On Saturday 11 April 2009 19:10:37 Anne Wilson wrote:
> Then there is something very odd about your machine. System Settings, as
> it appears on the menu, has been present on every install I've had of KDE4,
> going back to early 4.0 on F9 beta. Try looking on the menu's Computer tab
> - on mine
On Saturday 18 April 2009 19:21:30 Remi Collet wrote:
...
> You use want to use apache with php and Oracle.
>
> In your root environment you have all the stuff needed
> (mainly LD_LIBRARY_PATH, yes I know it's stupid, but it's Oracle)
>
> If you use /etc/init.d/httpd script apache will start.
>
> O
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 19:50:13 bruce wrote:
> Hi guys...
>
> I know this isn't the list for this question.. but i'm trying to get a
> quick resolve for a problem i have.. i'm prety sure it's user related.
>
> i'm doing a curl to a site, and not getting the results i'm looking for..
> i've got
On Thursday 02 April 2009 05:28:07 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bill Crawford wrote:
> > Typo in the package name, it's fedora-release-10.92-1.noarch
>
> No, 10.92 is for Rawhide, he's on F10.
>
> Kevin Kofler
Right you are. Forgot I was reading fedora not
On Thursday 02 April 2009 05:09:32 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Time to upgrade to Fedora 10! (Skip Fedora 9, its end of life is also
> coming soon.)
Will do as soon as someone fixes the X server to soft boot multiple cards
properly ...
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscrib
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 17:08:46 m wrote:
> Anyone want to join my support group for the
> insanely pedantic.
*Does* anyone want to ... ?
Count me in ;o)
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http:/
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 13:39:44 dco...@efn.org wrote:
> [r...@boatbuyer etc]# rpm -Uvh
> ftp://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/i386/o
>s/Packages/fedora-release-10.1.noarch.rpm Retrieving
> ftp://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/i386
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 13:39:36 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i'm reading the section on CPU virtualization extensions here:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_Quick_Start
>
> and it occurs to me to ask whether anyone would want to get
> *seriously* into virtualization without havin
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 13:31:33 David Hláčik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> how could I check that?
>
> Best Regards,
> David Hlacik
>
> 2009/4/1 Bill Crawford :
> > On Wednesday 01 April 2009 08:23:58 David Hláčik wrote:
> >> Hello guys,
> >>
> >>
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 10:59:28 Paul Black wrote:
> 2009/4/1 Bill Crawford
>
> > > http://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/releases/8/
> >
> > I notice the older stuff has now disappeared from there. Is anyone
> > keeping the
> > previ
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 10:10:51 Sharpe, Sam J wrote:
> Terry Barnaby wrote:
> > The Fedora 8 binary and source packages seem to have gone from
> > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/
> >
> > Have they been moved elsewhere ?
> > I need the sources for some packages to do
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 01:11:47 David Burns wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Craig White wrote:
> > subtitle...fun with sed
> >
> > I have a list of changes to make to a file...
> >
> > dc rc
> > - ---
> > 15T6145V DELETED
> > NATL19502 DELE
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 21:32:37 Ian Pilcher wrote:
> I'm trying to get used to KDE 4.2.1 on Fedora 10. One thing that's
> driving me nuts is Dolphin's penchant for opening files/folders with a
> single click. I can't find a configuration setting for this anywhere.
First thing I always did with
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 19:34:43 Bram_Gro wrote:
> It could be helpful to others if a reference to this key is added to the
> Beta release notes page.
There's currently a "Verify your download" link there on the "Get Fedora" page,
don't know if that was recently added. It's easier if you alread
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 21:39:11 Jim wrote:
> That doesn't seem to work for what I'm doing.
>
> What I'm trying to do is change all directories/files in a /home/user,
> from one owner/group to another owner/group.
>
> When I installed FC10, fresh install and format the / partition and
> left t
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 08:23:58 David Hláčik wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I did installed gtk-nodoka-engine.i386, but still skype ignores gtk looks.
It's probably time to figure out how and where qtconfig stores the style
setting
as if it's doing something as odd as store a path to a .so that im
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 19:09:49 Bram_Gro wrote:
> Bill Crawford wrote:
> > On Tuesday 31 March 2009 18:54:05 Bram_Gro wrote:
> >> 0xD22E77F2
> >
> > In /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-test-11-primary in the latest
> > fedora release package from rawhide
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 18:54:05 Bram_Gro wrote:
> 0xD22E77F2
In /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-test-11-primary in the latest fedora
release package from rawhide (fedora-release-10.92-1).
