On Feb 21, 2006, at 4:00 PM, off_world_beings wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 21, 2006, at 11:06 AM, authfriend wrote: Again: Were these qualities MMY got from mind-modeling Guru Dev? He was a SECRETARY for christsakes--he just did what any go
On Feb 21, 2006, at 1:13 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 21, 2006, at 11:06 AM, authfriend wrote: Again: Were these qualities MMY got from mind-modeling Guru Dev? He was a SECRETARY for christsakes--he just did what any good s
On Feb 21, 2006, at 11:06 AM, authfriend wrote:Again: Were these qualities MMY got from mind-modeling Guru Dev? He was a SECRETARY for christsakes--he just did what any good secretary does, anticipated the needs of his boss. Why do people need to read some cosmic explanation into that? He learned
on 2/21/06 10:06 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> on 2/21/06 4:21 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>> So IMO it's a good idea, from time to time, to take
>>> a few steps back and reall
on 2/21/06 9:07 AM, hugheshugo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Are you going to tell them? It will be interesting to see if they
> believe
>> you. I think it would be healthy for most if they did, as I don't
> believe
>> that continually attuning one's "thinking" to that of someone who
> is clea
on 2/21/06 4:21 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> So IMO it's a good idea, from time to time, to take
> a few steps back and really *examine* the mind that
> you're trying to attune yourself to. Do you really
> *want* all that you see there? Because you're going
> to get it *all* as a
Better yet, let's send DOJ over to teach a residence course--ladies only.
Sal
On Feb 20, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
on 2/20/06 10:33 AM, hugheshugo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I still think the truth is always clear though and I will be
> interested to see the expressions on my
--- hugheshugo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > on 2/20/06 1:34 AM, hugheshugo at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks I've just read the sadie files. very
> interesting.
> > >
> > > I think you
on 2/20/06 10:33 AM, hugheshugo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I still think the truth is always clear though and I will be
> interested to see the expressions on my believer friends faces when
> they find out their guru, who they think speaks with the voice of god
> don't forget, is not as pure as
on 2/20/06 1:34 AM, hugheshugo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Thanks I've just read the sadie files. very interesting.
>
> I think you've missed the point though, Maharishi claims to be a
> celibate monk and was apparently sleeping with his disciples I can't
> think of anything that undermines
On Feb 19, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Rick Archer wrote:It seems like this recent story from "Deepak" may be advance preparation for buttressing that denial. It's an attempt to rewrite the story of why the Beatles left Rishikesh so as to shift all blame from MMY to them and discredit the womanizing story.
on 2/19/06 1:49 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> And what would Deepak's motivation be in defending MMY and the TMO?
I have no idea. Who knows when he even uttered this quote? If it was recent,
then I guess he's just expressing his experience and opinion. Doesn't need
some overarch
on 2/19/06 12:07 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Feb 19, 2006, at 4:04 AM, Ron F wrote (quoting Deepak Chopra):
>>
>>> "There was never any truth to stories about the maharishi's
>>> womanising.
>>
>
on 2/19/06 10:56 AM, hugheshugo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hugheshugo"
>> wrote:
>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
>>> wrote:
The only wom
on 2/19/06 10:33 AM, hugheshugo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> on 2/19/06 7:11 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 19, 2006, at 4:04 AM, Ron F wrote (quoting Deepak Chopra):
>>>
"There wa
Well, then you've come to the right place, Hugo. We have nothing but the unvarnished Truth here. Just ask anyone.
Sal
On Feb 19, 2006, at 10:33 AM, hugheshugo wrote:
Why would this person wait until MMY died before publishing? Fear of
litigation perhaps?
I want the Truth, whatever it i
16 matches
Mail list logo
