[FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment as moodmaking?

2007-07-25 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sinhlnx sinhlnx@ wrote:
  
   ---Consider an apartment as a type of cage. Could a person 
   only think the apartment is real, but really be living inside 
   Mae West's head?
   
   http://www.planetperplex.com/en/item203
   
   Or, Jim, you were fortunate in realizing you were in a cage. So 
   I guess the people living in the cage but don't know it are 
   in ignorant Bliss?kind of like the people living in the 
   Matrix world while the aliens are sucking out the juices from 
   their real bodies.
  
  Or perhaps Jim is living locked in the cage of Enlightenment 
  World -- perhaps not knowing he is caged, all the while 
  thinking he is boundlessly free.
 
 Or, having made the mistake of announcing that he is
 realized/enlightened, now he's stuck in the cage of
 pretending that he is. I guess that's the same thing
 you mean by enlightenment world.
 
 I can't say fersure, of course, but it's certainly a
 possibility. I've seen the same phenomenon before in 
 many different spiritual trips. Someone has a neat 
 experience of realization -- a *real* experience of 
 realization -- and, because they assume that once 
 they have such an experience it will be permanent,
 they announce to the world their enlightenment. Some
 of them even set themselves up as spiritual teachers
 or gurus at this point.
 
 And then the experience fades. What's a guru to do?
 
 An honest one would go to his students and say, Oops,
 I was wrong. One who was a little less honest, espec-
 ially with himself, would pretend that the experience
 of realization was still going on. An even less honest
 one would indulge in self deception, and convince him-
 self that it was still going on.
 
 Once you've had a couple of these realization exper-
 iences, it's pretty easy to talk the talk of them.
 Few can tell whether you're talkin' from present exper-
 ience or past experience, because you *are* talkin'
 from experience. So it's actually a fairly common
 phenomenon in the larger community of spiritual trips
 and seekers to see people milking a transitory exper-
 ience of realization for years or decades after it
 has gone away or faded. 
 
 Not to say that's what's going on here on FFL, but it
 could be. Because such things *aren't* talked about
 much in the TMO, but are known about and talked about
 openly in other spiritual trips, I just thought I'd
 bring up the possibility.

Just to clarify, what I am talking about above
is a spirituality-wide phenomenon, one *not*
limited to TM and the TMO. For the record, however,
there are a couple of aspects of this phenomenon
that I have noticed are stronger in the TMO.

The first is the willingness of the larger commun-
ity of seekers to *perpetuate* the phenomenon of
people moodmaking their enlightenment and allow
it to go on. IMO, this is because in the TMO, 
relatively few people (maybe a few hundred out of 
what, millions?) have ever *had* strong realization 
experiences. *And* they've paid a great deal, both 
in terms of time and money, *to* have such an 
experience. So when someone announces that they've 
had one, or have realized their enlightenment, 
there is a tendency to suspend disbelief and allow 
them to do it out of hopes that, If it can happen 
for him/her, it could still happen for me.

The second aspect of this phenomenon that I see as
fairly unique within the TM movement variant of it
is that the hierarchical oneupsmanship *continues*
in those who have announced their enlightenment. In
the TMO, with its rigid, hierarchical conceptual 
framework of seven states of consciousness, it's
not *enough* to just realize one's enlightenment.
No. :-) Once one has announced that one is real-
ized (CC), there are still GC and UC and BC to 
announce. And now there are all the siddhis and
other perceptions to announce as well. It's like
the moment Maharishi talks about a new state of
consciousness or a new type of subtle perception,
there are realized souls lining up to announce that
they've just reached that state of consciousness
or had that perception.

What's funniest for those of us who have seen this
phenomenon in other spiritual traditions is to watch
the enlightened dick size contests. They go some-
thing like the following imaginary dialog between
two TM-realized souls:

Yeah, that's a pretty good realization experience
you just talked about. Thanks for sharing it. I used
to have those experiences, too, back before my own
realization began to open up into God consciousness.

Oh, I didn't mean to imply that the experience I 
was talking about was *limited* to only CC; it has
continued for me, even after I started experiencing
GC. In fact, I still have these experiences now that
I'm living in UC.

Yes, I agree. Even from the standpoint of Brahman
it is possible to have such experiences. I know 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment as moodmaking?

2007-07-25 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ 
wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sinhlnx sinhlnx@ wrote:
  
   ---Consider an apartment as a type of cage. Could a person 
   only think the apartment is real, but really be living 
inside 
   Mae West's head?
   
   http://www.planetperplex.com/en/item203
   
   Or, Jim, you were fortunate in realizing you were in a cage.  
So I 
   guess the people living in the cage but don't know it are 
   in ignorant Bliss?kind of like the people living in the 
   Matrix 
   world while the aliens are sucking out the juices from their 
real 
   bodies.
  
  Or perhaps Jim is living locked in the cage of Enlightenment 
World
  -- perhaps not knowing he is caged, all the while thinking he is
  boundlessly free.
 
 Or, having made the mistake of announcing that he is
 realized/enlightened, now he's stuck in the cage of
 pretending that he is. I guess that's the same thing
 you mean by enlightenment world.
 
 I can't say fersure, of course, but it's certainly a
 possibility. I've seen the same phenomenon before in 
 many different spiritual trips. Someone has a neat 
 experience of realization -- a *real* experience of 
 realization -- and, because they assume that once 
 they have such an experience it will be permanent,
 they announce to the world their enlightenment. Some
 of them even set themselves up as spiritual teachers
 or gurus at this point.
 
