CSI artwork

Hey everyone! I put a request in to the design service just now to get some banners and logos made. CSI is a community based standards set. more info at: https://fedorahosted.org/csi/ The first policy we're rolling out is a security policy: http://mmcgrath.fedorapeople.org/policy/

Re: CSI artwork

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:40:07AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: Hey everyone! I put a request in to the design service just now to get some banners and logos made. CSI is a community based standards set. more info at: https://fedorahosted.org/csi/ The first policy we're rolling out is a

Re: CSI artwork

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:41:03AM -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: Good chance to try something really different from the Design Team? I'm not even sure what CSI could be represented as if it were an actual object, instead of a document. Any ideas? -- Ian Weller ianwel...@gmail.com

Re: CSI artwork

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:13:58PM -0600, Ian Weller wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:41:03AM -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: Good chance to try something really different from the Design Team? I'm not even sure what CSI could be represented as if it were an actual object, instead of a

Re: CSI artwork

On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 15:13 -0600, Ian Weller wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:41:03AM -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: Good chance to try something really different from the Design Team? I'm not even sure what CSI could be represented as if it were an actual object, instead of a document. Any

Suggestions for this web page.

Hi, We have been moving the freemedia infrastructure from fedoranews to our own servers. Towards this goal, we have managed to setup this[1] form and a TRAC[2] . Now, can you please suggest, how to keep this[1] form consistence with rest of the Fedora website/wiki? I tried to use

Re: Suggestions for this web page.

I tried to use http://fedoraproject.org/static/css/fedora.css but without much result. On using this, I am getting only the left side bar. Nothing else. :) Some help will be nice to have. Sorry to disturb. I managed to find it out and get it working from fedorapeople. :) Thanks. --

[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #40 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-20 03:26:11 EDT --- I don't know, the whole

[Bug 477375] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477375 Roy Rankin rran...@ihug.com.au changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480458] [hedgewars] Adapt to font package renamings

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480458 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480458, which changed state. Bug 480458 Summary: [hedgewars] Adapt to font package renamings

[Bug 480466] [openoffice.org] Adapt to font package renamings

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480466 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480465, which changed state. Bug 480465 Summary: [ogre] Adapt to font package renamings

[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480476, which changed state. Bug 480476 Summary: [trackballs] Adapt to font package renamings

[Bug 480465] [ogre] Adapt to font package renamings

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480465 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480476] [trackballs] Adapt to font package renamings

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480476 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480475, which changed state. Bug 480475 Summary: [TnL-data] Adapt to font package renamings

[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480471, which changed state. Bug 480471 Summary: [scorched3d] Adapt to font package renamings

[Bug 480475] [TnL-data] Adapt to font package renamings

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480475 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477435] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477435 --- Comment #8 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 05:01:58 EDT --- needs another attempt, will be =

[Bug 480750] New: liberation-fonts1-.04.93-5 fails to install

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: liberation-fonts1-.04.93-5 fails to install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480750 Summary: liberation-fonts1-.04.93-5 fails to install

[Bug 480471] [scorched3d] Adapt to font package renamings

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480471 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477425] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477425 Sarantis Paskalis paska...@di.uoa.gr changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477448] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477448 --- Comment #9 from Hedayat Vatankhah heda...@grad.com 2009-01-20 07:04:15 EDT --- :) Are you referring to a missing

[Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #20 from Ankur Sinha sanjay_an...@yahoo.co.in 2009-01-20 07:37:24 EDT --- hi, I changed the fontconfig in

[Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 Nicholas Wourms nwou...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480473] [slingshot] Adapt to font package renamings

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480473 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477336] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477336 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 477416] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-01-20 13:02:01 EDT --- How's this?

[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #31 from Ankur Sinha sanjay_an...@yahoo.co.in 2009-01-20 13:14:21 EDT --- :D my first approved package!

