After several hours of fiddling with the non-working wireless network in
my new Fedora installation, I noticed in the log file a list of
supported security modules - and WPA - AES wasn't in the list.
So, I changed my router to use WPA - TKIP instead of WPA - AES. I
then restarted the box,
Kevin J. Cummings wrote:
john wendel wrote:
After several hours of fiddling with the non-working wireless network
in my new Fedora installation, I noticed in the log file a list of
supported security modules - and WPA - AES wasn't in the list.
So, I changed my router to use WPA - TKIP
Christoph Höger wrote:
Hi,
above message appears when I try to watch youtube with totem. It results
in no sound.
Does anyone have a clue which codec needs to be installed and which
package ships it?
rpm -qa | grep gstreamer
gstreamer-plugins-base-devel-0.10.19-2.fc9.i386
Tom Horsley wrote:
The new 2.6.25.4-10.fc8 kernel update seems to have infected
my fedora 8 boot partition with the same popping noise that
I first noticed after installing fedora 9:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446535
I thought folks had finally figured out how to initialize
http://web.eweek.com/t?r=2c=1230l=24ctl=86A9:C4A208E9B2377D1F7250ABE765FD2F22kc=EWKNLNAV09102008STR1
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Alan Evans ame.fedora at gmail.com writes:
It's just that in this case, I didn't expect updating subversion to
pull in a new version of openoffice! And sendmail???
If packages A and B both depend on library L and if Rawhide has a newer version
of L with a different soname
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 01:25:29 +0100, Andras Simon wrote:
In other words, my question is not about whether mplayer really
depends on those other packages, but whether it should depend on them.
And I still think that downloading the rpm file will not answer this.
(I may
Tom Horsley wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 15:18:55 -0600 (CST)
Steve Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there an easy rule to create for udev that will turn off that function?
I don't know about easy, but I'm sure it can be done. Here is an
example of a file I have in my /etc/hal/fdi/policy/
After reading some of the 32bit vs 64bit thread(s), I thought I'd build
a 64bit kernel on my 32bit F8 box. Got the latest kernel source and
stable patch from kernel.org and tried running make menuconfig. Much to
my surprise, there isn't a 32 vs 64 bit toggle in the kernel config.
Google
Gordon Messmer wrote:
john wendel wrote:
After reading some of the 32bit vs 64bit thread(s), I thought I'd
build a 64bit kernel on my 32bit F8 box. Got the latest kernel source
and stable patch from kernel.org and tried running make menuconfig.
Much to my surprise, there isn't a 32 vs 64
Beartooth wrote:
I have no PDA, nor expect ever to, much less hardware to connect
it to a PC.
When I was working, and literally running my life on rails, its
ancestors, then called organizers, were fine things; I had a whole series
of them.
Those who want or need them are welcome to
ftp.free.fr has posted F10 DVDs x86-64 and 386 to Usenet -
alt.binaries.cd.image.linux.
Coming down here at 1MB/sec (from newshosting.com).
Get'um while they're still fresh!
Regards,
John
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Aaron Konstam wrote:
I tried once and got no response so I am trying again. It is strange
that people understand all such obscure things but can't explain one of
the many gobbledygook statements made in the release notes.
In section 2.2.6 of the F10 release notes is the following statement:
Reg Clemens wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:56 AM, Reg Clemens r...@dwf.com wrote:
I keep reading comments on this list that one can remove pulseaudio
from f9 and it will run like a normal alsa system.
I have removed
alsa-plugins-pulseaudio
and libflashsupport
from my f9 system,
Dave Feustel wrote:
man avahi produces no output.
apropos avahi produces
avahi [] (1) - browse - Browse for mDNS/DNS-SD services using the
Avahi daemon
avahi [] (1) - discover - Browse for mDNS/DNS-SD services using
the Avahi daemon
avahi [] (1) -
Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 09:50 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
Comcast bundles several accounts with email and space on their servers
for storage and http service along with the connection. There's not a
lot of reason to run your own server unless you have dynamic content.
Or space? I
NiftyFedora Mitch wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
Tim:
Five seconds is probably ambitious, but I still like how my old Amiga
would COLD BOOT in 13 seconds, warm boot was 11 seconds. That's from
off, to fully working system.
g:
also, think
tom wrote:
Aside: I can not remember a Red Hat or a Fedora release that has given me
these kinds of fits. I'm sure they have but... Must have been a while.
