[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
If his birthday is on 11/21, he's a Queen of Hearts in the Card System: Queen of Hearts: The Mother Card As the double Neptune card, the Queen of Hearts has its share of idealism. All of these people possess a certain charm and magnetism that attracts others. They are the mothers of love and share this love with all they come in contact with. They either get married and devote themselves to family or get involved in some professional career. These people are very sweet, attractive, sociable and loving. They can be successful artists and all have an appreciation for art and beauty. Many are aware of and make use of their abundance of psychic ability. As long as their idealism is guided by truth, they can live the life of love and nurturing that is their birthright. When operating on the lower levels, they can be too self-indulgent, lazy, frivolous, and into the good life. There are many escapists and alcoholics among the Queen of Hearts as well. Once they set their sights, however, there is no limit to how high they can climb in their work and career. Your Karma Cards are the: Ten of Spades - You owe something to this person and they reflect you in some way. Nine of Clubs - This person owes you and you are their mirror in some way. Text Copyright 1996 by Robert Camp - all rights reserved --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: messianic-narcissism? messianism 1.Belief in a messiah. 2. Belief that a particular cause or movement is destined to triumph or save the world. 3. Zealous devotion to a leader, cause, or movement messianic 1. Of or characterized by messianism: messianic nationalism. Adjective, of or relating to a messiah promising deliverance; messianic cult Of or relating to a messiah: messianic hopes. ... Combing the two get a modern clinical psychologist's diagnosis : messianic-narcissist. Leave the man alone, it's his birthday today...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I said, I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. The formula was in terms of one in one hundred. In San Francisco, the formula came: for whatever reason they come, I should not reject them. In England, the formula came: in whatever way they oppose me, I should not deter. I remain firm. One in one hundred, one in one hundred. And I was repeating that I am prepared to have 99 oppositions, as long as there is one word through him that we will rise up to the goal. source: http://globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html?art=11955008971054584 === I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. Absolute Being? Maharishi doesn't sound here like a man who's fully confident in his position. He sounds like a guy who's arrogant, combative, defensive and vulnerable.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest george.deforest@ wrote: I said, I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. The formula was in terms of one in one hundred. In San Francisco, the formula came: for whatever reason they come, I should not reject them. In England, the formula came: in whatever way they oppose me, I should not deter. I remain firm. One in one hundred, one in one hundred. And I was repeating that I am prepared to have 99 oppositions, as long as there is one word through him that we will rise up to the goal. source: http://globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html?art=11955008971054584 === I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. Absolute Being? Maharishi doesn't sound here like a man who's fully confident in his position. He sounds like a guy who's arrogant, combative, defensive and vulnerable. From yourself you know others. Your projections, mate.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest george.deforest@ wrote: I said, I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. The formula was in terms of one in one hundred. In San Francisco, the formula came: for whatever reason they come, I should not reject them. In England, the formula came: in whatever way they oppose me, I should not deter. I remain firm. One in one hundred, one in one hundred. And I was repeating that I am prepared to have 99 oppositions, as long as there is one word through him that we will rise up to the goal. source: http://globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html?art=11955008971054584 === I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. Absolute Being? Maharishi doesn't sound here like a man who's fully confident in his position. He sounds like a guy who's arrogant, combative, defensive and vulnerable. From yourself you know others. Your projections, mate. Look up the word 'sycophant', Mr. Nablusoss.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest george.deforest@ wrote: I said, I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. The formula was in terms of one in one hundred. In San Francisco, the formula came: for whatever reason they come, I should not reject them. In England, the formula came: in whatever way they oppose me, I should not deter. I remain firm. One in one hundred, one in one hundred. And I was repeating that I am prepared to have 99 oppositions, as long as there is one word through him that we will rise up to the goal. source: http://globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html? art=11955008971054584 === I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. Absolute Being? Maharishi doesn't sound here like a man who's fully confident in his position. He sounds like a guy who's arrogant, combative, defensive and vulnerable. From yourself you know others. Your projections, mate. Look up the word 'sycophant', Mr. Nablusoss. You know that dont't you, a fawning parasite hehe