 And then the experience fades. What's a guru to do?
 
 An honest one would go to his students and say, Oops,
 I was wrong. One who was a little less honest, espec-
 ially with himself, would pretend that the experience
 of realization was still going on. An even less honest
 one would indulge in self deception, and convince him-
 self that it was still going on.
 
 Once you've had a couple of these realization exper-
 iences, it's pretty easy to talk the talk of them.
 Few can tell whether you're talkin' from present exper-
 ience or past experience, because you *are* talkin'
 from experience. So it's actually a fairly common
 phenomenon in the larger community of spiritual trips
 and seekers to see people milking a transitory exper-
 ience of realization for years or decades after it
 has gone away or faded. 
 
 Not to say that's what's going on here on FFL, but it
 could be. Because such things *aren't* talked about
 much in the TMO, but are known about and talked about
 openly in other spiritual trips, I just thought I'd
 bring up the possibility.

This experience of transitory enlightenment is actually quite a good 
one to have, for several reasons. First, while it is occurring, it 
feels great; a blissful vacation from ourselves. The experiences we 
have during that time move us ahead in terms of being unlike what 
we've experienced before. Next, as the experience fades, it leaves 
behind a strong impression of that which is very desirable for us, 
spurring us forward in our quest for eternal freedom. Finally, the 
more we milk it as you say (for years??? I find that hard to 
believe, though I used to try to hold on for a couple of days 
afterwards...), the more our ego goes through an adjustment 
afterwards, realizing its limits, and hopefully helping us to become 
more humble in the process (lol). I look at those experiences of 
transitory enlightenment in hindsight as advertisements for and by  
the Divine-- flashy, desirable, and brief.:-) 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment as moodmaking?

2007-07-25 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The bottom line from my point of view is that there
 is simply No Way to tell whether someone is bullshitting
 you (and often themselves) about their supposed enlight-
 enment or not. So you believe whatever you want, and 
 whatever makes you happy.

not to be too cryptic about it, but try listening beyond your hearing. 
Its a quick and easy way to suss out the bullshitters.:-)



[FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment as moodmaking?

2007-07-25 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
  The bottom line from my point of view is that there
  is simply No Way to tell whether someone is bullshitting
  you (and often themselves) about their supposed enlight-
  enment or not. So you believe whatever you want, and 
  whatever makes you happy.

 not to be too cryptic about it, but try listening beyond 
 your hearing. Its a quick and easy way to suss out the 
 bullshitters.:-)

If I'd done that, you would definitely have been 
in the bullshitter's group. I think it's far more
compassionate and charitable to just say, No Way to
tell.  :-)






[FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment as moodmaking?

2007-07-25 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ 
wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
wrote:
   The bottom line from my point of view is that there
   is simply No Way to tell whether someone is bullshitting
   you (and often themselves) about their supposed enlight-
   enment or not. So you believe whatever you want, and 
   whatever makes you happy.
 
  not to be too cryptic about it, but try listening beyond 
  your hearing. Its a quick and easy way to suss out the 
  bullshitters.:-)
 
 If I'd done that, you would definitely have been 
 in the bullshitter's group. I think it's far more
 compassionate and charitable to just say, No Way to
 tell.  :-)

Get real. I don't want your compassion to determine whether or not 
you think I am enlightened or BSing. What a rediculous notion. Think 
whatever you want. This is an absurd conversation at this 
point; compassion- what a joke.:-)



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment as moodmaking?

2007-07-25 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Jul 25, 2007, at 4:26 PM, Peter wrote:

 I officially declare that Jim is enlightened and is
 the envy of the entire host of celestial gods. I will
 declare anyone else to be enlightened too if they
 like. Also Risk Archer is enlightened because he's my
 initiator. Micheal Dean Goodman is also enlightened
 because I drum with him and went to his house last
 Saturday night.

Dr. Pete, maybe next time you see him you could mention that his house 
in FF is on the verge of being condemned, and several of his neighbors 
are seriously ticked that he's let things get to the point they have.  
Apparently he's been ignoring letters from the city to take care of his 
property for years now.

  Curtis is enlightened because I went
 to MIU with him.



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Enlightenment as moodmaking?

2007-07-25 Thread Peter
I officially declare that Jim is enlightened and is
the envy of the entire host of celestial gods. I will
declare anyone else to be enlightened too if they
like. Also Risk Archer is enlightened because he's my
initiator. Micheal Dean Goodman is also enlightened
because I drum with him and went to his house last
Saturday night. Curtis is enlightened because I went
to MIU with him.


--- jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 jim_flanegin jflanegi@ 
 wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
 no_reply@ 
 wrote:
The bottom line from my point of view is that
 there
is simply No Way to tell whether someone is
 bullshitting
you (and often themselves) about their
 supposed enlight-
enment or not. So you believe whatever you
 want, and 
whatever makes you happy.
  
   not to be too cryptic about it, but try
 listening beyond 
   your hearing. Its a quick and easy way to suss
 out the 
   bullshitters.:-)
  
  If I'd done that, you would definitely have been 
  in the bullshitter's group. I think it's far
 more
  compassionate and charitable to just say, No Way
 to
  tell.  :-)
 
 Get real. I don't want your compassion to
 determine whether or not 
 you think I am enlightened or BSing. What a
 rediculous notion. Think 
 whatever you want. This is an absurd conversation at
 this 
 point; compassion- what a joke.:-)
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



  

Luggage? GPS? Comic books? 
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mailp=graduation+giftscs=bz