Re: base banner style for f11 leonidas artwork

2009-03-19 Thread Alexander Smirnov
Hi, What do you think about this as a base style to go with for the various banners/splashes for F11? http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/art/f11/mockups/style/fedora-greek-style_mockup.png even plainer: http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/art/f11/mockups/style/fedora-greek-style_mockup_2.png

Re: base banner style for f11 leonidas artwork

2009-03-19 Thread Nicu Buculei
Máirín Duffy wrote: Hi, What do you think about this as a base style to go with for the various banners/splashes for F11? http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/art/f11/mockups/style/fedora-greek-style_mockup.png even plainer:

Re: base banner style for f11 leonidas artwork

2009-03-19 Thread Nicu Buculei
Charlie Brej wrote: I do like. Simple yet styled. I made a plymouth splash based on it. There is a video[1] and the source for anyone who wants to have a go at Cool animation Charlie, but somewhat slow :p I hope the F11 boot process will not take *that* much and increasing the speed of the

Re: base banner style for f11 leonidas artwork

2009-03-19 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 20:50:32 Máirín Duffy wrote: - Original Message From: Máirín Duffy What do you think about this as a base style to go with for the various banners/splashes for F11? http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/art/f11/mockups/style/fedora-greek-style_mo

Re: base banner style for f11 leonidas artwork

2009-03-19 Thread Charlie Brej
Nicu Buculei wrote: Charlie Brej wrote: I do like. Simple yet styled. I made a plymouth splash based on it. There is a video[1] and the source for anyone who wants to have a go at Cool animation Charlie, but somewhat slow :p I hope the F11 boot process will not take *that* much and

Re: base banner style for f11 leonidas artwork

2009-03-19 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:30:42AM +, Charlie Brej wrote: Nicu Buculei wrote: Charlie Brej wrote: I do like. Simple yet styled. I made a plymouth splash based on it. There is a video[1] and the source for anyone who wants to have a go at Cool animation Charlie, but somewhat slow :p

Re: base banner style for f11 leonidas artwork

2009-03-19 Thread Nicu Buculei
Nicu Buculei wrote: I like them and I do not find them too over-the-top Greek, back when I was a kid I enjoyed *a lot* reading a book with ancient Greek legends. This is cool. However, I find them a bit too plain, I would like them more vivid, maybe combined with the photo we are going to

Re: base banner style for f11 leonidas artwork

2009-03-19 Thread Máirín Duffy
- Original Message From: Nicu Buculei nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro However, I find them a bit too plain, I would like them more vivid, maybe combined with the photo we are going to use as a background? Like this: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/gnome-splash_f11.png I'll raise your

Re: base banner style for f11 leonidas artwork

2009-03-19 Thread Nicu Buculei
Máirín Duffy wrote: - Original Message From: Nicu Buculei However, I find them a bit too plain, I would like them more vivid, maybe combined with the photo we are going to use as a background? Like this: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/gnome-splash_f11.png I'll raise your wallpaper

Re: base banner style for f11 leonidas artwork

2009-03-19 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 04:03:48PM +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote: Máirín Duffy wrote: - Original Message From: Nicu Buculei However, I find them a bit too plain, I would like them more vivid, maybe combined with the photo we are going to use as a background? Like this:

Re: base banner style for f11 leonidas artwork

2009-03-19 Thread Martin Sourada
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 06:48 -0700, Máirín Duffy wrote: - Original Message From: Nicu Buculei nicu_fed...@nicubunu.ro However, I find them a bit too plain, I would like them more vivid, maybe combined with the photo we are going to use as a background? Like this:

Re: Fedora-art-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 35

2009-03-19 Thread brian hurren
What exactly is the fedora font? --- On Thu, 19/3/09, fedora-art-list-requ...@redhat.com fedora-art-list-requ...@redhat.com wrote: From: fedora-art-list-requ...@redhat.com fedora-art-list-requ...@redhat.com Subject: Fedora-art-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 35 To: fedora-art-list@redhat.com

[Bug 490830] Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name

2009-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830 Mathieu Bridon boche...@no-log.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 490610] [mr_IN][hi_IN] Anchoring in combination द + ़ looks need update

2009-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490610 Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 490372] Missing source for lohit 2.3.8

2009-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490372 Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 490373] Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package

2009-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490373 --- Comment #1 from Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com 2009-03-19 11:15:00 EDT --- Certainly, I am looking forward to do

[Bug 490373] Please build lohit from sources in the lohit package

2009-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490373 Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 490372] Missing source for lohit 2.3.8

2009-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490372 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts

2009-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts

2009-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts

2009-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-19 16:36:24 EDT --- Sorry, I was not clear.

