Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
What happened to your macro? The difference now is that more and more people are standing up to you and your tyrannical mode of operation. Even Barry is reading my messages these days. Now that's better! Your name is now mud all over the internet, thanks to Robin's recent post about you. You have been totally discredited and now we know who is the real stalker and troll and liar is - you are confirming this in almost every message you post these days. All you have to do, Ms Stein is STFU about Richard. It's that simple. On 12/26/2013 8:45 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? */ /* */Not even *close* to a record. Back *before* the posting limits were created, several people including Judy often made more posts than this a week. /* It's to be expected that Barry would jump on this as an opportunity to stalk me, and of course to do it with lies. In the first place, as Barry knows, the 125 total of RIchard's posts was as of Wednesday. By Friday, he'll have gone well above his previous record of 160-something. Before posting limits, I rarely made more than 160 posts per week. And as Barry knows, the situation back then was so different that it can't legitimately be compared to what it is now. I'll get to that when I deal with the rest of Barry's posts this morning. */ But mark my words...the next thing that's going to happen is that the Mean Girls are going to start calling for Posting Limits again, now that they're the people being stalked, instead of the stalkers... /* */ /* *That's not why Ann and I wished a limit could be imposed again. Richard couldn't stalk his way out of a paper bag, first of all. Second, it's the outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless posts that's the problem. If his only posts were those stalking Ann and me, that would be no trouble to deal with.* * * *And BTW, Barry knew when he wrote this that we had already expressed this wish, although he's pretending here to be predicting it. How pathetic is that? Especially for the dude who claims he doesn't care what anybody thinks of him.* * *
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
On 12/26/2013 8:45 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *it's the outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless posts that's the problem.* WOW! That was a fast reply. You must be monitoring all my messages. Go figure. And, exactly how would you be knowing if any of my posts were outlandish or meaningless, if you haven't been reading them for the past fourteen years? You need to stop the fibbing, Judy, and just get some work done, before you get laid off for slacking on the job. LoL!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. What happened to your macro? The difference now is that more and more people are standing up to you and your tyrannical mode of operation. Even Barry is reading my messages these days. Now that's better! Your name is now mud all over the internet, thanks to Robin's recent post about you. You have been totally discredited and now we know who is the real stalker and troll and liar is - you are confirming this in almost every message you post these days. All you have to do, Ms Stein is STFU about Richard. It's that simple. On 12/26/2013 8:45 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? Not even *close* to a record. Back *before* the posting limits were created, several people including Judy often made more posts than this a week. It's to be expected that Barry would jump on this as an opportunity to stalk me, and of course to do it with lies. In the first place, as Barry knows, the 125 total of RIchard's posts was as of Wednesday. By Friday, he'll have gone well above his previous record of 160-something. Before posting limits, I rarely made more than 160 posts per week. And as Barry knows, the situation back then was so different that it can't legitimately be compared to what it is now. I'll get to that when I deal with the rest of Barry's posts this morning. But mark my words...the next thing that's going to happen is that the Mean Girls are going to start calling for Posting Limits again, now that they're the people being stalked, instead of the stalkers... That's not why Ann and I wished a limit could be imposed again. Richard couldn't stalk his way out of a paper bag, first of all. Second, it's the outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless posts that's the problem. If his only posts were those stalking Ann and me, that would be no trouble to deal with. And BTW, Barry knew when he wrote this that we had already expressed this wish, although he's pretending here to be predicting it. How pathetic is that? Especially for the dude who claims he doesn't care what anybody thinks of him.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
When did I ever say otherwise? And, how would you know, since you don't even read my messages. Go figure. On 12/26/2013 10:53 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be taken seriously.* What happened to your macro? The difference now is that more and more people are standing up to you and your tyrannical mode of operation. Even Barry is reading my messages these days. Now that's better! Your name is now mud all over the internet, thanks to Robin's recent post about you. You have been totally discredited and now we know who is the real stalker and troll and liar is - you are confirming this in almost every message you post these days. All you have to do, Ms Stein is STFU about Richard. It's that simple. On 12/26/2013 8:45 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? */ /* */Not even *close* to a record. Back *before* the posting limits were created, several people including Judy often made more posts than this a week. /* It's to be expected that Barry would jump on this as an opportunity to stalk me, and of course to do it with lies. In the first place, as Barry knows, the 125 total of RIchard's posts was as of Wednesday. By Friday, he'll have gone well above his previous record of 160-something. Before posting limits, I rarely made more than 160 posts per week. And as Barry knows, the situation back then was so different that it can't legitimately be compared to what it is now. I'll get to that when I deal with the rest of Barry's posts this morning. */ But mark my words...the next thing that's going to happen is that the Mean Girls are going to start calling for Posting Limits again, now that they're the people being stalked, instead of the stalkers... /* */ /* *That's not why Ann and I wished a limit could be imposed again. Richard couldn't stalk his way out of a paper bag, first of all. Second, it's the outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless posts that's the problem. If his only posts were those stalking Ann and me, that would be no trouble to deal with.* * * *And BTW, Barry knew when he wrote this that we had already expressed this wish, although he's pretending here to be predicting it. How pathetic is that? Especially for the dude who claims he doesn't care what anybody thinks of him.* * *
