María Leandro wrote:
something like this?
http://tatica.org/tux/fedora-science-pe.png
I like this one better but maybe with *less* bright colors.
http://tatica.org/tux/fedora-education-pe.png
(just draws)
--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora
María Leandro wrote:
just another idea
http://tatica.org/tux/fedora-edu-wp2-wide.png
Sorry, but I not think this one is a good idea, it is disturbingly
similar to http://images.google.com/images?q=vista+boxbtnG=Search+Images
--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
María Leandro wrote:
I was reading the Artwork Design Service and some ideas came up on the
FedoraQA open request. I was talking a little with jlaska at the IRC
channel and this are two propositions. (draws).
Hope some like it :D
http://tatica.org/tux/FedoraQA.png
Erick Henrique wrote:
Hi Hans and Nicu
See the 2 ships that I drew for the Starfighter game. Later sending the
other conceptual images and avatars.
This is interesting, I would like to see how they look inside the game.
When to conclude the other ships I will generate one pixel art to see
Klaatu wrote:
I am not clear, is this to be the final katana or is it still being
swapped out with a newly photographed one? I recall there being an
issue with licensing, and thought we would be seeing a different
sword...but maybe I missed the thread in which all of this was solved.
Gian Paolo Mureddu wrote:
I have done a translation of the banner to Spanish, following your
banners as template. However, I don't seem to have the fonts you guys
used to create the banner (on F9)... At any rate, I have used URW Gothic
L in substitution, this is work in progress as I'll most
sstorari *claimed* that he had remade the photo cos he had remade the photo.
If u take a look in the source before write something u can see that the
problem was solved creatin' the blade from 0.
I think it's clear this sword is totally a patchwork of various level created.
Just take a look to
sstorari *claimed* that he had remade the photo cos he had remade the photo.
If u take a look in the source before write something u can see that the
problem was solved creatin' the blade from 0.
I think it's clear this sword is totally a patchwork of various level created.
Just take a look to
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 11:50 +0200, Samuele Storari wrote:
sstorari *claimed* that he had remade the photo cos he had remade the
photo. If u take a look in the source before write something u can see
that the problem was solved creatin' the blade from 0. I think it's
clear this sword is
Samuele Storari wrote:
Sorry, but I'm a lil sick to try to defend my work everyday and u wait til the last day
to make a new question?
Well, Klaatu asked and I answered to the best of my knowledge.
I have not waited until the last day, this is something I said all
along, see [1], but didn't
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Nicu Buculei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: Discussions about the artwork included with Fedora, including icons,
themes, and wallpapers. fedora-art-list@redhat.com
Inviato: Martedì, 23 settembre 2008 12:42:16 GMT +01:00
Amsterdam/Berlino/Berna/Roma/Stoccolma/Vienna
Luca Foppiano wrote:
I completely agree! Sometime I don't understand which is the real goal:
find *the best* fedora theme or do whatever to try to denigrate the
others?
The real goal is to create a Free theme, using as much as possible Free
tools, by a team working in an open and
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 09:53 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 12:13 -0500, Michael Beckwith wrote:
I like this overall, but the text on the banner sounds like we're
closing shop. If we could somehow add and many more or something
similar to it, it'd be better in my
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:36 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
María Leandro wrote:
I was reading the Artwork Design Service and some ideas came up on the
FedoraQA open request. I was talking a little with jlaska at the IRC
channel and this are two propositions. (draws).
Hope some like it
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 11:50 +0200, Samuele Storari wrote:
sstorari *claimed* that he had remade the photo cos he had remade the photo.
If u take a look in the source before write something u can see that the
problem was solved creatin' the blade from 0.
I think it's clear this sword is
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 15:06 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
Paul W. Frields wrote:
I tried doing this myself this morning, without any luck or success. If
anyone can get this banner working this morning, I'll talk to the admins
about putting it up tonight.
I think this should do it...
Part of my idea come from part of that image. YES
But the desktop was created by USING free source and this is the last time I
will say it.
The Hattory Hanzo katana is a katana u know a katana.
Katana is for most similar:
I link for u some photo so u can see what I mean:
Samuele Storari wrote:
Part of my idea come from part of that image. YES
But the desktop was created by USING free source and this is the last time I
will say it.
The Hattory Hanzo katana is a katana u know a katana.
Katana is for most similar:
Trying to hod myself from exclaiming no shit?
2008/9/23 Nicu Buculei [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Samuele Storari wrote:
Part of my idea come from part of that image. YES
But the desktop was created by USING free source and this is the last time
I will say it.
The Hattory Hanzo katana is a katana u know a katana.
