--- Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
drpetersutphen@ wrote:
--- Alex Stanley
On Jul 12, 2006, at 3:49 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In
On Jul 12, 2006, at 6:50 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:What is YOUR explation for the "less-than-pleasant sdie effects of TM?" A technique that was cobbled together from several other existing techniques and given to guinea pigs (us) to test. As opposed to a technique or techniques that have been
On Jul 12, 2006, at 7:36 AM, Alex Stanley wrote:And Waking Down is also not for everyone (in fact, I'd say it's not for the vast majority of people). What bugs me, though, is that the TM TB has to portray my dropping TM as a case of me being weak and unwilling. Hey, lets be fair, you could have
On Jul 12, 2006, at 7:36 AM, Alex Stanley wrote:And Waking Down is also not for everyone (in fact, I'd say it's notfor the vast majority of people). What bugs me, though, is that the TMTB has to portray my dropping TM as a case of me being weak andunwilling. Hey, lets be fair, you could have a
On Jul 12, 2006, at 8:10 AM, sparaig wrote:Always seemed like a blanket term for 'side effects from unbalanced meditation practice' and of course that could come from many sources. It would be interesting to know if other groups who practice mental mantra meditation experience so many
--- Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 12, 2006, at 7:36 AM, Alex Stanley wrote:
And Waking Down is also not for everyone (in
fact, I'd say it's
not for the vast majority of people). What bugs
me,
On Jul 11, 2006, at 8:20 AM, Alex Stanley wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:35 AM, Mark wrote: Is it possible that the criticism of TM, that it doesn't accomplish anything for many is because the Being by it's nature doesn't do
--- Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex
Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In
