--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" wrote:
> >
> > Translation: Robin claimed he didn't hit anyone. However,
> > if he did, it was the devil who made him do it. Is that
> > clear enough?
>
> EXACTLY. You and I may have had o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" wrote:
>
> Translation: Robin claimed he didn't hit anyone. However,
> if he did, it was the devil who made him do it. Is that
> clear enough?
EXACTLY. You and I may have had our differences, John,
but you just *nailed* it here.
The diatribe Judy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" wrote:
>
> Translation: Robin claimed he didn't hit anyone. However,
> if he did, it was the devil who made him do it. Is that
> clear enough?
No, because that isn't what he said at all. My goodness,
I really didn't think any *more* confusion could
Translation: Robin claimed he didn't hit anyone. However, if he did, it was
the devil who made him do it. Is that clear enough?
JR
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> This is long but pretty interesting, especially as it
> describes Robin's experience with his com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" wrote:
>
> Hey, back to square one for me. This is as Clintonesque as
> it gets.
Oh, I think it could get more Clintonesque, actually. It's
certainly along the same general lines, as I've said from
the start. But the situation and motivation,
Hey, back to square one for me. This is as Clintonesque as it gets.
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky"
I think that is a perfect comparison.
Acquit him if you don't believe oral sex is "sexual relations", and
convict him if you think it is.
--- In FairfieldLife@y
