It's not complicated: In one post Judy says the TM bijas are not the
names of the Hindu gods. In the other post, she denies posting that the
TM bija are not the names of the Hindu gods.
So, which is it? Did Judy post that the TM bijas are not the names of
the Hindu gods, or didn't she?
It lo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "TurquoiseB" wrote:
>
> Ah, the patented Steinian Nitpick Lie. :-)
>
> Now Judy's going to pretend that 41 instances of "I don't lie" don't
add
> up to a declaration of "I never lie."
>
>
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/msearch?date=any&DM=---
Yes, they can Richard. That's what I don't understand and why I was asking.
If you can't explain said allegation, why don't you let let it go? It appears
to be taking up valuable space in your brain. You and Rita have a good day.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
It's not co
Yes, I see. It's weird. Have a wonderful day.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
All you're going to get from Richard is trollage, Emily. I guarantee it.
Emily wrote:
> Richard, seriously, I just don't understand what you are saying here.
> Instead of reposting and reposti
All you're going to get from Richard is trollage, Emily. I guarantee it.
Emily wrote:
> Richard, seriously, I just don't understand what you are saying here.
> Instead of reposting and reposting
> the same thing, can you, in detail, explain how, based on the words in the
> two sentences i
It's not complicated: Judy posted both statements, both can't be true.
On 11/27/2013 9:54 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Richard, seriously, I just don't understand what you are saying here.
Instead of reposting and reposting the same thing, can you, in detail,
explain how, based on the wor
Richard, seriously, I just don't understand what you are saying here. Instead
of reposting and reposting the same thing, can you, in detail, explain how,
based on the words in the two sentences in question, you are coming to said
conclusion of Judy "lying?" If you are all bent out of shape abou
Well, I'm quoting it because you posted it. You're not doing a very good
job of explaining what you meant. So, did you or did you not post this?
"Richard is lying. I never said anything about "the technique," whatever
it is, or was. Nor did I say the bijas weren't "nicknames" of the
deities (w
I don't know why you keep quoting stuff that documents the fact that you were
lying, but that's your problem.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
The most reliable proof is to post the message number and the URL to the
actual words, like when I posted your own words and the URL to
The most reliable proof is to post the message number and the URL to the
actual words, like when I posted your own words and the URL to see them,
and you still called me a liar.
"Richard is lying. I never said anything about "the technique," whatever
it is, or was. Nor did I say the bijas were
I think the solution to all of this kerfuffle is simple, and what Judy
really wants:
Always believe Judy.
Because, as she has said many times,
"I never lie."
Researchers into lying would find this claim rather suspect, because in
their studies they've never found a single individual who *never*
Hey, Barry, have a look at this. It's fascinating.
Xeno wrote:
10 Ways Liars Use Words To Obscure the Truth
http://liespotting.com/liespotting-basics/words/
http://liespotting.com/liespotting-basics/words/ We are not face-to-face on
FFL, it's all words, words, words. There are those here who
12 matches
Mail list logo