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
Richard, didn't Maharishi say once that everything is important but nothing is serious? On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:14 PM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: When did I ever say otherwise? And, how would you know, since you don't even read my messages. Go figure. On 12/26/2013 10:53 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. What happened to your macro? The difference now is that more and more people are standing up to you and your tyrannical mode of operation. Even Barry is reading my messages these days. Now that's better! Your name is now mud all over the internet, thanks to Robin's recent post about you. You have been totally discredited and now we know who is the real stalker and troll and liar is - you are confirming this in almost every message you post these days. All you have to do, Ms Stein is STFU about Richard. It's that simple. On 12/26/2013 8:45 AM, authfriend@... wrote: RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? Not even *close* to a record. Back *before* the posting limits were created, several people including Judy often made more posts than this a week. It's to be expected that Barry would jump on this as an opportunity to stalk me, and of course to do it with lies. In the first place, as Barry knows, the 125 total of RIchard's posts was as of Wednesday. By Friday, he'll have gone well above his previous record of 160-something. Before posting limits, I rarely made more than 160 posts per week. And as Barry knows, the situation back then was so different that it can't legitimately be compared to what it is now. I'll get to that when I deal with the rest of Barry's posts this morning. But mark my words...the next thing that's going to happen is that the Mean Girls are going to start calling for Posting Limits again, now that they're the people being stalked, instead of the stalkers... That's not why Ann and I wished a limit could be imposed again. Richard couldn't stalk his way out of a paper bag, first of all. Second, it's the outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless posts that's the problem. If his only posts were those stalking Ann and me, that would be no trouble to deal with. And BTW, Barry knew when he wrote this that we had already expressed this wish, although he's pretending here to be predicting it. How pathetic is that? Especially for the dude who claims he doesn't care what anybody thinks of him.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
On 12/25/2013 6:58 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? Thanks, Ann, for you short response. You've got to realize, Ann, that this posting takes practice, just like if you wanted to get good at playing Angry Birds. It takes years to learn these skills. You can't keep up with this without dedication. That means ideally, you need to be alone most of the time with no husband or children or pets to look after. If you have to work at a job you'd want to be getting one where you're on a computer most of the time or at least have a laptop and Wi-Fi available all the time. At home, you'd want to be sitting at a computer desk with a large flat-screen so you can have several windows open all at once - one for the news reader, one for Microsoft Word or EditPad for composing, and one with a browsers to do research using Google. You need to be online at least sixteen hours a day except for sleep; if you go out, be sure to take a laptop with you; or at the least a smartphone; so you can monitor everything that posted to the discussion group every few minutes. I've been doing this since 1999, so I can say without the least hesitation, this isn't part-time endeavor - if you're a really serious poster - otherwise you'll just be considered a poser or a troll. It's not for just a casual conversation like on a chat room. It is a way of life, not a mere hobby.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
Richard, I find so many of your posts interesting or fun or informative or humorous or kind or some combination of these qualities. I hope you'll keep up the good work. You're my role model in all this posting business. I'm just grateful that you post as much as you do. Happy Boxing Day tomorrow! On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 7:26 PM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/25/2013 6:58 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? Thanks, Ann, for you short response. You've got to realize, Ann, that this posting takes practice, just like if you wanted to get good at playing Angry Birds. It takes years to learn these skills. You can't keep up with this without dedication. That means ideally, you need to be alone most of the time with no husband or children or pets to look after. If you have to work at a job you'd want to be getting one where you're on a computer most of the time or at least have a laptop and Wi-Fi available all the time. At home, you'd want to be sitting at a computer desk with a large flat-screen so you can have several windows open all at once - one for the news reader, one for Microsoft Word or EditPad for composing, and one with a browsers to do research using Google. You need to be online at least sixteen hours a day except for sleep; if you go out, be sure to take a laptop with you; or at the least a smartphone; so you can monitor everything that posted to the discussion group every few minutes. I've been doing this since 1999, so I can say without the least hesitation, this isn't part-time endeavor - if you're a really serious poster - otherwise you'll just be considered a poser or a troll. It's not for just a casual conversation like on a chat room. It is a way of life, not a mere hobby.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
