Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
Bingo! You hit the nail on the head ! He's thinking ,short term, of his image and campaign promises, not the good of the country or world. He's shirking his responsibilty and his place in history is going to take a hard hit. The longer a cancer grows and spreads, the harder it is to get rid of and at greater cost. The *cancer* was in serious remition, however, he elected to stop treatment and it's back worse than ever. I know, I know, it's Bush's fault for invading Iraq in the first place, right? Ask yourself, what would Saddam being doing right now, with his mortal enemy, Iran, building a nuke right next door. An Islamic nuclear weapons race is the last think the world needs. I'm just sayin'. On Friday, September 19, 2014 9:10 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Mike, It appears that Obama wants the other Arab nations in the Middle East to put their troops in Iraq to defeat ISIS. This strategy may not world since these nations don't want to spend their own money and their troops for a campaign that might last for years. IMO, Obama is just waiting it out until a new president in the US is elected to take over this problem. But in the meantime, he will not send any American troops back in that troubled land.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
True, but a lot of the flag waving by those at the top, in favor of *the definitive war* often deteriorates into a grab for resources, and another chance for weapons testing, and an inflaming of a conflict. If any politician meant to solve the problem, they would. I sort of like the hands-off, but airstrikes if necessary, approach. It appears to have caused a shift in at least the public face of ISIS, now letting hostages go, vs. continuing with horrors. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mdixon.6569@... wrote : Bingo! You hit the nail on the head ! He's thinking ,short term, of his image and campaign promises, not the good of the country or world. He's shirking his responsibilty and his place in history is going to take a hard hit. The longer a cancer grows and spreads, the harder it is to get rid of and at greater cost. The *cancer* was in serious remition, however, he elected to stop treatment and it's back worse than ever. I know, I know, it's Bush's fault for invading Iraq in the first place, right? Ask yourself, what would Saddam being doing right now, with his mortal enemy, Iran, building a nuke right next door. An Islamic nuclear weapons race is the last think the world needs. I'm just sayin'. On Friday, September 19, 2014 9:10 PM, jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Mike, It appears that Obama wants the other Arab nations in the Middle East to put their troops in Iraq to defeat ISIS. This strategy may not world since these nations don't want to spend their own money and their troops for a campaign that might last for years. IMO, Obama is just waiting it out until a new president in the US is elected to take over this problem. But in the meantime, he will not send any American troops back in that troubled land.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
[FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : H, I may have been mistaken.about who said what.not about who would do what. You've expressed so many war mongering concepts, I'm willing to forgive myself for the --- considering who I think you are in real life -- sleight. I officially retract my statement that Richard Williams posted that he'd nuke anyone. The plan that I was in favor of is President Obama's plan - that's the point. To send in drones to destroy ISIS by hitting the infrastructure - bombing the the oil processing and delivery systems to cut off the cash flow; bombing any wheeled vehicle seen on the road in the ISIS controlled areas carrying armed insurgents in jeeps, Land Cruisers or Toyotas with mounted weapons. This will be done without any U.S. troops on the ground. The drones operate remotely from the U.S. We will make a data base of every vehicle in the area and see the gold in the teeth of the leaders - they will have no place to run and hide out in the desert. It was a very dumb thing for them to do - to commit these atrocities and think they could get away with it. According to the U.S. Vice President, 'WE WILL CHASE THESE GUYS TO THE GATES OF HELL1!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
I'm not exactly sure who's saying *what* around here either. However, I don't expect anything significant to happen with ISIS until we have a president that will listen to his military scientists, his top generals.As long as we have a *community organizer* ignoring the best advice of military scientist and advising them what they can do, based on his political agenda, the generals will have their hands tied and will, most likely, have limited success at best, dragging this conflict out for an indefinite length of time and at *who knows what cost*. Nobody wants to end up at the gates of hell. Just send them (ISIS) there. BTW only an idiot telegraphs to his enemies what he will and will not do, unless he's a liar. Then nothing he says can be believed. On Friday, September 19, 2014 10:58 AM, pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : H, I may have been mistaken.about who said what.not about who would do what. You've expressed so many war mongering concepts, I'm willing to forgive myself for the --- considering who I think you are in real life -- sleight. I officially retract my statement that Richard Williams posted