[Bug 490372] Missing source for lohit 2.3.8

2009-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490372 --- Comment #3 from Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com 2009-03-20 01:04:35 EDT --- This is unusual, as it used to be the

[Bug 490372] Missing source for lohit 2.3.8

2009-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490372 Rahul Bhalerao rbhal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 490610] [mr_IN][hi_IN] Anchoring in combination द + ़ looks need update

2009-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490610 Pravin Satpute psatp...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

change request: remove fedora8 from the infofeed updates

2009-03-19 Thread Seth Vidal
Somehow fedora8 is still being looked for for the infofeed rss feed on planet.fedoraproject.org. I'd like to remove this entry it is now outputting cron errors. can I get some +1's? thanks, -sv ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list

Re: change request: remove fedora8 from the infofeed updates

2009-03-19 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
Seth Vidal wrote: Somehow fedora8 is still being looked for for the infofeed rss feed on planet.fedoraproject.org. I'd like to remove this entry it is now outputting cron errors. can I get some +1's? +1 -Toshio signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: change request: remove fedora8 from the infofeed updates

2009-03-19 Thread Ricky Zhou
On 2009-03-19 02:59:36 PM, Seth Vidal wrote: Somehow fedora8 is still being looked for for the infofeed rss feed on planet.fedoraproject.org. I'd like to remove this entry it is now outputting cron errors. can I get some +1's? +1 Thanks, Ricky pgpuw6KAVRpJk.pgp Description: PGP

Re: change request: remove fedora8 from the infofeed updates

2009-03-19 Thread Mike McGrath
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Seth Vidal wrote: Somehow fedora8 is still being looked for for the infofeed rss feed on planet.fedoraproject.org. I'd like to remove this entry it is now outputting cron errors. can I get some +1's? +1 +1, you can do that one without a

Meeting Log - 2009-03-19

2009-03-19 Thread Ricky Zhou
20:00 -!- mmcgrath changed the topic of #fedora-meeting to: Infrastructure -- Who's here 20:00 mmcgrath Ok all, time to get started, who's here for the infrastructure meeting? 20:00 * ricky 20:00 * jds2001 20:01 * ke4qqq 20:01 * abadger1999 here 20:01 -!- che [n=...@redhat/che] has

[Change Request] Use single quotes for the mysql backup cronjob.

2009-03-19 Thread Ricky Zhou
This has been causing us to get extra cron spam (and stalling mysql updates). I doubt anybody would consider this very risky :-) --- manifests/services/db.pp |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/manifests/services/db.pp b/manifests/services/db.pp index

Re: NM fails to connect when booting ?? -[SOLVED]

2009-03-19 Thread Richard England
Mark Haney wrote: Timothy Murphy wrote: I wish some guru who understands NM would bring out a variant that just connects on bootup. I'm pretty sure the standard version would rapidly fall into disuse. But, they have that feature already. It's the way network interfaces have started

fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread Adel ESSAFI
Hi list I was using fedora and redhat since 2000. To day, I can see that our favorite distro is really very strong. However, I have done some experience (short) with Ubuntu and I have liked to LTS concept (Long Term support). My idea is to build a distribution that is based on Fedora at 100%

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread Xue Xg
GOOD IDEA! 2009/3/19 Adel ESSAFI adeless...@gmail.com Hi list I was using fedora and redhat since 2000. To day, I can see that our favorite distro is really very strong. However, I have done some experience (short) with Ubuntu and I have liked to LTS concept (Long Term support). My idea

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread fedora
Hi Adel sounds very interesting to me. suomi Adel ESSAFI wrote: Hi list I was using fedora and redhat since 2000. To day, I can see that our favorite distro is really very strong. However, I have done some experience (short) with Ubuntu and I have liked to LTS concept (Long Term support).