ROTFL. Richard, I find so many of your posts interesting or fun or informative or humorous or kind or some combination of these qualities. I hope you'll keep up the good work. You're my role model in all this posting business. I'm just grateful that you post as much as you do. Happy Boxing Day tomorrow! On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 7:26 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: On 12/25/2013 6:58 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? Thanks, Ann, for you short response. You've got to realize, Ann, that this posting takes practice, just like if you wanted to get good at playing Angry Birds. It takes years to learn these skills. You can't keep up with this without dedication. That means ideally, you need to be alone most of the time with no husband or children or pets to look after. If you have to work at a job you'd want to be getting one where you're on a computer most of the time or at least have a laptop and Wi-Fi available all the time. At home, you'd want to be sitting at a computer desk with a large flat-screen so you can have several windows open all at once - one for the news reader, one for Microsoft Word or EditPad for composing, and one with a browsers to do research using Google. You need to be online at least sixteen hours a day except for sleep; if you go out, be sure to take a laptop with you; or at the least a smartphone; so you can monitor everything that posted to the discussion group every few minutes. I've been doing this since 1999, so I can say without the least hesitation, this isn't part-time endeavor - if you're a really serious poster - otherwise you'll just be considered a poser or a troll. It's not for just a casual conversation like on a chat room. It is a way of life, not a mere hobby.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
Someone is monitoring my messages! Go figure. On 12/25/2013 9:10 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *Maybe at this point in the week. He was up to 160-something one Friday; he looks to be on track to break that record over the next two days.* RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean?
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
Thanks, Share - it looks like we are down to about a dozen regular respondents these days. It only takes a few minutes to read the posts on FFL - most of the time there's something to read, but for information junkies, it's just a very small pittance. Some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to. Thanks to everyone playing the game! So, I want to thank you and Buck for making this place more interesting - it's just awesome to have a few insiders like you two here to let us know what's going on up there. I am sorry you have to put up with Judy and Ann - they are real downers, fer sure. It's almost an embarrassment - reading those posts from the two ankle-biters, except some of us are very thick-skinned - we survived an Andrew Skolnick attack a few years ago over on Google Groups! On 12/25/2013 9:15 PM, Share Long wrote: Richard, I find so many of your posts interesting or fun or informative or humorous or kind or some combination of these qualities. I hope you'll keep up the good work. You're my role model in all this posting business. I'm just grateful that you post as much as you do. Happy Boxing Day tomorrow! On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 7:26 PM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/25/2013 6:58 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com mailto:awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? Thanks, Ann, for you short response. You've got to realize, Ann, that this posting takes practice, just like if you wanted to get good at playing Angry Birds. It takes years to learn these skills. You can't keep up with this without dedication. That means ideally, you need to be alone most of the time with no husband or children or pets to look after. If you have to work at a job you'd want to be getting one where you're on a computer most of the time or at least have a laptop and Wi-Fi available all the time. At home, you'd want to be sitting at a computer desk with a large flat-screen so you can have several windows open all at once - one for the news reader, one for Microsoft Word or EditPad for composing, and one with a browsers to do research using Google. You need to be online at least sixteen hours a day except for sleep; if you go out, be sure to take a laptop with you; or at the least a smartphone; so you can monitor everything that posted to the discussion group every few minutes. I've been doing this since 1999, so I can say without the least hesitation, this isn't part-time endeavor - if you're a really serious poster - otherwise you'll just be considered a poser or a troll. It's not for just a casual conversation like on a chat room. It is a way of life, not a mere hobby.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
Judy, you are an embarrassment. Maybe it's time for you to take a long sabbatical from posting to FFL, then in a year or two, return here when you can dialog like a professional, or at least like a seeker; at present, you are neither, Ms Stein. Have a nice day. On 12/25/2013 9:24 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: ROTFL. Richard, I find so many of your posts interesting or fun or informative or humorous or kind or some combination of these qualities. I hope you'll keep up the good work. You're my role model in all this posting business. I'm just grateful that you post as much as you do. Happy Boxing Day tomorrow! On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 7:26 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: On 12/25/2013 6:58 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? Thanks, Ann, for you short response. You've got to realize, Ann, that this posting takes practice, just like if you wanted to get good at playing Angry Birds. It takes years to learn these skills. You can't keep up with this without dedication. That means ideally, you need to be alone most of the time with no husband or children or pets to look after. If you have to work at a job you'd want to be getting one where you're on a computer most of the time or at least have a laptop and Wi-Fi available all the time. At home, you'd want to be sitting at a computer desk with a large flat-screen so you can have several windows open all at once - one for the news reader, one for Microsoft Word or EditPad for composing, and one with a browsers to do research using Google. You need to be online at least sixteen hours a day except for sleep; if you go out, be sure to take a laptop with you; or at the least a smartphone; so you can monitor everything that posted to the discussion group every few minutes. I've been doing this since 1999, so I can say without the least hesitation, this isn't part-time endeavor - if you're a really serious poster - otherwise you'll just be considered a poser or a troll. It's not for just a casual conversation like on a chat room. It is a way of life, not a mere hobby.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, sharelong60@... wrote:
Richard, I find so many of your posts interesting or fun or informative or
humorous or kind or some combination of these qualities. I hope you'll keep up
the good work. You're my role model in all this posting business. I'm just
grateful that you post as much as you do.