To quickly recap the situation. I started by installing F10 from DVD,
and the networking aspect declined to function. Two reinstalls
Jim wrote:
Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Jim mickey...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Does Linux have any Appa for converting music files to MP3 to play on
Ipods.
You'll need to install a 3rd party repo like rpmfusion[1] and install
lame. Personally I installed RockBox[2]
Fresh F10 install from a live-cd.
When I try to start firefox from a console, here's the error.
Error: Platform version '1.9.0.4' is not compatible with
minVersion = 1.9.0.5
maxVersion = 1.9.0.5
Any clues.
Thanks,
John
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So I mistyped noatime in /etc/fstab; wished there was a way to test
this first!
Anyway, since this is my ASUS Eee and my swap is on the SD card, by
pulling the SD card the boot halts and puts me into Repair Filesystem
I recently installed F10 on a really old computer that previously was
running FC6 (perfectly). The hardware is a Dell 900 Mhz P3, 512 MB
memory (all it will take) and a ancient Nvidia card with a PCI interface
(dog slow).
Everything went well, except for a few quirks and a big problem.
I
g wrote:
john wendel wrote:
Any clues.
after installing from a 'live cd' run 'yum update'.
Good suggestion, but that was the first thing I did. Several times
actually, the last being yesterday.
Regards,
John
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https
g wrote:
john wendel wrote:
I recently installed F10 on a really old computer that previously was
running FC6 (perfectly). The hardware is a Dell 900 Mhz P3, 512 MB
speed may not be a problem, it will just react slowly. 512mb may be a
problem running x server, especially if you try to use kde
g wrote:
john wendel wrote:
Good suggestion, but that was the first thing I did. Several times
actually, the last being yesterday.
same box you are trying to build new kernel?
Yes.
Regards,
John
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com
David Timms wrote:
john wendel wrote:
this box without any problems. Now with F10, I can't compile the
kernel, gcc dies with a segmentation fault and the output tries to
tell me that
Can you provide the text of the segfault (without that you are asking
for speculation) ?
I'll get
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Blake Hudson wrote:
The 9250's are a little dated and I've since started using GeforceFX
5200's as replacements due to availability. I've found the 5200's to be
equal or better in quality,
They're not. The Radeon 9250 is supported by the Free Software drivers in
Fedora.
g wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
I have not done it in a few months, but before that I built my own since RH8 and
FC4 in that series.
i would not say that it is not possible. it is just that because fedora does
customize their software, it is best to stay with fedora source to insure
that
Hugh Caley wrote:
Ah, OK, I've also had this problem since F9. I'd assumed it was general
pulse audio problems, glad to know it's actually specific to my hardware
(seriously).
The information is much appreciated.
Hugh
Welcome on the band of snd_intel8x0 guys.!!!
I have your hardware and
Javier Perez wrote:
Hi
I tried to install a pure XFCE system but I can't
It looks like in order to install XFCE, I have to install also GNOME.
It is so very counterproductive because my idea was to setup a
small,efficient system specifically without GNOME or KDE's overhead.
This is an old
JD wrote:
I have built kernel 2.6.28.2 on my FC7 machine,
but I cannot boot it. It panics very
very early in the boot.
Is there a dep I am missing? If so, shouldn't
the build belch out some message about it?
Hard to diagnose without seeing the boot output. Maybe a problem with
your initial
Rant mode
I recently upgraded my computer at work from FC6 to F10 and
performance went from OK to barely usable. The box is an ancient PIII
900 MHz with 512 MB memory, a PCI Nvidia graphics card with the free nv
driver, a 1600x1200 monitor, and a slow 13 GB disk (your US tax dollars
at
Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 21:50 -0800, john wendel wrote:
Rant mode
With FC6, I ran KDE 3.5 without any problems. I could drag and resize
windows without glitches, scrolling was slow but basically usable, and
Vim in a console (where I spend most of my time) was pleasant
Gordon Messmer wrote:
john wendel wrote:
Now with F10 I'm using XFCE, and the box is a total P.O.S. Resizing
or moving a window is a nightmare, the screen redraw is too slow to
keep up with the cursor, and I see lots of screen glitches. When I
open an app like Firefox with a complicated
Peter Arremann wrote:
On Sunday 15 February 2009 12:50:48 am john wendel wrote:
a 1600x1200 monitor
With FC6, I ran KDE 3.5 without any problems.
Now with F10 I'm using XFCE, and the box is a total P.O.S.