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread Rangeen Basu
My idea is to build a distribution that is based on Fedora at 100% with 1. LTS 2. with a very reduce number of packages Sounds good. 3. with proprietary codecs and essentiel software (mp3, flash ) included in. Please be careful with the codecs and proprietary licenses involved in it. Rest

Re: Running a web server on 256 RAM

2009-03-19 Thread James Matthews
Good, I am now trying that out! On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Clemens Eisserer linuxhi...@gmail.comwrote: yes, sure. I have a P90/24mb running apache+postgres, however on a slightly outdated debian. - Clemens 2009/3/16 James Matthews nytrok...@gmail.com: Hi, I am wondering if I

tons of LXSessions

2009-03-19 Thread John Aldrich
I routinely connect to my system from remote via VNC. Apparently when I shut down VNC, it's not shutting off the lxsession that was running in that virtual desktop. Any suggestions on how to fix that? I'm usually shutting down the VNC server when I get done, and normally, in KDE or Gnome, that

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread Adel ESSAFI
2009/3/19 Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br why not contribute with fedora and rpmfusion ? Normal users find this complicated (linux fans are more competent than usual users) ;) the only reason to fedora doesn't have LTS is the man power. 2009/3/19 Adel ESSAFI

Re: KDE 4 network configuratin

2009-03-19 Thread Clive Messer
On Thursday 19 Mar 2009 02:48:06 jlwallen wrote: using KDE 4.2.1 i am getting unable to parse xml file errors every time i go to the control panel and attempt to do any configuration with networks. i have googled this all day and have come up with a possible listed bug but every attempted

re: tons of LXSessions

2009-03-19 Thread Steven I Usdansky
Run lxsession-logout before shutting down the VNC session? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Fedora 8 system won't upgrade to Fedora 10

2009-03-19 Thread Langdon Stevenson
I have a Fedora 8 server that I want to upgrade to Fedora 10. I recently did this same task with a workstation and had no problem upgrading from 8 to 10 using a DVD. Just ran the installer, it detected the F8 install (on logical volumes over RAID 5) and did the upgrade. The server is an old

Re: copying lvm with the same name

2009-03-19 Thread Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
Frank Cox wrote: It looks like the machine can see the second drive and the lvm that's on it /dev/sdb2, but it has the same VolGroup name as /dev/sda2. Yes, this is common and annoying. Here is the guide that I followed when it happened to me:

Re: copying lvm with the same name

2009-03-19 Thread Bill Crawford
On Thursday 19 March 2009 12:10:25 Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote: ... I filed bug 461682 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461682), requesting that the default volume names not be so generic - they now incorporate the hostname, so this problem should be much less common in F11+.

Re: NM fails to connect when booting ?? -[SOLVED]

2009-03-19 Thread Michael J Gruber
William Case venit, vidit, dixit 18.03.2009 18:55: On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 17:35 +, Matthew Saltzman wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 11:46 -0400, William Case wrote: Hi; On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 14:26 +0200, Antti J. Huhtala wrote: ke, 2009-03-18 kello 08:22 +0100, Kevin Kofler kirjoitti:

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adel ESSAFI wrote: However, I aim to build a distribution with only one software from each catégory. That may sound like a good idea at first, but at the end nobody will agree about what that only one software will be in each case, and you'll definitely get lots of complaints about your

Re: NM fails to connect when booting ?? -[not quite SOLVED]

2009-03-19 Thread Michael J Gruber
Bill Davidsen venit, vidit, dixit 18.03.2009 23:52: Michael J Gruber wrote: Todd Zullinger venit, vidit, dixit 18.03.2009 04:25: William Case wrote: It has been reported by someone else as a medium level bug. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470477 Or see the changelog of

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread Adel ESSAFI
2009/3/19, Rangeen Basu sherry...@gmail.com: My idea is to build a distribution that is based on Fedora at 100% with 1. LTS 2. with a very reduce number of packages Sounds good. 3. with proprietary codecs and essentiel software (mp3, flash ) included in. Please be careful with the codecs

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
why not contribute with fedora and rpmfusion ? the only reason to fedora doesn't have LTS is the man power. 2009/3/19 Adel ESSAFI adeless...@gmail.com: Hi list I was using fedora and redhat since 2000. To day, I can see that our favorite distro is really very strong. However, I have done

