--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > Note that Lawson has acknowledged his mistake.
> >
> > Barry never will.
>
> Barry didn't make any. Nothing I said commented on
> whether Lawson's story was correct or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> Note that Lawson has acknowledged his mistake.
>
> Barry never will.
Barry didn't make any. Nothing I said commented on
whether Lawson's story was correct or not in anything
it said about you, merely that it was incorrect about
somet
Note that Lawson has acknowledged his mistake.
Barry never will.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > A big irony about the ongoing thing between you and Barry
> > is that at one point, on alt.meditation.tra
Judy has denied that Barry baby. But don't let facts, reality spoil your
delusional fantasies - it's more fun that way - you pathetic son-of-a-bitch.
On May 29, 2013, at 12:02 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > A big irony about the ongoing t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> A big irony about the ongoing thing between you and Barry
> is that at one point, on alt.meditation.transcendental,
> you complemented him on his writing style and suggested
> he consider taking it up as a career which apparently he did
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> And so you did: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/274728
>
> My bad. I apparently didn't register it the first 2-3 times
> you said this..
>
> Makes mental note to rearrange mental archives.
Thank you. I really wouldn'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > A big irony about the ongoing thing between you and Barry is that at one
> > point, on alt.meditation.transcendental, you complemented him on his
> > writing style and
And so you did: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/274728
My bad. I apparently didn't register it the first 2-3 times you said this..
Makes mental note to rearrange mental archives.
L
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogrou
Huh. Could swear it was you, in response to his description of Clint Eastwood's
socks when he took off his shoes to give a flower to MMY.
L
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > A big irony about the ongoin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> A big irony about the ongoing thing between you and Barry is that at one
> point, on alt.meditation.transcendental, you complemented him on his writing
> style and suggested he consider taking it up as a career which apparently he
> did
A big irony about the ongoing thing between you and Barry is that at one point,
on alt.meditation.transcendental, you complemented him on his writing style and
suggested he consider taking it up as a career which apparently he did.
You helped launch his career and you guys STILL can't get along.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> (snip)
> > > I mean, really...the same guy who pretends to be
> > > enlightened once pretended for several months
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
(snip)
> > I mean, really...the same guy who pretends to be
> > enlightened once pretended for several months to
> > be a woman.
>
> This is an online forum. I don't know the real na
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I absolutely revel in the householder's life and
> > non-attachment, both!! A perfect combination!
>
> Then again, you see no contradiction in spending all
> we
e is the inability to maintain Being together with
> > > identification.ÃâàWhat is bondage is inability to maintain Being
> > > while indulging in experience and activity ...IdentificationÃâàis
> > > not bondage because freedom must be lived in the world, and living in the
> > > world entails identif
Yes, that is consistent with your negative view of the world. In spite of that,
yes, I truly revel in the householder's life and non-attachment!
I wake up every day in freedom, and go to bed each evening the same way. I am
relatively young, in excellent health, and no longer have to work. I am
?
From: "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 11:27 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Barry HAS NEVER experienced enlightenment [was Re:
Free Man In Paris, v3.01]
Yes, I absolutely revel in the householder's life and non-attac
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> Interesting, as the people who knew SBS all said that MMY was basically
> channeling SBS whenever he spoke on such matters.
>
> L
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote:
> >
> >
> > "Ego" (New Latin - circa 1789
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
>
> Yes, I absolutely revel in the householder's life and
> non-attachment, both!! A perfect combination!
Then again, you see no contradiction in spending all
week obsessing on a guy who hasn't been replying to
you while preaching no
ing attached. Â
>
>
>
> From: "doctordumbass@..."
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 8:34 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Barry HAS NEVER experienced enlightenment [was Re:
> Free Man In Paris, v3.01]
&
householder way of
life, which by its nature is all about being attached.
From: "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 8:34 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Barry HAS NEVER experienced enlightenment
f them together.
> > Brahman is not neither of them.
> > Brahman is The Knower."
> >
> > The Unified Field has made the senses turn outwards,
> > Humans therefore look outwards,
> > Not in to themselves,
> > But occasionally a daring soul,
> >
Interesting, as the people who knew SBS all said that MMY was basically
channeling SBS whenever he spoke on such matters.