Sorry for the big edit but I cut out everything that wasn't 100% on topic ;)
Anyway
Gordon Messmer wrote:
john wendel wrote:
Gordon Messmer wrote:
My first guess is that your system is using the VESA driver rather
than nv. Maybe you should send /var/log/Xorg.0.log ?
Thanks, I didn't think of this one. I'll check when I return to work.
Did you ever get to check that, John
On my newly installed F10 box, NM insists on starting wpa_supplicant,
but I don't have any wireless devices.
How can I configure NM so that it doesn't run wpa_supplicant?
Thanks,
John
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 14:18 -0500, Richard Heck wrote:
john wendel wrote:
On my newly installed F10 box, NM insists on starting wpa_supplicant,
but I don't have any wireless devices.
How can I configure NM so that it doesn't run wpa_supplicant?
I'd like to know
I'd like to install F10 on a tiny box that has only a compact flash disk
(ide interface) and a network interface. I tried cobbler, but it died
with some strange python runtime error, so a network install is out (I'm
too lazy to learn how to setup a PXE server).
Is it possible to do an
I got a cheap MCE remote control (usb interface), and thought I'd give
it a try. After reading the lirc documentation, my brain exploded, so I
thought I'd just plug the sucker in and see what happened.
Well, what happened is that the keyboard stopped working along with the
mouse buttons.
Clueless here,
I've got an F10 install running well, and I'd like to move the system to
a flash disk. This flash will become the boot device for a small system
I'm building. Can I just use cp and end up with a workable system? I
know that I need to do a grub install. Anything else?
I'd
I built a bootable flash F10 using the wiki instructions, but I'm having
boot problems. I'm pretty sure it's a bios problem, since it never gets
to grub.
1st try was X86-64 and it didn't boot on either of the 2 intel based
systems I tried. One system prints boot error and the other silently
Phil Meyer wrote:
john wendel wrote:
Clueless here,
I've got an F10 install running well, and I'd like to move the system
to a flash disk. This flash will become the boot device for a small
system I'm building. Can I just use cp and end up with a workable
system? I know that I need to do
For those of you lusting after XFCE 4.6, I just wanted to report that I
ran the graphical installer and installed in a sub-directory in my home
directory. The only tweak I had to do was edit the gtk-doc.pc
pkgconfig file and pretend that it was version 1.10. The build took 7
minutes.
Added
I first noticed the X slowdown when I installed F8. I've used every
version of Fedora, and I noticed that the user experience with F8 was
not as smooth as earlier versions. I spend most of my day hacking code
in vi, so 2D video performance is important to me. I care nothing about
3D video.
Alan Cox wrote:
regardless the difference between X and no X in each version/hardware is
astounding! what are the reasons for this, your not telling me that X is
chewing up that much cpu cycles to turn a 1minute 40sec operation into a
4minute 53sec one?
Why do you assume this has anything to
David Hlác(ik wrote:
Hello,
I have following audio device in my notebook :
00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio
Controller (rev 03)
I am user of Fedora 10 x86_64 , with latest updates as well.
My current experience is, that when audio volume on maximum (in
Stumbled across a reference to Tiny Core Linux on distrowatch, thought
I'd give it a try. 10MB download (yes, I said 10MB). Burned a CD,
booted, and it was running. Read the single page help, installed mplayer
and OSS sound and in 2 minutes I was playing a video.
These guys have some unique
Robert L Cochran wrote:
You had it easy with the tiny text window. I started my mainframe career
just as IBM shops were converting over to huge CRT monitors and the joys
ISPF edit, but were still using punched cards for some things. So I had
a little exposure to correcting a punched card which
Mike Chambers wrote:
I tried googling this question and not having any luck. And not being
the hardware expect, thought I would ask here.
I have 2 sata slots on my MB, 1 goes to my dvd player, the other to my
HD. And I do have one IDE slot to use.
Now to the question. What I want to know,
I'm formatting a new disk and running mkfs.ext3. I asked for 25000
inodes with -N 25000, but it gave me 118,272 inodes.
What did I do wrong?
Thanks,
John
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
I'm trying to use a smart card reader, without any luck. I've installed
pcscd and whatever else yum pilled in and have 2 new services running
(pcscd and ???). The system log shows the following failure to setup the
device. I'm stuck.
Any clues appreciated.