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest george.deforest@ wrote: I said, I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. The formula was in terms of one in one hundred. In San Francisco, the formula came: for whatever reason they come, I should not reject them. In England, the formula came: in whatever way they oppose me, I should not deter. I remain firm. One in one hundred, one in one hundred. And I was repeating that I am prepared to have 99 oppositions, as long as there is one word through him that we will rise up to the goal. source: http://globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html?art=11955008971054584 === I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. Absolute Being? Maharishi doesn't sound here like a man who's fully confident in his position. He sounds like a guy who's arrogant, combative, defensive and vulnerable. When we were getting our sidhis on the Invincibility for Israel course 1978-1979, I found this passage: You will chase and destroy your enemies, 8even if there are only five of you and a hundred of them, or only a hundred of you and ten thousand of them. Leviticus 26:8 Maharishi works five times more efficiently...no surprise. It's not arrogance, he just is making a statement of who he is. That tends to bring out irritation in people that can't handle it. Look what happened with Raja Emmanuel the other day. (And note the significance of his name, God is with us. JGD Donald
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Donald Sosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I said, I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. The formula was in terms of one in one hundred. In San Francisco, the formula came: for whatever reason they come, I should not reject them. In England, the formula came: in whatever way they oppose me, I should not deter. I remain firm. One in one hundred, one in one hundred. And I was repeating that I am prepared to have 99 oppositions, as long as there is one word through him that we will rise up to the goal. source: http://globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html? art=11955008971054584 === I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. When we were getting our sidhis on the Invincibility for Israel course 1978-1979, I found this passage: You will chase and destroy your enemies, 8even if there are only five of you and a hundred of them, or only a hundred of you and ten thousand of them. Leviticus 26:8 Maharishi works five times more efficiently...no surprise. It's not arrogance, he just is making a statement of who he is. That tends to bring out irritation in people that can't handle it. You can say that again - the story of FFL, tons of irritated people :-) Look what happened with Raja Emmanuel the other day. (And note the significance of his name, God is with us. JGD Donald Thanks for posting this Jai Guru Dev
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- Donald Sosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest george.deforest@ wrote: I said, I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. The formula was in terms of one in one hundred. In San Francisco, the formula came: for whatever reason they come, I should not reject them. In England, the formula came: in whatever way they oppose me, I should not deter. I remain firm. One in one hundred, one in one hundred. And I was repeating that I am prepared to have 99 oppositions, as long as there is one word through him that we will rise up to the goal. source: http://globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html?art=11955008971054584 === I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. Absolute Being? Maharishi doesn't sound here like a man who's fully confident in his position. He sounds like a guy who's arrogant, combative, defensive and vulnerable. When we were getting our sidhis on the Invincibility for Israel course 1978-1979, I found this passage: You will chase and destroy your enemies, 8even if there are only five of you and a hundred of them, or only a hundred of you and ten thousand of them. Leviticus 26:8 Maharishi works five times more efficiently...no surprise. It's not arrogance, he just is making a statement of who he is. That tends to bring out irritation in people that can't handle it. Look what happened with Raja Emmanuel the other day. (And note the significance of his name, God is with us. JGD Donald Donald, I get your point, but don't be so dismissive regarding other people's reactions to your or MMY's behavior. It reeks of arrogance. To say they can't handle it is ridiculous. It implies a position of intrinsic superiority. This is a position that MMY comes from and this is why the TMO is lost and will die soon. He relates to people as objects simply to gratify his own desires. Bevan imitates this from the waking state level and has destroyed the TMO because of this. A real shame. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7ntAcJ
