RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread emilymaenot
Share, have you ever attended to someone dying?  My guess is no based on your 
comments.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Ann, I don't think people are lying about it. Do you?
 

 
 
 On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:16 AM, awoelflebater@... 
awoelflebater@... wrote:
 

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 John, just to share that death notices on the bulletin board of the coat room 
in the women's Dome often say that the person passed peacefully and or 
blissfully surrounded by friends and family. 
 

 Well, it's highly unlikely that they're going to say they went out screaming.
 

 
 
 On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:03 AM, jr_esq@... jr_esq@... wrote:
 
Richard,
 

 A Dominican priest, who heads a hospice center here in the Bay Area, stated 
that 90 percent of us will know when death is near.  So, he's saying that for 
most of us, we can prepare for death.  But he didn't say that euthanasia is the 
answer.
 

 IMO, death is a rite of passage that should be respected in a natural way, and 
not hastened by unnatural means.  It is a transforming experience both for the 
dying person and the family members.  But it obviously is not a pleasant one.
 

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 CULTURE: “I’m looking for early symptoms of acceptance of euthanasia, which I 
believe will creep in as we Baby Boomers become more and more of a burden.”
 
 'Sympathy for the euthanists'
 Posted by Ann Althouse:
 http://althouse.blogspot.com/2013/09/sympathy-for-euthanists.html 
http://althouse.blogspot.com/2013/09/sympathy-for-euthanists.html
 
 On 10/16/2013 9:23 PM, jr_esq@... mailto:jr_esq@... wrote:
 
   Seraphita,
 
 
 Based on historical records, it's apparent that the family unit is the best 
natural way to maintain or improve the quality of people in a given society. 
There is no doubt that genetics are involved in some individuals who excel in 
science, business or sports.  As such, the natural way of selection is promoted 
to let people enjoy the quality of life that is most beneficial for the entire 
world.
 
 
 IMO, this is the reason why eugenics, as practiced by the Nazi's and some 
people here in the USA, won't work as it would interfere with nature's 
functioning.  Similarly, this is the reason why Osho's experiment of having a 
communal family didn't work.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Re Thus, there is a strong argument for having a cohesive family unit in 
order to have a stable population in any country.: 
 That makes good sense . . . but would you *completely* rule out a genetic 
component in this case? It's such a controversial minefield, and - rather like 
global warming - you need to invest so much effort into studying the relevant 
data that I can't be bothered. I'd keep an open mind though.
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
  Carde,
 
 
 According to Wikipedia, the Jewish population is only about 2 percent of the 
entire US population.  But they do appear to have many successful people in 
this country, including Einstein and Barbara Streisand.  IMO, it shows that the 
Jewish families encourage their children to be successful in whatever field 
they choose to work in.
 
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jews 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jews
 
 
 
 Thus, there is a strong argument for having a cohesive family unit in order to 
have a stable population in any country.  If the family unit is in disarray, 
guess what would happen to the entire country?
 
 
 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
 
 I'm afraid without Abraham's descendants US might be way worse off, or stuff.
 
 
 In scientific documentaries from the US of A, usually at least a half of the 
experts interviewed appear to have Jewish family names?? 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Would you believe Russia is on top of this list?  And, the USA is only on the 
5th place.  But the US has a secret weapon by offering Genius visas to the 
best and brightest from countries around the world. 
 
 http://finance.yahoo.com/news/most-educated-countries-world-102232490.html 
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/most-educated-countries-world-102232490.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 




 
 
 
 


 
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 





Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread Share Long
Emily, I haven't but I believe people who report a peaceful or blissful death. 
Do you think they're lying?





On Thursday, October 17, 2013 11:01 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com 
emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
Share, have you ever attended to someone dying?  My guess is no based on your 
comments.  


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


Ann, I don't think people are lying about it. Do you?





On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:16 AM, awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... 
wrote:
 
  
 


---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


John, just to share that death notices on the bulletin board of the coat room 
in the women's Dome often say that the person passed peacefully and or 
blissfully surrounded by friends and family. 

Well, it's highly unlikely that they're going to say they went out screaming.





On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:03 AM, jr_esq@... jr_esq@... wrote:
 
  
 Richard,

A Dominican priest, who heads a hospice center here in the Bay Area, stated 
that 90 percent of us will know when death is near.  So, he's saying that for 
most of us, we can prepare for death.  But he didn't say that euthanasia is the 
answer.

IMO, death is a rite of passage that should be respected in a natural way, and 
not hastened by unnatural means.  It is a transforming experience both for the 
dying person and the family members.  But it obviously is not a pleasant one.