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/lis
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 18:43:45 Rohit Gupta wrote:
> [r...@satadal Download]# rpm -Uvh fuse-sshfs-2.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm
> rpmdb: PANIC: fatal region error detected; run recovery
cd /var/lib/rpm
/usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_recover
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https:/
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 16:28:45 David Hláčik wrote:
> Yes, thanks for this.
>
> But this is not helping. I did this allready. When i execute
> qtconfig-gt4 it does affects only applications using qt4 64bit and not
> 32bit, so the skype still looks not like should ... Where are the
> config stored
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 15:01:42 Anne Wilson wrote:
...
> Anne
By the way, your mails are showing up as having BAD signature in kmail here
(the
key is available). Is your mailer munging things, or is it the list servers?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 15:01:42 Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 March 2009 13:16:42 Tim wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 12:27 +0100, Bill Crawford wrote:
> > > Ought to be possible for people to visit companies' offices and sign
> > > their keys, and add them
On Monday 30 March 2009 20:12:45 Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 13:46:02 -0400,
>
> Todd Denniston wrote:
> > i.e., sure all the root CA's that the browser producers want to include
> > can come in, but they should have trust DBs that allow each user to tick:
> > * Never trust
On Monday 30 March 2009 15:29:55 Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 10:00 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > This communication provides additional information on the Fedora
> > infrastructure intrusion first reported on August 14, 2008. In part
> > this communication reiterates informa
On Saturday 28 March 2009 02:13:42 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> brian wrote:
> > su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing install
> > libX11-1.1.5-2.fc10.i386.rpm libX11-devel-1.1.5-2.fc10.i386.rpm
> > --nogpgcheck'
>
> --nogpgcheck shouldn't be needed, you get prompted to import the key for
> updates-test
On Friday 27 March 2009 19:32:13 James Harrison wrote:
> When removing a USB key, I use:
> sync ; sync ; umount {/Path/to/USB/key}
Just "eject /dev/whatever" works well in my experience, and causes e.g. my
phone
to display "USB connection ended" as well, i.e. equivalent to "Safely remove".
--
On Friday 27 March 2009 09:01:30 Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> It does work best if you clear unused space before doing an image to reduce
> space since the null filled sectors compress to almost nothing.
How do you do that?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: htt
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 15:14:27 Mike Cloaked wrote:
> But that is not the end of the problem - now running winecfg just hangs -
> no messages, no avc, nothing - just hangs. I think an update has broken
> something but I have no idea which update or what is broken. I have posted
> elsewhere that
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 14:21:05 Mike Cloaked wrote:
> I just yum installed wine in F10 on a machine - in the past this gave a
> wine menu item set in Gnome at the top taskbar when the "Applications" menu
> is opened - is it just me or has something changed with a recent update? --
> View this mes
On Monday 23 March 2009 15:53:01 Robin Laing wrote:
> There needs to be a firm way of changing and editing LVM characteristics
> in these situations.
Yeah, boot from rescue disk and rename the first one it sees, should then let
the other be visible. You could, at a pinch, change the partition ty
On Friday 20 March 2009 18:52:59 Aldo Foot wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:24:14 +
> >
> > Bill Crawford wrote:
> >> You should probably be able to get some sense out of this by doing:
> >>
> &g
On Friday 20 March 2009 18:29:33 Frank Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:24:14 +
>
> Bill Crawford wrote:
> > You should probably be able to get some sense out of this by doing:
> >
> > # vgrename 1dl8EY-s2Qe-W50Y-wU8V-nCRJ-5Upz-SEkJgp vg_sda2
>
> [fra
On Thursday 19 March 2009 18:02:26 Frank Cox wrote:
...
> LV Name/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
> VG NameVolGroup00
> LV UUIDyFemKc-s2bo-zZC0-cc7q-50By-4jQM-G1MsQr
...
> Block device 253:0
>
> --- Segments ---
> Logical extent 0 to 887
On Thursday 19 March 2009 18:02:26 Frank Cox wrote:
...
> LV Name/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
> VG NameVolGroup00
> LV UUIDyFemKc-s2bo-zZC0-cc7q-50By-4jQM-G1MsQr
...