(Squeal) Me too! Oh Retardo, please pick on Judy more, please post more - 125+
so far this week is just not enough. And I wish you and all those that look
like you the best of everything, now and until eternity. You are the mostest of
the mostest. I can't get enough of what you are all about. And while I'm at it
I wish everyone here at FFL just the most fun day tomorrow, yipee and yay!
What is it that we're celebrating anyway? Oh gee, I am just sooo silly - silly,
silly me, I must have had too much sugar -those eggnog lattes are just so
deeelicious - and my little brain has taken a turn toward vitiated pitta, or is
that vitiligo? Anyway, if someone could explain what critters actually do at
night I would just love to know. Nighty, nighty boys.
Happy Boxing Day tomorrow!
On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 7:26 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@...
wrote:
On 12/25/2013 6:58 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean?
Thanks, Ann, for you short response.
You've got to realize, Ann, that this posting takes practice, just like if you
wanted to get good at playing Angry Birds. It takes years to learn these
skills. You can't keep up with this without dedication. That means ideally, you
need to be alone most of the time with no husband or children or pets to look
after. If you have to work at a job you'd want to be getting one where you're
on a computer most of the time or at least have a laptop and Wi-Fi available
all the time.
At home, you'd want to be sitting at a computer desk with a large flat-screen
so you can have several windows open all at once - one for the news reader, one
for Microsoft Word or EditPad for composing, and one with a browsers to do
research using Google. You need to be online at least sixteen hours a day
except for sleep; if you go out, be sure to take a laptop with you; or at the
least a smartphone; so you can monitor everything that posted to the discussion
group every few minutes.
I've been doing this since 1999, so I can say without the least hesitation,
this isn't part-time endeavor - if you're a really serious poster - otherwise
you'll just be considered a poser or a troll. It's not for just a casual
conversation like on a chat room. It is a way of life, not a mere hobby.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
This is just mean, plain old mean coming out of Ann. It almost sounds
like she is JELLOS. Go figure.
On 12/25/2013 9:59 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, sharelong60@... wrote:
Richard, I find so many of your posts interesting or fun or
informative or humorous or kind or some combination of these
qualities. I hope you'll keep up the good work. You're my role model
in all this posting business. I'm just grateful that you post as much
as you do.
(Squeal) Me too! Oh Retardo, please pick on Judy more, please post
more - 125+ so far this week is just not enough. And I wish you and
all those that look like you the best of everything, now and until
eternity. You are the mostest of the mostest. I can't get enough of
what you are all about. And while I'm at it I wish everyone here at
FFL just the most fun day tomorrow, yipee and yay! What is it that
we're celebrating anyway? Oh gee, I am just sooo silly - silly, silly
me, I must have had too much sugar -those eggnog lattes are just so
deeelicious - and my little brain has taken a turn toward vitiated
pitta, or is that vitiligo? Anyway, if someone could explain what
critters actually do at night I would just love to know. Nighty,
nighty boys.
Happy Boxing Day tomorrow!
On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 7:26 PM, Richard J. Williams
punditster@... wrote:
On 12/25/2013 6:58 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean?
Thanks, Ann, for you short response.
You've got to realize, Ann, that this posting takes practice, just
like if you wanted to get good at playing Angry Birds. It takes years
to learn these skills. You can't keep up with this without dedication.
That means ideally, you need to be alone most of the time with no
husband or children or pets to look after. If you have to work at a
job you'd want to be getting one where you're on a computer most of
the time or at least have a laptop and Wi-Fi available all the time.
At home, you'd want to be sitting at a computer desk with a large
flat-screen so you can have several windows open all at once - one for
the news reader, one for Microsoft Word or EditPad for composing, and
one with a browsers to do research using Google. You need to be online
at least sixteen hours a day except for sleep; if you go out, be sure
to take a laptop with you; or at the least a smartphone; so you can
monitor everything that posted to the discussion group every few minutes.
I've been doing this since 1999, so I can say without the least
hesitation, this isn't part-time endeavor - if you're a really
serious poster - otherwise you'll just be considered a poser or a
troll. It's not for just a casual conversation like on a chat room. It
is a way of life, not a mere hobby.