Katana is for most similar:
U can exclaim exactly what do u want.
Part of my idea come from part of that image. YES
U use the round 1 image.
Other?
U know what's the problem?
Since the first round u try to push my works down.
InvinXble, Solar as same, everyday every single day since some months ago but I
made all u
David... Yes I admit... I stoled it.
Say to your friend that now he can come to me to get back his own katana. :D
Thanks
Samuele
- Messaggio originale -
Da: David Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: Discussions about the artwork included with Fedora, including icons,
themes, and wallpapers.
Hi guys.. I'd like to (finally) join the Fedora Art team.. -[Proper]-
I've helped out on DVD artwork stuff, contributed a few samples, built
visual remixes on your ideas and a shot a few fedora inspired photos too .
(most mentioned on this list or peer to peer with other art team members)
I'd
Samuele Storari wrote:
So just a little question: If u can't do something, it means that it can't be
done?
I find this presumption extremely offensive.
~m
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@redhat.com
Honestly I can't see the problem.
In round 1, as Samuele said, there was a question about the origin of
katana (all sword look like a peace of iron with an handle) and there
was a discussion about it... Samuele posted a photo to shown the start
point of his image... and you (I don't know who...
Luca Foppiano wrote:
I completely agree! Sometime I don't understand which is the real goal:
find *the best* fedora theme or do whatever to try to denigrate the
others?
We have had egregious violations of copyright and image licensing in the
past, due to a misunderstanding of licensing and
Samuele Storari wrote:
U can exclaim exactly what do u want.
Part of my idea come from part of that image. YES
U use the round 1 image.
Other?
U know what's the problem?
Yes, I do know what the problem is: you appear to be taking Fedora's
license policies personally.
Please don't.
Since
Marco Mornati wrote:
In this moment there is again the same question about Katana in the
photo... I think you if you are not sure (also with all probations
about katana) you have to STOP the vote over that theme.
If invixble wins, and there is still a question over the licensing of
the
Yes... I'm in agreement with you Máirín... we can't have a NO.Licenses
Image inside Fedora... that it's completely free!
My question is... why now? There are user voting also Invinxible
theme... and are all lost. There were a licensing doubt over that
theme... why it's in the final round?
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 12:04 +0200, Luca Foppiano wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 11:50 +0200, Samuele Storari wrote:
sstorari *claimed* that he had remade the photo cos he had remade the
photo. If u take a look in the source before write something u can see
that the problem was solved
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:33 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
I worked on gears. I decided to stop working on it because I liked Solar
and wanted it to win.
Me too... I can't vote but I'm happy to read this! :)
Marco
--
Dott. Ing. Mornati Marco
Byte-Code s.r.l
via Antonio Cechov, 1
San Giuliano
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:35 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Marco Mornati wrote:
In this moment there is again the same question about Katana in the
photo... I think you if you are not sure (also with all probations
about katana) you have to STOP the vote over that theme.
If invixble
Andy Fitzsimon wrote:
Hi guys.. I'd like to (finally) join the Fedora Art team.. -[Proper]-
I've helped out on DVD artwork stuff, contributed a few samples, built
visual remixes on your ideas and a shot a few fedora inspired photos too
. (most mentioned on this list or peer to peer with
David Nielsen wrote:
...it surprises you that an iconic image of a katana which he already
admitted to using as inspiration contains a katana of a similar design..
when katanas are pretty much the same, I mean it looks exactly like the
replica my friend has hanging on his wall as well, will
I'm little sad about our discussion.
I think everyone loud his voice more than necessary, the only problem with my
image is the hilt?
Ok, but why waitin the last day to say it?
I understand your position, and believe me I've got nothing with u don't take
me bad.
I worked a lot for adv agency and
Paul W. Frields wrote:
Using
non-free elements for examples for the first round (or two) is probably
even OK.
I don't think it should be, absolutely not if the artwork is going to be
uploaded to our wiki.
We have always said, if you are using artwork you did not create to make
a proposal,
Hi Samuele,
Samuele Storari wrote:
I'm little sad about our discussion.
I think everyone loud his voice more than necessary, the only problem with my
image is the hilt?
Ok, but why waitin the last day to say it?
Nicu and I brought up our concerns with the licensing of this imagery
weeks
Hi Marco,
Marco Mornati wrote:
Yes... I'm in agreement with you Máirín... we can't have a NO.Licenses
Image inside Fedora... that it's completely free!
My question is... why now? There are user voting also Invinxible
theme... and are all lost. There were a licensing doubt over that
theme...