> Block device 253:0
>
> --- Segments ---
> Logical extent 0 to 887
On Thursday 19 March 2009 17:17:43 Rick Stevens wrote:
> This is truly screwey. The pvscan shows sdb2 as part of VolGroup00,
> lvdisplay shows the partition as in use, but vgreduce says sdb2 isn't
> part of the VG. Hoo, boy.
Could someone post the output of lvdisplay --maps and of pvdisplay --m
On Thursday 19 March 2009 12:10:25 Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
...
> I filed bug 461682 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461682),
> requesting that the default volume names not be so generic - they now
> incorporate the hostname, so this problem should be much less common in
> F11+.
On Wednesday 18 March 2009 14:18:50 Tim wrote:
> PS: I'm quite sick of gmane news postings to this mailing list that
> INAPPROPRIATELY set a post-to header to THEIR news server. I have to
> manually remove the post-to header and manually add the proper to
> header. It's quite a cheek to act as
On Thursday 12 March 2009 01:46:09 Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
> Yes, I need the IP address so I can make a TCP/IP connection.
Just out of curiosity, how are making the connection? Most applications can
take
a hostname for the address to connect to ...
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list
On Thursday 12 March 2009 11:25:07 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
...
> "Welcome to Fedora Unity's Re-Spin download site. In the past we have
> chosen BitTorrent as our method for sharing bits. For our latest
> release we have gone with using Jigdo to reduce the bandwidth and time
> requirements of each S
On Wednesday 11 March 2009 23:31:50 Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:20:12 +1030
>
> Tim wrote:
> > > There's no reason to do any of these unless there's something actually
> > > wrong.
> >
> > Seconded. When things are working fine, yum takes care of itself.
>
> The most suspicious thi
On Friday 13 March 2009 04:07:27 Craig White wrote:
> I have to say that I am confused because I remember you saying that the
> problem was with a gmail account which should have been imap and in the
> imap subdirectory and not the local subdirectory.
I remember when gmail didn't support IMAP ...
On Wednesday 11 March 2009 15:17:53 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
...
>
>
> technically, i know that, but perhaps red hat should start
> protecting its brand a bit more aggressively. go to fedoraunity.org:
>
> http://fedoraunity.org/
>
> everything about that site screams "fedora". the name. the
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 19:25:51 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> No, I was wrong, it's slightly more subtle (right key but wrong signing
> algorithm):
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-March/msg4.ht
>ml
Ahh, that explains a lot :o)
Now, what confused me was the "impor
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 16:28:14 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
...
> I tried importing the key by hand (from pgp.mit.edu), which has always
> worked for me before, but rpm said "import failed" for some reason.
It should be in /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-10-primary ...
--
fedora-list mailin
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 16:13:16 Ed Greshko wrote:
> If everybody listened to somebody that told them not to buy something
> then nobody would buying anything.
But, the same applies in reverse, and the warnings - which might apply to some
particular hardware, or software versions, more than othe
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 11:31:39 Tim wrote:
> Anyone who thinks that increasing the resolution *should* create smaller
> fonts, or GUI gadgets, has got it extremely wrong. And that includes
> all the programmers who stupidly do that.
Except that, if you want to do so, because you want more "rea
On Friday 06 March 2009 18:23:08 Tim wrote:
...
> I see something like that all the time when there's a CD in the drive.
> The auto-mounter attempts to read a file system from the disc, and can't
> (e.g. because it's an audio disc), and those are the error responses
> about the failure. If it can
On Friday 06 March 2009 14:58:34 Andras Simon wrote:
> On 3/6/09, Bill Crawford wrote:
...
> > It's lvm scanning for volume group metadata, probably.
>
> I'm not sure. I also have a fair amount of these messages, and no lvm.
See also: https://bugzilla.redhat.c
On Friday 06 March 2009 14:58:34 Andras Simon wrote:
> I'm not sure. I also have a fair amount of these messages, and no lvm.
I bet you have it installed, and hal.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
On Friday 06 March 2009 16:43:58 Steve wrote:
> After some investigation, I have found that I only get these errors if I
> boot with a CD in the drive. Then I found that they also appear in the logs
> whenever a CD in inserted into the drive.
>
> Anybody else sseing this? I googled and only saw so
On Friday 06 March 2009 10:12:29 johnbs wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> could somebody please give me the load down on recording quality
> music with Fedora 10? What programmes should I use, etc in fact
> everything! My friends tell me I would have to quit Fedora and go to
> Windows : an idea whic
On Thursday 05 March 2009 15:45:46 Nick Zhokhov wrote:
> Hi
> rpm -ql perl-Test-Simple-0.62-30.fc8.x86_64
> ...