---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:


CULTURE: “I’m looking for early symptoms of acceptance of euthanasia, which I 
believe will creep in as we Baby Boomers become more and more of a burden.”

'Sympathy for the euthanists'
Posted by Ann Althouse:
http://althouse.blogspot.com/2013/09/sympathy-for-euthanists.html


On 10/16/2013 9:23 PM, jr_esq@... wrote:

  
Seraphita,


Based on historical records, it's apparent that the family unit is the best 
natural way to maintain or improve the quality of people in a given society. 
There is no doubt that genetics are involved in some individuals who excel in 
science, business or sports.  As such, the natural way of selection is 
promoted to let people enjoy the quality of life that is most beneficial for 
the entire world.


IMO, this is the reason why eugenics, as practiced by the Nazi's and some 
people here in the USA, won't work as it would interfere with nature's 
functioning.  Similarly, this is the reason why Osho's experiment of having a 
communal family didn't work.  






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


Re Thus, there is a strong argument for having a cohesive family unit in 
order to have a stable population in any country.: 
That makes good sense . . . but would you *completely* rule out a genetic 
component in this case? It's such a controversial minefield, and - rather like 
global warming - you need to invest so much effort into studying the relevant 
data that I can't be bothered. I'd keep an open mind though.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


 Carde,


According to Wikipedia, the Jewish population is only about 2 percent of the 
entire US population.  But they do appear to have many successful people in 
this country, including Einstein and Barbara Streisand.  IMO, it shows that 
the Jewish families encourage their children to be successful in whatever 
field they choose to work in.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jews



Thus, there is a strong argument for having a cohesive family unit in order to 
have a stable population in any country.  If the family unit is in disarray, 
guess what would happen to the entire country?


---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister@... wrote:


I'm afraid without Abraham's descendants US might be way worse off, or stuff.


In scientific documentaries from the US of A, usually at least a half of the 
experts interviewed appear to have Jewish family names?? 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


Would you believe Russia is on top of this list?  And, the USA is only on the 
5th place.  But the US has a secret weapon by offering Genius visas to the 
best and brightest from countries around the world. 


http://finance.yahoo.com/news/most-educated-countries-world-102232490.html








RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread emilymaenot
Who have you heard of who has personally reported.  Also, you have taken the 
conversation to a ludicrous place again with your trying to turn it into a case 
of lying.  Nonsense, my dear, more nonsense.  Waste of time.   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Emily, I haven't but I believe people who report a peaceful or blissful death. 
Do you think they're lying?
 

 
 
 On Thursday, October 17, 2013 11:01 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   Share, have you ever attended to someone dying?  My guess is no based on 
your comments.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Ann, I don't think people are lying about it. Do you?
 

 
 
 On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:16 AM, awoelflebater@... 
awoelflebater@... wrote:
 

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 John, just to share that death notices on the bulletin board of the coat room 
in the women's Dome often say that the person passed peacefully and or 
blissfully surrounded by friends and family. 
 

 Well, it's highly unlikely that they're going to say they went out screaming.
 

 
 
 On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:03 AM, jr_esq@... jr_esq@... wrote:
 
Richard,
 

 A Dominican priest, who heads a hospice center here in the Bay Area, stated 
that 90 percent of us will know when death is near.  So, he's saying that for 
most of us, we can prepare for death.  But he didn't say that euthanasia is the 
answer.
 

 IMO, death is a rite of passage that should be respected in a natural way, and 
not hastened by unnatural means.  It is a transforming experience both for the 
dying person and the family members.  But it obviously is not a pleasant one.
 

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 CULTURE: “I’m looking for early symptoms of acceptance of euthanasia, which I 
believe will creep in as we Baby Boomers become more and more of a burden.”
 
 'Sympathy for the euthanists'
 Posted by Ann Althouse:
 http://althouse.blogspot.com/2013/09/sympathy-for-euthanists.html 
http://althouse.blogspot.com/2013/09/sympathy-for-euthanists.html
 
 On 10/16/2013 9:23 PM, jr_esq@... mailto:jr_esq@... wrote:
 
   Seraphita,
 
 
 Based on historical records, it's apparent that the family unit is the best 
natural way to maintain or improve the quality of people in a given society. 
There is no doubt that genetics are involved in some individuals who excel in 
science, business or sports.  As such, the natural way of selection is promoted 
to let people enjoy the quality of life that is most beneficial for the entire 
world.
 
