I like Curtis, but I found him to be emotionally duplicitous - that means
acting one way, while feeling another. Its a gut thing, Barry, so I cannot
explain it further. Except to say that Curtis is not unique in that regard, and
I show no prejudice, personally, towards him, as I avoid all of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
I like Curtis, but I found him to be emotionally duplicitous - that
means acting one way, while feeling another.
Whereas you felt completely comfortable with Robin's overuse
(combined with bad writing) of irony, the very
I miss Curtis too. He has a solid, practical nature, and expresses it
masterfully.
Barry wrote:
Which of the people you have claimed were phonies, for instance, have ever
said something as stupid
and as *obviously* untrue as I never lie?
YOU. Many times, pretending to quote me.
YOU have said this, many times,
I can't find one single instance in the
To be a little more specific, if I may: Curtis pretended to be comfortable
with who he was, as Barry puts it. But that was a carefully constructed facade,
and it took very little in the way of chipping to expose the real Curtis
underneath. Anyone who ever tangled with Curtis discovered this.
Xeno wrote:
As for authfriend, she said she would not have any discussions with me until
I apologised for
some slight to her phony authenticity, and she has tried to worm out of that
by entering into
a thread I have started or entered myself by 'making a comment' and
proclaiming
Dr. Dumbass wrote: I like Curtis, but I found him to be emotionally
duplicitous - that
means acting one way, while feeling another. Barry remarked:
Whereas you felt completely comfortable with Robin's overuse
(combined with bad writing) of irony, the very definition of
which is
Ah, the patented Steinian Nitpick Lie. :-)
Now Judy's going to pretend that 41 instances of I don't lie don't add
up to a declaration of I never lie.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/msearch?date=anyDM=\
DD=DY=DM2=DD2=DY2=AM=containsAT=a\
No big deal - You, however, strike me as a lot more emotionally honest, than
Curtis. Weird, huh? Seriously, you sometimes express yourself in a hostile and
negative way, and own it, but ol' Curt, blinded with his stories of who he was,
was just so gosh darned folksy jokesy, until his shit
Actually, having been caught lying about what I've said, Barry is now
pretending it wasn't the never that had him so exercised:
Researchers into lying would find this claim rather suspect, because in their
studies they've never found a single individual who *never* lies.
Science tells
us
So, I've been thinking about this for awhile and I've come to the
conclusion that Judy doesn't want to dialog with anyone, otherwise she
would be, I guess.
And, I don't know of anyone who would want to dialog with Judy, after
meeting up with her in this group. But, I can think of several
What are you talking about - I'm not living in a pod with Share! (no pun
intended).
On 11/27/2013 10:33 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Share, do you want to take a crack at explaining why what Richard
keeps posting constitutes a lie on Judy's part? As one of the two
peas in a pod, do you
You just don't get it Judy - just stop the lying. There is an an echo in
here - but you already knew that. LoL!
On 11/27/2013 11:33 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let
Richard,
A well poisoner. Nice observation, including all the rest you wrote. In post
363322 perhaps there is a clue. In a response to Share authfriend wrote:
P.S.: You're quite right about my childhood, albeit not in the way you hope.
I had a happy, stress-free childhood with two parents
Still infuriated, Xeno seethed:
A well poisoner. Nice observation, including all the rest you wrote.
Nice, but false.
In post 363322 perhaps there is a clue. In a response to Share authfriend
wrote:
Hypocrisy and false metaphysics from Xeno too. Not a pretty sight.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Richard,
A well poisoner. Nice observation, including all the rest you wrote.
In post 363322 perhaps there is a clue. In a response to Share
authfriend wrote:
P.S.: You're quite right about my childhood, albeit not in the way
you hope. I had a
Maybe, but I almost always suspect someone of not being totally honest
when they post as an anonymous informant. I used to post under various
handles until I got outed, and so I decided when I retired, I would just
use my real name. I've got nothing to hide and nobody can fire me from
my job
I think Truth is something huge, that cannot really be completely conveyed in
words alone. Unless the speaker or writer is communicating from a very settled
and integrated level of consciousness. OTOH, unless someone has a nefarious
intention, I think most people try to communicate truthfully.
Share platitudinated irrelevantly:
I think Truth is something huge, that cannot really be completely conveyed
in words
alone. Unless the speaker or writer is communicating from a very settled and
integrated level
of consciousness.
Duh. However, we haven't been talking about
I've been an respondent on the internet since 1999, so it's not like I'm
a newbie or something. And it's been my observation that Judy has a
really big ego, maybe bigger even than Barry, and that's saying a lot!
There are facts and there are opinions - facts can be argued, but an
opinion
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard
seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
I've been an respondent on the internet since 1999, so it's not like I'm a
newbie or
This your your style I guess.
On 11/27/2013 6:03 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. *
**
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
I've
Judy asked if there was an echo in here. I guess she hasn't noticed how many
times she's posted about refutation, etc.
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:02 PM, Richard J. Williams
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:
This your your style I guess.
On 11/27/2013 6:03 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com
Go figure!
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:06 PM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Judy asked if there was an echo in here. I guess she hasn't noticed how many
times she's posted about refutation, etc.
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:02 PM, Richard J. Williams
What is she going to say? She's been caught telling a deliberate untruth
and she can't refute it. Go figure.
On 11/27/2013 9:06 PM, Share Long wrote:
Judy asked if there was an echo in here. I guess she hasn't noticed
how many times she's posted about refutation, etc.
On Wednesday,
Well, I figure nobody wants to dialog with Judy tonight.
On 11/27/2013 9:09 PM, Share Long wrote:
Go figure!
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 9:06 PM, Share Long
sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote:
Judy asked if there was an echo in here. I guess she hasn't noticed
how many times she's posted
Share, do you want to take a crack at explaining why what Richard keeps posting
constitutes a lie on Judy's part? As one of the two peas in a pod, do you
get it? It makes no sense to me at all, but I'm willing to try and understand
what Richard is putting forth. Objectively, of course.
This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard
seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
What is she going to say? She's been caught telling a deliberate untruth and
she can't refute
28 matches
Mail list logo