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Test/More.pm
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Test/Simple.pm
> ...
>
> the problem is that I can't found perl-Test- Simple src rpm
> spec of which should have something lik
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 17:01:29 Jeffrey Ross wrote:
> I have a application monitoring program running on the display of a
> machine and I'm looking to have the screen lock with a password like the
> screensaver does however I do not want the screen to blank since this
> would obviously prevent me
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 08:10:48 Cameron Simpson wrote:
...
> I wonder how you find that, since it _is_ ssh-agent which provides this
> service. What specific checks have you made?
Or in GNOME, "Seahorse" provides the same service.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscri
On Tuesday 03 March 2009 01:37:17 Rick Stevens wrote:
> Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> > Rick Stevens writes:
> >> I believe you'll find all that in ~/.purple
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Now I'm not sure they could have made that any harder to find. Purple?
> > Purple
>
> Yup. Pidgin uses libpur
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 19:00:46 Rick Bilonick wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 10:24 -0800, Aldo Foot wrote:
> > Have you turned off NetworkManager?
> >
> > > chkconfig --list | grep Manager
> >
> > NetworkManager 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off
> >
> > You either run th
On Friday 20 February 2009 01:44:27 bruce wrote:
> hey...
>
> here's one i can't see..
>
> goat a bunch of files in different dirs.. the files might have spaces
>
> 1foo_ aa_bb_cc.dog
> 2foo_aa__cc.dog
> 3foo_aa_bb _ccc.dog
> 4foo_aa_bb_cc.dog
> 5foo_aa_bb_cc.dog
> 6foo_aa_bb_cc.dog
>
> i
On Thursday 19 February 2009 16:20:49 Steve wrote:
> I've been on a long wild goose chase trying to figure out why I get one of
> two different hostnames alternatively when I boot the system. Based on what
> I read in the dhclient man page, I believed that the hostname was provided
> by the dhcp s
On Thursday 19 February 2009 15:50:24 Linuxguy123 wrote:
> When did Fedora/X stop using an xorg.conf file ?
>
> It certainly isn't mentioned in the F10 release notes.
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f10/en_US/What_is_New_for_Insta
>llation_and_Live_Images.html#X_Window_system_-_graph
On Thursday 19 February 2009 15:27:15 Mike Martin wrote:
> Hi I am haaving a problem building a rpm for vlc 0.9.8 (spec file attached)
>
> The same spec file works for vlc 0.8.6*
>
> The final output is
>
> Binary file
> /home/mike/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/vlc-0.9.8a-ffmpeg.i386/usr/lib/vlc/visualizat
>i
On Monday 16 February 2009 20:27:04 Gene Heskett wrote:
> To start mysqld at boot time you have to copy
> support-files/mysql.server to the right place for your system
>
> PLEASE REMEMBER TO SET A PASSWORD FOR THE MySQL root USER !
> To do so, start the server, then issue the following commands:
>
On Monday 16 February 2009 07:13:23 Vijay Gill wrote:
...
> In my case I have provided 1M which is far much less than 512M which
> XFS is pre-allocating. This is what caught my eye.
That might be 1M * 512 byte traditional disk sector size?
> Cheers
> Vijay
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-li
On Wednesday 18 February 2009 17:15:45 Axel Thimm wrote:
> This is a know issue of F9 and F10, but Chris Tyler is working on it
> for F11. You will find background information at
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Multiseat
>
> And if you really want to see it in F11 one should ask Chris
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 17:27:00 Marc Schwartz wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Is this in a system with multiple GPUs from the same vendor (eg. nVidia)
> or is this a heterogeneous GPU vendor system?
Three Radeon cards, although they're two brands they are pretty much identical:
00:09.0 VGA compatible co
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 15:43:28 Marc Schwartz wrote:
> If there is a bug preventing you from installing, get it filed.
> Otherwise, you have a decision to make here. Stay with F8 at your own
> peril or move to another Linux distribution that works for you.
The problems appear mostly to be no
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 04:37:22 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
> > ATRPMs for F8 will disappear almost immediately, the other repos leave
> > their last stuff around for a long time.
>
> The CalcForge stuff is not going to stay up forever. People still running
> F8 should al
On Monday 24 November 2008 00:34:25 Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I duplicate an hard drive to another one with logical partition.