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Donald Sosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest george.deforest@ wrote: I said, I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. The formula was in terms of one in one hundred. In San Francisco, the formula came: for whatever reason they come, I should not reject them. In England, the formula came: in whatever way they oppose me, I should not deter. I remain firm. One in one hundred, one in one hundred. And I was repeating that I am prepared to have 99 oppositions, as long as there is one word through him that we will rise up to the goal. source: http://globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html?art=11955008971054584 === I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. Absolute Being? Maharishi doesn't sound here like a man who's fully confident in his position. He sounds like a guy who's arrogant, combative, defensive and vulnerable. When we were getting our sidhis on the Invincibility for Israel course 1978-1979, I found this passage: You will chase and destroy your enemies, 8even if there are only five of you and a hundred of them, or only a hundred of you and ten thousand of them. Leviticus 26:8 Maharishi works five times more efficiently...no surprise. It's not arrogance, he just is making a statement of who he is. That tends to bring out irritation in people that can't handle it. Look what happened with Raja Emmanuel the other day. (And note the significance of his name, God is with us. JGD Donald Donald, I get your point, but don't be so dismissive regarding other people's reactions to your or MMY's behavior. It reeks of arrogance. To say they can't handle it is ridiculous. It implies a position of intrinsic superiority. This is a position that MMY comes from and this is why the TMO is lost and will die soon. He relates to people as objects simply to gratify his own desires. Exactly; rising world consciousness. Bevan imitates this from the waking state level and has destroyed the TMO because of this. What planet are you living on ? The TMO is doing fine and expanding every month. That you have left it is a sign of success, not failure :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Donald Sosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest george.deforest@ wrote: I said, I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. The formula was in terms of one in one hundred. In San Francisco, the formula came: for whatever reason they come, I should not reject them. In England, the formula came: in whatever way they oppose me, I should not deter. I remain firm. One in one hundred, one in one hundred. And I was repeating that I am prepared to have 99 oppositions, as long as there is one word through him that we will rise up to the goal. source: http://globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html?art=11955008971054584 === I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. Absolute Being? Maharishi doesn't sound here like a man who's fully confident in his position. He sounds like a guy who's arrogant, combative, defensive and vulnerable. When we were getting our sidhis on the Invincibility for Israel course 1978-1979, I found this passage: You will chase and destroy your enemies, 8even if there are only five of you and a hundred of them, or only a hundred of you and ten thousand of them. Leviticus 26:8 You're using Leviticus to defend Maharishi? Are you a religious scholar? Perhaps you could help with the following questions: a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Leviticus 1:9). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them? b) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her? c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev 15:19-24). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense. d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians? e) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself? f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an Abomination (Lev 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? g) Lev 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here? Maharishi works five times more efficiently...no surprise. It's not arrogance, he just is making a statement of who he is. That tends to bring out irritation in people that can't handle it. Pointing out the obvious is because of irritation? It's interesting that true believer indoctrinees like you try to blame people who make honest observations that you don't like. It appears that you lack critical thinking skills. That's to your loss. Look what happened with Raja Emmanuel the other day. (And note the significance of his name, God is with us. You think that because he calls himself Emmanuel that that somehow suggests that God was actually with him when he made that disastrous lecture? I know guys in South America named Jesus. Does that mean that they are the Sons of God? Again, you're trying to blame the audience for 'Raja Emanuel's' ineptitude in giving a lecture. He made an ass of himself. David Lynch had to rescue him. It's that simple. JGD Donald
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