Thanks,
John
Apr 22 13:50:58
While playing with tinycore linux, I installed OSS audio drivers for
my onboard Intel HD audio. AMAZING IMPROVEMENT VS ALSA! With ALSA, I
have to max the volume to hear anything, with OSS 20% volume was a
normal listening level. Everything that I tried sounded much better with
OSS. I'm
Todd Denniston wrote:
it looks like you have a ActivCard USB Reader V2,
http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/iManufacturer.html
with usb product id 0x0008
http://pcsclite.alioth.debian.org/unsupported.html#0x09C30x0008
Some folks have had luck upgrading the firmware on SOME instances of
that
Since the nv driver seems to have lots of problems, I thought I'd try
the nouveau driver. The result was a black screen and a locked up box.
No Xorg.0.log file created, so no errors to report.
Does this actually work with F10? Anybody got it running? Tips?
Thanks,
John
--
fedora-list
Antonio Olivares wrote:
--- On Thu, 4/30/09, john wendel jwende...@comcast.net wrote:
From: john wendel jwende...@comcast.net
Subject: Nouveau driver on F10
To: For users of Fedora fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Thursday, April 30, 2009, 8:52 PM
Since the nv driver seems to have lots
François Patte wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonsoir,
At boot up starting udev step is very long ( 1 mn)
how can I get infos on what is going on at that time?
f10 on toshiba laptop.
Thank you.
Just wanted to add a me too, so you wouldn't feel lonely.
f10 on Intel
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Tod Thomas wrote:
I'm partial to AMD chips. I'm not a gamer but I do like nice visuals
Well, then maybe you should stop being partial to AMD and looking for Intel
chipsets with integrated graphics. :-) Intel integrated graphics just work
in Fedora (just keep your hands
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com writes:
A vendor such as Newegg will put you in a nice machine for about $800
for CPU, M/B, and 12GB RAM. That's my goal for my next system, four
cores, eight threads,
12 Gig? You really want to run with 3 sockets filled and one
Steven W. Orr wrote:
On Saturday, May 16th 2009 at 15:00 -, quoth g:
=Valent Turkovic wrote:
=
= If you wondered why Intel sucks on Fedora read this article, it
= expains all complexities of Intel drivers and for me it shows hope
= that Intel drivers are becoming better.
=
=intel sucks on
Stupid question ...
How can I tell if my sata controller supports hot-plugging an e-sata
connection?
I'm afraid to just try it, don't want to fry something.
Thanks,
John
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
After a little reading (thanks for the link), I decided that it was safe
to hot-plug my e-sata disk. So, I did. And what happened? A big nothing.
I've got a WD e-sata disk connected to an Intel ICH7 controller, using
the AHCI driver. If I boot with drive powered up, it comes up as device
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Steve Underwood wrote:
I thought most people wanted to get rid of pulseaudio.
Only because people like you perpetuate some stupid myth that PulseAudio is
evil.
Its a very troublesome program with poor documentation, and little output
to help you resolve problems. If you
Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to check with you whether this is feasible before I attempted
it. I use a ATI HD4870 so I _need_ the proprietary drivers for a working
GUI. However they don't support 2.6.29 yet. So I was advised on the
RPMFusion list, that if I really wanted to upgrade to
Suvayu Ali wrote:
john wendel wrote:
Suvayu Ali wrote:
I want to upgrade mostly because of XFCE 4.6. I wanted to get rid of
Gnome completely and move to XFCE and Windowmaker. Gnome is too slow
even on high-end hardware like mine. Sometimes simply opening Firefox
or Thunderbird takes ages(5
Suvayu Ali wrote:
john wendel wrote:
Suvayu Ali wrote:
I want to upgrade mostly because of XFCE 4.6. I wanted to get rid of
Gnome completely and move to XFCE and Windowmaker. Gnome is too slow
even on high-end hardware like mine. Sometimes simply opening Firefox
or Thunderbird takes ages(5
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Dave Cross wrote:
Package amazonmp3 requires libboost_date_time.so.3
Package amazonmp3 requires libboost_filesystem.so.3
Package amazonmp3 requires libboost_iostreams.so.3
Package amazonmp3 requires libboost_regex.so.3
Package amazonmp3 requires libboost_signals.so.3
Package
On 06/18/2009 03:14 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:44:17 +0900, Misha wrote:
В Чтв, 18/06/2009 в 00:44 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto пишет:
koji is the fedora build system
there are a 2.6.30 compiled in koji.