 
 IMO, this is the reason why eugenics, as practiced by the Nazi's and some 
people here in the USA, won't work as it would interfere with nature's 
functioning.  Similarly, this is the reason why Osho's experiment of having a 
communal family didn't work.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Re Thus, there is a strong argument for having a cohesive family unit in 
order to have a stable population in any country.: 
 That makes good sense . . . but would you *completely* rule out a genetic 
component in this case? It's such a controversial minefield, and - rather like 
global warming - you need to invest so much effort into studying the relevant 
data that I can't be bothered. I'd keep an open mind though.
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
  Carde,
 
 
 According to Wikipedia, the Jewish population is only about 2 percent of the 
entire US population.  But they do appear to have many successful people in 
this country, including Einstein and Barbara Streisand.  IMO, it shows that the 
Jewish families encourage their children to be successful in whatever field 
they choose to work in.
 
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jews 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Jews
 
 
 
 Thus, there is a strong argument for having a cohesive family unit in order to 
have a stable population in any country.  If the family unit is in disarray, 
guess what would happen to the entire country?
 
 
 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
cardemaister@... mailto:cardemaister@... wrote:
 
 I'm afraid without Abraham's descendants US might be way worse off, or stuff.
 
 
 In scientific documentaries from the US of A, usually at least a half of the 
experts interviewed appear to have Jewish family names?? 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Would you believe Russia is on top of this list?  And, the USA is only on the 
5th place.  But the US has a secret weapon by offering Genius visas to the 
best and brightest from 

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread emilymaenot
Re: Well we're talking about the death notices of plain folks, not famous 
ones.  Share, this is *not* what you were talking about.  You continually 
betray yourself in your own posts - why do you do this?  Yet more absurd 
nonsense; words that mean nothing and go nowhere.  Dig a little deeper, maybe?  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Well we're talking about the death notices of plain folks, not famous ones. I 
would think that families would simply not mention if the passing was rough. 
Actually I have heard of one such rough passing of a TMer so there has also 
been honesty about such.
 

 
 
 On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:35 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:
 
  Ann, I don't think people are lying about it. Do you?
 
 In this case, I think that Ann's comment, snarky
 though it may be, is valid. That's *exactly* what
 True Believers do. 
 
 Case in point: When Carlos Castaneda died (of cancer)
 some of his TBs claimed that he passed peacefully.
 The real story, according to eyewitnesses, is that he
 *literally* died screaming. 
 
  On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:16 AM, awoelflebater@... 
  awoelflebater@... wrote:
  
  ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@ wrote:
  
   John, just to share that death notices on the bulletin 
  board of the coat room in the women's Dome often say that 
  the person passed peacefully and or blissfully surrounded 
  by friends and family.
  
  Well, it's highly unlikely that they're going to say 
  they went out screaming.
  
 
 
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 





RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread Share Long
Emily I shared with John that death notices here report blissful and or 
peaceful deaths. Turq brought up about Castanedas. I said the notices I've seen 
have been about unfamous people. What do you think I'm talking about?

On Thu, 10/17/13, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Thursday, October 17, 2013, 11:46 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
   Re: Well
 we're talking about the death notices of plain folks,
 not famous ones.  Share, this is *not* what you
 were talking about.  You continually betray yourself in
 your own posts - why do you do this?  Yet more absurd
 nonsense; words that mean nothing and go nowhere.  Dig
 a little deeper, maybe?   
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Well we're talking
 about the death notices of plain folks, not famous ones. I
 would think that families would simply not mention if the
 passing was rough. Actually I have heard of one such rough
 passing of a TMer so there has also been honesty about
 such.
 
  
  
  On Thursday, October
 17, 2013 10:35 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
  

  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
--- In
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long
 sharelong60@... wrote:
 
 
 
  Ann, I don't think people are lying about it. Do
 you?
 
 
 
 In this case, I think that Ann's comment, snarky
 
 though it may be, is valid. That's *exactly* what
 
 True Believers do. 
 
 
 
 Case in point: When Carlos Castaneda died (of cancer)
 
 some of his TBs claimed that he passed
 peacefully.
 
 The real story, according to eyewitnesses, is that he
 
 *literally* died screaming. 
 
 
 
  On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:16 AM,
 awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@...
 wrote:
 
   
 
  ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com,
 sharelong60@ wrote:
 
  
 
   John, just to share that death notices on the
 bulletin 
 
  board of the coat room in the women's Dome often
 say that 
 
  the person passed peacefully and or blissfully
 surrounded 
 
  by friends and family.
 