On Nov 21, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Peter wrote: Donald, I get your point, but don't be so dismissive regarding other people's reactions to your or MMY's behavior. It reeks of arrogance. To say they can't handle it is ridiculous. It implies a position of intrinsic superiority. This is a position that MMY comes from and this is why the TMO is lost and will die soon. He relates to people as objects simply to gratify his own desires. Bevan imitates this from the waking state level and has destroyed the TMO because of this. A real shame. Yeah but I thought the Big Reesh had said Bevan 'could make no mistakes' as he was enlightened? That's not waking state.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
Good bible quotes. Reminds me that I heard David Lynch is working on a new film script, Manu Meets Moses on the Road to Meeca Its a docu-drama, part comedy, part tragedy. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You're using Leviticus to defend Maharishi? Are you a religious scholar? Perhaps you could help with the following questions: a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Leviticus 1:9). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them? b) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her? c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev 15:19-24). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense. d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians? e) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself? f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an Abomination (Lev 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? g) Lev 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
Actually, he reminds me of my CEO, who has pushed projects through to completion, regardless of the negative reaction from almost everyone around him. Yeah he's also a narcissist, but so what? 200 + families get fed everyday because of it! I also find it interesting how everyone is fascinated by the Maharishi, even after they decide they don't like him or the movement anymore, they remain preoccupied by him/it. I wonder if he listens to Bonnie Raitt? Lets give them something to talk about A little mystery to figure out Lets give them something to talk about How about love, love, love, love? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: more bizarre narcissism? you be the judge American Heritage Dictionary / nar·cis·sism (när's#301;- s#301;z'#601;m) n. 1. Excessive love or admiration of oneself. See Synonyms at conceit. 2. A psychological condition characterized by self-preoccupation, lack of empathy, and unconscious deficits in self-esteem. 3. Erotic pleasure derived from contemplation or admiration of one's own body or self, especially as a fixation on or a regression to an infantile stage of development. 4. The attribute of the human psyche charactized by admiration of oneself but within normal limits. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest george.deforest@ wrote: I said, I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. The formula was in terms of one in one hundred. In San Francisco, the formula came: for whatever reason they come, I should not reject them. In England, the formula came: in whatever way they oppose me, I should not deter. I remain firm. One in one hundred, one in one hundred. And I was repeating that I am prepared to have 99 oppositions, as long as there is one word through him that we will rise up to the goal. source: http://globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html?art=11955008971054584
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
Birthday boy wrote... Donald, I get your point, but don't be so dismissive regarding other people's reactions to your or MMY's behavior. It reeks of arrogance. To say they can't handle it is ridiculous. It implies a position of intrinsic superiority. This is a position that MMY comes from and this is why the TMO is lost and will die soon. He relates to people as objects simply to gratify his own desires. Nabluss wrote... Exactly; rising world consciousness. Sorry, I don't understand, how did you get from there to here?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Donald Sosin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest george.deforest@ wrote: I said, I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. The formula was in terms of one in one hundred. In San Francisco, the formula came: for whatever reason they come, I should not reject them. In England, the formula came: in whatever way they oppose me, I should not deter. I remain firm. One in one hundred, one in one hundred. And I was repeating that I am prepared to have 99 oppositions, as long as there is one word through him that we will rise up to the goal. source: http://globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html? art=11955008971054584 === I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. Absolute Being? Maharishi doesn't sound here like a man who's fully confident in his position. He sounds like a guy who's arrogant, combative, defensive and vulnerable. When we were getting our sidhis on the Invincibility for Israel course 1978-1979, I found this passage: You will chase and destroy your enemies, 8even if there are only five of you and a hundred of them, or only a hundred of you and ten thousand of them. Leviticus 26:8 Maharishi works five times more efficiently...no surprise. It's not arrogance, he just is making a statement of who he is. That tends to bring out irritation in people that can't handle it. Look what happened with Raja Emmanuel the other day. (And note the significance of his name, God is with us. JGD Donald And what, pray tell, does Raja Kohoutek Emmanuelle have to do with the TM Program, Donald? The answer is zilch, nada, nothing, zero. That you could actually invoke an expression of cult negativity as an example of someone who is part of the one in one hundred doing good work is a sad, silly comment on where the TMO has found itself. If you want to truly be part of the 1 in 100 that stand up for something, try this on for size: stand up to the cult influences in the TMO and say stop this silly cult nonsense with raja's and million dollar course fees. Stop making TM a cult. You got it bass-ackwards, Donald.