Re: tons of LXSessions

2009-03-19 Thread Tom Horsley
I find that all the helpful desktops are anxious to start up 6000 daemons on your behalf, but not so good about cleaning them up. I finally wrote a little program I call eradicator I can use to start of things like a gnome session. It creates a magic environment variable which gets inherited by

building i386 packages in x86_64 Fedora 10

2009-03-19 Thread David Hláčik
Hello guys, i want to build i386 freetype source rpm on by 64 bit Fedora 10, so i will issue rpmbuild -ba --target i386 , i will usually end up with gcc error. Do i need 32bit gcc compiler to built that? As I know it is not in x86_64 repository :(. Please, how to generally build 32bit

font weight (freetype)

2009-03-19 Thread David Hláčik
Hello guys, this is probably question to be addresed to developers of freetype . But i will give a try. I found hinted fonts in linux generally to thin . I would like to make them little bolder , at least as on M$ Windows. Currently they are to thin and my eyes hurt from that. ( I am using my own

Re: alternative for MS Visio ?

2009-03-19 Thread Phil Savoie
David Hláčik wrote: Hi, i am looking for an alternative for MS Visio. Is there any popular OpenSource alternative? Thanks! D. kivio or dia? Phil -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines:

Re: NM fails to connect when booting ?? -[SOLVED]

2009-03-19 Thread Timothy Murphy
Aaron Konstam wrote: And the latest NM can be configured to connect on boot. 1. What do you mean by the latest NM? I get [...@mary ~]$ grep NetworkManager /var/log/rpmpkgs NetworkManager-0.7.0.99-3.fc10.i386.rpm

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread Armin
On Thursday 19 March 2009 05:35:16 Adel ESSAFI wrote: Hi list I was using fedora and redhat since 2000. To day, I can see that our favorite distro is really very strong. However, I have done some experience (short) with Ubuntu and I have liked to LTS concept (Long Term support). My idea is

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread Armin
On Thursday 19 March 2009 05:35:16 Adel ESSAFI wrote: Hi list I was using fedora and redhat since 2000. To day, I can see that our favorite distro is really very strong. However, I have done some experience (short) with Ubuntu and I have liked to LTS concept (Long Term support). My idea is

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread Gordon Messmer
Adel ESSAFI wrote: My idea is to build a distribution that is based on Fedora at 100% with 1. LTS 2. with a very reduce number of packages I don't mean to rain on your parade, but I think you underestimate the amount of effort involved in this. Fedora is a community with many members, and

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread Armin
On Thursday 19 March 2009 08:10:11 Adel ESSAFI wrote: 2009/3/19 Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br why not contribute with fedora and rpmfusion ? Normal users find this complicated (linux fans are more competent than usual users) ;) I have to agree with this point. Linux and its

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread Armin
On Thursday 19 March 2009 12:07:42 Gordon Messmer wrote: Adel ESSAFI wrote: My idea is to build a distribution that is based on Fedora at 100% with 1. LTS 2. with a very reduce number of packages I don't mean to rain on your parade, but I think you underestimate the amount of effort

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread Jeff Spaleta
2009/3/19 Adel ESSAFI adeless...@gmail.com: My idea is to build a distribution that is based on Fedora at 100% with 1. LTS 2. with a very reduce number of packages 3. with proprietary codecs and essentiel software (mp3, flash ) included in. First let me point out that such an effort would

Re: Problem with xdg-open

2009-03-19 Thread Steven W. Orr
On Wednesday, Mar 18th 2009 at 16:19 -, quoth Kevin Kofler: =Rex Dieter wrote: = The answer is, in whatever environment you're in, how to set the default = browser (ie, the default handler for text/html). = =Actually, it's more complicated than that: =* In KDE 3, the default browser was

Re: NM fails to connect when booting ?? -[SOLVED]

2009-03-19 Thread Kevin Kempter
On Thursday 19 March 2009 00:11:19 Richard England wrote: Mark Haney wrote: Timothy Murphy wrote: I wish some guru who understands NM would bring out a variant that just connects on bootup. I'm pretty sure the standard version would rapidly fall into disuse. But, they have that

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread John Cornelius
Adel ESSAFI wrote: Hi list I was using fedora and redhat since 2000. To day, I can see that our favorite distro is really very strong. However, I have done some experience (short) with Ubuntu and I have liked to LTS concept (Long Term support). My idea is to build a distribution that is

Re: F10 and built-in Intel graphics [SOLVED]