  
 
  Well, it's highly unlikely that they're going
 to say 
 
  they went out screaming.
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread Share Long
Emily, there's a fellow in FF who has shared his NDE. I said that I think the 
notices of blissful and or peaceful death are honest and since you and Ann 
disagreed, I asked if you thought the notices were lying.

On Thu, 10/17/13, emilymae...@yahoo.com emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Most Educated Countries in the World
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Thursday, October 17, 2013, 11:37 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
   Who have you heard of who has personally
 reported.  Also, you have taken the conversation to a
 ludicrous place again with your trying to turn it into a
 case of lying.  Nonsense, my dear, more
 nonsense.  Waste of time.    
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Emily, I
 haven't but I believe people who report a peaceful or
 blissful death. Do you think they're lying?
 
  
  
  On Thursday, October 17, 2013 11:01
 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@...
 wrote:
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
   Share, have you ever attended to someone dying?
  My guess is no based on your comments.  
 
 
 ---In
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Ann, I
 don't think people are lying about it. Do you?
 
 
 
  
  On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:16
 AM, awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@...
 wrote:
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
     
 
 ---In
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@...
 wrote:
 
 John,
 just to share that death notices on the bulletin board of
 the coat room in the women's Dome often say that the
 person passed peacefully and or blissfully surrounded by
 friends and family. 
 Well, it's highly unlikely that they're going
 to say they went out screaming.
 
  
  
  On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:03
 AM, jr_esq@... jr_esq@... wrote:
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
    Richard,
 A
 Dominican priest, who heads a hospice center here in the Bay
 Area, stated that 90 percent of us will know when death is
 near.  So, he's saying that for most of us, we can
 prepare for death.  But he didn't say that
 euthanasia is the answer.
 IMO,
 death is a rite of passage that should be respected in a
 natural way, and not hastened by unnatural means.  It
 is a transforming experience
  both for the dying person and the family members.  But
 it obviously is not a pleasant one.
  
 
 ---In
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@...
 wrote:
 
 
   
 
   
   
 CULTURE:
 “I’m looking for early
   symptoms of acceptance of euthanasia, which I believe
 will creep
   in as we Baby Boomers become more and more of a
 burden.”
 
   
 
   'Sympathy for the euthanists'
 
   Posted by Ann Althouse:
 
   http://althouse.blogspot.com/2013/09/sympathy-for-euthanists.html
 
   
 
  
 
 
   On 10/16/2013 9:23 PM, jr_esq@... wrote:
 

 
 
    
   
   
 Seraphita,
 
 
 
 Based
   on historical records, it's apparent that
 the family unit
   is the best natural way to maintain or improve
 the quality
   of people in a given society. There is no
 doubt that
   genetics are involved in some individuals who
 excel in
   science, business or sports.  As such,
 the natural way of
   selection is promoted to let people enjoy the
 quality of
   life that is most beneficial for the entire
 world.
 
 
 
 IMO,
   this is the reason why eugenics, as practiced
 by the
   Nazi's and some people here in the USA,
 won't work as it
   would interfere with nature's functioning.
  Similarly,
   this is the reason why Osho's experiment
 of having a
   communal family didn't work.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
   fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 wrote:
 
   
 
   
 Re Thus, there is a strong argument for
   having a cohesive family unit in order
 to have a
   stable population in any
 country.: 
 That makes good sense . . .
 but would you *completely* rule out a
 genetic
 component in this case? It's such a
 controversial
 minefield, and - rather like global
 warming - you
 need to invest so much effort into
 studying the
 relevant data that I can't be
 bothered. I'd keep an
 open mind though.
 
 
   
 
   ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
   fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com

RE: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread emilymaenot
Then he didn't die (near death doesn't count), did he?  I didn't disagree - I 
didn't comment on that at all; that, Share, is a lie. *You* determined to 
subvert the conversation and brought up lying, as if that has anything to do 
with anything.  Don't you see that the question itself is completely 
nonsensical?   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Emily, there's a fellow in FF who has shared his NDE. I said that I think the 
notices of blissful and or peaceful death are honest and since you and Ann 
disagreed, I asked if you thought the notices were lying.
 
 On Thu, 10/17/13, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote:
 
 Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Most Educated Countries in the World
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Thursday, October 17, 2013, 11:37 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Who have you heard of who has personally
 reported.  Also, you have taken the conversation to a
 ludicrous place again with your trying to turn it into a
 case of lying.  Nonsense, my dear, more
 nonsense.  Waste of time.
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Emily, I
 haven't but I believe people who report a peaceful or
 blissful death. Do you think they're lying?
 