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And what, pray tell, does Raja Kohoutek Emmanuelle have to do with the TM Program, Donald? The answer is zilch, nada, nothing, zero. That you could actually invoke an expression of cult negativity as an example of someone who is part of the one in one hundred doing good work is a sad, silly comment on where the TMO has found itself. If you want to truly be part of the 1 in 100 that stand up for something, try this on for size: stand up to the cult influences in the TMO and say stop this silly cult nonsense with raja's and million dollar course fees. Stop making TM a cult. You got it bass-ackwards, Donald. Shemp swings...and...and...knocks one out of the park! Donald's thought process is clearly immersed in that TMO-cult mentality and he doesn't even know it. He considers no criticism of TM or MMY as valid. Is that true, Donald? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7ntAcJ
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good bible quotes. No, they're not. They're good PLAGIARISM quotes that John Manning (aka do.rflex) stole from someone named Kent Ashcraft without giving him credit: http://www.stallman.org/dr-laura.html Reminds me that I heard David Lynch is working on a new film script, Manu Meets Moses on the Road to Meeca Its a docu-drama, part comedy, part tragedy. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote: You're using Leviticus to defend Maharishi? Are you a religious scholar? Perhaps you could help with the following questions: a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Leviticus 1:9). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them? b) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her? c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev 15:19-24). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense. d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians? e) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself? f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an Abomination (Lev 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this? g) Lev 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- hugheshugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Birthday boy wrote... Donald, I get your point, but don't be so dismissive regarding other people's reactions to your or MMY's behavior. It reeks of arrogance. To say they can't handle it is ridiculous. It implies a position of intrinsic superiority. This is a position that MMY comes from and this is why the TMO is lost and will die soon. He relates to people as objects simply to gratify his own desires. Nabluss wrote... Exactly; rising world consciousness. Sorry, I don't understand, how did you get from there to here? Easy: Valid question + cult logic = absurd response (Vq+cl = ar) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- martyboi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also find it interesting how everyone is fascinated by the Maharishi, even after they decide they don't like him or the movement anymore, they remain preoccupied by him/it. That's because MMY is quite the paradox especially to those who have had personal contact with him. We actually love that dear old crazy coot quite a bit. I see this newsgroup as an attempt to resolve this amazing paradox of the TMO and MMY. Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest george.deforest@ wrote: I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. Absolute Being? Maharishi doesn't sound here like a man who's fully confident in his position. He sounds like a guy who's arrogant, combative, defensive and vulnerable. And, a person who is convinced that he is RIGHT, and not open to any discussion on the topic. There is no room for feedback, because he's RIGHT. So anyone who is less than on board with what he wants to do is opposing him. The reason people might do this is because they're just not as evolved as he is. They'll understand when they get as evolved as he is. Sound familiar? We hear similar positions every week on FFL.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person... This must be the new course I just heard about: Enlightened Eating Through Maharishi Pythonology Naturally, this course will be taught by His Honorable Bevin Morris, PHD, MP. Courses are limited, except for the courses being served on the courses, where 100 Indian entrees will be served.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote: Good bible quotes. No, they're not. They're good PLAGIARISM quotes that John Manning (aka do.rflex) stole from someone named Kent Ashcraft without giving him credit: http://www.stallman.org/dr-laura.html As usual, Magoo gets it wrong. Well, the one thing I'm right about is that you didn't write it. You stole it as soon as you didn't give the author credit (even if it was anonymous). The list in question was widely circulated across the internet and the author hasn't been confirmed. Ken Ashcraft was mentioned, but so were countless others. See Snopes: http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/drlaura.asp
