RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-09 Thread authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Actually that phrasing is ambiguous when it comes to something that's only 
speculative. It can mean either that you don't believe it exists, or that if it 
did exist, you'd be opposed to it. In the case of the death penalty, we know it 
exists, so I don't believe in it can only mean I'm opposed to it. In the 
case of Maharishi's remark, I don't believe in reincarnation could mean one 
or the other, but because we know he does believe in reincarnation, it can only 
mean he's opposed to it. 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 There's no distinction. I don't believe in it in this context is just the 
same as saying I don't believe in the death penalty even as people are 
sentenced to death. 

 And it's just the same as the Buddhist monks protesting reincarnation in the 
cartoon.
 

 L
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, rick@... wrote :

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of LEnglish5@...
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 1:12 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists
  
  
 Reincarnation? I don't believe in it -Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
 He didn’t say that. He said he was “opposed” to it. Get the distinction? Means 
he believes in it, but wants people to get liberated so they won’t reincarnate.
  



 










RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of lengli...@cox.net
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 1:12 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

 

  

Reincarnation? I don't believe in it -Maharishi Mahesh Yogi

He didn’t say that. He said he was “opposed” to it. Get the distinction? Means 
he believes in it, but wants people to get liberated so they won’t reincarnate.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , 
turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@...  wrote :

Hey, I laughed, too...  :-)

  
https://scontent-a-ams.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/t1.0-9/1471352_595235260524265_2013215405_n.jpg
 

 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread TurquoiseBee
From: TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com

To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 8:15 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists
 


  
If you're going to quote the Rish, at least do it correctly. The exact quote 
is, Reincarnation? We are opposed to it.

From my side, I laughed at this in spite of the fact that I've always assumed 
that Reformed Buddhists would be the ones marching around in front of 
monasteries carrying protest signs that say Repeal the First Noble Truth!  
:-)



I mean, really. Try to find a justification for dedicating your life to the 
pursuit of enlightenment is life is *not* suffering.  :-)




 From: lengli...@cox.net lengli...@cox.net
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 8:12 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists
 


  
Reincarnation? I don't believe in it -Maharishi Mahesh Yogi


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :


Hey, I laughed, too...  :-)









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread TurquoiseBee
If you're going to quote the Rish, at least do it correctly. The exact quote 
is, Reincarnation? We are opposed to it.

From my side, I laughed at this in spite of the fact that I've always assumed 
that Reformed Buddhists would be the ones marching around in front of 
monasteries carrying protest signs that say Repeal the First Noble Truth!  
:-)




 From: lengli...@cox.net lengli...@cox.net
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 8:12 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists
 


  
Reincarnation? I don't believe in it -Maharishi Mahesh Yogi


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :


Hey, I laughed, too...  :-)







RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread authfriend
Just to be picky, I don't believe in it can mean either I don't believe it 
exists or I'm opposed to it. If you're opposed to abortion, you might well 
say, I don't believe in abortion. 

 Anyway, what I heard that he said was Reincarnation is for the ignorant, 
which is better than either.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, rick@... wrote :

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of LEnglish5@...
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 1:12 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists
  
  
 Reincarnation? I don't believe in it -Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
 He didn’t say that. He said he was “opposed” to it. Get the distinction? Means 
he believes in it, but wants people to get liberated so they won’t reincarnate.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... wrote :
 Hey, I laughed, too...  :-)

 
  




 








RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread anartaxius
I have heard he said it many different ways. Maharishi was repetitive; he had 
basically the same message for over 50 years. As he said to one teacher 
'Haven't you noticed I say the same thing over and over again?' 

 The subject of reincarnation I find intriguing because, from a spiritual point 
of view, exactly what does reincarnation mean? The typical thing seems to be 
there is some special something in you that survives death of the body and 
somehow re-inhabits another body later on, but I have never bought that 
explanation. I have always thought it had to do with how the mind fragments 
experience, that is reincarnation - embodiment - is something that happens in 
real time now, something that breaks the unity of experience into separate 
embodied pieces each of which, to the viewpoint of the mind, has a beginning, a 
birth, and an ending, a death.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 Just to be picky, I don't believe in it can mean either I don't believe it 
exists or I'm opposed to it. If you're opposed to abortion, you might well 
say, I don't believe in abortion. 