> I kept the / on a standard partition, put the /usr on /dev/VG1/usr, etc...
> When I mount the logical partitions I do experience any problem but when
> I boot th
On Thursday 09 October 2008 04:04:45 Tim wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 19:04 -0700, Konstantin Svist wrote:
> > There are also some PS2 models (though they're not very common), but
> > they work just as well if not better than USB mice.
>
> Why do you say that? I'd been my experience, over severa
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 21:00:23 Bill Crawford wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 October 2008 00:48:23 nikita wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > BOOTPROTO=none
>
> Change this to "dhcp"
>
> > HWADDR=00:19:66:40:cc:7a
>
> ...
Ignore me, I saw "dhcp hostname&qu
On Wednesday 08 October 2008 00:48:23 nikita wrote:
...
> BOOTPROTO=none
Change this to "dhcp"
> HWADDR=00:19:66:40:cc:7a
...
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communi
On Monday 06 October 2008 20:42:10 Dylan Semler wrote:
> ** (/usr/lib/f-spot/f-spot.exe:4906): WARNING **: The following assembly
> referenced from /usr/lib/f-spot/f-spot.exe could not be loaded:
> Assembly: NDesk.DBus(assemblyref_index=9)
...
> I've (re)installed f-spot via yum with th
On Sunday 05 October 2008 12:08:14 Jeffrey Ross wrote:
> Only remaining question, if I should adjust the /etc/mdadm.conf file
> again how can I get the initrc file to update without having to manually
> uncompress and extract the cpio archive and then re-archive and
> re-compress it by hand?
for
On Saturday 04 October 2008 13:33:31 B Wooster wrote:
> The chroot environment shares /tmp and hence all of X display with the
> main host. Is there a way to trick firefox into not locating the
> firefox running outside the chroot? I suspect it is the sharing of the
> tmp folder that allows firefo
On 27/09/2008, Björn Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don Russell wrote:
...
>> Should I just change the "x" in passwd to * and call it a day?
>> And if that's the case, surely the update process could have done that...
>> but, it's not a big deal.
> I suppose this change was made because disa
On Thursday 25 September 2008 15:11:09 Todd Denniston wrote:
> So
> ssh-keygen -f id_rsa -e >SECSHpkff
> ssh-keygen -i -f SECSHpkff > id_rsa.pub
> should get your public side back. There is probably an easier way, but this
> worked.
ssh-keygen -y id_rsa > id_rsa.pub ;o) (I had to look in the man
On Thursday 25 September 2008 12:41:13 Brian Millett wrote:
> So the password field has changed from x to *
>
> I know that that means look in /etc/shadow for the password, but what
> inconsistancy will the older, established users find ??
'x' means look in /etc/shadow, '*' is one of severa
On Tuesday 23 September 2008 17:09:46 Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> Is there any computer monitor out in the market today that can sync down to
> 15 KHz?
Might be worth just buying a cheap LCD television (i.e. not a 42" one ;o)) ?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: ht
On Tuesday 23 September 2008 17:31:11 Eric wrote:
> At 10:30 AM 9/23/2008, Stuart Sears wrote:
> >Alternatively, remove one disk, boot F9 (or FC5, really doesn't matter
> >which!) with a rescue disc and rename the volumegroup.
> >
> >vgrename /dev/VolGroup00 /dev/VolGroup-F9 (or something like that
On Monday 22 September 2008 11:31:05 Steve Hill wrote:
> Should this not be a system wide setting rather than browser specific? It
> isn't as if anyone would want their whole system to be in German, except
> the browser which is set to French... (Although I don't think the current
> situation of
On Saturday 20 September 2008 15:16:54 Nigel Henry wrote:
> When I built this machine the dvd combo drive came with no audio, or
> digital cables so I tried the "direct digital playback" option with Kscd.
> For some of the distros installed on this machine, that worked, but for
> other distros, it
On Monday 15 September 2008 18:17:18 Nigel Henry wrote:
> hear a click from the speakers. Open Kscd, and now no phonon message, but
> Kscd still won't play a music cd. Kaffeine still does, but I have problems
Kscd will just start and stop the CD drive, unless you have the correct cable
from the
On Monday 15 September 2008 23:02:47 Braden McDaniel wrote:
> Actually, it's for compatibility with Mozilla--the behavior of which is
> based on this broken-by-design document:
>
>http://www.jwz.org/doc/threading.html
If you read it carefully, it explains exactly what and WHY the original moz
On 11/09/2008, Mikkel L. Ellertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christoph Höger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> mirrors.fedoraproject.org states:
>>
>>> This list is dynamically generated every hour, listing only up-to-date
>>> mirrors.
