On Jun 28, 2005, at 4:04 PM, sparaig wrote:
If I recall correctly, MMY defined samyama as maintainance, motion
and samadhi.
A very good english definition IMO. Maintenance is maintaining
awareness in a particular spot: Dharana. Motion is the continuous
flow towards the object: Dhyana.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 28, 2005, at 1:33 PM, johnlasher20002000 wrote:
There seems to be a difference between Maharishi's description of
samyama and that of most other saints.
Indeed.
In samkhya one will want to cultivate the
Good morning Rick C.:
On Jun 29, 2005, at 9:33 AM, Rick wrote:
This sounds like the Christian approach.
The samkhya/yogic approach dude. I thought we were talking Patanjali
here?
If I act good and think
good and am good then the kingdom of heaven will open for me.
LOL.
To
quote MMY,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Thus when one uses a magical
formula, one exhausts a cause--accumulated virtues--and manifests a
particular form--the siddhi (e.g. yogic hopping). If the
underlying
intent of the action is not for something greater
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 28, 2005, at 1:33 PM, johnlasher20002000 wrote:
There seems to be a difference between Maharishi's description of
samyama and that of most other saints.
Indeed.
In samkhya one will want to cultivate the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 28, 2005, at 4:04 PM, sparaig wrote:
If I recall correctly, MMY defined samyama as maintainance, motion
and samadhi.
A very good english definition IMO. Maintenance is maintaining
awareness in a particular
On Jun 29, 2005, at 9:54 AM, sparaig wrote:
This explains the TMers participation on the list, but what is your
excuse?
Sparaig do you think this is a TM list? It's for everyone dude.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning Rick C.:
On Jun 29, 2005, at 9:33 AM, Rick wrote:
This sounds like the Christian approach.
The samkhya/yogic approach dude. I thought we were talking
Patanjali
here?
If I act good and think
good
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seems to be a difference between Maharishi's description of
samyama and that of most other saints.
Most teachers would consider what we do as TM meditation as doing
samyama on the mantra, that is,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There seems to be a difference between Maharishi's description of
samyama and that of most other saints.
Most teachers would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- johnlasher20002000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There seems to be a difference between Maharishi's
description of
samyama and that of most other saints.
Most teachers would consider what we do as TM
--The intension is maintanence, the movement is falling back to the
self, and samhadi is witnessing the process...
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, johnlasher20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have never been clear about the difference between samyama and TM
meditation. (I know the difference as per tm-sidhis instructions, but
in general)
In samyama there is concentration (effortlessly thinking
13 matches
Mail list logo
