2008/12/23 Paul W. Frields sticks...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 04:35:37PM -0800, Máirín Duffy wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
Hi Mark,
Mark wrote:
So what do you think about this?
Is it worth starting to make
Mark wrote:
The new name is now known: Leonidas
but my question for the theme still stands. So here is my initial post
on this subject again:
I don't think the themes of FC1-4 were particularly notable, and I do
think it is worth discussing a new theme for F11.
Nased on Leonidas we could do
2009/1/9 Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I've just posted a poll about Echo Perspective on Fedora Forum [1] to
see our user base opinion and I'd like to hear the opinions of the Art
Team members as well. As you are probably aware of, we are starting Echo
Perspective and are
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Mark wrote:
The new name is now known: Leonidas
but my question for the theme still stands. So here is my initial post
on this subject again:
I don't think the themes of FC1-4 were particularly notable, and I do
Mark wrote:
So a new theme would be welcome. Why not on the FC1 - 4 releases
(blue/purple like) which fits the name perfectly. Blue/purple is like
the ocean (oke, more blue then purple).
Are you talking about just the colors of FC1-FC4 or the actual theme?
And are you talking about the
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Mark wrote:
So a new theme would be welcome. Why not on the FC1 - 4 releases
(blue/purple like) which fits the name perfectly. Blue/purple is like
the ocean (oke, more blue then purple).
Are you talking about just
On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 16:56 +0100, Mark wrote:
Hi martin,
Hi Mark,
But now something i don't understand. You seemed to be a person
heavily in favor of the isometric perspective.. what happened with
that idea? is isometric gone and is this the new idea?
For isometric it was relatively unique
2009/1/11 Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com:
On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 16:56 +0100, Mark wrote:
Hi martin,
Hi Mark,
But now something i don't understand. You seemed to be a person
heavily in favor of the isometric perspective.. what happened with
that idea? is isometric gone and is this
On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 18:14 +0100, Mark wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
Are you talking about just the colors of FC1-FC4 or the actual theme? And
are you talking about the *artwork* or are you talking about the
GTK/metacity etc?
Just
2009/1/11 Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com:
On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 18:14 +0100, Mark wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
Are you talking about just the colors of FC1-FC4 or the actual theme? And
are you talking about the *artwork* or
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=378927
Natch highmin...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477392
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:27 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477413
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:46 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477464
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:24 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477404
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:37 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477471
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:30 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477394
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:29 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477368
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:11 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477472
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:31 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477390
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:26 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477480
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:39 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477487
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:43 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477477
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:36 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477372
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:14 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:09 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477441
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:07 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477439
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:06 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477450
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:17 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477483
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:41 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477335
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:08 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477397
--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:31 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477424
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:55 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477442
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:08 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477463
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:24 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477427
--- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:57 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477481
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:39 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477382
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:20 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:14 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477386
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:23 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:18 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477403
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:36 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477417
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:48 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477421
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:52 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477405
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:37 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:02 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477374
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:17 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477401
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:35 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477331
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:03 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477393
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:28 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:42 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477443
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:10 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478891
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:45 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477468
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:29 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477474
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:33 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477389
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:25 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477436
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:03 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477400
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:34 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477476
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:35 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477333
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:06 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477428
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:58 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477447
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:13 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477446
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:12 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477445
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:11 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477395
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:30 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:37 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:25 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477378
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:19 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477429
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:59 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477449
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:16 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477432
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:01 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416
--- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:47 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477370
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:12 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477334
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:07 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477422
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:54 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477373
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:15 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477451
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:18 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477467
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:28 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477418
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:49 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:43 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477387
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:24 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477411
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:45 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477431
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:00 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477462
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:23 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477385
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:22 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:05 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477473
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:32 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477426
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:56 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477423
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:55 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477409
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:42 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477438
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:05 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477412
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:46 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477419
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:50 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477407
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:40 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477398
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:19:33 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477488
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:44 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477461
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
10:20:22 EDT ---
To help packagers manage the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433
Hans Ulrich Niedermann rhb...@n-dimensional.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433
Hans Ulrich Niedermann rhb...@n-dimensional.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477433
--- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-11
11:27:33 EDT ---
Yes, sorry, next time I'll
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477428
Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