I am using F10. Would it be safe for me to
I've got a WD external drive with an e-sata connection. Works fine if I
boot with it connected/powered.
If I hot plug it, I see the following in the messages log
Jun 18 21:09:35 godzilla2 kernel: ata1: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0
SErr 0x405 action 0xe frozen
Jun 18 21:09:35 godzilla2
On 06/19/2009 06:10 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
[snip]
BTW,
If kernel.org releases 2.6.30.1, Are there any delta *.tar.gz's that one can
download instead of downloading
the full kernel source again to update to 2.6.30.1? I have been
yearning to ask this question, but never had the
courage
On 06/19/2009 03:39 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 14:38 -0700, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
Sorry, but it is a driver problem. The current
( 2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE in my case ) kernel ships the 1.0.18a Alsa
driver (confirm this with cat /proc/asound/version) Significant work
was
On 06/19/2009 11:17 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
john wendel wrote:
On 06/19/2009 06:10 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
[snip]
BTW,
If kernel.org releases 2.6.30.1, Are there any delta *.tar.gz's that
one can download instead of downloading
the full kernel source again to update to 2.6.30.1? I
On 06/19/2009 01:54 AM, John Austin wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 21:19 -0700, john wendel wrote:
I've got a WD external drive with an e-sata connection. Works fine if I
boot with it connected/powered.
If I hot plug it, I see the following in the messages log
Jun 18 21:09:35 godzilla2 kernel
Great job, whoever setup the F11 boot scripts.
My old Intel motherboard box, P4, boots F11 from a cold start to
runlevel 3 in 18 seconds (includes the BIOS time). I don't use any of
the graphical boot stuff.
I was on the phone last night with a Comcast tech trying to fix a broken
cable
On 06/19/2009 08:27 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:46:54 -0700
john wendel wrote:
Great job, whoever setup the F11 boot scripts.
Yea, I think I forgot to mention that as well. Huge improvement
in boot time on fedora 11! (Makes up for the steadily increasing
boot times starting
On 06/19/2009 08:58 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 19:13 -0700, john wendel wrote:
On 06/19/2009 03:39 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 14:38 -0700, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
Sorry, but it is a driver problem. The current
( 2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE in my case ) kernel
On 06/21/2009 09:56 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Dear fellow Fedora users,
Is there a way to tell if a kernel is 64 bit or 32 bit? If one compiles and
installs a kernel from kernel.org. Why am I asking? I have a 64 bit Fedora 11
installed and it showed 2.6.29.4-???x86_64 at the end so I know
On 06/21/2009 07:23 AM, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
I can set my screen-saver to display a random picture from my Pictures
folder, and it will keep changing it every few seconds.
But only when the screen-saver is active - I'd like to do the same for
my desktop background (GNOME).
Is there a way to
On 06/21/2009 07:23 AM, Colin Paul Adams wrote:
I can set my screen-saver to display a random picture from my Pictures
folder, and it will keep changing it every few seconds.
But only when the screen-saver is active - I'd like to do the same for
my desktop background (GNOME).
Is there a way to
On 06/23/2009 09:30 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 23:00 -0700, john wendel wrote:
My Intel sound started working when I removed pulse-audio.
I removed it and still no sound.
If you run alsamixer (in a console), does it show the correct card
and
codec chip?
I'm not sure about
On 06/24/2009 03:04 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Tom Horsley wrote:
Certainly with the advent of the DRI2 utter and complete rewrite
of 3d support in the server, everyone is either giving up or
taking a long time to cath up (it is never clear which :-).
As near as I can tell, the only option for
On 06/24/2009 10:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Tom Horsley wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506552
Hmmm, that's, uh, interesting...
(Blowed up capacitors on the nvidia card :-).
And that shows the great quality of NVidia hardware. :-D
Kevin Kofler
Kevin, don't
Running updated Fedora 11, downloaded FF3.5RC3 and installed in my home
directory to test. Crashed on almost every web page. Removed it, but my
bookmarks were clobbered when I restarted FF3.5B4.
Working/not working for anyone else?
Regards,
John
--
fedora-list mailing list
On 06/30/2009 09:23 AM, Kam Leo wrote:
[snip]
I do not mind the experimental nature of Fedora. In fact, it is one
of the features that draws me to the distribution. Unfortunately, in
the F11 release the Fedora project team screwed up royally by not
providing or leaving available fallback
On 07/01/2009 12:30 AM, Kam Leo wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:05 PM, john wendeljwende...@comcast.net wrote:
On 06/30/2009 09:23 AM, Kam Leo wrote:
[snip]
I do not mind the experimental nature of Fedora. In fact, it is one
of the features that draws me to the distribution. Unfortunately,
On 07/02/2009 11:41 AM, Jim wrote:
FC11/Kde4
.
