yum
update than it is with the current setup, where a manual change of a
config file is required.
You don't have to edit the config file, it's enough to run yum with
--enablerepo=rawhide (or --enablerepo=* !).
+1 for branching, with default disabled.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
/python2.6/site-packages/fedora/client/proxyclient.py,
line 275, in send_request
request.perform()
pycurl.error: (60, 'Peer certificate cannot be authenticated with known
CA certificates')
make: *** [bodhi] Error 1
What's the problem and how do I fix it?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project
, which should be a slowly moving distribution.
[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Who_is_allowed_to_modify_which_packages
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 16:35 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Even though any proven packager could do the change, that bug does not
fall in the items listed in the proven packager policy [1]. You haven't
listed any problems with the current package, you're just
Hi all,
pondus was previously licensed under GPLv3+; now starting from 0.7.0 the
license is MIT.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
this thread will die away.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
+* Sun Dec 27 2009 Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org - 1:1.4.2-1
+- Update to 1.4.2.
+- Fix spelling in rpm version: 1.4.1 instead of previous 1.41.
+
+* Mon Dec 7 2009 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com - 1.4.1-5
- rebuild against perl 5.10.1
-* Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+rm -rf %{buildroot}
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
@@ -55,12 +56,22 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
-* Wed Apr 15 2009 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi - 1.41-3
+* Sun Dec 27 2009 Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org - 1:1.4.2-1
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+rm -rf %{buildroot}
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
@@ -55,12 +56,22 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
-* Wed Apr 15 2009 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi - 1.41-3
+* Sun Dec 27 2009 Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org - 1:1.4.2-1
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+rm -rf %{buildroot}
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
@@ -55,15 +56,22 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
-* Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.41-4
+* Sun Dec 27 2009 Jussi Lehtola jussileht
.
If you have any decent connection, downloading the rpms shouldn't take
that much time compared to their installation. Besides, on an old
computer it might be worthwhile anyway to do a minimal install to get
the system running and then install the extra packages you need with
yum.
--
Jussi Lehtola
would auto-Require the libjpeg and libtiff RPMs?
And if it actually needs the binaries, then you can just put in
Requires: libjpeg, libtiff
and safely ignore the rpmlint warning. AFAIK resolving file dependencies
is a lot slower than resolving explicit dependencies.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora
to the packager.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
/show_bug.cgi?id=523998
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
, then
execution is about 20% faster in without hyperthreading since no
performance is lost because of the dual core emulation.
However, in normal desktop use you don't really care about the MFLOPS;
hyperthreading makes the system more responsive.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht
package
or with rpm
# rpm -ivh --replacepkgs /path/to/package.rpm
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org
the MPI problem a year ago or so in a different
way with mpi-selector.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 18:43 +0100, Christoph Höger wrote:
Hi,
has anybody seen some rpm packaging for the current texlive
distribution? Since fedora switched over things look stalled.
Have a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 17:52 -0800, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
Installation of Fedora 12 (ie., not update) went well except that it
does not recognize two partitions that had ext3 file systems. Any ideas
on recovering?
Please define does not recognize.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 08:49 +0100, M. Fioretti wrote:
On Wed, November 25, 2009 8:47 am, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Please paste also the output of
# fdisk -l /dev/sda
Here it is, thanks:
[r...@polaris ~]# fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev/sda: 250.1 GB, 250059350016 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x000acea3
According to fdisk, you only have 250GB drive.
BIOS issue?
That's not possible, since linux doesn't use BIOS calls to access hard
drives. (Only the initial stages of the boot are handled with BIOS.)
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht
.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
, for a total space, if I understand correctly,
of only 250 GB.
What happened and why? Where are those missing ~100 GBytes, and how do I
recover them without reinstalling from scratch?
Please paste also the output of
# fdisk -l /dev/sda
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht
with
$ chromium-browser
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
as for normal updates. For instance:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2009-November/thread.html
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
)
chainloader +1
so you need to use the Windows boot partition, not the Windows system
partition for the chailoader to work. My grub is (naturally) in the MBR.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
can fetch the new build of kpathsea manually from
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=137909
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
this is a hardware or a driver problem, so I was
thinking about spending another 30€ for a USB ethernet card that works.
If anyone has experiences one way or another, I'd be happy to hear them.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
the unnecessary repositories (keep just Fedora
RPMFusion), remove the packages that haven't come from those repos and
replace them with the versions from the repos mentioned above.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
think you need to install the exchange plugin with
# yum install evolution-brutus
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http
that they are failing.
You can read the raw SMART data with
# smartctl -A /dev/sda
where sda is your disk drive device (you need to run this as root).
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com
the SELinux security contexts of the
files on your file system. If the problem is SELinux related, it should
get fixed.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman
contained in it?
if yes then please let me know how.
No, the contents of the DVD is source code. You'd need to bootstrap the
whole system from source before you would be able to install it.