 
 
 On Thursday, October 17, 2013 11:01
 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@...
 wrote:
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Share, have you ever attended to someone dying?
  My guess is no based on your comments.  
 
 
 ---In
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Ann, I
 don't think people are lying about it. Do you?
 
 
 
 
 On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:16
 AM, awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@...
 wrote:
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 ---In
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
sharelong60@...
 wrote:
 
 John,
 just to share that death notices on the bulletin board of
 the coat room in the women's Dome often say that the
 person passed peacefully and or blissfully surrounded by
 friends and family. 
 Well, it's highly unlikely that they're going
 to say they went out screaming.
 
 
 
 On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:03
 AM, jr_esq@... jr_esq@... wrote:
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Richard,
 A
 Dominican priest, who heads a hospice center here in the Bay
 Area, stated that 90 percent of us will know when death is
 near.  So, he's saying that for most of us, we can
 prepare for death.  But he didn't say that
 euthanasia is the answer.
 IMO,
 death is a rite of passage that should be respected in a
 natural way, and not hastened by unnatural means.  It
 is a transforming experience
 both for the dying person and the family members.  But
 it obviously is not a pleasant one.
 
 
 ---In
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
punditster@...
 wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 CULTURE:
 “I’m looking for early
 symptoms of acceptance of euthanasia, which I believe
 will creep
 in as we Baby Boomers become more and more of a
 burden.”
 
 
 
 'Sympathy for the euthanists'
 
 Posted by Ann Althouse:
 
 http://althouse.blogspot.com/2013/09/sympathy-for-euthanists.html 
http://althouse.blogspot.com/2013/09/sympathy-for-euthanists.html
 
 
 
 
 
 
 On 10/16/2013 9:23 PM, jr_esq@... wrote:
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 Seraphita,
 
 
 
 Based
 on historical records, it's apparent that
 the family unit
 is the best natural way to maintain or improve
 the quality
 of people in a given society. There is no
 doubt that
 genetics are involved in some individuals who
 excel in
 science, business or sports.  As such,
 the natural way of
 selection is promoted to let people enjoy the
 quality of
 life that is most beneficial for the entire
 world.
 
 
 
 IMO,
 this is the reason why eugenics, as practiced
 by the
 Nazi's and some people here in the USA,
 won't work as it
 would interfere with nature's functioning.
  Similarly,
 this is the reason why Osho's experiment
 of having a
 communal family didn't work.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 wrote:
 
 
 
 
 Re Thus, there is a strong argument for
 having a cohesive family unit in order
 to have a
 stable population in any
 country.: 
 That makes good sense . . .
 but would you *completely* rule out a
 genetic
 component in this case? It's such a
 controversial
 minefield, and - rather like global
 warming - you
 need to invest so much effort into
 studying the
 relevant data that I can't be
 bothered. I'd keep an
 open mind though.
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com

RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread emilymaenot
I have no idea Share what you are talking about.  You are talking gibberish 
based on a knowledge base of death and dying that appears to be zero, based on 
your comments.  That's what I'm saying here.  That's my point.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Emily I shared with John that death notices here report blissful and or 
peaceful deaths. Turq brought up about Castanedas. I said the notices I've seen 
have been about unfamous people. What do you think I'm talking about?
 
 On Thu, 10/17/13, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote:
 
 Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Thursday, October 17, 2013, 11:46 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Re: Well
 we're talking about the death notices of plain folks,
 not famous ones.  Share, this is *not* what you
 were talking about.  You continually betray yourself in
 your own posts - why do you do this?  Yet more absurd
 nonsense; words that mean nothing and go nowhere.  Dig
 a little deeper, maybe?   
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Well we're talking
 about the death notices of plain folks, not famous ones. I
 would think that families would simply not mention if the
 passing was rough. Actually I have heard of one such rough
 passing of a TMer so there has also been honesty about
 such.
 
 
 
 On Thursday, October
 17, 2013 10:35 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --- In
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long
 sharelong60@... wrote:
 
 
 
  Ann, I don't think people are lying about it. Do
 you?
 
 
 
 In this case, I think that Ann's comment, snarky
 
 though it may be, is valid. That's *exactly* what
 
 True Believers do. 
 
 
 
 Case in point: When Carlos Castaneda died (of cancer)
 
 some of his TBs claimed that he passed
 peacefully.
 
 The real story, according to eyewitnesses, is that he
 
 *literally* died screaming. 
 