Intel 82801G (ICH7 family) High DEfinition Audio
snd_hda_intel
Sound breaks up when starting a video, youtube or wma video. It's slow
at starting and breaks up, into the first 10 sec, of a video.
What's up ?
I have the same problem on my ICH7
On 07/05/2009 08:07 AM, Robert L Cochran wrote:
I think there is probably a physical cause. It gets too easy to blame
the operating system for physical device issues. The fan speed is
controlled in part by temperature sensors on the CPU and feedback from
the fan circuit itself. I think all the
On 07/14/2009 02:22 PM, Chris wrote:
2009/7/14 Luc MAIGNANluc.maig...@winxpert.com:
We can note that Linux is unable to manage my sound card (Creative SB X-FI).
Can it be the problem ? (but no driver is loaded...)
Well, maybe somebody knows another way of investigating this... but
the only
On 07/14/2009 11:22 AM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
I've been using F11 since it came out and it works great. But I haven't
had any sound since I did the upgrade. Sound worked great in F10. Its
getting old not having sound. How do I get it working ?
$ uname -a
Linux localhost.localdomain
On 07/14/2009 10:02 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 20:31 -0700, john wendel wrote:
Looks like our junk is similar - Intel chip
I had lots of sound problems until I moved to a 2.6.30 kernel. You'll
note that all the sound modules have very different sizes from yours.
And your
On 07/19/2009 08:05 PM, Markus Kesaromous wrote:
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:09:51 -0700
From: olivares14...@yahoo.com
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: F11 and PulseAudio
--- On Sun, 7/19/09, Markus Kesaromous wrote:
From: Markus Kesaromous
On 07/20/2009 09:26 AM, William Case wrote:
Hi;
I haven't. Thought I might have missed a [SOLVED] or something. I have
tried just about everything I can think of and every bit of advice on
the list. I am just hoping there is some light at the end of the
tunnel.
Sound working fine here on
On 07/21/2009 07:04 AM, William Case wrote:
Hi John;
On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 20:10 -0700, john wendel wrote:
On 07/20/2009 09:26 AM, William Case wrote:
Hi;
Sound working fine here on 2 different Intel motherboards (with PCIe bus).
Just an afterthought. Since you have got your internal
On 07/23/2009 01:15 AM, Ron Yorston wrote:
Bradleypursley...@comcast.net wrote:
On 07/22/2009 09:01 AM, Bradley wrote:
On 07/22/2009 07:17 AM, davide wrote:
Bradleypursley001at comcast.net writes:
I have my system do regular automated backups and just noticed that the
backups have been
Anyone have a simple recipe for building a Fedora system with a 64-bit
kernel and only 32-bit applications?
Thanks,
John
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
On 07/24/2009 12:53 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
john wendel wrote:
Anyone have a simple recipe for building a Fedora system with a 64-bit
kernel and only 32-bit applications?
I'd say you have to install the 32 bit distro and then
manually install the 64 bit kernel.
Then you have to be a little
On 07/24/2009 08:35 AM, Steve Berg wrote:
On 07/24/2009 12:53 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
john wendel wrote:
Anyone have a simple recipe for building a Fedora system with a 64-bit
kernel and only 32-bit applications?
I tried it, using the kernel from my F10 64-bit system on a F11 32-bit
box
On 07/24/2009 07:59 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Michael Hennebry wrote:
From glxinfo:
direct rendering: Yes
OpenGL renderer string: Software Rasterizer
I guess that the second means I don't have hardware aceleration.
What
On 07/27/2009 06:58 PM, John Mellor wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 12:23 +0200, Julian Aloofi wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2009, 20:13 -0400 schrieb John Mellor:
This is a Fedora-killer. Nothing should be higher priority.
Is there any way to get Radeon HD support as a mandatory blocking
On 07/28/2009 09:28 PM, Jatin K wrote:
I've installed fedora FC (2.6.29.4.fc11.i586) ... after getting update
my kernel updated to 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586, now my system freezes at
udev when booting, before update it was fine !!!
what it could be ?? how do I solve this issue ?
Regards
Jatin
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