Hi Marco,
Marco Mornati wrote:
Ok thanks for the answer Máirín... For me was so strange the decision to
have an image not creative commons in the final round!
I was unaware the image wasn't properly licensed as again, it had been
brought up earlier and Samuele assured us he would replace it.
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:33 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Samuele Storari wrote:
U can exclaim exactly what do u want.
Part of my idea come from part of that image. YES
U use the round 1 image.
Other?
U know what's the problem?
Yes, I do know what the problem is: you appear to be
Thanks Nicu
Here are the links for anyone else having to do the reactivation:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2008-September/msg9.html
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/New_signing_key
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Enabling_new_signing_key
Andy
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at
wait, those links are in regards to signed packages. not fedora account
membership
(man im a top poster... sorry :-/ )
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork#Final_Steps is the correct link/.
/me wipes mud off face
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Andy Fitzsimon [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On 2008-09-23 10:31:36 PM, Andy Fitzsimon wrote:
wait, those links are in regards to signed packages. not fedora account
membership
You should be able to just request a password reset at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/resetpass.
Thanks,
Ricky
pgpZYTlZnIalS.pgp
Description:
Hi folks,
Since it is now clear we have some licensing issues with at least one of
the candidates for the theme, I would like to hear your thoughts on what
we should do. Since the vote is in art team members' hands I think it's
our call to decide what to do next.
Here are the options as I
Hi folks,
Did any of you joining the art team have doubts/questions/confusion over
copyright law and licensing as it pertains to the usage of
externally-sourced images used in artwork? Were you unsure of what
licenses were acceptable to use in Fedora artwork?
What kinds of questions /
The rules and licensing issues were clear to me when I joined a few months
ago.
I think a quick reference guide on what is ok to use and what is not ok to
use might be a good idea, though, just because i think everyone must get a
little confused from time to time about what combination of magic
I was frankly confused on what I was voting on, which is why I asked for
clarification on this in the first place. I did not want to vote on
InvinXible as it was only to have a different sword in the final product. I
didn't mean to wait til the last minute, I jsut didn't understand why in the
Klaatu a écrit :
The rules and licensing issues were clear to me when I joined a few
months ago.
I think a quick reference guide on what is ok to use and what is not
ok to use might be a good idea, though, just because i think everyone
must get a little confused from time to time about what
Yes... maybe you are right. But I think that anyway theme could have
some mods also after vote. But it's true that, for example with
Invixible theme, if you decide to change the katana, maybe the result
couldn't be beautiful like current version.
Marco
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 11:06 -0700, Klaatu
2008/9/23 Máirín Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi folks,
Since it is now clear we have some licensing issues with at least one of
the candidates for the theme, I would like to hear your thoughts on what we
should do. Since the vote is in art team members' hands I think it's our
call to decide
David Nielsen wrote:
I would favor option 2 with the understanding that a proper policy be
written and must be agreed upon when submitting artwork for Fedora in
the future.
I don't understand. This is the case today. We've had a clearly written
policy on our wiki page for at least a year
2008/9/23 Máirín Duffy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi folks,
Did any of you joining the art team have doubts/questions/confusion over
copyright law and licensing as it pertains to the usage of
externally-sourced images used in artwork? Were you unsure of what
licenses were acceptable to use in Fedora
Hi,
I haven't read the whole discussion yet, but I feel greatly disappointed
with what I read so far. First, I have an impression that Mo and Nicu
are somehow biased against Samuele's work. First, some weeks ago, Mo
kept asking Samuele about Moon brushes in the Solar theme, when the
Moons were
Hi,
Martin Sourada wrote:
I haven't read the whole discussion yet, but I feel greatly disappointed
with what I read so far. First, I have an impression that Mo and Nicu
are somehow biased against Samuele's work. First, some weeks ago, Mo
kept asking Samuele about Moon brushes in the Solar
Martin Sourada wrote:
Hi,
I haven't read the whole discussion yet, but I feel greatly disappointed
with what I read so far. First, I have an impression that Mo and Nicu
are somehow biased against Samuele's work. First, some weeks ago, Mo
kept asking Samuele about Moon brushes in the Solar
Ok, ok, I am sorry, you proved me partly wrong, my bad. I still feel
awkward about the whole discussion, but Mo is right there (I am sorry
for my accusations). I looked into the sources and while the blade has
been changed I believe it is directly based on Samuele's own photo, the
tilt is from
Nicu Buculei escribió:
Gian Paolo Mureddu wrote:
I have done a translation of the banner to Spanish, following your
banners as template. However, I don't seem to have the fonts you guys
used to create the banner (on F9)... At any rate, I have used URW
Gothic L in substitution, this is work in
When we approved Echo as the default icon theme for F10, I was under the
assumption that this was already more or less known as a feature to the
Desktop group, and they were OK with the coverage provided and the
experience given. Is that the case?
