--- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > snip
> > >
> > > And also when Maharishi speaks about being
> instantly
> > > enlightened
> > > once
On 10/5/05 12:38 PM, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you provide some of the links to get-rich-quick
> schemes that you found?
No because you just want to start an argument.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Get fast access to your fav
On 10/5/05 11:52 AM, "TurquoiseB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I always assumed that both phrases were just marketing
> jive aimed at Westerners who *wanted* to accomplish
> everything without doing a damned thing themselves.
> Pander to the idiots by selling them idiocy, that
> sorta thing.
A
--- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip
>
> And also when Maharishi speaks about being instantly
> enlightened
> once we transcend for the first time. ...
I've never heard MMY say anything remotely close to
this. MMY always presented enlightenment from the
"gradual school" perspectiv
On 10/5/05 8:57 AM, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Both were current when I started TM in 1975, so I
> couldn't say. But I've heard TM teachers say that
> at first it was just "Do less and accomplish more."
>
> Back in 1967, did you understand "Do nothing and
> accomplish everythin
on 10/4/05 7:33 PM, jim_flanegin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> In this case, MMY started out with "Do less and
>> accomplish more," which was understood to be simply a
>> claim of more efficient action as a result o
On 10/4/05 4:37 PM, "Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/3/05 11:47 PM, "matrixmonitor"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> If novices are to accept anybody's Enlightenment,
>> then there is a
>>> general concensus even among other Sa
--- Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/3/05 11:47 PM, "matrixmonitor"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If novices are to accept anybody's Enlightenment,
> then there is a
> > general concensus even among other Sages such as
> Adi Da, Swami
> > Sivananda, Yogananda, and philsopher
On 10/3/05 11:47 PM, "matrixmonitor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If novices are to accept anybody's Enlightenment, then there is a
> general concensus even among other Sages such as Adi Da, Swami
> Sivananda, Yogananda, and philsophers such as Ken Wilber; that Ramana
> was not only Enlightened
On 10/3/05 12:37 PM, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 10/3/05 12:12 PM, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> So Papaji shows contempt for his students, and that's
>>> a virtue;
>>
>> He's merely sayi
On 10/3/05 12:12 PM, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So Papaji shows contempt for his students, and that's
> a virtue;
He's merely saying 'listen, just because I gave you the taste of the
non-dual state doesn't mean you're in it forever and it doesn't mean you are
enlightened.' I fin
On 10/3/05 11:23 AM, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 10/3/05 10:06 AM, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Some here have claimed MMY expressed contempt for his
>>> Western students, saying how easi
On 10/3/05 10:06 AM, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some here have claimed MMY expressed contempt for his
> Western students, saying how easily they were fooled.
> I guess that's really a virtue, then, no?
I must have missed that. Please explain.
Yahoo!
Or we just see them as old friends. If we know how to relax into the natural
state, we can take notice and they self-liberate--as the yogis say 'like dew
in the sun'.
" In self-liberation observing the object¹ (gcer-grol), by looking directly
at the discursive, intuitive or super-subtle thought t
On 10/3/05 8:49 AM, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the rundown. Seems odd to me, though,
> to lump pseudo- and neo-Advaitins together if Papaji
> is an example of the former and Ramana of the latter.
Not what I was trying to convey. Papaji was the real juju. He transmitt
On 10/2/05 9:21 PM, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sinhlnx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 1. In the Pseudo- or Neo-Advaitin "tradition": Ramana Maharshi,
>> HWL Poonja, Nisargadatta Maharaj, Gangaji, I-Nome, Andrew Cohen,
>> Adi Da, etc
16 matches
Mail list logo