that he'd nuke anyone. The plan that I was in favor of is President Obama's plan - that's the point. To send in drones to destroy ISIS by hitting the infrastructure - bombing the the oil processing and delivery systems to cut off the cash flow; bombing any wheeled vehicle seen on the road in the ISIS controlled areas carrying armed insurgents in jeeps, Land Cruisers or Toyotas with mounted weapons. This will be done without any U.S. troops on the ground. The drones operate remotely from the U.S. We will make a data base of every vehicle in the area and see the gold in the teeth of the leaders - they will have no place to run and hide out in the desert. It was a very dumb thing for them to do - to commit these atrocities and think they could get away with it. According to the U.S. Vice President, 'WE WILL CHASE THESE GUYS TO THE GATES OF HELL1!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
Mike, It appears that Obama wants the other Arab nations in the Middle East to put their troops in Iraq to defeat ISIS. This strategy may not world since these nations don't want to spend their own money and their troops for a campaign that might last for years. IMO, Obama is just waiting it out until a new president in the US is elected to take over this problem. But in the meantime, he will not send any American troops back in that troubled land.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
H, I may have been mistaken.about who said what.not about who would do what. You've expressed so many war mongering concepts, I'm willing to forgive myself for the --- considering who I think you are in real life -- sleight. I officially retract my statement that Richard Williams posted that he'd nuke anyone.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote : Emptybill, That scenario you're imagining is a bit extreme. The jihadists' agenda in Syria is very much in flux. They could change at any moment. It is very likely that ISIS will disappear and simply blend in with the rest of the so called friendly rebels. In that case, they would be unified in fighting the Assad government. And they could possibly win, especially if the US supplied the weapons that are intended to defeat ISIS. IMO, the existence of ISIS is now severely threatened since all of the Arab nations and the rest of the world are heavily against it. It would be best for them to conveniently disappear and fight another day after Assad is toppled. If not, Obama will hunt its leaders with drones and special forces commandos similar to what he did with Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. The situation is complicated. Apparently there is not a single country on the planet willing to send in military boots on the ground to fight ISIS in Iraq, except the Kurds. What we need to remember is that we are dealing with Islamic fundamentalists of one strip or another - all one family, according to Sam Harris. There will probably NOT be any military action taken by NATO or anyone else against the ISIS, even after the ISIS strikes their own country. We are familiar with this based on previous engagements where the U.S. pays in money, blood, sweat and tears for almost the entire defense budget of Europe and the Far East. There may come a time, and probably sooner than later, when the U.S. will not be willing to fight everyone's battle for them anymore. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote : This pact complicates the scenario in fighting ISIS. Its probably not a good idea to arm the so-called friendly rebels at this time. Doesn't matter. Islamic State will attempt to convene an Islamic Caliphate to establish regional lordship over Muslim countries. They will then come back home to further educate us into real Islam - like they are doing now - by following their genocidal prophet. American Muslim jihadi-s are going through Turkey to get through to the Syria/Iraq border. That means no passport stamps are necessary, so they just appear to us as East-European travelers. Wait until the jihadi shooters unload their hollow-points into the crowds at a football game, music concert or else go blow-up a big metro hotel. Mothers Against Murdering Muslims will demand a police state and people will happy to comply - just to feel safer. We will be one step closer to The Other Final Solution - Nuking Mecca.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
[FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
Richard, Whether you like it or not, the US is at war with another group. ISIS must be taken out of Iraq first before any of the other parts in the plan can be implemented. For the time being, the Assad government should be a US friend while ISIS is still alive and well in Iraq and Syria. Once ISIS is eliminated, the relationship would dramatically change. But, at the same time, Obama has the option to take out the ISIS leaders in Syria if the opportunity presents itself. One big bomb could wipe out their leaders if they are housed in one building. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote : Emptybill, That scenario you're imagining is a bit extreme. The jihadists' agenda in Syria is very much in flux. They could change at any moment. It is very likely that ISIS will disappear and simply blend in with the rest of the so called friendly rebels. In that case, they would be unified in fighting the Assad government. And they could possibly win, especially if the US supplied the weapons that are intended to defeat ISIS. IMO, the existence of ISIS is now severely threatened since all of the Arab nations and the rest of the world are heavily against it. It would be best for them to conveniently disappear and fight another day after Assad is toppled. If not, Obama will hunt its leaders with drones and special forces commandos similar to what he did with Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. The situation is complicated. Apparently there is not a single country on the planet willing to send in military boots on the ground to fight ISIS in Iraq, except the Kurds. What we need to remember is that we are dealing with Islamic fundamentalists of one strip or another - all one family, according to Sam Harris. There will probably NOT be any military action taken by NATO or anyone else against the ISIS, even after the ISIS strikes their own country. We are familiar with this based on previous engagements where the U.S. pays in money, blood, sweat and tears for almost the entire defense budget of Europe and the Far East. There may come a time, and probably sooner than later, when the U.S. will not be willing to fight everyone's battle for them anymore. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote : This pact complicates the scenario in fighting ISIS. Its probably not a good idea to arm the so-called friendly rebels at this time. Doesn't matter. Islamic State will attempt to convene an Islamic Caliphate to establish regional lordship over Muslim countries. They will then come back home to further educate us into real Islam - like they are doing now - by following their genocidal prophet. American Muslim jihadi-s are going through Turkey to get through to the Syria/Iraq border. That means no passport stamps are necessary, so they just appear to us as East-European travelers. Wait until the jihadi shooters unload their hollow-points into the crowds at a football game, music concert or else go blow-up a big metro hotel. Mothers Against Murdering Muslims will demand a police state and people will happy to comply - just to feel safer. We will be one step closer to The Other Final Solution - Nuking Mecca.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
In the desert there's no place to run and no place to hide. U.S. firepower will pick off every jeep, fore-runner and Toyota on the road between Mosul and Damascus. All the ISIS oil terminals will be destroyed - there will no fuel, no food, nothing will get in or out. The ISIS-controlled area will be marked off for destruction. In a few years a wall will be built around the entire Middle East - it will all be a future Gaza Strip - cut off from the rest of the world - no flights in and no flights out - except for drones in the sky.The terrorists are doomed if Hillary is the next U.S.President. I predict. On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 5:16 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Richard, Whether you like it or not, the US is at war with another group. ISIS must be taken out of Iraq first before any of the other parts in the plan can be implemented. For the time being, the Assad government should be a US friend while ISIS is still alive and well in Iraq and Syria. Once ISIS is eliminated, the relationship would dramatically change. But, at the same time, Obama has the option to take out the ISIS leaders in Syria if the opportunity presents itself. One big bomb could wipe out their leaders if they are housed in one building. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote : Emptybill, That scenario you're imagining is a bit extreme. The jihadists' agenda in Syria is very much in flux. They could change at any moment. It is very likely that ISIS will disappear and simply blend in with the rest of the so called friendly rebels. In that case, they would be unified in fighting the Assad government. And they could possibly win, especially if the US supplied the weapons that are intended to defeat ISIS. IMO, the existence of ISIS is now severely threatened since all of the Arab nations and the rest of the world are heavily against it. It would be best for them to conveniently disappear and fight another day after Assad is toppled. If not, Obama will hunt its leaders with drones and special forces commandos similar to what he did with Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. The situation is complicated. Apparently there is not a single country on the planet willing to send in military boots on the ground to fight ISIS in Iraq, except the Kurds. What we need to remember is that we are dealing with Islamic fundamentalists of one strip or another - all one family, according to Sam Harris. There will probably NOT be any military action taken by NATO or anyone else against the ISIS, even after the ISIS strikes their own country. We are familiar with this based on previous engagements where the U.S. pays in money, blood, sweat and tears for almost the entire defense budget of Europe and the Far East. There may come a time, and probably sooner than later, when the U.S. will not be willing to fight everyone's battle for them anymore. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote : This pact complicates the scenario in fighting ISIS. Its probably not a good idea to arm the so-called friendly rebels at this time. Doesn't matter. Islamic State will attempt to convene an Islamic Caliphate to establish regional lordship over Muslim countries. They will then come back home to further educate us into real Islam - like they are doing now - by following their genocidal prophet. American Muslim jihadi-s are going through Turkey to get through to the Syria/Iraq border. That means no passport stamps are necessary, so they just appear to us as East-European travelers. Wait until the jihadi shooters unload their hollow-points into the crowds at a football game, music concert or else go blow-up a big metro hotel. Mothers Against Murdering Muslims will demand a police state and people will happy to comply - just to feel safer. We will be one step closer to The Other Final Solution - Nuking Mecca.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