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote: Good bible quotes. No, they're not. They're good PLAGIARISM quotes that John Manning (aka do.rflex) stole from someone named Kent Ashcraft without giving him credit: http://www.stallman.org/dr-laura.html As usual, Magoo gets it wrong. The list in question was widely circulated across the internet and the author hasn't been confirmed. Ken Ashcraft was mentioned, but so were countless others. See Snopes: http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/drlaura.asp
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest george.deforest@ wrote: I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. Absolute Being? Maharishi doesn't sound here like a man who's fully confident in his position. He sounds like a guy who's arrogant, combative, defensive and vulnerable. And, a person who is convinced that he is RIGHT, and not open to any discussion on the topic. There is no room for feedback, because he's RIGHT. So anyone who is less than on board with what he wants to do is opposing him. The reason people might do this is because they're just not as evolved as he is. They'll understand when they get as evolved as he is. Sound familiar? We hear similar positions every week on FFL. Wow. You're RIGHT! :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
Vaj wrote: I thought the Big Reesh had said Bevan 'could make no mistakes' as he was enlightened? Bevan's performance evaluation did not get him the promotion; everyone else gets to be a Raja, he's still a civilian. As soup nazi would say: no crown for you!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote: Good bible quotes. No, they're not. They're good PLAGIARISM quotes that John Manning (aka do.rflex) stole from someone named Kent Ashcraft without giving him credit: http://www.stallman.org/dr-laura.html As usual, Magoo gets it wrong. Well, the one thing I'm right about is that you didn't write it. You stole it as soon as you didn't give the author credit (even if it was anonymous). There's no need to attribute common quotes or expressions, Magoo, particularly when they've been plastered all over the internet for seven years and no author has ever been confirmed. You're still just as thick as you've always been. The list in question was widely circulated across the internet and the author hasn't been confirmed. Ken Ashcraft was mentioned, but so were countless others. See Snopes: http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/drlaura.asp
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest george.deforest@ wrote: I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. Absolute Being? Maharishi doesn't sound here like a man who's fully confident in his position. He sounds like a guy who's arrogant, combative, defensive and vulnerable. And, a person who is convinced that he is RIGHT, and not open to any discussion on the topic. There is no room for feedback, because he's RIGHT. So anyone who is less than on board with what he wants to do is opposing him. The reason people might do this is because they're just not as evolved as he is. They'll understand when they get as evolved as he is. Sound familiar? We hear similar positions every week on FFL. Wow. You're RIGHT! No, You are wrong! :-) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make Yahoo! your homepage. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
R: Wow. You're RIGHT! :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, You are wrong! Hahahahaha. Wait a minute. Which one is You, again? I am like so confused. Anyway, as I think I was saying before I so rudely interrupted myself, Happy Birthday to Me.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Birthday boy wrote... Donald, I get your point, but don't be so dismissive regarding other people's reactions to your or MMY's behavior. It reeks of arrogance. To say they can't handle it is ridiculous. It implies a position of intrinsic superiority. This is a position that MMY comes from and this is why the TMO is lost and will die soon. He relates to people as objects simply to gratify his own desires. Nabluss wrote... Exactly; rising world consciousness. Sorry, I don't understand, how did you get from there to here? Maharishis's desire is for a rising world consciousness.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- hugheshugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Birthday boy wrote... Donald, I get your point, but don't be so dismissive regarding other people's reactions to your or MMY's behavior. It reeks of arrogance. To say they can't handle it is ridiculous. It implies a position of intrinsic superiority. This is a position that MMY comes from and this is why the TMO is lost and will die soon. He relates to people as objects simply to gratify his own desires. Nabluss wrote... Exactly; rising world consciousness. Sorry, I don't understand, how did you get from there to here? Easy: Valid question + cult logic = absurd response (Vq+cl = ar) If I was in your country I'd give you a checking for a birthdaypresent.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
