Hi,
On 12/29/2009 11:20 PM, Christopher Brown wrote:
Hi folks,
Linux Format is a popular magazine in the U.K but which ships all over
the world. It regularly reviews interesting bits of software and I
thought:
a) It would be interesting to see how much of what they review is
included in
On 11/18/2009 01:49 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:36:02 -0600,
Bruno Wolff IIIbr...@wolff.to wrote:
We currently have a 3d chess game packaged as chess. I want to ask for
fedora hosted space for it sop that we can be upstream for some modernization
(with regard to
Hi,
On 11/13/2009 09:37 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/libsndfile
What's up with libsndfile in Fedora and EPEL?
There are open tickets
On 11/11/2009 01:11 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Hi,
It has been plain since 2003¹ our new font access standard would be
fontconfig. Since then most users of the old core fonts X11 backend have
migrated, but there are still a few stragglers.
Unfortunately these stragglers matter. Core fonts were
On 10/06/2009 06:29 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 16:27 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Thanks for bringing this up. I'll create a patch for the scripts
generating the livecd to add rd_NO_LUKS to the normal livecd
syslinux.cfg entry. I already was planning on doing this, but I
On 10/22/2009 01:46 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 10/06/2009 06:29 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 16:27 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Thanks for bringing this up. I'll create a patch for the scripts
generating the livecd to add rd_NO_LUKS to the normal livecd
syslinux.cfg entry
On 10/04/2009 11:35 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
Dracut currently tries to find and activate all RAID, LVM, and LUKS
partitions on the hard disks when booting the LiveCD.
Several of my systems are made up of many RAID, LVM, and LUKS
partitions in various combinations. Booting the LiveCD now goes
On 09/03/2009 09:10 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 09/03/2009 02:20 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Regeneration is as easy with dracut as it is with mkinitrd, actually they
have the same cmdline syntax.
The only extra step required with dracut when using pre-generated images
is:
yum install dracut
On 09/03/2009 09:22 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 09/03/2009 02:25 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Note that we have the same problem with any package which does static
linking against an lgpl library (such as glibc).
This is (one of the big reasons) why we only permit static linking with
explicit
On 09/02/2009 07:17 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 10:26 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
As one of the persons involved in dracut and in integrating dracut into the
distribution I'm rather surprised to hear this.
Where has this been discussed ? Were are the bugs for the situations
Hi,
On 09/03/2009 03:36 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Hans de Goede (j.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl) said:
The fact that it wasn't turned on at Alpha means it really shouldn't be
on now, not without FESCo approval.
That is interesting reasoning, first keep it out of Alpha even though it was
ready as you
Hi,
On 09/03/2009 06:00 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On 09/03/2009 11:35 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
The kernel binary RPM contains this pre-built initrd. The kernel source
RPM does not contain the sources necessary to make this pre-built initrd.
This makes me rather uncomfortable from
Hi,
On 09/03/2009 06:29 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Hans de Goede (j.w.r.dego...@hhs.nl) said:
It really is like having to support gentoo, versus having to support a
distro using pre build packages. And I would really like to move to the having
to
support a pre-build package model
Hi,
On 08/26/2009 08:11 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 14:07 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 11:45 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
dracut using kernel come with a prebuild initrd-generic-version instead
of initrd-version, so if we fail to find /boot/initrd
On 07/16/2009 02:30 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Audacious 2.1 is going to land in Rawhide soon.
src.rpm updates have been comitted to Fedora package cvs/devel already.
Compared with 1.5.1 this new final release changes the SONAME version
of essential libraries within the audacious-libs package.
On 06/15/2009 10:04 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:21:40PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
I've just build ImageMagick 6.5.3.7 for rawhide. This version
introduces *silent* ABI breakage, as the ABI has changed without
changing the soname (woohoo way to go upstream!)
Can you
On 06/15/2009 07:53 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Way back when in February [1], FESCo decided that for Fedora 11, i586 would
be the default architecture, and for Fedora 12, it would be some variant of
i686. It's time to follow through on that action item.
I've submitted
Hi,
I've just build ImageMagick 6.5.3.7 for rawhide. This version
introduces *silent* ABI breakage, as the ABI has changed without
changing the soname (woohoo way to go upstream!)
So I strongly urge anyone who maintains a package which uses the
ImageMagick libraries to rebuild it.
Regards,
On 06/11/2009 06:28 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 12:09:24 -0300, Paulo wrote:
I would create a symbolic link audacious - audacious2, so the previous
bin can still be called.
AFAIK, this is not done in Debian/Ubuntu either. The .desktop file has
been renamed, too, and
On 06/04/2009 12:29 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:31:27 -0300, Paulo wrote:
Hi.