 Anyway, what I heard that he said was Reincarnation is for the ignorant, 
which is better than either.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, rick@... wrote :

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of LEnglish5@...
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 1:12 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists
  
  
 Reincarnation? I don't believe in it -Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
 He didn’t say that. He said he was “opposed” to it. Get the distinction? Means 
he believes in it, but wants people to get liberated so they won’t reincarnate.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... wrote :
 Hey, I laughed, too...  :-)

 
  




 











Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread Richard J. Williams
On 5/8/2014 1:12 PM, lengli...@cox.net wrote:
 Reincarnation? I don't believe in it -Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
 
Just as in the physical body of the embodied being is the process of 
childhood, youth, old age; similarly in the transmigration from one body 
to another the wise are never deluded. - BG 2:13.

http://www.bhagavad-gita.org/Articles/gita-reincarnation.html

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread Richard J. Williams

On 5/8/2014 1:22 PM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
Try to find a justification for dedicating your life to the pursuit of 
enlightenment is life is *not* suffering. :-)


It's not all about you, Barry.

The Buddha's First Noble Truth is the truth of suffering. At first this 
seems to be something anyone would reject, especially if you're having a 
good time in Amsterdam on a sunny day sitting at a cafe enjoying a latte.


But, you need to realize that if */anyone, anywhere/* is suffering, then 
you're suffering too, that is, if you believe that we are all connected 
and you have any compassion at all.


It's not all about you, Barry - it's about the suffering of others. 
You're just sounding like a typical prosperity preacher. Go figure.



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com


RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread fleetwood_macncheese
There certainly seems to be something of us, existing beyond the body, and 
whatever that is, it doesn't care a whole lot about who we are, this time, or 
any other time, around. As important as we seem to ourselves, now, we are 
clearly disposable, in the service of that which is not. It is our 
consciousness that continues, using whatever vehicle becomes available, whether 
through this body, or the next one. Paradoxically, I would never treat this 
vessel in a cavalier way - it is all I have, right now. 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :

 I have heard he said it many different ways. Maharishi was repetitive; he had 
basically the same message for over 50 years. As he said to one teacher 
'Haven't you noticed I say the same thing over and over again?' 

 The subject of reincarnation I find intriguing because, from a spiritual point 
of view, exactly what does reincarnation mean? The typical thing seems to be 
there is some special something in you that survives death of the body and 
somehow re-inhabits another body later on, but I have never bought that 
explanation. I have always thought it had to do with how the mind fragments 
experience, that is reincarnation - embodiment - is something that happens in 
real time now, something that breaks the unity of experience into separate 
embodied pieces each of which, to the viewpoint of the mind, has a beginning, a 
birth, and an ending, a death.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 Just to be picky, I don't believe in it can mean either I don't believe it 
exists or I'm opposed to it. If you're opposed to abortion, you might well 
say, I don't believe in abortion. 

 Anyway, what I heard that he said was Reincarnation is for the ignorant, 
which is better than either.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, rick@... wrote :

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of LEnglish5@...
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 1:12 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists
  
  
 Reincarnation? I don't believe in it -Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
 He didn’t say that. He said he was “opposed” to it. Get the distinction? Means 
he believes in it, but wants people to get liberated so they won’t reincarnate.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... wrote :
 Hey, I laughed, too...  :-)

 
  




 













Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread Richard J. Williams

On 5/8/2014 3:26 PM, anartax...@yahoo.com wrote:
The subject of reincarnation I find intriguing because, from a 
spiritual point of view, exactly what does reincarnation mean? 


Maybe reincarnation means the soul or spirit of a person at death, 
taking on the body of another, and being reincarnated again based on 
one's accumulated karma - */a central tenet of Indian religions/*.


The typical thing seems to be there is some special something in you 
that survives death of the body and somehow re-inhabits another body 
later on, but I have never bought that explanation. I have always 
thought it had to do with how the mind fragments experience, that is 
reincarnation - embodiment - is something that happens in real time 
now, something that breaks the unity of experience into separate 
embodied pieces each of which, to the viewpoint of the mind, has a 
beginning, a birth, and an ending, a death.