 
 
  On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:16 AM,
 awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@...
 wrote:
 
  
 
  ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com,
 sharelong60@ wrote:
 
  
 
   John, just to share that death notices on the
 bulletin 
 
  board of the coat room in the women's Dome often
 say that 
 
  the person passed peacefully and or blissfully
 surrounded 
 
  by friends and family.
 
  
 
  Well, it's highly unlikely that they're going
 to say 
 
  they went out screaming.
 
  



RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread authfriend
What was the point you thought you were making? That famous people are more 
likely to have unpleasant deaths than people who aren't famous? And therefore 
we should trust reports of peaceful deaths of the not-famous?
 

 Makes no sense, Share (not to mention the fact that whatever you were trying 
to say was based on the single example of Castaneda, in which those closest to 
him lied about how he died).
 

 Again, Share, you have this pathological compulsion to SAY SOMETHING, 
ANYTHING, just to be saying something, just to see your name as the author of a 
post, whether it makes sense or not, whether it makes a contribution or not.
 
Share wrote:
 
  Emily I shared with John that death notices here report blissful and or 
  peaceful deaths.
  Turq brought up about Castanedas. I said the notices I've seen have been 
  about unfamous
  people. What do you think I'm talking about?





RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread authfriend
 I wrote:
 (snip)
  Again, Share, you have this pathological compulsion to SAY SOMETHING,
  ANYTHING, just to be saying something, just to see your name as the author 
  of a  post, whether it makes sense or not, whether it makes a contribution 
  or not.
 

 Just to add: It's as if the only way you know you exist is if you can see your 
words and your name on your computer screen.
 
 
 






RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread sharelong60
Judy, it's true, I trust those death notices I read because I don't see why 
people would lie about how the person passed. Others can trust or not as they 
wish. I was discussing something of interest to me with John and turq. There 
are many topics and posts on FFL that I ignore. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 What was the point you thought you were making? That famous people are more 
likely to have unpleasant deaths than people who aren't famous? And therefore 
we should trust reports of peaceful deaths of the not-famous?
 

 Makes no sense, Share (not to mention the fact that whatever you were trying 
to say was based on the single example of Castaneda, in which those closest to 
him lied about how he died).
 

 Again, Share, you have this pathological compulsion to SAY SOMETHING, 
ANYTHING, just to be saying something, just to see your name as the author of a 
post, whether it makes sense or not, whether it makes a contribution or not.
 
Share wrote:
 
  Emily I shared with John that death notices here report blissful and or 
  peaceful deaths.
  Turq brought up about Castanedas. I said the notices I've seen have been 
  about unfamous
  people. What do you think I'm talking about?

 





RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread authfriend
Share, this is not a response to my post. Did you not read it? Or is this just 
one more attempt to avoid dealing with reality? Or is it the compulsion I 
mentioned to say SOMETHING, ANYTHING, even if it isn't the tiniest bit 
responsive, so you can pretend you're interacting with other people?
 

 What was the point of your post mentioning Castaneda?
 
Share wrote:
 
  Judy, it's true, I trust those death notices I read because I don't see why 
  people would lie
  about how the person passed. Others can trust or not as they wish. I was 
  discussing
  something of interest to me with John and turq. There are many topics and 
  posts on FFL
  that I ignore. 

 

What was the point you thought you were making? That famous people are more 
likely to have unpleasant deaths than people who aren't famous? And therefore 
we should trust reports of peaceful deaths of the not-famous? 

 Makes no sense, Share (not to mention the fact that whatever you were trying 
to say was based on the single example of Castaneda, in which those closest to 
him lied about how he died).
 

 Again, Share, you have this pathological compulsion to SAY SOMETHING, 
ANYTHING, just to be saying something, just to see your name as the author of a 
post, whether it makes sense or not, whether it makes a contribution or not.
 
Share wrote:
 
  Emily I shared with John that death notices here report blissful and or 
  peaceful deaths.
  Turq brought up about Castanedas. I said the notices I've seen have been 
  about unfamous
  people. What do you think I'm talking about?

 







Re: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread Share Long
laughing, Judy, then why do you not only exchange posts with me? Why do you 
actually butt into my exchanges with others to do so?! And are you even 
interested in the topic?!





On Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:00 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com 
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
Share, this is not a response to my post. Did you not read it? Or is this just 
one more attempt to avoid dealing with reality? Or is it the compulsion I 
mentioned to say SOMETHING, ANYTHING, even if it isn't the tiniest bit 
responsive, so you can pretend you're interacting with other people?

What was the point of your post mentioning Castaneda?