[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480480, which changed state. Bug 480480 Summary: [xmoto] Adapt to font package renamings

[Bug 480456] [gnubg] Adapt to font package renamings

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480456 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480443] [Tracker] Deploy new fonts package naming guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480443 Bug 480443 depends on bug 480456, which changed state. Bug 480456 Summary: [gnubg] Adapt to font package renamings

[Bug 480774] Fontconfig cache files in bogus ~/${localstatedir}

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480774 --- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 15:58:05 EDT --- I built

rpms/liberation-fonts/devel liberation-fonts.spec,1.31,1.32

Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/liberation-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv14119 Modified Files: liberation-fonts.spec Log Message: Fix busted inter-subpackage dependencies. Yay, font activism Index: liberation-fonts.spec

[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 --- Comment #14 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 18:04:54 EDT --- thanks mclasen:

[Bug 477332] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477332 --- Comment #8 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 18:06:16 EDT --- thanks mclasen:

[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 --- Comment #42 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 18:31:49 EDT ---

[Bug 477410] Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477410 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480750] liberation-fonts1-.04.93-5 fails to install

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480750 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 475743] Many chinese glyphs on Japanese environment

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475743 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480774] Fontconfig cache files in bogus ~/${localstatedir}

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480774 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

rpms/fontconfig/devel .cvsignore, 1.33, 1.34 fontconfig.spec, 1.115, 1.116 sources, 1.34, 1.35

Author: behdad Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/fontconfig/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5572 Modified Files: .cvsignore fontconfig.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Jan 20 2009 Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com - * 2.6.93-1.git.64.g6aa4dce - Update to

[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #3 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 20:49:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329524) --

[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 480774] Fontconfig cache files in bogus ~/${localstatedir}

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480774 --- Comment #3 from Behdad Esfahbod besfa...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 21:22:33 EDT --- I'm extremely sorry Jesse. Not sure

[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #5 from Cody Boisclair c...@zone38.net 2009-01-20 21:27:37 EDT --- Still broken, but in a different way. See

[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Cody Boisclair c...@zone38.net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #6 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 21:50:20 EDT --- I have checked again. The hinting

[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #7 from Cody Boisclair c...@zone38.net 2009-01-20 22:00:23 EDT --- Weird. No idea what would be causing that.

rpms/cjkuni-fonts - New directory

Author: petersen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/petersen/admin/tmpcvsr21071/rpms/cjkuni-fonts Log Message: Directory /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts added to the repository ___

rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel - New directory

Author: petersen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/petersen/admin/tmpcvsr21071/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel Log Message: Directory /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel added to the repository

rpms/cjkuni-fonts Makefile,NONE,1.1

Author: petersen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/petersen/admin/tmpcvsr21071/rpms/cjkuni-fonts Added Files: Makefile Log Message: Setup of module cjkuni-fonts --- NEW FILE Makefile --- # Top level Makefile for module

rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel .cvsignore, NONE, 1.1 Makefile, NONE, 1.1 sources, NONE, 1.1

Author: petersen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/home/fedora/petersen/admin/tmpcvsr21071/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel Added Files: .cvsignore Makefile sources Log Message: Setup of module cjkuni-fonts --- NEW FILE .cvsignore --- ---

[Bug 253813] Package Review: cjkunifonts (split from fonts-chinese) [renamed to cjkuni-fonts]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253813 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #8 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 22:15:04 EDT --- I have triaged on my Fedora 10 and

[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #9 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 22:16:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329532) --

[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #12 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 22:20:14 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329537)

[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #11 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-20 22:19:12 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329536)

[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #13 from Cody Boisclair c...@zone38.net 2009-01-20 22:22:53 EDT --- It looks fine with hinting turned off on

rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel CIDFnmap.zh_CN, NONE, 1.1 CIDFnmap.zh_TW, NONE, 1.1 FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN, NONE, 1.1 FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW, NONE, 1.1 cidfmap.zh_CN, NONE, 1.1 cidfmap.zh_TW, NONE, 1.1 cjkuni-fonts.spe

Author: cchance Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/cjkuni-fonts/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28457/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: CIDFnmap.zh_CN CIDFnmap.zh_TW FAPIcidfmap.zh_CN FAPIcidfmap.zh_TW cidfmap.zh_CN cidfmap.zh_TW

[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #14 from Cody Boisclair c...@zone38.net 2009-01-20 22:44:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329538) --

[Bug 479371] Broken hinting on u in Liberation Mono Bold

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479371 --- Comment #16 from Cody Boisclair c...@zone38.net 2009-01-20 22:48:04 EDT --- I fixed it by using Edit - Copy From -

[Bug 474734] Blurriness of Latin letter R (U+0052) in Liberation Regular

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474734 --- Comment #13 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-01-21 00:21:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329546)

Broken dependencies: tetex-font-kerkis

tetex-font-kerkis has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On x86_64: tetex-font-kerkis-2.0-16.fc11.noarch requires kerkis-fonts = 0:2.0-16.fc11 On i386:

