Kalev Lember wrote:
On 11/30/2009 12:19 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
MinGW thinks this, but what about the GCC developers? I think I
trust GCC upstream much more than MinGW ...
I'd like to hear Kevin Kofler comment on that as he appears to have a
strong opinion about that and knows
(kwizart in this case)
directly or something, I don't think every maintainer of a mingw32-* package
reads this list regularly. (Of course they should, but there are only so
many hours in a day. ;-) )
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
in that directory for libraries etc.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
with
and, rpmlint will no longer complain.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
of exception ?
If even the native package gets away with a static library, the MinGW one
should too (though technically I think you're supposed to ask FESCo for
permission).
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw
%{_mingw32_debug_install_post}
to the spec file. %global doesn't work in this case!
Does this work on packages which are mixed native and cross such as
mingw32-nsis?
And it should indeed be -debuginfo, not -debug.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
They're OK as long as they are development tools, and in this case
they look like mostly development tools, so I would say this is OK.
But why would you need the EXE versions of those as opposed to the native
ones?
Kevin Kofler
and description, using the MinGW macros where
appropriate).
I also am not understanding what you mean by a different wxWidgets
backend?
wxGTK is a different backend than the W32 one.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw
generates corrupt
executables which crash or trigger errors in tools like UPX or objdump (and
may also have other ill side effects). If debuginfo extraction works, that
would of course solve this particular issue, as well as the bloat issue.
Kevin Kofler
Farkas Levente wrote:
- wouldn't we like to merge all 3 platform (mingw32, mingw64, darwin)
into a common name and package set as discussed earlier?
Huh? How would that work? MinGW and darwinx are very different targets.
Kevin Kofler
be one for
cross-MinGW packages.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
update or (b) someone files a BZ to get a package backported. I feel
this would mean less work all round for packagers.
But it's not how the rest of Fedora works, so I think this is a bad policy.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
kdelibs falls under group 2
But kdewin32 falls under group 3, there's no native kdewin32. It's a
portability layer for KDE under W32 only.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw
.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
Fridrich Strba wrote:
Just out of curiosity: this is what I do in my packages.
And this one changes the ABI.
Looks like there's really no good solution here. :-(
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
breaks ABI compatibility.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
on the live
images or the installer DVD anyway, at worst this can affect custom spins
including those packages but not including updates.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
one of the pieces in the KDE
cross-MinGW puzzle and it might also help other projects.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
So that upgrades between branches of Fedora work. This is a standard
Fedora practice.
But it's not necessary here as all branches are being upgraded.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw
.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
has sadly spread to other stuff, e.g. Java and
Qt). Their Not Invented Here attitude towards UTF-8 is the bigger issue.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
not
making them find it automatically?
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
it
needs, a .la file won't be needed or useful.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
to generate *.msi files too, but I have not
tried this. Microsoft's own program, WiX, isn't really open source
although Microsoft and others claim it is.
Right, the problem is that while WiX itself is Free Software, it requires
the M$I SDK which isn't.
Kevin Kofler
from Wine.
DDK is the Device Development Kit, it has nothing to do with DirectX.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
device driver on a 64-bit OS. (That said, with 64-bit drivers
there's also the problem that 64-bit Vista requires signed drivers unless
you manually choose a boot option every single time you boot - every
available method to automate this has been removed.)
Kevin Kofler
pthreads unusable
Ugh. This really needs to be fixed or worked around somehow. Maybe the
unifdef tool can help?
I don't understand why it's doing configure checks at all as it's targeting
a single operating system with a stable API/ABI.
Kevin Kofler
to be signed by M$ for users to be able to install them
without convoluted workarounds (and without losing HD video support, too).
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
first. I think it should be
called just mingw32-qt.
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdesupport/kdewin32/src/pwd.c?revision=825607view=markup
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
there is to get KDE to build).
Kevin Kofler
___
fedora-mingw mailing list
fedora-mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw
33 matches
Mail list logo