L
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "emptybill" wrote:
>
>
> "Ego" (New Latin - circa 1789 A.D.) is from the Latin word meaning "I".
> By returning to the meaning of th
fieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 7:03 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Barry HAS NEVER experienced enlightenment [was Re:
Free Man In Paris, v3.01]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
>
> Doc, that Planter's jingle comment makes me sm
"Ego" (New Latin - circa 1789 A.D.) is from the Latin word meaning "I".
By returning to the meaning of the good English word "I", most of the
b.s. disappears - such as using the English word-article "the"
in front of the word "ego".
Maharishi's idea of the expansion of the "I" to cosmic dimension
enlightened teachers whether I want to or not!ÃÂ What to do?ÃÂ (-:
> >
> >
> > BTW, nnoozguru, I watched Kumare last night.ÃÂ Turns out our public
> > library has had it all along!ÃÂ But they had it in non fiction!ÃÂ
> > Anyway, VERY cool movie.ÃÂ
> >
&
t;doctordumb...@rocketmail.com"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 12:39 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Barry HAS NEVER experienced enlightenment [was Re:
Free Man In Paris, v3.01]
"I think there is a stage of enlightenment wherein one realizes that one
A shovel is useful enough for me, to avoid wondering who invented it. I am sure
you get my drift. The only way Maharishi's enlightenment would matter to me, is
if my experiences were not according to what he said about it. No questions, no
problem.
I like what you said about picking MMY's outl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Its funny, dude. I am writing about direct experience wrt Barry, an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Its funny, dude. I am writing about direct experience wrt Barry, and when
> > >
re last night. Turns out our public library
> has had it all along! But they had it in non fiction! Anyway, VERY cool
> movie.Â
>
>
>
> From: "doctordumbass@..."
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, May
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Since you feel you have nailed Barry, what about Maharishi?
> > > W
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote:
> >
> > Its funny, dude. I am writing about direct experience wrt Barry, and when I
> > do, you quote me chapter and verse out of some metaphysical playbook.
Please explain "enlightenment", Barry. All I am hearing is that you get some
kind of drugged radiation effect from being near someone, and you then consider
them enlightened.
I am also without thoughts when sleeping. Coincidentally, it is next to my
wife. Should I then conclude, due to her pro
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
> >
> > Since you feel you have nailed Barry, what about Maharishi?
> > Was Maharishi enlightened or not? What is your take on that?
>
> You didn't ask me, but
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> Since you feel you have nailed Barry, what about Maharishi?
> Was Maharishi enlightened or not? What is your take on that?
You didn't ask me, but because this is shaping up as
another Get Barry Sunday :-), I might as we
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
>
> Its funny, dude. I am writing about direct experience wrt Barry, and when I
> do, you quote me chapter and verse out of some metaphysical playbook. Which
> is a little too conceptual for my taste. If you doubt what I said about B
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
>
> Its funny, dude. I am writing about direct experience wrt Barry, and when I
> do, you quote me chapter and verse out of some metaphysical playbook. Which
> is a little too conceptual for my taste. If you doubt what I said about B
c library has
had it all along! But they had it in non fiction! Anyway, VERY cool movie.
From: "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com"
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 6:02 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Barry HAS NEVER experienc
Its funny, dude. I am writing about direct experience wrt Barry, and when I do,
you quote me chapter and verse out of some metaphysical playbook. Which is a
little too conceptual for my taste. If you doubt what I said about Barry never
having experienced enlightenment, and why, why not ask Barry
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
>
> Hi Share, Barry said something in his reply to you that is pretty confused,
> and I wanted to clear it up. He states that he has, had long flashes or
> periods of enlightenment. Wow, what a mess.
>
> Just so you know, he is t
Flashes of 'enlightenment' do not involve witnessing, its something else
entirely. Flashes of CC involve witnessing, but CC is just, as Maharishi said
(I think I got that from one of Judy's posts), 'glorified ignorance'.
Enlightenment is learning how to be in accord with what you experience in t
Hi Share, Barry said something in his reply to you that is pretty confused, and
I wanted to clear it up. He states that he has, had long flashes or periods of
enlightenment. Wow, what a mess.
Just so you know, he is talking about what I call "dirty" witnessing. There is
a temporary conditionin
45 matches
Mail list logo