Looking at the desktop now (beta), I see:
- at
Hi Bill,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Bill Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When we approved Echo as the default icon theme for F10, I was under the
assumption that this was already more or less known as a feature to the
Desktop group, and they were OK with the coverage provided and the
William Jon McCann wrote:
Hi Bill,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Bill Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When we approved Echo as the default icon theme for F10, I was under the
assumption that this was already more or less known as a feature to the
Desktop group, and they were OK with the
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:47 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
I had thought Matthias volunteered to serve as the Desktop team
representative. He had outlined a plan here which is what the Echo folks
have been following:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/2008-September/msg00044.html
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:47 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
I had thought Matthias volunteered to serve as the Desktop team
representative. He had outlined a plan here which is what the Echo folks
have been following:
William Jon McCann wrote:
Hi,
Is there a reason why Mike Langlie's Spectrum wallpaper is no longer
being considered for Fedora 10?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F10Themes/spectrum
I've looked at the wiki and I'm still not sure exactly how this
selection process works.
It was not
William Jon McCann a écrit :
Hi Bill,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Bill Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When we approved Echo as the default icon theme for F10, I was under the
assumption that this was already more or less known as a feature to the
Desktop group, and they were OK
Bill Nottingham a écrit :
Looking at the desktop now (beta), I see:
- at least three different icon perspectives in the stock menus
(echo, 'stock', bluecurve)
I think Bluecurve mix are desktop bug. Current Fedora default theme used
Bluecurve from some applications, same issue occurs on
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
For the former, it can be possible as long more people participate. For
the latter, upstream gnome can be echofied following the guideline[3].
Is it realistic to expect this to happen?
~m
___
Fedora-art-list mailing list
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 07:28:06PM -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
Is there a reason why Mike Langlie's Spectrum wallpaper is no longer
being considered for Fedora 10?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F10Themes/spectrum
I was gonna complete this for Mike but I unfortunately ran out of
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:22 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Bill Nottingham a écrit :
Looking at the desktop now (beta), I see:
- at least three different icon perspectives in the stock menus
(echo, 'stock', bluecurve)
I think Bluecurve mix are desktop bug. Current Fedora default
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:22 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Bill Nottingham a écrit :
Looking at the desktop now (beta), I see:
- at least three different icon perspectives in the stock menus
(echo, 'stock', bluecurve)
I think Bluecurve mix are desktop bug.
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 22:09 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:22 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Bill Nottingham a écrit :
Looking at the desktop now (beta), I see:
- at least three different icon perspectives in the stock menus
(echo,
On an operating system, far far away,, we were deep. We were busy
slaving away in front of our lovely Fedora 9-run computer, hacking away
at graphics for our theme proposals. Three rounds in, and we were down
to four options. When it came down to it, we decided that we were no
longer content
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Michael Beckwith wrote:
Solar
InvinXble
Gears
Neon
They are all beautifully done pieces of artwork, and I really hope that
everyone in the Art Team is proud of what the group has collectively
achieved. I say congrats to everyone on the Art Team.
--Max
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356
Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I was doing a ticket on creating new projects on fedorahosted today and
found certain anomalies in the documentation [1].
Since this is my first ticket on creating new projects on fedorahosted,
I am not sure if my methods are correct,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I was doing a ticket on creating new projects on fedorahosted today and
found certain anomalies in the documentation [1].
Since this is my first ticket on creating new projects on
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which no one claims
ownership or the owner cannot be found?
-Mike
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
Mike McGrath wrote:
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which no one claims
ownership or the owner cannot be found?
Has something like an AWOL procedure been considered?
-Jeroen
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which no one claims
ownership or the owner cannot be found?
Has something like an AWOL procedure been considered?
Not really, thats kind of what I'm probing about.
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 16:53 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which no one claims
ownership or the owner cannot be found?
Has something like an AWOL procedure been
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Brett Lentz wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 16:53 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which no one
claims
ownership or the owner cannot be found?
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 13:58 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which no one claims
ownership or the owner cannot be found?
* Make Trac Read Only (maybe static content too, in
old.fedorahosted.org/projectname/)
* Disable commit group in FAS (in
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:14 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Brett Lentz wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 16:53 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Mike McGrath wrote:
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 18:43 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Nigel Jones wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 13:58 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Getting back to this. What should we do with code to which no one claims
ownership or the owner cannot be found?