Just download the binary DVD.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
will be used. I'm not sure whether this is a problem, though,
since the module is not loaded by default and one does not run into any
conflicts. Renaming binaries is a nuisance, too.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
:(
Then have a look at the Gurulabs howto
http://www.gurulabs.com/GURULABS-RPM-LAB/GURULABS-RPM-GUIDE-v1.0.PDF
which I find quite nice. You'll be wanting to look at page 18 of the PDF
(on the page it reads 12-17), which handles spec files.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht
,
should be given first priority or is there any criteria as such? or is
it left to the Packagers?
Not especially, but the review bugs have bug numbers that are in
increasing order in time, so older reviews have smaller numbers. Picking
what to review is up to the packager.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora
(and
the necessary execute permissions to the directories). To change the
ownership run
# chown someuser: -R /path/to/photos
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 05:46 -0400, Bob Goodwin wrote:
On 08/09/09 05:29, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
It seems the user mapping failed and thus the default guest user
'nfsnobody' was used to access the server. (r/w as guest is a possible
security issue.)
If you can't list the directories all
) and run the upgrade.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 17:10 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:48:49PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
It seems your spec making program has some bugs, as some packages have
names such as texlive-csplain.ARCH, this probably shouldn't be..?
Nope, it is intentional
: texlive-titlepic is needed by package
texlive-collection-latexextra-2009-14750.fc11.noarch (texlive)
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
there, but is still
way back). AFAIK there's a CD install available of the whole package
collection, too.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
numpy dependencies in pygtk.)
But one can compile against LAPACK, which admittedly is slower than
ATLAS, but works like a charm.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
?
Stupid question: did you try accessing outside IP addresses or domain
names? You need to set the name servers as well if you want domain names
to work.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe
Hi,
why does %configure still use
--build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu
--target=i586-redhat-linux-gnu
in rawhide i386, shouldn't the target be i686-redhat-linux-gnu?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 18:34 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/08/2009 12:19 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Hi,
why does %configure still use
--build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu
--target=i586-redhat-linux-gnu
in rawhide i386, shouldn't the target be i686-redhat-linux
into account yet.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 12:17 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
JL == Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org writes:
JL (I'm not very sure, however, about the current policy of wanting
JL sponsors to review first packages. IMHO anyone should be able to
JL review them, just as long
package links against OpenSSL?
GPL with exceptions or what? Or is it even allowed?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
')
but calling
%dconfigure
gives me
+ CFLAGS=-O2
+ -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mvjW71: line 42: -g: command not found
What's the correct way to do this?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 13:42 +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote:
What's the correct way to do this?
%global dconfigure %(rpm -E %%configure | sed 's!./configure!../configure!g')
%dconfigure
This works, but isn't it bad style to call rpm from within a spec
file..?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 14:47 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org writes:
So far I've tried
%global dconfigure %(echo %{configure} | sed
's|./configure|../configure|g')
Since %configure expands to a text containing double quotes this gets
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 18:06 +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 17:26 +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
To test things I've written a small application called solv that
works like a very tiny package manager. It's available via:
http://software.opensuse.org/search?baseproject
.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
hour window in between the F11 and F12 build
(F11 being first), so the rawhide compose has been during that window.
The next refresh should pick up the correct F12 version.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel
at
least the upgrades 2 - 4 - 6 - 8 - 10 - 11, i.e. three intermediary
stages that have been EOL'd a long time ago.)
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
been superseded by cpanspec, use that instead.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate
-macros
Setup an rpm build tree in your homedir
$ rpmdev-setuptree
and build the rpm with
$ rpmbuild --rebuild boost-1.39.0-3.fc12.src.rpm
Or, even better, you can use mock.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel
:
The above page states that the flags will be
-march=i686 -mtune=atom
on i386, but a build I just did in rawhide has
-march=i686 -mtune=generic
so -march has changed but -mtune hasn't?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
-fonts-misc.noarch : misc bitmap fonts for the X Window System
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org
and built.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
and
smartctl version 5.38 [x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8
Bruce Allen
Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
on F11. I suspect the popup regarding disk failure is bogus.
You need to run smartctl on the drive, not the partition, i.e. /dev/sdf
instead of /dev/sdf1.
--
Jussi
strange in the messages file:
You don't see it in dmesg. You can see it with
# smartctl -A /dev/(drive)
If you get the popup then your drive is breaking down and you should
replace it (it's probably still under warranty?).
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
?
In other cases, for example, %dist suggests that a spec/src.rpm would be
dist-independent and could simply be copied to multiple branches. That
doesn't need to be true.
Yes, that is true.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list
to the branch that previously targeted rawhide. F-10 in your
example.
And it automatically ends up in F-11? I can't tag and build for F-11 if
the tag with same EVR already exists in F-10.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
is obsolete.)
