Wiki page highlighting blurry/missing icons in F9beta
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F9IconCheck
--
~Michael
http://ridleytx.structed.net (for now)
http://michaelbox.net (eventually)
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
Hello Artists!
I’m Kyle from Washington, USA. I’ve got some basic programming experience
but art is where it’s at. I’d love to help out on the development of how
fedora looks!
I do a lot of Photoshop and graphic design (I’ve done several posters and
websites) and I’m a photographer.
Let
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 01:01 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> I took an opportunity to look at Waves background and noticed a
> tremendous amount
> of nodes for curves causing a huge slowdown to my x86_64 workstation.
> Removing some of them have reduced the original size from 208 to 186 KB.
> The
Máirín Duffy wrote:
Nicu Buculei wrote:
And I like better version 1. for consistency (all the other screens
have reflection in the water, not on an additional plane) and 2. for
physical reasons (we have waves on a liquid surface and a plane and is
not realistic at all - the water is like a wal
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Nicu Buculei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A first thing would be, IMO, to define when we start counting. I see two
> possible scenarios: either from a certain number of days in advance (30
> days sounds plausible) or from the Release Candidate.
I'm not on the w
Frank Murphy wrote:
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 12:03 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm not sure which version is better. Let me know what you think. I
tried adding sulphur to them but it didn't really come out right.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F9Themes/Waves/Round3Final#head-c451
Nicu Buculei wrote:
Jon Stanley wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Máirín Duffy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not sure which version is better. Let me know what you think. I
tried adding sulphur to them but it didn't really come out right.
From the peanut gallery over here, I like
Hey Jon!
Jon Stanley wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Máirín Duffy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not sure which version is better. Let me know what you think. I
tried adding sulphur to them but it didn't really come out right.
From the peanut gallery over here, I like version 2 b
Máirín Duffy wrote:
Hi Matthias!
Matthias Clasen wrote:
Hey,
now that the beta is out, it is high time that we start getting the F9
artwork in place. Unfortunately, I haven't followed the discussions on
this list very closely in the last weeks, so I need a quick update on
where we stand wrt to
Matthias Clasen wrote:
Wrt to the resolutions, it will be much more useful to have them
as separate pngs if we can actually correct the aspect ratio of the
images, just rendering the same svg at the different sizes will not give
much of an improvement over just using the svg in the first place.
On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 18:33 -0500, Michael Beckwith wrote:
> Here's an updated version with the support for multi-resolutions.
> However, I'm not sure how to handle it once we reach the static
> moments. Perhaps someone with some more experience can help at those
> points.
You can use elements in
Nicu Buculei wrote:
The release counter we had for F8 proved to be quite popular, so is
natural to have this time another one, maybe with some improvements.
With the release scheduled for April 29, about a month from now, I think
it is a good time to start planning it.
This is my first attempt
I took an opportunity to look at Waves background and noticed a
tremendous amount
of nodes for curves causing a huge slowdown to my x86_64 workstation.
Removing some of them have reduced the original size from 208 to 186 KB.
The blurred dark flame is made with less node though it could be tweaked
f
13 matches
Mail list logo