefit in such
wisdom, otherwise I tend to lose interest. One that has occurred with more and
more frequency, with me, is
didn't I hear this back in SCI tape 22?
I think I did. (-:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
“You are not looking at the field in every wave and particle, the field is
your extended body….you are a local concentration of information and energy in
the wholeness that is the bo
On 3/16/2014 10:01 AM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com wrote:
> Jokes on you, toilet-boy. Since Chopra speaks the truth, coherently,
> mixing and matching comes up with the same result. Don't be so full of
> yourself, please. Go get a pastry.
>
Maybe it's time to start talking about Barry's cogniti
*his* writing, too, so no wonder he
couldn't tell the difference. :-)
From: "doctordumbass@..."
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2014 11:43 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alternative View of Deepak Chopra
Yeah, so true, and well said - I
On 3/16/2014 5:53 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
The idea is to create something that appeals to gullible idiots
>
"You perceive yourself as being solid and physical, limited to a body.
You are made up of light, endless mind. The way you see life is a
limited state of mind."
http://www.ramaquotes.c
1:43 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alternative View of Deepak Chopra
Yeah, so true, and well said - I like to find a practical benefit in such
wisdom, otherwise I tend to lose interest. One that has occurred with more and
more frequency, with me, is not having to consciously try to remember
Yeah, so true, and well said - I like to find a practical benefit in such
wisdom, otherwise I tend to lose interest. One that has occurred with more and
more frequency, with me, is not having to consciously try to remember the
masses of data I have absorbed over the years. Living more as a conce
“You are not looking at the field in every wave and particle, the field is
your extended body….you are a local concentration of information and energy in
the wholeness that is the body of the universe.”
http://www.wisdomofchopra.com/ http://www.wisdomofchopra.com/
---In FairfieldLife@yah
26 matches
Mail list logo