Under those circumstances, I'd' bet anyone subjected by ISIS is doomed as well. Drones aren't going to know the difference between a wedding party and a care load of terrorists. On Sunday, September 14, 2014 6:54 PM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: In the desert there's no place to run and no place to hide. U.S. firepower will pick off every jeep, fore-runner and Toyota on the road between Mosul and Damascus. All the ISIS oil terminals will be destroyed - there will no fuel, no food, nothing will get in or out. The ISIS-controlled area will be marked off for destruction. In a few years a wall will be built around the entire Middle East - it will all be a future Gaza Strip - cut off from the rest of the world - no flights in and no flights out - except for drones in the sky.The terrorists are doomed if Hillary is the next U.S.President. I predict. On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 5:16 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Richard, Whether you like it or not, the US is at war with another group. ISIS must be taken out of Iraq first before any of the other parts in the plan can be implemented. For the time being, the Assad government should be a US friend while ISIS is still alive and well in Iraq and Syria. Once ISIS is eliminated, the relationship would dramatically change. But, at the same time, Obama has the option to take out the ISIS leaders in Syria if the opportunity presents itself. One big bomb could wipe out their leaders if they are housed in one building. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote : Emptybill, That scenario you're imagining is a bit extreme. The jihadists' agenda in Syria is very much in flux. They could change at any moment. It is very likely that ISIS will disappear and simply blend in with the rest of the so called friendly rebels. In that case, they would be unified in fighting the Assad government. And they could possibly win, especially if the US supplied the weapons that are intended to defeat ISIS. IMO, the existence of ISIS is now severely threatened since all of the Arab nations and the rest of the world are heavily against it. It would be best for them to conveniently disappear and fight another day after Assad is toppled. If not, Obama will hunt its leaders with drones and special forces commandos similar to what he did with Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. The situation is complicated. Apparently there is not a single country on the planet willing to send in military boots on the ground to fight ISIS in Iraq, except the Kurds. What we need to remember is that we are dealing with Islamic fundamentalists of one strip or another - all one family, according to Sam Harris. There will probably NOT be any military action taken by NATO or anyone else against the ISIS, even after the ISIS strikes their own country. We are familiar with this based on previous engagements where the U.S. pays in money, blood, sweat and tears for almost the entire defense budget of Europe and the Far East. There may come a time, and probably sooner than later, when the U.S. will not be willing to fight everyone's battle for them anymore. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote : This pact complicates the scenario in fighting ISIS. Its probably not a good idea to arm the so-called friendly rebels at this time. Doesn't matter. Islamic State will attempt to convene an Islamic Caliphate to establish regional lordship over Muslim countries. They will then come back home to further educate us into real Islam - like they are doing now - by following their genocidal prophet. American Muslim jihadi-s are going through Turkey to get through to the Syria/Iraq border. That means no passport stamps are necessary, so they just appear to us as East-European travelers. Wait until the jihadi shooters unload their hollow-points into the crowds at a football game, music concert or else go blow-up a big metro hotel. Mothers Against Murdering Muslimswill demand a police state and people will happy to comply - just to feel safer. We will be one step closer to The Other FinalSolution - Nuking Mecca.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Under those circumstances, I'd' bet anyone subjected by ISIS is doomed as well. Drones aren't going to know the difference between a wedding party and a care load of terrorists. As it stands now, everyone in ISIS controlled Iraq and Syria is doomed. There will be no winners. On Sunday, September 14, 2014 6:54 PM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: In the desert there's no place to run and no place to hide. U.S. firepower will pick off every jeep, fore-runner and Toyota on the road between Mosul and Damascus. All the ISIS oil terminals will be destroyed - there will no fuel, no food, nothing will get in or out. The ISIS-controlled area will be marked off for destruction. In a few years a wall will be built around the entire Middle East - it will all be a future Gaza Strip - cut off from the rest of the world - no flights in and no flights out - except for drones in the sky.The terrorists are doomed if Hillary is the next U.S.President. I predict. On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 5:16 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Richard, Whether you like it or not, the US is at war with another group. ISIS must be taken out of Iraq first before any of the other parts in the plan can be implemented. For the time being, the Assad government should be a US friend while ISIS is still alive and well in Iraq and Syria. Once ISIS is eliminated, the relationship would dramatically change. But, at the same time, Obama has the option to take out the ISIS leaders in Syria if the opportunity presents itself. One big bomb could wipe out their leaders if they are housed in one building. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote : Emptybill, That scenario you're imagining is a bit extreme. The jihadists' agenda in Syria is very much in flux. They could change at any moment. It is very likely that ISIS will disappear and simply blend in with the rest of the so called friendly rebels. In that case, they would be unified in fighting the Assad government. And they could possibly win, especially if the US supplied the weapons that are intended to defeat ISIS. IMO, the existence of ISIS is now severely threatened since all of the Arab nations and the rest of the world are heavily against it. It would be best for them to conveniently disappear and fight another day after Assad is toppled. If not, Obama will hunt its leaders with drones and special forces commandos similar to what he did with Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. The situation is complicated. Apparently there is not a single country on the planet willing to send in military boots on the ground to fight ISIS in Iraq, except the Kurds. What we need to remember is that we are dealing with Islamic fundamentalists of one strip or another - all one family, according to Sam Harris. There will probably NOT be any military action taken by NATO or anyone else against the ISIS, even after the ISIS strikes their own country. We are familiar with this based on previous engagements where the U.S. pays in money, blood, sweat and tears for almost the entire defense budget of Europe and the Far East. There may come a time, and probably sooner than later, when the U.S. will not be willing to fight everyone's battle for them anymore. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote : This pact complicates the scenario in fighting ISIS. Its probably not a good idea to arm the so-called friendly rebels at this time. Doesn't matter. Islamic State will attempt to convene an Islamic Caliphate to establish regional lordship over Muslim countries. They will then come back home to further educate us into real Islam - like they are doing now - by following their genocidal prophet. American Muslim jihadi-s are going through Turkey to get through to the Syria/Iraq border. That means no passport stamps are necessary, so they just appear to us as East-European travelers. Wait until the jihadi shooters unload their hollow-points into the crowds at a football game, music concert or else go blow-up a big metro hotel. Mothers Against Murdering Muslims will demand a police state and people will happy to comply - just to feel safer. We will be one step closer to The Other Final Solution - Nuking Mecca.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
The soldiers that are flying the drones can see fairly well through the cameras from as far as 5 to 6 miles away. They can pick out enemy combatants. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mdixon.6569@... wrote : Under those circumstances, I'd' bet anyone subjected by ISIS is doomed as well. Drones aren't going to know the difference between a wedding party and a care load of terrorists. On Sunday, September 14, 2014 6:54 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: In the desert there's no place to run and no place to hide. U.S. firepower will pick off every jeep, fore-runner and Toyota on the road between Mosul and Damascus. All the ISIS oil terminals will be destroyed - there will no fuel, no food, nothing will get in or out. The ISIS-controlled area will be marked off for destruction. In a few years a wall will be built around the entire Middle East - it will all be a future Gaza Strip - cut off from the rest of the world - no flights in and no flights out - except for drones in the sky.The terrorists are doomed if Hillary is the next U.S.President. I predict. On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 5:16 PM, jr_esq@... mailto:jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Richard, Whether you like it or not, the US is at war with another group. ISIS must be taken out of Iraq first before any of the other parts in the plan can be implemented. For the time being, the Assad government should be a US friend while ISIS is still alive and well in Iraq and Syria. Once ISIS is eliminated, the relationship would dramatically change. But, at the same time, Obama has the option to take out the ISIS leaders in Syria if the opportunity presents itself. One big bomb could wipe out their leaders if they are housed in one building. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote : Emptybill, That scenario you're imagining is a bit extreme. The jihadists' agenda in Syria is very much in flux. They could change at any moment. It is very likely that ISIS will disappear and simply blend in with the rest of the so called friendly rebels. In that case, they would be unified in fighting the Assad government. And they could possibly win, especially if the US supplied the weapons that are intended to defeat ISIS. IMO, the existence of ISIS is now severely threatened since all of the Arab nations and the rest of the world are heavily against it. It would be best for them to conveniently disappear and fight another day after Assad is toppled. If not, Obama will hunt its leaders with drones and special forces commandos similar to what he did with Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. The situation is complicated. Apparently there is not a single country on the planet willing to send in military boots on the ground to fight ISIS in Iraq, except the Kurds. What we need to remember is that we are dealing with Islamic fundamentalists of one strip or another - all one family, according to Sam Harris. There will probably NOT be any military action taken by NATO or anyone else against the ISIS, even after the ISIS strikes their own country. We are familiar with this based on previous engagements where the U.S. pays in money, blood, sweat and tears for almost the entire defense budget of Europe and the Far East. There may come a time, and probably sooner than later, when the U.S. will not be willing to fight everyone's battle for them anymore. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote : This pact complicates the scenario in fighting ISIS. Its probably not a good idea to arm the so-called friendly rebels at this time. Doesn't matter. Islamic State will attempt to convene an Islamic Caliphate to establish regional lordship over Muslim countries. They will then come back home to further educate us into real Islam - like they are doing now - by following their genocidal prophet. American Muslim jihadi-s are going through Turkey to get through to the Syria/Iraq border. That means no passport stamps are necessary, so they just appear to us as East-European travelers. Wait until the jihadi shooters unload their hollow-points into the crowds at a football game, music concert or else go blow-up a big metro hotel. Mothers Against Murdering Muslims will demand a police state and people will happy to comply - just to feel safer. We will be one step closer to The Other Final Solution - Nuking Mecca.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
Actually it would be easier for the Iraqi forces to retake the towns that the ISIS militants have occupied after the US bombs the ISIS equipment, weapons and stronghold. However, it's another scenario in Syria itself. At this time, I would assume Assad's forces are more likely to finish the job after the US bombs the ISIS stronghold, equipment and weapons. If they don't, the so-called friendly militants would take control and Assad's power will more likely be degraded.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
This pact complicates the scenario in fighting ISIS. Its probably not a good idea to arm the so-called friendly rebels at this time. Doesn't matter. Islamic State will attempt to convene an Islamic Caliphate to establish regional lordship over Muslim countries. They will then come back home to further educate us into real Islam - like they are doing now - by following their genocidal prophet. American Muslim jihadi-s are going through Turkey to get through to the Syria/Iraq border. That means no passport stamps are necessary, so they just appear to us as East-European travelers. Wait until the jihadi shooters unload their hollow-points into the crowds at a football game, music concert or else go blow-up a big metro hotel. Mothers Against Murdering Muslims will demand a police state and people will happy to comply - just to feel safer. We will be one step closer to The Other Final Solution - Nuking Mecca.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact
Emptybill, That scenario you're imagining is a bit extreme. The jihadists' agenda in Syria is very much in flux. They could change at any moment. It is very likely that ISIS will disappear and simply blend in with the rest of the so called friendly rebels. In that case, they would be unified in fighting the Assad government. And they could possibly win, especially if the US supplied the weapons that are intended to defeat ISIS. IMO, the existence of ISIS is now severely threatened since all of the Arab nations and the rest of the world are heavily against it. It would be best for them to conveniently disappear and fight another day after Assad is toppled. If not, Obama will hunt its leaders with drones and special forces commandos similar to what he did with Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote : This pact complicates the scenario in fighting ISIS. Its probably not a good idea to arm the so-called friendly rebels at this time. Doesn't matter. Islamic State will attempt to convene an Islamic Caliphate to establish regional lordship over Muslim countries. They will then come back home to further educate us into real Islam - like they are doing now - by following their genocidal prophet. American Muslim jihadi-s are going through Turkey to get through to the Syria/Iraq border. That means no passport stamps are necessary, so they just appear to us as East-European travelers. Wait until the jihadi shooters unload their hollow-points into the crowds at a football game, music concert or else go blow-up a big metro hotel. Mothers Against Murdering Muslims will demand a police state and people will happy to comply - just to feel safer. We will be one step closer to The Other Final Solution - Nuking Mecca.