Share wrote:


 Judy, it's true, I trust those death notices I read because I don't see why 
 people would lie
 about how the person passed. Others can trust or not as they wish. I was 
 discussing
 something of interest to me with John and turq. There are many topics and 
 posts on FFL
 that I ignore. 



What was the point you thought you were making? That famous people are more 
likely to have unpleasant deaths than people who aren't famous? And therefore 
we should trust reports of peaceful deaths of the not-famous?


Makes no sense, Share (not to mention the fact that whatever you were trying to 
say was based on the single example of Castaneda, in which those closest to him 
lied about how he died).

Again, Share, you have this pathological compulsion to SAY SOMETHING, ANYTHING, 
just to be saying something, just to see your name as the author of a post, 
whether it makes sense or not, whether it makes a contribution or not.

Share wrote:


 Emily I shared with John that death notices here report blissful and or 
 peaceful deaths.
 Turq brought up about Castanedas. I said the notices I've seen have been 
 about unfamous
 people. What do you think I'm talking about?




RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread authfriend
Very hollow laughter, Share. You can't even write a coherent sentence.
 

 You've asked those (disingenuous) questions before, and you know what my 
answers are. But you're afraid to even try to answer my questions.
 

 What was the point of your post mentioning Castaneda?

 

Share babbled dishonestly:

  laughing, Judy, then why do you not only exchange posts with
  me? Why do you actually butt into my exchanges with others
  to do so?! And are you even interested in the topic?!
 

 
 
 On Thursday, October 17, 2013 3:00 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
 
   Share, this is not a response to my post. Did you not read it? Or is this 
just one more attempt to avoid dealing with reality? Or is it the compulsion I 
mentioned to say SOMETHING, ANYTHING, even if it isn't the tiniest bit 
responsive, so you can pretend you're interacting with other people?
 

 What was the point of your post mentioning Castaneda?
 
Share wrote:
 
  Judy, it's true, I trust those death notices I read because I don't see why 
  people would lie
  about how the person passed. Others can trust or not as they wish. I was 
  discussing
  something of interest to me with John and turq. There are many topics and 
  posts on FFL
  that I ignore. 

 

What was the point you thought you were making? That famous people are more 
likely to have unpleasant deaths than people who aren't famous? And therefore 
we should trust reports of peaceful deaths of the not-famous? 

 Makes no sense, Share (not to mention the fact that whatever you were trying 
to say was based on the single example of Castaneda, in which those closest to 
him lied about how he died).
 

 Again, Share, you have this pathological compulsion to SAY SOMETHING, 
ANYTHING, just to be saying something, just to see your name as the author of a 
post, whether it makes sense or not, whether it makes a contribution or not.
 
Share wrote:
 
  Emily I shared with John that death notices here report blissful and or 
  peaceful deaths.
  Turq brought up about Castanedas. I said the notices I've seen have been 
  about unfamous
  people. What do you think I'm talking about?

 





 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 





RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread sharelong60
Judy, I was discussing something of interest to me with John and turq. You are 
of course entitled to your opinion about my posting. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

  I wrote:
 (snip)
  Again, Share, you have this pathological compulsion to SAY SOMETHING,
  ANYTHING, just to be saying something, just to see your name as the author 
  of a  post, whether it makes sense or not, whether it makes a contribution 
  or not.
 
 

 Just to add: It's as if the only way you know you exist is if you can see your 
words and your name on your computer screen.
 
 
 







RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread authfriend
Yes, I'm aware of who you were conversing with. And yes, I sure am entitled to 
my opinion about your posting.
 

 Now, let's get back to what I asked you. You wrote to Barry:
 

 Well we're talking about the death notices of plain folks, not famous ones.
 

 What was your point? That famous folks are more likely to have unpleasant 
deaths than plain folks, and therefore we should assume that reports of 
peaceful deaths of plain folks are always true?
 

 Share wrote:


  Judy, I was discussing something of interest to me with John and turq. You 
  are of course
  entitled to your opinion about my posting. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

  I wrote:
 (snip)
  Again, Share, you have this pathological compulsion to SAY SOMETHING,
  ANYTHING, just to be saying something, just to see your name as the author 
  of a  post, whether it makes sense or not, whether it makes a contribution 
  or not.
 
 

 Just to add: It's as if the only way you know you exist is if you can see your 
words and your name on your computer screen.
 