As I don't have the time to maintain audacious any more I'm orphaning the
following packages:
audacious
audacious-plugins
libmowgli
mcs
The last two are dependencies which, as far as I am
drago01 wrote:
Currently we have:
CONFIG_SOUND_OSS_CORE=y
CONFIG_SND_OSSEMUL=y
CONFIG_SND_MIXER_OSS=m
CONFIG_SND_PCM_OSS=m
CONFIG_SND_PCM_OSS_PLUGINS=y
CONFIG_SND_SEQUENCER_OSS=y
this cause the OSS compat modules to be loaded on every system (that
has sound), even thought most people do not
Hi Dave,
The ACPI subsystem has a kernelcmdline setting called acpi_enforce_resources
which defaults to lax, I would like to propose to change this the default to
strict in *rawhide*.
As you may (not) know I'm an active contributor to the lm_sensors project both
to the userspace tools as to
Nicu Buculei wrote:
Erick Henrique wrote:
Hi Hans
Erick,
AFAIK, Hans is not subscribed to out list, so you may need to add him to
CC: (or just use the reply all button).
Correct, I didn't see the original mail thanks for CC-ing me.
Then, we need to redesign all the graphs of the game
Michel Salim wrote:
I can take a look at it later today.
Good,
Let me know if you can't solve it then I'll take a look.
Regards,
Hans
___
Fedora-music-list mailing list
Fedora-music-list@redhat.com
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 21:52 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 16:03 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
ZC Miao wrote:
[quote]
Ardour 2.4 released
Submitted by paul on Mon, 2008-03-31 21:03. :: Articles
Well, its over
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 02:49 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Since there seems much demand for this I've just pushed a build of ardour-2.4
to the F-8 updates-testing repo (it will show up there with the next update of
the update repositories). Please give this
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
#define CLIP(color) (unsigned char)(((color)0xFF)?0xff:(((color)0)?0:(color)))
Add a comment about what this is doing? Could you just do it as a
static function instead?
The macro itself is too trivial to be commented, IMHO, but I have
to ask just what it is doing there.
Hi All,
I'm a Linux enthusiast / developer. Lately I'm mainly active doing development
for Fedora and writing kernel drivers (and as my day job I'm a lecturer in
Computer Science).
Fedora has a policy of not shipping a heavily patched kernel, but instead tries
to work with upstream to get
Hi All,
As explained in my introduction mail I've been working on a standalone v4l2
driver for pac207 based usb webcams. I've attached the hopefully pretty clean
result to this mail.
This is the promised split version of the pac207 driver I've been working on, I
would like to ask everyone to
Hi Michel,
Michel Xhaard wrote:
Hans,
I don't understand why you start this work without asking the gspca
maintener ?
As I wrote I wanted to have something to show before announcing my plans, I
don't like doing hot air only announcements. Also these last few weeks have
been very usefull
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 23:32 -0800, Anthony Green wrote:
Ok, I've kicked off a devel build of ardour 2.2 with the changes you
described. It should show up in rawhide soon (assuming the build
completes). Please have a look if you can. If it looks good, then I'll
probably push it out to F8 as
Hi All,
In the thread I started about Fedora perhaps being to cutting edge, it was said
that I shouldn't complain as there is only one problem left with the juju stack
which is a bug with via vt6306 cards in OHCI 1.0 cards.
Further analysis of the problem has learned that this is not true,
Hi All,
I guess / hope some of you now me. For those on this list who don't here is a
short intro I'm an active Fedora contributer, maintaining over 150 packages.
Currently I'm working on integrating all of the Planet CCRMA audio packages
into Fedora.
I'm also a lecturer in computer science for
Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote:
On 10/15/07, Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since we do a lot with and somethings for Fedora we would also like to give
Fedora a prominent place there, so I'm looking for things like T-shirts, but
also things like maybe a big blue flag with the Fedora logo
Hi all,
A bit offtopic for this list, but this is the best place I could think of to
discuss this.
A friend of mine had trouble with 2 different via c7 epia motherboards (mini
itx boards with single chip chipset with unichrome integrated graphics) machines.
They would freeze (hard) pretty
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 27 août 2007 12:07, Hans de Goede a écrit :
Hi all,
A bit offtopic for this list, but this is the best place I could think
of to discuss this.
...
So appearantly the via c7 isn't all that i686 compatible as via
claims
As Alan will likely repeat, the glibc
David Woodhouse wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 17:17 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
I tend to say that approach is fine for you, Hans and some other
developers that are familiar with kernel-coding as those people have
shown to be able to get code upstream and know how to work with
upstream.
Josh Boyer wrote:
I'd like to just do a brief poll here just to see how many are yay or
nay for kmods. And I'm not talking about their current implementation
or the other various ways that the idea can be accomplished, but rather
on the idea of having kernel modules as separate packages in
Hi all,
AFAIK ubuntu includes a patch to allow dynamic loading of alternate AML code
dumps, to work around bios ACPI bugs. I know BIOS's and the kernel ACPI code
are getting betterm but for some laptops this is needed, any chance this could
be included into the Fedora kernel?
Also any
John Thacker wrote:
Anyone else seeing this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184593 ?
With the last two kernels, 2.6.15-1.2032_FC5 and 2.6.15-1.2038_FC5,
the system clock starts running too fast for me. It gains about an
hour per day. It runs so fast that NTP won't sync
40 matches
Mail list logo