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1473086name=build.log
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
contains some multilib packages. If you don't specify
the wanted architecture when installing, yum might install both 32- and
64-bit versions if available. Try adding the .x86_64 arch specifier,
e.g. instead of
# yum install foo
perform
# yum install foo.x86_64
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project
Hi,
is the default attribute definition
%defattr(-,root,root)
the same as
%defattr(-,root,root,-)?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 01:10 -0400, gil...@altern.org wrote:
I'm still having problems downloading from liberty.edu . Ex, installing
kdenlive:
Check that you have the mirrorlist enabled in
the /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmfusion*.repo files and install
yum-fastestmirror.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 10:17 +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 23:30 +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Because I have a couple of FC5 servers, and I could upgrade through
the odd releases 5-7-9-11.
It should be rather straightforward to upgrade them
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 19:25 +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
The reason is that RHEL 5 is based on Fedora 6, so the upgrade should
work out smoothly.
This also means I'm almost not really upgrading anything.
FC5-CentOS5 is similar to FC5-F6
(ok, with some backports, I
if someone
packages them.
I began work on the pondus package and will submit it for review
shortly.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
really be a macro in rpm, as it has to be duplicated in so
many places. Say, %{_noarch_subpackage} which would expand to
%if 0%{?fedora} 9 || 0%{?rhel} 5
BuildArch: noarch
%endif
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
Lainaus yersinia yersinia.spi...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr.
rviny...@cs.nmsu.eduwrote:
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
This should really be a macro in rpm, as it has to be duplicated in so
many places. Say, %{_noarch_subpackage} which would expand to
Yes
; maybe the spool
gets permanently file-locked? I have since reduced this to 2 min.,
and I *think* it's reduced the frequency of occurrences (my cron job
also greps maillog for new errors).
Does it work when TB is not on?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
a couple of FC5 servers, and I could upgrade through
the odd releases 5-7-9-11.
It should be rather straightforward to upgrade them to CentOS 5.3, you
should be able to do it with yum. If they're 64-bit boxes you may have
to remove some .i386 packages before the transaction goes through.
--
Jussi
, in case
the package gets too much karma..
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
if it is loaded.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476844
Related to this is bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504357
Openmpi needs some TLC.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
lost some data. Replace the disk
ASAP.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate
original dual-PPro ran Xenix-386 IIRC, and
compatibility with anything 16 bit was irrelevant.
F11 is -march=i586 -mtune=generic, F12 is going to be -march=i686
-mtune=atom. Everything from PPro up is i686, so everything should work
just fine.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht
such as yum?
This is quite important if the version in the old distro is newer than
that on the DVD.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
off due to a bug that
slowed the process down intolerably. The huge update batch released
yesterday didn't include drpms.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman
and netboot CD and remove the other
CD images.
Hmm, I'd want netboot.img back, since I normally use a USB stick to
start the network install (OK, there is the possibility of using
livecd-iso-to-disk, but that's a lot more hassle than downloading a
minimalistic img and running dd).
--
Jussi Lehtola
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 11:12 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 07:04:12PM +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
Hmm, I'd want netboot.img back, since I normally use a USB stick to
start the network install (OK, there is the possibility of using
livecd-iso-to-disk, but that's a lot more
currently have a howto: debug failing builds on esoteric
architectures. Is it as simple as running mock
$ mock -r fedora-11-ppc package.srpm
and testing the binaries with
$ qemu-system ./binary
?
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-devel-list mailing
, and the probability of that
is only 0.97 per cent. Recovering anything beyond a single byte is even
less likely.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora
. Macromedia (now Adobe) is good at making bull***t that
eats away your CPU. Installing flashblocker should do the trick - it
only loads the flash plugin if you click on the flash item.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list
determining
what format the partition really has. To do that, you need to
# tune2fs -l /dev/partition
and look at the Filesystem features.
$ man tune2fs
tells you that ext4-only features are ununit_bg and flex_bg. If you see
these your partition is ext4, if not it can be mounted as ext3.
--
Jussi Lehtola
yum-fastestmirror
and try again. You just may be using a sluggish mirror.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http
kernel, install kernel headers
# yum -y install kernel-PAE-devel
3. Install VirtualBox with
# yum -y install VirtualBox-OSE
4. Reboot or
run
# service akmods restart
to build kernel module and
# modprobe vboxdrv
to load it
5. Run Virtualbox by
$ VirtualBox
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project
created RPM can botch your system.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate
in
the latter two you should panic.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 09:31 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 16:41 +0300, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
You can verify the diagnosis with
# smartctl -A /dev/sda
If you have a nonzero number in one or more of the following fields
Reallocated_Sector_Ct
need to bother with
compiling kernel modules at all.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki
, no wonder why
it doesn't work.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
be quite painless.
You should even be able to do the update with yum.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org
kernels prior to 2.6.27.5
CentOS 4 was released in 2005 and will be supported AFAIK until 2012.
There should be no security concerns with it.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