Broken dependencies: elisa

elisa has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-good = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires elisa-plugins-bad = 0:0.5.20 elisa-0.5.20-1.fc11.noarch requires mgopen-fonts On x86_64:

[Fwd: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines]

Message transféré De: Tom spot Callaway À: fedora-devel-announce Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:16:09 -0500 As usual, the Fedora Packaging Committee has been busy adding and amending the Fedora Packaging Guidelines. Specifically: The Packaging Guidelines describing

Re: Fedora Weekly news

On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nicu Buculei wrote: Mike McGrath wrote: Any volunteers to keep in touch with FWN about our goings on? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue159 It is usually covered by Huzaifa

Re: Infrastructure FAD?

On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Mike McGrath wrote: On Wed, 14 Jan 2009, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: Regarding: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2009-January/msg00017.html What do people think of having an Infrastructure-related FAD (Fedora Activity Day)? Something more along the

Fedora Security Policy

So I've added some suggested changes and would like to do this on the list instead of on IRC. So here's what I propose: http://mmcgrath.fedorapeople.org/policy/ [1] 1) I'd like everyone in a sysadmin* group to be compliant with this policy as part of orientation for new members. 2) I'd like

TMOUT

Hey guys, so we talked about this... well, a long time ago and decided to do it but it never got implemented. So I'm going to implement it now and its likely going to cause some people pain for now. I'm going to set the default bash TMOUT value to 32400 (9 hours). If you need to overwrite this,

Re: Fedora Security Policy

Hi there, in iptables config, why not, change the default forward policy to drop ? by default ip forwarding is off, but I think is a good practice deny everything by default, just in case. cheers, ./bras On Jan 20, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: So I've added some suggested

Re: Switching Fedora to pae kernel by default?

Jeremy Katz wrote: On Monday, January 19 2009, Avi Kivity said: Jeremy Katz wrote: That said, we currently do install the PAE kernel if you have 4 GB+ of RAM[1]. Switching to it by default is problematic because then we're back to using different kernels for different cases

Re: Switching Fedora to pae kernel by default?

Eric Paris wrote: I've got a P3 (Coppermine) with 256M memory running F10. My significant other took it with her to Antarctica (Well F9 has been to Antarctica but it'll be F10 in Antarctica next month). You can only run one app at a time and have to be patient, but it's perfectly usable (and

Re: Switching Fedora to pae kernel by default?

On Tuesday 20 January 2009 01:06:17 am Avi Kivity wrote: Eric Paris wrote: I've got a P3 (Coppermine) with 256M memory running F10. My significant other took it with her to Antarctica (Well F9 has been to Antarctica but it'll be F10 in Antarctica next month). You can only run one app at a

Re: Switching Fedora to pae kernel by default?

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:06:17AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: Eric Paris wrote: I've got a P3 (Coppermine) with 256M memory running F10. My significant other took it with her to Antarctica (Well F9 has been to Antarctica but it'll be F10 in Antarctica next month). You can only run one app at a

Re: Switching Fedora to pae kernel by default?

Avi Kivity wrote: Kyle McMartin wrote: Unless we keep the non-PAE i586 kernel around as a fallback, we're not going to be able to boot on a whole raft of crappy i386 chips (original Pentium M most notably...) I'm not suggesting dropping non-PAE. Simply defaulting to PAE where possible.

Re: Switching Fedora to pae kernel by default?

Kyle McMartin wrote: Look, I'm sorry if I'm just not thinking big picture enough here, but what exactly is the use case for a PAE kernel these days? The compat code in x86_64 should be more than good enough for the apps that require an i686 chroot. It's certainly very good. I converted my

Re: Switching Fedora to pae kernel by default?

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:28:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: Users won't be running yum. They're running that applet thing. Which just shells out to yum... ;-) ___ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com

Re: Switching Fedora to pae kernel by default?