2009-03-19 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 19:18, Matthew Saltzman wrote: I can't find the other e-mail in which someone suggested using XAA acceleration, but that seems to have worked so far. Thanks, all! It doesn't work. It improves the time between two crashes, but does not eliminate them. The only

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread Alan Cox
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:35:16 +0100 Adel ESSAFI adeless...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list I was using fedora and redhat since 2000. To day, I can see that our favorite distro is really very strong. However, I have done some experience (short) with Ubuntu and I have liked to LTS concept (Long

Re: copying lvm with the same name

2009-03-19 Thread Aldo Foot
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak m...@avtechpulse.com wrote: Frank Cox wrote: It looks like the machine can see the second drive and the lvm that's on it /dev/sdb2, but it has the same VolGroup name as /dev/sda2. Yes, this is common and annoying. Here is the guide

Re: Fedora Eclipse, Java: System.console() is null

2009-03-19 Thread Andrew Overholt
Hi, On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 21:51 -0400, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote: I'm using Fedora Eclipse with OpenJDK 5.0, and although I checked allocate console in the run configuration, System.console() returns null. Any idea how I can get my console, which I need for user terminal input? Output via

Re: copying lvm with the same name

2009-03-19 Thread Rick Stevens
Frank Cox wrote: On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:07:28 -0700 Rick Stevens wrote: We have a serious conflict here. The df command shows you as on sda, but LVM is reporting sdb. My gut reaction is to have you do a: vgreduce --test VolGroup00 /dev/sdb2 and see if it would be successful. If

Bash help requested: Capturing command errors within pipes

2009-03-19 Thread Daniel B. Thurman
I have been trying to capture bash pipe errors as follows: ret1=0; ret2=0; ret3=0; ret4=0; ret5=0 out=$(\ grep PATTERN ${SFILE}; ret1=$? 21 | \ sed $re1 $re2; ret2=$? 21 | \ sort -n; ret3=$? 21 | \ uniq ${TFILE}; ret4=$? 21\ ); ret5=$? But the return status variables are not changed should

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread Kam Leo
2009/3/19 Adel ESSAFI adeless...@gmail.com Hi list I was using fedora and redhat since 2000. To day, I can see that our favorite distro is really very strong. However, I have done some experience (short) with Ubuntu and I have liked to LTS concept (Long Term support). My idea is to build

Re: Bash help requested: Capturing command errors within pipes

2009-03-19 Thread S P Arif Sahari Wibowo
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: How could one go about capturing command errors within pipes? The variable $PIPESTATUS is just for that. -- (stephan paul) Arif Sahari Wibowo _ _ _ _ / // // / _/ / /

Re: copying lvm with the same name

2009-03-19 Thread Bill Crawford
On Thursday 19 March 2009 17:17:43 Rick Stevens wrote: This is truly screwey. The pvscan shows sdb2 as part of VolGroup00, lvdisplay shows the partition as in use, but vgreduce says sdb2 isn't part of the VG. Hoo, boy. Could someone post the output of lvdisplay --maps and of pvdisplay

Re: Fedora 8 system won't upgrade to Fedora 10

2009-03-19 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:21:39 +1100 Langdon Stevenson wrote: Can anyone suggest how to troubleshoot this issue? Have you considered using preupgrade instead of trying to upgrade from a disk? -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com -- fedora-list mailing list

Re: copying lvm with the same name

2009-03-19 Thread Aldo Foot
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com wrote: This is truly screwey.  The pvscan shows sdb2 as part of VolGroup00, lvdisplay shows the partition as in use, but vgreduce says sdb2 isn't part of the VG.  Hoo, boy. Frank, this is potentially dangerous, but you can try    

Problems with mplayerplugin

2009-03-19 Thread Angel Natan Villegas Vicencio
Hi all: I was installed Fedora 10 on my laptop and follow some guide in the net, but when i was trying to install the package for mplayerplugin, yum can't find anything with relation to this package, i was browsing and try to find some in the net but i can't see anything about this issue.