 
 









RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread doctordumbass
You crack me up, emnot. sounds too much like me, burning another bridge, in 
another meeting, during my working daze. Always got stuff done, though.  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 I have no idea Share what you are talking about.  You are talking gibberish 
based on a knowledge base of death and dying that appears to be zero, based on 
your comments.  That's what I'm saying here.  That's my point.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Emily I shared with John that death notices here report blissful and or 
peaceful deaths. Turq brought up about Castanedas. I said the notices I've seen 
have been about unfamous people. What do you think I'm talking about?
 
 On Thu, 10/17/13, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote:
 
 Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Thursday, October 17, 2013, 11:46 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Re: Well
 we're talking about the death notices of plain folks,
 not famous ones.  Share, this is *not* what you
 were talking about.  You continually betray yourself in
 your own posts - why do you do this?  Yet more absurd
 nonsense; words that mean nothing and go nowhere.  Dig
 a little deeper, maybe?   
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Well we're talking
 about the death notices of plain folks, not famous ones. I
 would think that families would simply not mention if the
 passing was rough. Actually I have heard of one such rough
 passing of a TMer so there has also been honesty about
 such.
 
 
 
 On Thursday, October
 17, 2013 10:35 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --- In
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long
 sharelong60@... wrote:
 
 
 
  Ann, I don't think people are lying about it. Do
 you?
 
 
 
 In this case, I think that Ann's comment, snarky
 
 though it may be, is valid. That's *exactly* what
 
 True Believers do. 
 
 
 
 Case in point: When Carlos Castaneda died (of cancer)
 
 some of his TBs claimed that he passed
 peacefully.
 
 The real story, according to eyewitnesses, is that he
 
 *literally* died screaming. 
 
 
 
  On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:16 AM,
 awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@...
 wrote:
 
  
 
  ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com,
 sharelong60@ wrote:
 
  
 
   John, just to share that death notices on the
 bulletin 
 
  board of the coat room in the women's Dome often
 say that 
 
  the person passed peacefully and or blissfully
 surrounded 
 
  by friends and family.
 
  
 
  Well, it's highly unlikely that they're going
 to say 
 
  they went out screaming.
 
  





RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World

2013-10-17 Thread emilymaenot
Yes, I was a high producer of high quality stuff myself, no question.  On one 
of the larger projects I was on, the scheduler would invite me to meetings 
because I would say what needed to be said; everyone else was too scared.  
That's what happens when one can't deliver what one has promised.  Smile.   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 You crack me up, emnot. sounds too much like me, burning another bridge, in 
another meeting, during my working daze. Always got stuff done, though.  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 I have no idea Share what you are talking about.  You are talking gibberish 
based on a knowledge base of death and dying that appears to be zero, based on 
your comments.  That's what I'm saying here.  That's my point.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Emily I shared with John that death notices here report blissful and or 
peaceful deaths. Turq brought up about Castanedas. I said the notices I've seen 
have been about unfamous people. What do you think I'm talking about?
 
 On Thu, 10/17/13, emilymaenot@... mailto:emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
mailto:emilymaenot@... wrote:
 
 Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Most Educated Countries in the World
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Thursday, October 17, 2013, 11:46 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Re: Well
 we're talking about the death notices of plain folks,
 not famous ones.  Share, this is *not* what you
 were talking about.  You continually betray yourself in
 your own posts - why do you do this?  Yet more absurd
 nonsense; words that mean nothing and go nowhere.  Dig
 a little deeper, maybe?   
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 Well we're talking
 about the death notices of plain folks, not famous ones. I
 would think that families would simply not mention if the
 passing was rough. Actually I have heard of one such rough
 passing of a TMer so there has also been honesty about
 such.
 
 
 
 On Thursday, October
 17, 2013 10:35 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --- In
 FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long
 sharelong60@... wrote:
 
 
 
  Ann, I don't think people are lying about it. Do
 you?
 
 
 
 In this case, I think that Ann's comment, snarky
 
 though it may be, is valid. That's *exactly* what
 
 True Believers do. 
 
 
 
 Case in point: When Carlos Castaneda died (of cancer)
 
 some of his TBs claimed that he passed
 peacefully.
 
 The real story, according to eyewitnesses, is that he
 
 *literally* died screaming. 
 
 
 
  On Thursday, October 17, 2013 10:16 AM,
 awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@...
 wrote:
 
  
 
  ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com,
 sharelong60@ wrote:
 
  
 
   John, just to share that death notices on the
 bulletin 
 
  board of the coat room in the women's Dome often
 say that 
 
  the person passed peacefully and or blissfully
 surrounded 
 
  by friends and family.
 
  
 
  Well, it's highly unlikely that they're going
 to say 
 
  they went out screaming.