>>
>> But in fact it is not. There is no .newkey folder. That would be ok,
On 10/09/2008, Konrad Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please provide xdelta patches + mtime info to enable conversion of
> rpm update archives to the new signature which would result to huge
> bandwidth savings (a few MB vs ~6 GB for i386 updates.
rsync
> The xdelta patch size is usually a few
On 09/09/2008, Jeff Spaleta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:08 AM, David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm happy to exchange signatures with Jesse or anyone else in the
>> Boston area.
>
> Who said Jesse was in the Boston area?
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-d
On 09/09/2008, David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm one of the GnuPG developers, and as such, a copy of my key is in
> /usr/share/doc/gnupg-1.4.x/samplekeys.asc on any system that has
> gnupg-1.4 installed. It's a key that many (most?) Fedora users
> already have, and had before this c
On 04/09/2008, Todd Zullinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since rpm/yum don't have any method to handle a key revocation, this
> process is harder than it might otherwise be.
"rpm -e --allmatches gpg-pubkey-$fingerprint" not enough? ;o)
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To uns
On 02/09/2008, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When and how did the intrusion occur? How was it initially detected?
*shrug*
I don't actually need to know, so I'm not making a fuss.
I suspect, as has been hinted at here multiple times, there may be
legal reasons why they haven't provi
On 02/09/2008, Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If there is a known date before which packages can be trusted, that
> should be said. Users who lag the cutting edge will be reassured. People
> won't have to be checking security logs for a decade if the problem is
> more recent. People on
On 02/09/2008, Timothy Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Crawford wrote:
>
>>> I would say it has been asked but not answered, many times.
>>
>> It's been answered, just not with a specific time, which is obviously
>> what everyone wants, but ..
On 02/09/2008, Timothy Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would say it has been asked but not answered, many times.
It's been answered, just not with a specific time, which is obviously
what everyone wants, but ... "sometime" is still an answer. In this
case, it's been explained that they have
On 01/09/2008, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 13:32 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 16:19 +, g wrote:
>> > spelling is a weak point with me. i have a tendency to spell too much
>> > in phonic. and my typing is even worse.
>>
>> Plus you
On 30/08/2008, Ian Pilcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suspect you're going to find that most real users of KDE (i.e. people
> who use it for real work) are still using KDE 3.5.
Yup. Stuck with F8 in the office (though the weak multi-head support
in kde 4 is the main factor, tbh).
--
fedora-
On 27/08/2008, Dan Thurman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a question that has been bugging me for awhile and
> countless of hours trying to fix song tags that seems to be
> overwritten, or so it seems.
I'd suggest making sure that you write both "v1" and "v2" tags; and at
a pinch, try "rebu
On 27/08/2008, Bill Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try "-t smb" rather than "smbfs" (like "-t ext3" not "-t ext3fs").
Apologies for the "top post" ... google mail now likes to do that for
some reason (doesn't appear that way i
Try "-t smb" rather than "smbfs" (like "-t ext3" not "-t ext3fs").
On 27/08/2008, Massimo Maiurana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Massimo Maiurana, il 26/08/2008 19:20, scrisse:
>
>> I even tried with secutity share, and this way I'm able to access the
>> share, but only with barbara's password.
>
>
2008/8/24 Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Disclosure doesn't sabotage forensic evidence. I can tell you that there is
> blood on this shoe without having any effect at all on the blood that's on the
> shoe.
Actually there is a long history of police forces withholding vital
details of a crime i
2008/8/22 Michael J Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - Fedora's key will be changed, not RHEL's, which has been compromised.
> - High security private keys are best kept in bare metal and used on
> boxes without incoming network. This doesn't seem to apply to the
> package signing keys.
We don't kno
2008/8/14 jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> adding /usr/lib/alliance/man to manpath
Remove the "alliance" package, for now.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
2008/8/13 linuxguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The fact that you refer to common Linux users like myself as
> "freeloaders who bitch" demonstrates a big part of this and other
> problems within the Linux community.
You are behaving like one.
> Keep it up. Linux adoption will stay at 1% for another 1
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