Re: copying lvm with the same name

2009-03-19 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:47:53 + Bill Crawford wrote: Could someone post the output of lvdisplay --maps and of pvdisplay --maps ? [r...@mutt ~]# lvdisplay --maps --- Logical volume --- LV Name/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 VG NameVolGroup00 LV UUID

Re: Problems with mplayerplugin

2009-03-19 Thread Mauriat
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Angel Natan Villegas Vicencio anvv.fed...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all: I was installed Fedora 10 on my laptop and follow some guide in the net, but when i was trying to install the package for mplayerplugin, yum can't find anything with relation to this package, i

Re: F10 and built-in Intel graphics [SOLVED]

2009-03-19 Thread Kevin Kofler
Marko Vojinovic wrote: and a bug that so radically affects all Intel cards is not fixed for half a year now... It doesn't affect all Intel cards, only 945 and older. My GM965 works great in F10. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe:

Re: Bash help requested: Capturing command errors within pipes

2009-03-19 Thread Daniel B. Thurman
S P Arif Sahari Wibowo wrote: On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: How could one go about capturing command errors within pipes? The variable $PIPESTATUS is just for that. I tried it, seems not to work. Try capturing a sed error when re1 or re2 has a bad regular expression string.

Re: building i386 packages in x86_64 Fedora 10

2009-03-19 Thread Kevin Kofler
David Hláčik wrote: i want to build i386 freetype source rpm on by 64 bit Fedora 10, so i will issue rpmbuild -ba --target i386 , i will usually end up with gcc error. Do i need 32bit gcc compiler to built that? As I know it is not in x86_64 repository :(. Please, how to generally

Re: MPEG-1 read support

2009-03-19 Thread Ian Malone
2009/3/17 Bryn M. Reeves b...@redhat.com: On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 14:48 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Alan Cox wrote: Please remember Wackipedia is often simply the collected urban legends, misunderstandings and general cluelessness of its contributors. What Wackipedia has to say and what the

Re: copying lvm with the same name

2009-03-19 Thread Aldo Foot
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com wrote: Frank Cox wrote: On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:07:28 -0700 Rick Stevens wrote: We have a serious conflict here.  The df command shows you as on sda, but LVM is reporting sdb.  My gut reaction is to have you do a:        

Re: BOINC

2009-03-19 Thread John Aldrich
On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote: I'm not sure why that's the case. I do know that we explicitly do not require root privileges for K3b, as they aren't necessary. (We also disable the check from upstream K3b which warns if wodim is not suid root, it works just fine without it!)

Re: fedora LTS , why not?

2009-03-19 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:35:16AM +0100, Adel ESSAFI wrote: Hi list I was using fedora and redhat since 2000. To day, I can see that our favorite distro is really very strong. However, I have done some experience (short) with Ubuntu and I have liked to LTS concept (Long Term support).

Re: BOINC

2009-03-19 Thread John Aldrich
On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Mike Burger wrote: It's not the case, any more, but I do recall it being an issue in FC3 or FC4, if memory serves. I've not seen it since FC5, and I know it's not the case in F8 or F9 (haven't tried in F10, yet). Yeah. I think that was about the time I discovered

Re: copying lvm with the same name

2009-03-19 Thread Rick Stevens
Aldo Foot wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com wrote: Frank Cox wrote: On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:07:28 -0700 Rick Stevens wrote: We have a serious conflict here. The df command shows you as on sda, but LVM is reporting sdb. My gut reaction is to have you do a:

Running Akonadi as root (was: Re: Akonadi on f10 (again))

2009-03-19 Thread Kevin Kofler
Gene Heskett wrote: [akonadiserver] 090301 15:32:16 [ERROR] Fatal error: Please read [Security section of the manual to find out how to run mysqld as root! Actually, to run akonadi with its local mysqld as root, all you need is: echo user=root /root/.config/akonadi/mysql-local.conf If it

Re: copying lvm with the same name

2009-03-19 Thread Aldo Foot
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com wrote: Aldo Foot wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Rick Stevens ri...@nerd.com wrote: Frank Cox wrote: On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:07:28 -0700 Rick Stevens wrote: We have a serious conflict here.  The df command shows you as

Re: Bash help requested: Capturing command errors within pipes

2009-03-19 Thread Steven W. Orr
On Thursday, Mar 19th 2009 at 14:11 -, quoth Daniel B. Thurman: =S P Arif Sahari Wibowo wrote: = On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: = How could one go about capturing command errors within pipes? = = The variable $PIPESTATUS is just for that. = =I tried it, seems not to work. =