This is just speculation. We know that metempsychosis happens because 
Barry and Rama both experienced it on several occasions and remembered 
several of their previous incarnations, so we have the advantage of 
verbal testimony - one guy still living in Leiden.



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com


RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread authfriend
In case anybody was confused, I was not suggesting that Reincarnation is for 
the ignorant was the only way he said it. 

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :

 I have heard he said it many different ways. 

 (snip)
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 Just to be picky, I don't believe in it can mean either I don't believe it 
exists or I'm opposed to it. If you're opposed to abortion, you might well 
say, I don't believe in abortion. 

 Anyway, what I heard that he said was Reincarnation is for the ignorant, 
which is better than either.
  




 











 


RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread fleetwood_macncheese
Makes sense - the process is not uniquely human, just that we can apprehend it, 
and become aware of it, during our time as humans. So there must come a time 
when it is no longer *necessary* to continue to come back here, or anywhere 
else, though quite possibly a choice remains, even then, to take any form at 
all, anywhere we choose to. 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 In case anybody was confused, I was not suggesting that Reincarnation is for 
the ignorant was the only way he said it. 

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :

 I have heard he said it many different ways. 

 (snip)
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 Just to be picky, I don't believe in it can mean either I don't believe it 
exists or I'm opposed to it. If you're opposed to abortion, you might well 
say, I don't believe in abortion. 

 Anyway, what I heard that he said was Reincarnation is for the ignorant, 
which is better than either.
  




 











 




RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread authfriend
I think by ignorant he meant not enlightened, not off the wheel. One of his 
better bons mots. 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote :

 Makes sense - the process is not uniquely human, just that we can apprehend 
it, and become aware of it, during our time as humans. So there must come a 
time when it is no longer *necessary* to continue to come back here, or 
anywhere else, though quite possibly a choice remains, even then, to take any 
form at all, anywhere we choose to. 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 In case anybody was confused, I was not suggesting that Reincarnation is for 
the ignorant was the only way he said it. 

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :

 I have heard he said it many different ways. 

 (snip)
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 Just to be picky, I don't believe in it can mean either I don't believe it 
exists or I'm opposed to it. If you're opposed to abortion, you might well 
say, I don't believe in abortion. 

 Anyway, what I heard that he said was Reincarnation is for the ignorant, 
which is better than either.
  




 











 






RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread steve.sundur
is that so? 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :

 I have heard he said it many different ways. Maharishi was repetitive; he had 
basically the same message for over 50 years. As he said to one teacher 
'Haven't you noticed I say the same thing over and over again?' 

 The subject of reincarnation I find intriguing because, from a spiritual point 
of view, exactly what does reincarnation mean? The typical thing seems to be 
there is some special something in you that survives death of the body and 
somehow re-inhabits another body later on, but I have never bought that 
explanation. I have always thought it had to do with how the mind fragments 
experience, that is reincarnation - embodiment - is something that happens in 
real time now, something that breaks the unity of experience into separate 
embodied pieces each of which, to the viewpoint of the mind, has a beginning, a 
birth, and an ending, a death.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 Just to be picky, I don't believe in it can mean either I don't believe it 
exists or I'm opposed to it. If you're opposed to abortion, you might well 
say, I don't believe in abortion. 

 Anyway, what I heard that he said was Reincarnation is for the ignorant, 
which is better than either.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, rick@... wrote :

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of LEnglish5@...
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 1:12 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists
  
  
 Reincarnation? I don't believe in it -Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
 He didn’t say that. He said he was “opposed” to it. Get the distinction? Means 
he believes in it, but wants people to get liberated so they won’t reincarnate.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... wrote :
 Hey, I laughed, too...  :-)

 
  




 













RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread fleetwood_macncheese
This stuff is confusing - I meant that someone who is ignorant [of his basic 
nature] will continue, by necessity, to reincarnate, after which the ignorance 
is dispelled, incarnation may possibly continue to be an option. Is that what 
you meant??
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 I think by ignorant he meant not enlightened, not off the wheel. One of 
his better bons mots. 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote :

 Makes sense - the process is not uniquely human, just that we can apprehend 
it, and become aware of it, during our time as humans. So there must come a 
time when it is no longer *necessary* to continue to come back here, or 
anywhere else, though quite possibly a choice remains, even then, to take any 
form at all, anywhere we choose to. 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 In case anybody was confused, I was not suggesting that Reincarnation is for 
the ignorant was the only way he said it. 