messianic-narcissism? messianism 1.Belief in a messiah. 2. Belief that a particular cause or movement is destined to triumph or save the world. 3. Zealous devotion to a leader, cause, or movement messianic 1. Of or characterized by messianism: messianic nationalism. Adjective, of or relating to a messiah promising deliverance; messianic cult Of or relating to a messiah: messianic hopes. ... Combing the two get a modern clinical psychologist's working diagnosis for: messianic-narcissist. American Heritage Dictionary / nar·cis·sism ( n. 1. Excessive love or admiration of oneself. See Synonyms at conceit. 2. A psychological condition characterized by self-preoccupation, lack of empathy, and unconscious deficits in self-esteem. 3. Erotic pleasure derived from contemplation or admiration of one's own body or self, especially as a fixation on or a regression to an infantile stage of development. 4. The attribute of the human psyche charactized by admiration of oneself but within normal limits. MMY: I said, I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. The formula was in terms of one in one hundred. In San Francisco, the formula came: for whatever reason they come, I should not reject them. In England, the formula came: in whatever way they oppose me, I should not deter. I remain firm. One in one hundred, one in one hundred. And I was repeating that I am prepared to have 99 oppositions, as long as there is one word through him that we will rise up to the goal. source: http://globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html?art=11955008971054584
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: messianic-narcissism? messianism 1.Belief in a messiah. 2. Belief that a particular cause or movement is destined to triumph or save the world. 3. Zealous devotion to a leader, cause, or movement messianic 1. Of or characterized by messianism: messianic nationalism. Adjective, of or relating to a messiah promising deliverance; messianic cult Of or relating to a messiah: messianic hopes. ... Combing the two get a modern clinical psychologist's diagnosis : messianic-narcissist. Leave the man alone, it's his birthday today...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leave the man alone, it's his birthday today... What could the TM-Rajas give him that would flatter excite him to the point of, quivering (with laughter) ? His own weight in gold? Let's next define, megalomania. As in: Messianic-narcissistic-Megalomaniac. dhamiltony2k5@ wrote: messianic-narcissism? messianism 1.Belief in a messiah. 2. Belief that a particular cause or movement is destined to triumph or save the world. 3. Zealous devotion to a leader, cause, or movement messianic 1. Of or characterized by messianism: messianic nationalism. Adjective, of or relating to a messiah promising deliverance; messianic cult Of or relating to a messiah: messianic hopes. ... Combing the two get a modern clinical psychologist's diagnosis : messianic-narcissist. xxox American Heritage Dictionary / nar·cis·sism ( n. 1. Excessive love or admiration of oneself. See Synonyms at conceit. 2. A psychological condition characterized by self-preoccupation, lack of empathy, and unconscious deficits in self-esteem. 3. Erotic pleasure derived from contemplation or admiration of one's own body or self, especially as a fixation on or a regression to an infantile stage of development. 4. The attribute of the human psyche charactized by admiration of oneself but within normal limits. MMY: I said, I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. The formula was in terms of one in one hundred. In San Francisco, the formula came: for whatever reason they come, I should not reject them. In England, the formula came: in whatever way they oppose me, I should not deter. I remain firm. One in one hundred, one in one hundred. And I was repeating that I am prepared to have 99 oppositions, as long as there is one word through him that we will rise up to the goal. source: http://globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html?art=11955008971054584 ooxx
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi speaks candidly about those opposing him
more bizarre narcissism? you be the judge American Heritage Dictionary / nar·cis·sism (när's#301;- s#301;z'#601;m) n. 1. Excessive love or admiration of oneself. See Synonyms at conceit. 2. A psychological condition characterized by self-preoccupation, lack of empathy, and unconscious deficits in self-esteem. 3. Erotic pleasure derived from contemplation or admiration of one's own body or self, especially as a fixation on or a regression to an infantile stage of development. 4. The attribute of the human psyche charactized by admiration of oneself but within normal limits. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I said, I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow and digest ninety-nine people opposing as long as I have one person to follow me. The formula was in terms of one in one hundred. In San Francisco, the formula came: for whatever reason they come, I should not reject them. In England, the formula came: in whatever way they oppose me, I should not deter. I remain firm. One in one hundred, one in one hundred. And I was repeating that I am prepared to have 99 oppositions, as long as there is one word through him that we will rise up to the goal. source: http://globalgoodnews.com/world-peace-a.html?art=11955008971054584