* Make Trac Read Only
Nigel Jones wrote:
IIRC the GPL at least requires that the code be kept for 3 years (hence
why we can't clean the look-a-side cache from memory).
AFAIK that only goes to /distribution/ under GPLv2 section 3b, not the
upstream SCM, but then again I'm not sure and it may be worthwhile
looking
Mike McGrath wrote:
For how long? Here's the concern. At some point between now and the end
of time decisions are going to have to be made about these projects. I'm
trying to have us learn a lesson from the elvis move as well trying to
make sure other's lack of planning doesn't become
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 01:59 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Nigel Jones wrote:
IIRC the GPL at least requires that the code be kept for 3 years (hence
why we can't clean the look-a-side cache from memory).
AFAIK that only goes to /distribution/ under GPLv2 section 3b, not the
Kevin Cadieux wrote:
Hello everyone,
My name is Kevin, and I just recently created my account to be a member of the
Fedora Project. I was interested in getting involved, so I looked at the
different sub-projects on the wiki. I found that the Infrastructure
sub-project
was the one that
Hi all:
I am a new member of the Fedora Infrastructure team.My name is Yuliang
from China.I have plenty of spare time to contribute and wish to involve the
team.
I like programming Any suggestion or mentorship from the team is
important to me.I want to work with you qucikly.
Best Regards
Quoting Toshio Kuratomi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Kevin Cadieux wrote:
Hello everyone,
My name is Kevin, and I just recently created my account to be a member of
the
Fedora Project. I was interested in getting involved, so I looked at the
different sub-projects on the wiki. I found that the
Thanks Kam Leo,
I have already downloaded the DVD ISO again and verified the file with the
SHA1 checksum calculator mentioned in the Read ME file.
The CheckSum matches...But had to go leave for work..
once i get back...let me see how the installation goes.
Thanks for the links.
@ Armin,
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 00:59 -0400, Rick Bilonick wrote:
I have a similar problem (F8 completely updated) - no sound on flash
videos (like youtube). I used to have audio on flash videos but at some
point it stopped. I can play and hear the sound in the sound card
detection and I can hear the
Il giorno lun, 22/09/2008 alle 23.49 +, Paul W. Frields ha scritto:
I think, given the error message, you may need to change your username
to xxx.xxx and not [EMAIL PROTECTED] in both the Receiving Email and
Sending Email tabs for your Gmail account.
Alredy done, but same response.
Are
Il giorno lun, 22/09/2008 alle 23.49 +, Paul W. Frields ha scritto:
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 17:44 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 23:14 +0200, Ambrogio De Lorenzo wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to use Evolution to fetch mail from gmail account.
I configured Evo
Ed Greshko wrote:
bob smith wrote:
trying to update F9, on a 386/686 box. Failing. Thanks in advance for
any help
quick description - can't run yum. Think I have the repositories files
from (addresses don't resolve)
yes, I probably hosed them up trying to fix them. Got not response to
yum
Ed Greshko wrote:
Seems like your system can't resolve the host names into an IP address.
Network/DNS problems
What does
host mirrors.fedoraproject.org
return?
What it looks like to me is I do not have the proper copy of the
repositories.
Does some one have a working copy, and
bob smith wrote:
[...]
What it looks like to me is I do not have the proper copy of the
repositories.
Does some one have a working copy, and example, I can try for 386/686
system?
rpm -Uvh
Hi list
I need a GUI editor for latex. Particulary i want to ask if there is a
feature that permits an instant visualization of the result as in latex
editor (http://www.latexeditor.org/)
Thanks for help
Adel
--
PhD candidate in Computer Science
Address
BP 108, Bureau de poste Tunis republique
Stuart Sears wrote:
bob smith wrote:
[...]
What it looks like to me is I do not have the proper copy of the
repositories.
Does some one have a working copy, and example, I can try for 386/686
system?
rpm -Uvh
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:13:36 -0400, bob smith wrote:
Stuart Sears wrote:
bob smith wrote:
[...]
What it looks like to me is I do not have the proper copy of the
repositories.
Does some one have a working copy, and example, I can try for 386/686
system?
rpm -Uvh
Gene Heskett wrote:
I just discovered that some custom scripts I wrote a year or so,
seem to have gone on the milling list, and that both the
fetchmail.log and the procmail.log were approaching a gigabyte in
size.
Ouch. :)
So I cobbled up this:
==
# Logrotate file for fetchmail.log
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 01:29 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 00:59 -0400, Rick Bilonick wrote:
I have a similar problem (F8 completely updated) - no sound on flash
videos (like youtube). I used to have audio on flash videos but at some
point it stopped. I can play and
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