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :

 I have heard he said it many different ways. 

 (snip)
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 Just to be picky, I don't believe in it can mean either I don't believe it 
exists or I'm opposed to it. If you're opposed to abortion, you might well 
say, I don't believe in abortion. 

 Anyway, what I heard that he said was Reincarnation is for the ignorant, 
which is better than either.
  




 











 








RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread authfriend
Yes, the first part. I doubt he had coming back by choice post-ignorance in 
mind, though. Or at least it wasn't implied by that quip. 

 Welcome back, by the way.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote :

 This stuff is confusing - I meant that someone who is ignorant [of his basic 
nature] will continue, by necessity, to reincarnate, after which the ignorance 
is dispelled, incarnation may possibly continue to be an option. Is that what 
you meant??
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 I think by ignorant he meant not enlightened, not off the wheel. One of 
his better bons mots. 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote :

 Makes sense - the process is not uniquely human, just that we can apprehend 
it, and become aware of it, during our time as humans. So there must come a 
time when it is no longer *necessary* to continue to come back here, or 
anywhere else, though quite possibly a choice remains, even then, to take any 
form at all, anywhere we choose to. 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 In case anybody was confused, I was not suggesting that Reincarnation is for 
the ignorant was the only way he said it. 

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :

 I have heard he said it many different ways. 

 (snip)
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 Just to be picky, I don't believe in it can mean either I don't believe it 
exists or I'm opposed to it. If you're opposed to abortion, you might well 
say, I don't believe in abortion. 

 Anyway, what I heard that he said was Reincarnation is for the ignorant, 
which is better than either.
  




 











 











RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread LEnglish5
There's no distinction. I don't believe in it in this context is just the 
same as saying I don't believe in the death penalty even as people are 
sentenced to death. 

 And it's just the same as the Buddhist monks protesting reincarnation in the 
cartoon.
 

 L
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, rick@... wrote :

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of LEnglish5@...
Sent: Thursday, May 8, 2014 1:12 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists
  
  
 Reincarnation? I don't believe in it -Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
 He didn’t say that. He said he was “opposed” to it. Get the distinction? Means 
he believes in it, but wants people to get liberated so they won’t reincarnate.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... wrote :
 Hey, I laughed, too...  :-)

 
  




 








RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Reformed Buddhists

2014-05-08 Thread fleetwood_macncheese
Agreed, his bons-mottlement did not precisely cover such an eventuality.  

 Thanks, I am happy to not be here again!  
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 Yes, the first part. I doubt he had coming back by choice post-ignorance in 
mind, though. Or at least it wasn't implied by that quip. 

 Welcome back, by the way.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote :

 This stuff is confusing - I meant that someone who is ignorant [of his basic 
nature] will continue, by necessity, to reincarnate, after which the ignorance 
is dispelled, incarnation may possibly continue to be an option. Is that what 
you meant??
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 I think by ignorant he meant not enlightened, not off the wheel. One of 
his better bons mots. 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote :

 Makes sense - the process is not uniquely human, just that we can apprehend 
it, and become aware of it, during our time as humans. So there must come a 
time when it is no longer *necessary* to continue to come back here, or 
anywhere else, though quite possibly a choice remains, even then, to take any 
form at all, anywhere we choose to. 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 In case anybody was confused, I was not suggesting that Reincarnation is for 
the ignorant was the only way he said it. 

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :

 I have heard he said it many different ways. 

 (snip)
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :

 Just to be picky, I don't believe in it can mean either I don't believe it 
exists or I'm opposed to it. If you're opposed to abortion, you might well 
say, I don't believe in abortion. 

 Anyway, what I heard that he said was Reincarnation is for the ignorant, 
which is better than either.