Kyle McMartin wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:28:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: Users won't be running yum. They're running that applet thing. Which just shells out to yum... ;-) Great, but any 'suggestions' need to find their way to the user. I'd prefer to do the right thing

Re: Gnome apps font size on KDE Live CD

What if I have the opposite problem, I have installed Fedora 10 with Gnome and my favorite KDE apps K3B and Amarok looks very ugly with a big font size. Could you help me with this problem? Thanks!! -- This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org

Re: Question for our users

On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 03:23 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: No, I was referring to deploying Fedora in office-like situation, i.e. to be used by non-technical people, who are using not much more than text processor, spreadsheet, internet browser, email, scanner, printer, fax. For them, an OS

Re: Zoneminder broken after F8 - F10 upgrade

Around about 19/01/09 14:44, Craig White typed ... the only error seems to be an error w/mysql complaining about a missing column (StreamReplayBuffer). Actually, I was more concerned by the crashes, but I took your advice and blatted the SQL d/b, set it up again, and it's all happy now,

Re: Package Manager Denies Permission to Install

On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 10:16 -0800, Kam Leo wrote: What's the difference whether the package got installed by root or via su? No difference. The difference is that if you're loading a GUI to do it, you're running 500,000 lines of code as root in an untrusted environment. Richard. --

RE: Package Manager Denies Permission to Install

On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 04:31 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: bruce wrote: just saw this thread. so, is there a way/solution to allow a root user to use the gui/gnome/package update app You need to patch both PolicyKit and gnome-packagekit. PolicyKit patch here:

Re: nfs / mount.nfs: mount to NFS server 'rpcbind' failed

after some digging around I found that the kernel task [lockd] is missing on one of the systems. The other the [lockd] magically reappeared and nfs is working on it. I know that somehow /etc/init.d/nfslock spawn this kernel task, but not sure why this would be happening. It seemed to begin with

Re: Question for our users

Tim wrote: On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 03:23 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: No, I was referring to deploying Fedora in office-like situation, i.e. to be used by non-technical people, who are using not much more than text processor, spreadsheet, internet browser, email, scanner, printer, fax. For them,

Evolution broken

Without any apparent reason, Evolution has suddenly become unable to send or receive messages. I set up Thunderbird instead and that works fine. However, it downloaded about 3500 messages that should have been deleted, so it looks as though there has been a problem for some time. Webmail shows

Re: F10 HD install - anyone successfully done this?

I'd like to report success! Here's the details of how the system looked. An interesting point is that I was doing this on a remote machine with only a serial console (and SSH) so the kernel and GRUB options all include serial console commands. ISO used was:

Re: F8 - F10 and Bluetooth broken

Around about 19/01/09 19:28, Patrick O'Callaghan typed ... Works for me. Mine is a Broadcom dongle (marked as: Anycom USB-250). Dmesg shows: I get something very similar (albeit at only one level [5-2] where you have 3-1 3-1.1: usb 5-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and

Re: Evolution broken

On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 10:45 +, Noel James Bridge wrote: Without any apparent reason, Evolution has suddenly become unable to send or receive messages. I set up Thunderbird instead and that works fine. However, it downloaded about 3500 messages that should have been deleted, so it looks

Re: Question for our users

On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 11:06 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: It's appropriate for single-user/single-seat personal setups, but not for office/production environment desktop and networked/centrally adminstrated installations. An administrator *IS* able to reconfigure the computer to work the way

Re: network manager / vpnc question

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:40:45PM -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 03:01:49PM -0500, Mail Lists wrote: I have set up a vpnc connection just fine (to cisco) - while there is a button to add routes, it seems to not understand the usual ip route arguments ...

Re: Restoring NetworkManager settings

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:35:47PM -0800, Dave Roberts wrote: On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 18:47 -0800, Alan Evans wrote: I wanted to temporarily assign static IP settings for eth0, and like a dufus I used system-config-network. Unchecked Controlled by Network Manager and entered the desired

Re: Evolution broken

Chris Tyler wrote: On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 10:45 +, Noel James Bridge wrote: Without any apparent reason, Evolution has suddenly become unable to send or receive messages. I set up Thunderbird instead and that works fine. However, it downloaded about 3500 messages that should have been

Re: Gnome apps font size on KDE Live CD

On Tuesday 20 January 2009 08:42:35 christoxl wrote: What if I have the opposite problem, I have installed Fedora 10 with Gnome and my favorite KDE apps K3B and Amarok looks very ugly with a big font size. Could you help me with this problem? Yes. Google for gtk-chtheme. Follow the

Re: VMware server 2.0, /usr/src/linux?

I found a problem, don't know if it is related but kernel-2.6.27.9-159.fc10.x86_64.rpm fails to install with the following error below. # yum update . Downloading Packages: kernel-2.6.27.9-159.fc10.x86_64.rpm | 20 MB 00:28

  1   2   3   >