Re: Problems with mplayerplugin

2009-03-19 Thread Antonio Olivares
--- On Thu, 3/19/09, Angel Natan Villegas Vicencio anvv.fed...@gmail.com wrote: From: Angel Natan Villegas Vicencio anvv.fed...@gmail.com Subject: Problems with mplayerplugin To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Thursday, March 19, 2009, 11:04 AM Hi all: I was installed Fedora 10 on my

Re: F10 and built-in Intel graphics [SOLVED]

2009-03-19 Thread psmith
Marko Vojinovic wrote: On Tuesday 17 March 2009 19:18, Matthew Saltzman wrote: I can't find the other e-mail in which someone suggested using XAA acceleration, but that seems to have worked so far. Thanks, all! It doesn't work. It improves the time between two crashes, but does not

Re: Bash help requested: Capturing command errors within pipes

2009-03-19 Thread Daniel B. Thurman
Steven W. Orr wrote: On Thursday, Mar 19th 2009 at 14:11 -, quoth Daniel B. Thurman: =S P Arif Sahari Wibowo wrote: = On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: = How could one go about capturing command errors within pipes? = = The variable $PIPESTATUS is just for that. = =I tried

Re: Bash help requested: Capturing command errors within pipes

2009-03-19 Thread Daniel B. Thurman
Daniel B. Thurman wrote: Steven W. Orr wrote: On Thursday, Mar 19th 2009 at 14:11 -, quoth Daniel B. Thurman: =S P Arif Sahari Wibowo wrote: = On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Daniel B. Thurman wrote: = How could one go about capturing command errors within pipes? = = The variable $PIPESTATUS is just

Re: Fedora 8 system won't upgrade to Fedora 10

2009-03-19 Thread Mike Burger
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:21:39 +1100 Langdon Stevenson wrote: Can anyone suggest how to troubleshoot this issue? Have you considered using preupgrade instead of trying to upgrade from a disk? While I'm not the original poster, I've not seen an option to download a preupgrade that will take

Re: Fedora 8 system won't upgrade to Fedora 10

2009-03-19 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:28:26 -0400 (EDT) Mike Burger wrote: While I'm not the original poster, I've not seen an option to download a preupgrade that will take one to F10. I had used preupgrade to go from F8 to F9, but I've not, yet, found one to go from F9 to F10 (or, I may simply be missing

Re: F10 and built-in Intel graphics [SOLVED]

2009-03-19 Thread fred smith
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 07:06:48PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Marko Vojinovic wrote: and a bug that so radically affects all Intel cards is not fixed for half a year now... It doesn't affect all Intel cards, only 945 and older. My GM965 works great in F10. While I can't recall, at the

SELinux Preventing Web Access to apcupsd multimon.cgi

2009-03-19 Thread Rick Bilonick
I'm using SELinux set to enforcing. apcaccess works fine and I can see the output from the ups. I have port 3551 tcp opened in the firewall (I think I need this to get the connection to the ups) and have the Apache web server enabled. I can access the web page from other computers and run

NetworkManager and RunLevel 3

2009-03-19 Thread Geoffrey Leach
I addressed this question to the NetworkManager list and received a couple of replies that I found to be quite educational. The topic appears on this list occasionally, so I thought it worthwhile to re- post here. The essence of what I discovered is that its not NetworkManager but nm- applet,

Re: Fedora 8 system won't upgrade to Fedora 10

2009-03-19 Thread Mike Burger
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:28:26 -0400 (EDT) Mike Burger wrote: While I'm not the original poster, I've not seen an option to download a preupgrade that will take one to F10. I had used preupgrade to go from F8 to F9, but I've not, yet, found one to go from F9 to F10 (or, I may simply be

Re: Fedora 8 system won't upgrade to Fedora 10

2009-03-19 Thread Frank Cox
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:13:50 -0400 (EDT) Mike Burger wrote: I'll go crawl back into my hidey-hole, now. You could always upgrade to F10 while you're in there. *tee hee* -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com

Re: Fedora 8 system won't upgrade to Fedora 10

2009-03-19 Thread Mike Burger
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:13:50 -0400 (EDT) Mike Burger wrote: I'll go crawl back into my hidey-hole, now. You could always upgrade to F10 while you're in there. *tee hee* That is my plan, but since it's X based, and I'm not sitting at my console, I'm not inclined to start the process from

  1   2   >